Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Phase 3CREDIBLE - CRNCT02714595
Study of Cefiderocol (S-649266) or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens
A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Bloodstream Infections (BSI), run by Shionogi at 85 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Bloodstream Infections (BSI), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP)
- What is being tested?
- Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 152 participants
- Where
- 85 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Sep 2016to 22 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with clinically documented infection (HAP/VAP/HCAP, cUTI, or BSI/sepsis) caused by a Gram-negative pathogen with evidence of carbapenem resistance
- Patients who have been treated previously with an empiric antibiotic regiment and failed treatment, both clinically and microbiologically, are eligible for the study, if they have an identified carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen which has either been shown to be nonsusceptible in vitro to each of the antibiotic(s) of the empiric antibiotic regimen or been grown from a culture performed after at least 2 days of the empiric antibiotic regimen
- Patient is male (no contraception required) or female and meets one of the following criteria:
- Surgically sterile by hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy or tubal ligation for the purpose of contraception for at least 6 weeks with appropriate documentation of such surgery
- Postmenopausal (defined as older than 45 years of age with cessation of regular menstrual periods for 6 months and confirmed by a follicle-stimulating hormone level of > 40 mIU/mL, or amenorrhea for at least 12 months)
- Of childbearing potential and using combined (estrogen and progestogen) or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (including oral, intravaginal, injectable, implantable, and transdermal contraceptives), or an intrauterine device (IUD), or intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) for the entire duration of the study
Show all 9Show fewer
- Of childbearing potential and practice abstinence as a preferred and usual lifestyle, and agrees to continue practicing abstinence from Screening and for the entire duration of the study
- Of childbearing potential, whose sole heterosexual partner has been successfully vasectomized and agrees to not have other heterosexual partners for the entire duration of the study
- Patients meeting specific criteria for each infection site
Who cannot join
- Patients who have a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam (Note: for β-lactams, a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment)
- Patients who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of the Gram-negative infection (patients with mixed Gram-positive or anaerobic infections may receive appropriate concomitant narrow spectrum antibiotics [eg, vancomycin, linezolid, metronidazole, clindamycin])
- Patients with coinfection caused by invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis or other highly lethal mold
- Patients who have central nervous system (CNS) infection (eg, meningitis, brain abscess, shunt infection)
- Patients with infection requiring > 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment (eg, bone and joint infection, endocarditis)
- Patients with cystic fibrosis or moderate to severe bronchiectasis
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patients in refractory septic shock defined as persistent hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation or despite vasopressive therapy at the time of Randomization
- Patients with severe neutropenia, ie, polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) < 100 cells/μL
- Female patients who have a positive pregnancy test at Screening or who are lactating
- Patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score > 30
- Patients who have received a potentially effective antibiotic regimen for the carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infection for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours in cUTI, or 36 hours in HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/sepsis during the 72 hours leading to Randomization
- Patients with any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the study data
- Patients who have received another investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to study entry
- Patients who have previously been randomized in this study or received S-649266
- Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis
- Patients meeting specific exclusion criteria for each infection site
Trial locations and contacts
85 sites in 16 countries.
