AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Phase 3CREDIBLE - CRNCT02714595

Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens

A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Bloodstream Infections (BSI), run by Shionogi at 85 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
152 participants
Where
85 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
7 Sep 2016to 22 Apr 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with clinically documented infection (HAP/VAP/HCAP, cUTI, or BSI/sepsis) caused by a Gram-negative pathogen with evidence of carbapenem resistance
  • Patients who have been treated previously with an empiric antibiotic regiment and failed treatment, both clinically and microbiologically, are eligible for the study, if they have an identified carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen which has either been shown to be nonsusceptible in vitro to each of the antibiotic(s) of the empiric antibiotic regimen or been grown from a culture performed after at least 2 days of the empiric antibiotic regimen
  • Patient is male (no contraception required) or female and meets one of the following criteria:
  • Surgically sterile by hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy or tubal ligation for the purpose of contraception for at least 6 weeks with appropriate documentation of such surgery
  • Postmenopausal (defined as older than 45 years of age with cessation of regular menstrual periods for 6 months and confirmed by a follicle-stimulating hormone level of > 40 mIU/mL, or amenorrhea for at least 12 months)
  • Of childbearing potential and using combined (estrogen and progestogen) or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (including oral, intravaginal, injectable, implantable, and transdermal contraceptives), or an intrauterine device (IUD), or intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) for the entire duration of the study
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Of childbearing potential and practice abstinence as a preferred and usual lifestyle, and agrees to continue practicing abstinence from Screening and for the entire duration of the study
  • Of childbearing potential, whose sole heterosexual partner has been successfully vasectomized and agrees to not have other heterosexual partners for the entire duration of the study
  • Patients meeting specific criteria for each infection site

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam (Note: for β-lactams, a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment)
  • Patients who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of the Gram-negative infection (patients with mixed Gram-positive or anaerobic infections may receive appropriate concomitant narrow spectrum antibiotics [eg, vancomycin, linezolid, metronidazole, clindamycin])
  • Patients with coinfection caused by invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis or other highly lethal mold
  • Patients who have central nervous system (CNS) infection (eg, meningitis, brain abscess, shunt infection)
  • Patients with infection requiring > 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment (eg, bone and joint infection, endocarditis)
  • Patients with cystic fibrosis or moderate to severe bronchiectasis
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Patients in refractory septic shock defined as persistent hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation or despite vasopressive therapy at the time of Randomization
  • Patients with severe neutropenia, ie, polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) < 100 cells/μL
  • Female patients who have a positive pregnancy test at Screening or who are lactating
  • Patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score > 30
  • Patients who have received a potentially effective antibiotic regimen for the carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infection for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours in cUTI, or 36 hours in HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/sepsis during the 72 hours leading to Randomization
  • Patients with any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the study data
  • Patients who have received another investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to study entry
  • Patients who have previously been randomized in this study or received S-649266
  • Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis
  • Patients meeting specific exclusion criteria for each infection site

Trial locations and contacts

85 sites in 16 countries.

85 sites in 16 countries

Spain13 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Ciudad Real, 13005

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Córdoba, Cordoba, 14004

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Girona, 17007

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Lleida, Lleida, 25198

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Málaga, 29010

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Seville, 41009

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Terrassa, Barcelona, 08035

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Valencia, 46015

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Israel10 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Be’er Ya‘aqov, Rehoboth, 70300

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Beersheba, Beersheba, 84101

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Hadera, 38100

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Haifa, 31048

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Haifa, 3109601

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Holon, 58100

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Safed, Zefat, 13100

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, 64239

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv, 52621

Other trials in Israel

Brazil8 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80050

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, 99010-080

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-074

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41810-011

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900

  • Shionogi Research Site

    São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090

  • Shionogi Research Site

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04378-000

Other trials in Brazil

South Korea8 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Daegu, 41931

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Daegu, 41944

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, 5030

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Seoul, 06591

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Seoul, 06973

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Seoul, 07441

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Seoul, 135-710

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, 26426

Other trials in South Korea

United States6 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Hartford, Connecticut, 06102

  • Shionogi Research Site

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Newark, Delaware, 19718

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

Other trials in United States

Italy6 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Cisanello, PISA, 56124

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Milan, 20122

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Milan, 20132

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Milan, 20162

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Modena, 41124

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Udine, 33100

Other trials in Italy

Greece5 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Athens, Attica, 11526

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Athens, Attica, 12462

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Larissa, Thessaly, 41110

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Larissa, Thessaly, 41221

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Patra, Peloponnese, 26504

Other trials in Greece

Taiwan5 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Hualien City, Hualien, 97002

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Kaohsiung City, 81362

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Taichung, ROC, 40705

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Taichung, 40447

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Taipei City, Taipei, 10002

Other trials in Taiwan

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Ankara

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Bornova, İzmir, 35100

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Istanbul, 34098

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Istanbul, 34214

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Trabzon

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    London, England, SE1 7EH

  • Shionogi Research Site

    London, England, W 120NN

  • Shionogi Research Site

    London, England, W12 0HS

  • Shionogi Research Site

    London, England

Other trials in United Kingdom

Croatia3 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Rijeka, Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, 51000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Split, 21000

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Germany3 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Berlin, 12351

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53105

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120

Other trials in Germany

Japan3 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Nagasaki, 852-8501

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8999

Other trials in Japan

Thailand3 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Bangkok, 10700

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Muang, 40002

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Muang Nonthaburi, 11000

Other trials in Thailand

France2 sites
  • Shionogi Research Site

    La Tronche, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38043

  • Shionogi Research Site

    Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75018

Other trials in France

Guatemala1 site
  • Shionogi Research Site

    Guatemala City

Other trials in Guatemala

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Study of S-649266 or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens

This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients with either hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI)/sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Being tested
Cefiderocol, Best Available Therapy
Keywords
cefiderocol, Bloodstream infections (BSI), Complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), Sepsis, multi-drug resistant pathogens, S-649266, Gram-negative pathogens, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), carbapenem resistant pathogens
Medical subject headings
Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Sepsis, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CefiderocolDrug

    Also called S-649266, Fetroja ®

    2 g intravenously over 3 hours every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days, or 2 g every 6 hours for participants with creatinine clearance >120 mL/min.

