Migraine HeadachePhase 3NCT02706015
Cefaliv® Compared to Neosaldina® in the Treatment of Migraine Attacks
A Phase 3 study of Migraine Headache, run by Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A. at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in the treatment of migraine attack in two hundred and sixteen adults of both sexes with age between eighteen and sixty five years old. The first Half of participants will receive Cefaliv®, the other half will receive Neosaldina®. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 66 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine Headache
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Oct 2020to Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 66 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects of both sexes;
- Age older or equal to 18 and younger than 66 years if they have symptoms of migraine headache before 50 years of age;
- Presence of migraine headache with or without aura symptoms, at least 03 months prior to the study, the criteria defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders(ICHD)-II, 2004 International Headache Society(IHS) - Annex I;
- Subjects which are experiencing 2-6 migraine attacks per month with mild to moderate pain intensity in the last 3 months prior to screening visit;
- Subjects which are able to distinguish migraine attacks to any other type of headache;
- Aptitude to understand and consent to participate in this clinical study, manifested by signing the Informed Consent and Informed (IFC);
Who cannot join
- Any clinical finding (clinical evaluation / physical) that is interpreted by the Investigator as a risk to the participant in the clinical trial;
- Subjects which had recent episodes of headache, with frequency equal or higher than 15 daily episodes per month, 3 months prior to the screening visit;
- Subjects with headache history defined by the ICHD-II criteria, 2004 IHS (International Headache Society) rated as:
- Typical aura with non-migraine headache;
- Typical aura without headache;
- Familial Hemiplegic Migraine (FHM);
Show all 28Show fewer
- Sporadic Hemiplegic Migraine;
- Basilar type Migraine;
- Any laboratorial finding that the Investigator consider a risk to the subject of the study;
- Hypersensitivity to the drug components, during the study;
- Women in pregnancy or nursing period;
- Women in reproductive age who do not agree to use contraception acceptable [oral contraceptives, injectable contraceptives, intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal implants, barrier methods, hormonal patch and tubal ligation]; other than surgically sterile (bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy), postmenopausal for at least one (01) years or sexual abstinence;
- Inability to understand and answer to the functional categorical scale of the study, diary of symptoms, and not having accompanying to assist him/her;
- History of abuse, according to the principal investigator, of the alcohol, opioids, barbiturates, benzodiazepines and illicit drugs in the last 02 years, or abuse of drugs for headache including ergotamines or narcotics in the last 03 months;
- Subjects with prolonged hypotension, shock, sepsis, pheochromocytoma, hemorrhage, mechanical obstruction or perforation of the gastrointestinal tract;
- Subjects with history of epilepsy or presence of psychiatric illness of any kind, in the opinion of the investigator, that may interfere with adherence to treatment;
- Subjects with a malignant disease less than five years, or for more than five years, but without documentation about the remission/cure. As example: melanoma, leukemia, lymphoma, myeloproliferative diseases and renal cell carcinoma of any length should be excluded. Exceptions: Subjects with basal cell skin cancers, squamous cell, and cervical cancer in situ may be eligible.
- Subjects which uses a preventive treatment and changed the dose in the last 3 months before the screening visit (V0);
- Subjects who have made an interruption in the prophylactic treatment, in the last 30 days prior to screening visit (V0);
- Subjects with hepatic or renal failure;
- Subjects in the research that has participated in clinical trial protocols in the last twelve (12) months (National Board of Health- Resolution 251 of 07 August 1997, Part III, sub-item J), unless the investigator considers that there may be a direct benefit to it;
- Subjects who are in prohibited medication as described in item 10.2 of the Protocol.
- Subjects with previous diagnosis of uncontrolled hypertension;
- Subjects with history of peripheral vascular disease; acute myocardial infarction, angina pectoris and other ischemic heart disease;
- Subjects who have allergy to pyrazolones (eg phenazone, propyphenazone) or pyrazolidines (eg phenylbutazone,oxyphenbutazone) or who have submitted agranulocytosis in relation to any of these medicines;
- Subjects with history of metabolic disorders such as porphyria and congenital deficiency of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase;
- Subjects with history of alteration in the bone marrow function or hematopoietic system diseases;
- Subjects with history of bronchospasm or other allergic reactions (rhinitis, urticaria, angioedema) induced by aspirin, acetaminophen, or other anti-inflammatory medications.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: National, Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Non-Inferiority Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cefaliv® Compared to the Neosaldina® in the Treatment of Migraine Attacks
This study evaluates the non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in the treatment of migraine attack in two hundred and sixteen adults of both sexes with age between eighteen and sixty five years old. The first Half of participants will receive Cefaliv®, the other half will receive Neosaldina®.