85 sites in 16 countries
Spain13 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Barcelona, 08003
Shionogi Research Site
Barcelona, 08025
Shionogi Research Site
Barcelona, 08036
Shionogi Research Site
Ciudad Real, 13005
Shionogi Research Site
Córdoba, Cordoba, 14004
Shionogi Research Site
Girona, 17007
Shionogi Research Site
Lleida, Lleida, 25198
Shionogi Research Site
Madrid, 28046
Shionogi Research Site
Málaga, 29010
Shionogi Research Site
Seville, 41009
Shionogi Research Site
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08035
Shionogi Research Site
Valencia, 46015
Shionogi Research Site
Zaragoza, 50009
Israel10 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Be’er Ya‘aqov, Rehoboth, 70300
Shionogi Research Site
Beersheba, Beersheba, 84101
Shionogi Research Site
Hadera, 38100
Shionogi Research Site
Haifa, 31048
Shionogi Research Site
Haifa, 3109601
Shionogi Research Site
Holon, 58100
Shionogi Research Site
Jerusalem, 91120
Shionogi Research Site
Safed, Zefat, 13100
Shionogi Research Site
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, 64239
Shionogi Research Site
Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv, 52621
Brazil8 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Curitiba, Paraná, 80050
Shionogi Research Site
Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, 99010-080
Shionogi Research Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-074
Shionogi Research Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Shionogi Research Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41810-011
Shionogi Research Site
Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900
Shionogi Research Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090
Shionogi Research Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04378-000
South Korea8 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Daegu, 41931
Shionogi Research Site
Daegu, 41944
Shionogi Research Site
Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, 5030
Shionogi Research Site
Seoul, 06591
Shionogi Research Site
Seoul, 06973
Shionogi Research Site
Seoul, 07441
Shionogi Research Site
Seoul, 135-710
Shionogi Research Site
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, 26426
United States6 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Shionogi Research Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Shionogi Research Site
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Shionogi Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Shionogi Research Site
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Shionogi Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Italy6 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Cisanello, PISA, 56124
Shionogi Research Site
Milan, 20122
Shionogi Research Site
Milan, 20132
Shionogi Research Site
Milan, 20162
Shionogi Research Site
Modena, 41124
Shionogi Research Site
Udine, 33100
Greece5 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Athens, Attica, 11526
Shionogi Research Site
Athens, Attica, 12462
Shionogi Research Site
Larissa, Thessaly, 41110
Shionogi Research Site
Larissa, Thessaly, 41221
Shionogi Research Site
Patra, Peloponnese, 26504
Taiwan5 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Hualien City, Hualien, 97002
Shionogi Research Site
Kaohsiung City, 81362
Shionogi Research Site
Taichung, ROC, 40705
Shionogi Research Site
Taichung, 40447
Shionogi Research Site
Taipei City, Taipei, 10002
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Ankara
Shionogi Research Site
Bornova, İzmir, 35100
Shionogi Research Site
Istanbul, 34098
Shionogi Research Site
Istanbul, 34214
Shionogi Research Site
Trabzon
United Kingdom4 sites
Shionogi Research Site
London, England, SE1 7EH
Shionogi Research Site
London, England, W 120NN
Shionogi Research Site
London, England, W12 0HS
Shionogi Research Site
London, England
Croatia3 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Rijeka, Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, 51000
Shionogi Research Site
Split, 21000
Shionogi Research Site
Zagreb, 10000
Germany3 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Berlin, 12351
Shionogi Research Site
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53105
Shionogi Research Site
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120
Japan3 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195
Shionogi Research Site
Nagasaki, 852-8501
Shionogi Research Site
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8999
Thailand3 sites
Shionogi Research Site
Bangkok, 10700
Shionogi Research Site
Muang, 40002
Shionogi Research Site
Muang Nonthaburi, 11000
France2 sites
Shionogi Research Site
La Tronche, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38043
Shionogi Research Site
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75018
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Study of S-649266 or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens
This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.
Read the detailed description
This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients with either hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI)/sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.
- Conditions
- Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Bloodstream Infections (BSI), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI), Sepsis, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
- Being tested
- Cefiderocol, Best Available Therapy
- Keywords
- cefiderocol, Bloodstream infections (BSI), Complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), Sepsis, multi-drug resistant pathogens, S-649266, Gram-negative pathogens, Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), carbapenem resistant pathogens
- Medical subject headings
- Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia, Sepsis, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CefiderocolDrug
Also called S-649266, Fetroja ®
2 g intravenously over 3 hours every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days, or 2 g every 6 hours for participants with creatinine clearance >120 mL/min.
Best Available TherapyDrug
Standard of care with either a polymyxin-based or non-polymyxin-based regimen as determined by the investigator and consisting of one to three marketed antibacterial agent(s).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cefiderocol | Experimental | Participants will receive cefiderocol 2 g administered intravenously over 3 hours, every 8 hours for 7-14 days. Treatment could be extended to 21 days at the discretion of the investigator. Receives: Drug: Cefiderocol |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Active comparator | Best available therapy (BAT) will be chosen by the investigator and may include up to three antibacterial agents for carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria, intravenously administered per country-specific guidelines for 7-14 days. Treatment could be extended to 21 days at the discretion of the investigator. Receives: Drug: Best Available Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
Participants with missing data were considered as non-responders.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI
Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Days 14 to 21
Secondary outcomes (40)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
Sustained clinical cure for cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline Pathogen
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline Pathogen
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection.