  • Best Available TherapyDrug

    Standard of care with either a polymyxin-based or non-polymyxin-based regimen as determined by the investigator and consisting of one to three marketed antibacterial agent(s).

Study groups in NCT02714595
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CefiderocolExperimentalParticipants will receive cefiderocol 2 g administered intravenously over 3 hours, every 8 hours for 7-14 days. Treatment could be extended to 21 days at the discretion of the investigator.
Receives: Drug: Cefiderocol
Best Available Therapy (BAT)Active comparatorBest available therapy (BAT) will be chosen by the investigator and may include up to three antibacterial agents for carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria, intravenously administered per country-specific guidelines for 7-14 days. Treatment could be extended to 21 days at the discretion of the investigator.
Receives: Drug: Best Available Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    Participants with missing data were considered as non-responders.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  2. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI

    Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Days 14 to 21

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  2. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  3. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  4. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  5. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    Sustained clinical cure for cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  6. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  7. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  8. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  9. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline Pathogen

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  10. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline Pathogen

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  11. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  12. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  13. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.

    BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.

    cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  14. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

    Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.

    Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  15. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  16. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  17. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. If an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For sepsis, if the participant has a successful clinical outcome after TOC and an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained, the response was presumed sustained eradication.

    Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  18. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI

    Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  19. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI

    Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen at follow-up was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site.

    For cUTI sustained eradication was defined as a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained <10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant sustained eradication was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  20. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  21. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  22. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable.

    For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.

    cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  23. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Pathogen

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  24. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Pathogen

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  25. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable.

    For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.

    cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  26. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

    Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  27. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

    Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.

    cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  28. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen

    Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:

    HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC.

    BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable.

    For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.

    cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained < 10³ CFU/mL.

    Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  29. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia

    The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  30. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia

    The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  31. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia

    The percentage of participants who experienced sustained eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture after TOC.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  32. Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT

    The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.

    Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14

  33. Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC

    The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  34. Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up

    The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both sustained clinical cure and sustained microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.

    Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28

  35. All-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28

    The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality regardless of the cause at or before Day 14 and Day 28, respectively.

    Measured: Day 14 and Day 28

  36. Percentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC

    Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21

  37. Survival Time

    Survival time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The table below presents deaths that occurred in10-day time intervals through the end of study

    Measured: Days 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, 41-50, and 51 to 60.

  38. Change From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)

    Clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) is a surrogate for diagnosis and treatment response. Points (0, 1, or 2) are assigned for observed findings for 5 variables including body temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), and chest radiograph infiltrates. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores may indicate a higher likelihood of mortality; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement

    Measured: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7-14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)

  39. Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)

    The SOFA score is a scoring system to determine the extent of a patient's organ function or rate of failure. The score is based on six different scores, one each for the respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological systems. Each score is from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24, where higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of mortality. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7 to 14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)

  40. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions:

    • Mild: Symptom or finding is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities
    • Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status
    • Severe: The event causes interruption of usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect

    The relationship of AEs to study treatment was determined by the investigator according to the following definition:

    ● Related: An AE which can be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study treatment.

    A serious AE is defined as any AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes:

    • Death
    • Life-threatening condition
    • Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
    • Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
    • Congenital anomaly/birth defect
    • Other medically important condition

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose; maximum treatment duration was 29 days in the cefiderocol group and 22 days in the BAT group.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start7 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion22 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
152 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02714595
Sponsor's protocol ID
1424R2131
Other IDs
2015-004703-23, 2015
Acronym
CREDIBLE - CR
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
26 Feb 2016
Last updated
12 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Expanded access
Available

Publications

  • Nordmann P, Shields RK, Doi Y, Takemura M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Yamano Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Apr;28(4):398-407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

    PubMed 35076335
  • Wenzler E, Butler D, Tan X, Katsube T, Wajima T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):539-552. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01086-y. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

    PubMed 34792787
  • Naseer S, Weinstein EA, Rubin DB, Suvarna K, Wei X, Higgins K, Goodwin A, Jang SH, Iarikov D, Farley J, Nambiar S. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Benefit-Risk Considerations for Cefiderocol (Fetroja(R)). Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;72(12):e1103-e1111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1799.

    PubMed 33393598
  • Bassetti M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, Doi Y, Ferrer R, Lodise TP, Naas T, Niki Y, Paterson DL, Portsmouth S, Torre-Cisneros J, Toyoizumi K, Wunderink RG, Nagata TD. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):226-240. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30796-9. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

    PubMed 33058795
  • Bassetti M, Ariyasu M, Binkowitz B, Nagata TD, Echols RM, Matsunaga Y, Toyoizumi K, Doi Y. Designing A Pathogen-Focused Study To Address The High Unmet Medical Need Represented By Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens - The International, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 CREDIBLE-CR Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Nov 21;12:3607-3623. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S225553. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31819544

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Bloodstream Infections (BSI), run by Shionogi at 85 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 85 sites in Spain, Israel, Brazil, South Korea, United States and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis (time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02714595, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in