Read the detailed description
Cefaliv® is a combination of 3 drugs: dihydroergotamine mesylate, dipyrone sodium, and caffeine. The dihydroergotamine mesylate interacts with the serotonergic, dopaminergic and noradrenergic receptors, but it's mechanism is not totally known. The dipyrone is a non-steroidal antiinflammatory which has an analgesic, antiinflammatory and antipyretic effect. And the caffeine presents mechanisms that are not totally clear, but it may relieves the pain by activating of the central noradenosine pathway (pain suppressing system).
- Conditions
- Migraine Headache
- Being tested
- Cefaliv® & Placebo, Neosaldina® & Placebo
- Keywords
- Headache, Aura, Migraine
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders, Headache, Epilepsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cefaliv® & PlaceboDrug
Also called Cefaliv® (Dihydroergotamine mesylate+ dipyrone sodium + caffeine) & Placebo
02 tablet of Cefaliv® + 02 tablet of comparator placebo, VO, after the beging of migraine with with mild to moderate pain
Neosaldina® & PlaceboDrug
Also called Neosaldina® (Isometheptene mucate + dipyrone sodium + anhydrous caffeine) & Placebo
02 tablets of Neosaldina® + 02 tablet of comparator placebo, VO, after the beging of migraine with with mild to moderate pain
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cefaliv® & Placebo | Experimental | Dihydroergotamine mesylate+ dipyrone sodium + caffeine Receives: Drug: Cefaliv® & Placebo |
| Neosaldina® & Placebo | Active comparator | Isometheptene mucate + dipyrone sodium + anhydrous caffeine Receives: Drug: Neosaldina® & Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate the efficacy and non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in pain relief
The evaluation will be measured by the absolute variation of VAS (0 mm no pain - 100 mm pain as bad as can be) 2 hours after taking the medication, without taking any rescue medication.
Measured: 2 Hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
The remission of the pain after use of the investigational product, without use of a rescue medication;
Proportion of participants with pain remission in 2 hours and 4 hours after the use of the investigational product, in the first migraine attack with mild or moderate pain, with remission defined as no pain (0) in categorical scale debilitating functional and behavioral (4 point-scale), without use of a rescue medication;
Measured: 2 and 4 hours after taking the medication
The relief of pain after use of the investigational product, without use of a rescue medication;
Proportion of participants with pain relief in 2 hours and 4 hours after the use of the investigational product, in the first migraine attack with mild or moderate pain,and is considered the relief reduction of at least 01 point in pain intensity from baseline, according to functional and behavioral debilitating categorical scale without use of a rescue medication;
Measured: 2 and 4 hours after taking the medication
Proportion of participants with pain relief maintenance during the period 4-24 hours after use of the investigational product, the first migraine attack with mild or moderate pain
The maintenance will be observed if the relief reached the first 4 hours will remain at 24 hours after use of the investigational product, according to functional and behavioral debilitating categorical scale (4 point scale) without use of a rescue medication during this period;
Measured: 4 to 24 hours after taking the medication
Need for use of a rescue medication.
Proportion of participants who use at least once a rescue medication in the period 2-24 hours after use of the investigational product.
Measured: 2 to 24 hours after taking the experimental drug
The proportion of subjects with no symptoms of Nausea / vomiting and photophobia / phonophobia
Free of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea and vomiting response rate symptoms 2 and 4 hours after use of the investigational product, the first with migraine pain of mild to moderate intensity, defined as the proportion of subjects with no symptoms of both among the participants have at least one symptom at baseline of migraine without use of a rescue medication during this period.