BSI/Sepsis: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen.
cUTI: Resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, such that no antibacterial therapy is required for the treatment of the current infection.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis.
Sustained clinical cure for HAP/VAP/HCAP: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of pneumonia in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Continued resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms associated with reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the original BSI/sepsis in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
cUTI: Continued resolution or improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of cUTI, or return to pre-infection Baseline if known, in a participant assessed as cured at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria established for each infection site:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen (sputum, tracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, protected specimen brush, pleural fluid, or lung biopsy). If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC. If an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable. For sepsis, if the participant has a successful clinical outcome after TOC and an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained, the response was presumed sustained eradication.
Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI
Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI
Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen at follow-up was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site.
For cUTI sustained eradication was defined as a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained <10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant sustained eradication was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable.
For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.
cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Pathogen
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Pathogen
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen were determined by the sponsor according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable.
For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.
cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Microbiological outcome per Baseline carbapenem-resistant pathogen were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen. If it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture and the participant had a successful clinical outcome, the response was presumed to be eradication.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture and/or other primary source as applicable. In the case of sepsis, if the participant had a successful clinical outcome and it was not possible to obtain an appropriate clinical culture, the response was presumed to be eradication.
cUTI: a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ CFU/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Microbiological outcomes per Baseline pathogen at FU were determined according to the following criteria for each diagnosis:
HAP/VAP/HCAP: Sustained eradication was defined as the absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen after TOC.
BSI/Sepsis: Absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture or other primary source after TOC as applicable.
For HAP/VAP/HCAP and sepsis if an appropriate clinical culture could not be obtained and the participant had a successful clinical response after TOC, the response was presumed sustained eradication.
cUTI: a culture taken any time after documented eradication at TOC, and a urine culture obtained at FU showed that the Baseline uropathogen found at entry at ≥10⁵ CFU/mL remained < 10³ CFU/mL.
Overall per-participant response was defined as sustained eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens after documented eradication at TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia
The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia
The percentage of participants who experienced eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia
The percentage of participants who experienced sustained eradication of the Baseline documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia, defined as absence of the Baseline Gram-negative pathogen from a blood culture after TOC.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT
The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.
Measured: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC
The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both clinical cure and microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up
The composite clinical and microbiological response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with both sustained clinical cure and sustained microbiologic eradication, as defined above for each site of infection.
Measured: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
All-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants who experienced mortality regardless of the cause at or before Day 14 and Day 28, respectively.
Measured: Day 14 and Day 28
Percentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC
Measured: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Survival Time
Survival time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The table below presents deaths that occurred in10-day time intervals through the end of study
Measured: Days 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, 41-50, and 51 to 60.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)
Clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) is a surrogate for diagnosis and treatment response. Points (0, 1, or 2) are assigned for observed findings for 5 variables including body temperature, white blood cell count, tracheal secretions, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), and chest radiograph infiltrates. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores may indicate a higher likelihood of mortality; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement
Measured: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7-14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)
Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)
The SOFA score is a scoring system to determine the extent of a patient's organ function or rate of failure. The score is based on six different scores, one each for the respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological systems. Each score is from 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24, where higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of mortality. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7 to 14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded by the investigator according to the following definitions:
- Mild: Symptom or finding is minor and does not interfere with usual daily activities
- Moderate: The event causes discomfort and interferes with usual daily activity or affects clinical status
- Severe: The event causes interruption of usual daily activities or has a clinically significant effect
The relationship of AEs to study treatment was determined by the investigator according to the following definition:
● Related: An AE which can be reasonably explained as having been caused by the study treatment.
A serious AE is defined as any AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes:
- Death
- Life-threatening condition
- Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
- Congenital anomaly/birth defect
- Other medically important condition
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose; maximum treatment duration was 29 days in the cefiderocol group and 22 days in the BAT group.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start7 Sep 2016
- Primary completion1 Apr 2019
- Study completion22 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ShionogiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shionogi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator Clinical Support Help Line, Study director, Shionogi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1424R2131
- Other IDs
- 2015-004703-23, 2015
- Acronym
- CREDIBLE - CR
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Nordmann P, Shields RK, Doi Y, Takemura M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Yamano Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Apr;28(4):398-407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
PubMed 35076335Wenzler E, Butler D, Tan X, Katsube T, Wajima T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):539-552. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01086-y. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
PubMed 34792787Naseer S, Weinstein EA, Rubin DB, Suvarna K, Wei X, Higgins K, Goodwin A, Jang SH, Iarikov D, Farley J, Nambiar S. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Benefit-Risk Considerations for Cefiderocol (Fetroja(R)). Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;72(12):e1103-e1111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1799.
PubMed 33393598Bassetti M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, Doi Y, Ferrer R, Lodise TP, Naas T, Niki Y, Paterson DL, Portsmouth S, Torre-Cisneros J, Toyoizumi K, Wunderink RG, Nagata TD. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):226-240. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30796-9. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
PubMed 33058795Bassetti M, Ariyasu M, Binkowitz B, Nagata TD, Echols RM, Matsunaga Y, Toyoizumi K, Doi Y. Designing A Pathogen-Focused Study To Address The High Unmet Medical Need Represented By Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens - The International, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 CREDIBLE-CR Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Nov 21;12:3607-3623. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S225553. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31819544
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Study of S-649266 or Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Pathogens
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CREDIBLE - CR / 1424R2131
- Conditions
- Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP), Bloodstream Infections (BSI), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI), Sepsis, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
- Keywords
- cefiderocol, Bloodstream infections (BSI), Complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), Sepsis, multi-drug resistant pathogens, S-649266
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ShionogiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Dec 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.
Detailed description
This study is designed to provide evidence of efficacy of cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections in adult patients with either hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), or bloodstream infections (BSI)/sepsis caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cefiderocol | Experimental | Drug: CefiderocolParticipants will receive cefiderocol 2 g administered intravenously over 3 hours, every 8 hours for 7-14 days. Treatment could be extended to 21 days at the discretion of the investigator. |
| Best Available Therapy (BAT) | Active comparator | Drug: Best Available TherapyBest available therapy (BAT) will be chosen by the investigator and may include up to three antibacterial agents for carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria, intravenously administered per country-specific guidelines for 7-14 days. Treatment could be extended to 21 days at the discretion of the investigator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with clinically documented infection (HAP/VAP/HCAP, cUTI, or BSI/sepsis) caused by a Gram-negative pathogen with evidence of carbapenem resistance
- Patients who have been treated previously with an empiric antibiotic regiment and failed treatment, both clinically and microbiologically, are eligible for the study, if they have an identified carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen which has either been shown to be nonsusceptible in vitro to each of the antibiotic(s) of the empiric antibiotic regimen or been grown from a culture performed after at least 2 days of the empiric antibiotic regimen
- Patient is male (no contraception required) or female and meets one of the following criteria:
- Patients meeting specific criteria for each infection site
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patients who have a history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam (Note: for β-lactams, a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment)
- Patients who need more than 3 systemic antibiotics as part of best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of the Gram-negative infection (patients with mixed Gram-positive or anaerobic infections may receive appropriate concomitant narrow spectrum antibiotics [eg, vancomycin, linezolid, metronidazole, clindamycin])
- Patients with coinfection caused by invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis or other highly lethal mold
- Patients who have central nervous system (CNS) infection (eg, meningitis, brain abscess, shunt infection)
- Patients with infection requiring > 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment (eg, bone and joint infection, endocarditis)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CefiderocolAlso: S-649266, Fetroja ®2 g intravenously over 3 hours every 8 hours for a period of 7 to 14 days, or 2 g every 6 hours for participants with creatinine clearance >120 mL/min. | Drug | Cefiderocol |
| Best Available TherapyStandard of care with either a polymyxin-based or non-polymyxin-based regimen as determined by the investigator and consisting of one to three marketed antibacterial agent(s). | Drug | Best Available Therapy (BAT) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Clinical response was based on the investigator's evaluation of the participant's clinical signs and symptoms and was defined for each diagnosis. HAP/VAP/HCAP: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia including a reduction in SOFA and CPIS scores, and improvement or lack of progression of chest radiographic abnormalities such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of the current infection. BSI/Sepsis: Clinical cure was defined as resolution or substantial improvement of Baseline signs and symptoms including a reduction in SOFA score, such that no antibacterial therapy was required for the treatment of BSI/sepsis. Participants with bacteremia must have eradication of bacteremia caused by the Gram-negative pathogen. Participants with missing data were considered as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With cUTI
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Days 14 to 21
Microbiological outcome per Baseline pathogen was determined by the sponsor as defined for each infection site. For cUTI eradication was defined as a urine culture that showed that the Gram-negative uropathogen identified at Baseline at ≥ 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL was reduced to < 10³ CFU/mL. Overall per-participant eradication was defined as eradication of all Baseline Gram-negative pathogens.