Measured: 2 to 4 hours after taking the medication
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2021 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Strategic reasons of the company
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Migraine HeadacheStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02706015
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACH-CFL-03(10/14)
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- National, Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Non-Inferiority Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cefaliv® Compared to the Neosaldina® in the Treatment of Migraine Attacks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02706015
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACH-CFL-03(10/14)
- Conditions
- Migraine Headache
- Keywords
- Headache, Aura, Migraine
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Strategic reasons of the company
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in the treatment of migraine attack in two hundred and sixteen adults of both sexes with age between eighteen and sixty five years old. The first Half of participants will receive Cefaliv®, the other half will receive Neosaldina®.
Detailed description
Cefaliv® is a combination of 3 drugs: dihydroergotamine mesylate, dipyrone sodium, and caffeine. The dihydroergotamine mesylate interacts with the serotonergic, dopaminergic and noradrenergic receptors, but it's mechanism is not totally known. The dipyrone is a non-steroidal antiinflammatory which has an analgesic, antiinflammatory and antipyretic effect. And the caffeine presents mechanisms that are not totally clear, but it may relieves the pain by activating of the central noradenosine pathway (pain suppressing system).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cefaliv® & Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Cefaliv® & PlaceboDihydroergotamine mesylate+ dipyrone sodium + caffeine |
| Neosaldina® & Placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Neosaldina® & PlaceboIsometheptene mucate + dipyrone sodium + anhydrous caffeine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 66 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects of both sexes;
- Age older or equal to 18 and younger than 66 years if they have symptoms of migraine headache before 50 years of age;
- Presence of migraine headache with or without aura symptoms, at least 03 months prior to the study, the criteria defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders(ICHD)-II, 2004 International Headache Society(IHS) - Annex I;
- Subjects which are experiencing 2-6 migraine attacks per month with mild to moderate pain intensity in the last 3 months prior to screening visit;
- Subjects which are able to distinguish migraine attacks to any other type of headache;
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Any clinical finding (clinical evaluation / physical) that is interpreted by the Investigator as a risk to the participant in the clinical trial;
- Subjects which had recent episodes of headache, with frequency equal or higher than 15 daily episodes per month, 3 months prior to the screening visit;
- Subjects with headache history defined by the ICHD-II criteria, 2004 IHS (International Headache Society) rated as:
- Any laboratorial finding that the Investigator consider a risk to the subject of the study;
- Hypersensitivity to the drug components, during the study;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cefaliv® & PlaceboAlso: Cefaliv® (Dihydroergotamine mesylate+ dipyrone sodium + caffeine) & Placebo02 tablet of Cefaliv® + 02 tablet of comparator placebo, VO, after the beging of migraine with with mild to moderate pain | Drug | Cefaliv® & Placebo |
| Neosaldina® & PlaceboAlso: Neosaldina® (Isometheptene mucate + dipyrone sodium + anhydrous caffeine) & Placebo02 tablets of Neosaldina® + 02 tablet of comparator placebo, VO, after the beging of migraine with with mild to moderate pain | Drug | Neosaldina® & Placebo |
Primary outcome
Evaluate the efficacy and non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in pain relief
Time frame: 2 Hours
The evaluation will be measured by the absolute variation of VAS (0 mm no pain - 100 mm pain as bad as can be) 2 hours after taking the medication, without taking any rescue medication.
5 secondary outcomes
The remission of the pain after use of the investigational product, without use of a rescue medication;
Time frame: 2 and 4 hours after taking the medication
The relief of pain after use of the investigational product, without use of a rescue medication;
Time frame: 2 and 4 hours after taking the medication
Proportion of participants with pain relief maintenance during the period 4-24 hours after use of the investigational product, the first migraine attack with mild or moderate pain
Time frame: 4 to 24 hours after taking the medication
Need for use of a rescue medication.
Time frame: 2 to 24 hours after taking the experimental drug
The proportion of subjects with no symptoms of Nausea / vomiting and photophobia / phonophobia
Time frame: 2 to 4 hours after taking the medication
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2019.
Related trials for Migraine Headache
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study of Migraine Headache, run by Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A. at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate the efficacy and non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in pain relief (time frame: 2 Hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2019.