40 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up (FU) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With cUTI
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) in Participants With cUTI
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment By Baseline Pathogen
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure By Baseline Pathogen
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Cure at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With cUTI
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With cUTI
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP + BSI/Sepsis, and Overall
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Pathogen
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Pathogen
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Pathogen
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up By Baseline Carbapenem-resistant Pathogen
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at EOT in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Eradication at TOC in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Microbiologic Eradication at Follow-up in Participants With Documented Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacteremia
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at EOT
Time frame: End of treatment, Day 7 to 14
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at TOC
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Percentage of Participants With a Composite Clinical and Microbiological Response at Follow-up
Time frame: Follow-up, defined as 14 days after the end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28
All-cause Mortality at Day 14 and Day 28
Time frame: Day 14 and Day 28
Percentage of Participants Alive and With No Change in Antibiotic Treatment Due to Either Lack of Therapeutic Benefit or Drug-related Toxicity at TOC
Time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21
Survival Time
Time frame: Days 1 to 10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, 41-50, and 51 to 60.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) in Participants With Pneumonia (HAP/VAP/HCAP)
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7-14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)
Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)
Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (Day 7 to 14), test of cure (7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21) and follow-up (14 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 21 to 28)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose; maximum treatment duration was 29 days in the cefiderocol group and 22 days in the BAT group.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35076335Nordmann P, Shields RK, Doi Y, Takemura M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Yamano Y. Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility to Cefiderocol Among Isolates from the CREDIBLE-CR and APEKS-NP Clinical Trials. Microb Drug Resist. 2022 Apr;28(4):398-407. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0180. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34792787Wenzler E, Butler D, Tan X, Katsube T, Wajima T. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Optimization of Cefiderocol during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):539-552. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01086-y. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33393598Naseer S, Weinstein EA, Rubin DB, Suvarna K, Wei X, Higgins K, Goodwin A, Jang SH, Iarikov D, Farley J, Nambiar S. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Benefit-Risk Considerations for Cefiderocol (Fetroja(R)). Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;72(12):e1103-e1111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1799.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33058795Bassetti M, Echols R, Matsunaga Y, Ariyasu M, Doi Y, Ferrer R, Lodise TP, Naas T, Niki Y, Paterson DL, Portsmouth S, Torre-Cisneros J, Toyoizumi K, Wunderink RG, Nagata TD. Efficacy and safety of cefiderocol or best available therapy for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CREDIBLE-CR): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, pathogen-focused, descriptive, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):226-240. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30796-9. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31819544Bassetti M, Ariyasu M, Binkowitz B, Nagata TD, Echols RM, Matsunaga Y, Toyoizumi K, Doi Y. Designing A Pathogen-Focused Study To Address The High Unmet Medical Need Represented By Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens - The International, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 CREDIBLE-CR Study. Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Nov 21;12:3607-3623. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S225553. eCollection 2019.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator Clinical Support Help Line study director
Shionogi
85 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cefiderocol and Best Available Therapy in people with Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) and Bloodstream Infections (BSI), run by Shionogi at 85 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 85 sites in Spain, Israel, Brazil, South Korea, United States and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) in Participants With HAP/VAP/HCAP or BSI/Sepsis (time frame: Test of cure, defined as 7 days after end of treatment, equivalent to Study Day 14 to 21). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02714595, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2021.