Transition-age YouthProjectTEAMNCT02714868
Evaluation of Project TEAM (Teens Making Environmental and Activity Modifications)
A study testing Project TEAM and Matched Comparison in people with Transition-age Youth and Developmental Disabilities, run by Boston University Charles River Campus.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which Project TEAM (Teens making Environment and Activity Modifications) is an effective, socially valid, and feasible intervention that prepares youth with developmental disabilities ages 14-21 to respond to environmental barriers and increases participation in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Transition-age Youth, Developmental Disabilities, Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Project TEAM and Matched Comparison
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2012to 31 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- 1) A developmental disability as defined by the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (Public Law No.106-402) 9(example diagnoses include autism, intellectual disability, and cerebral palsy), 2) Age 14 to 21 years at time of enrollment, 3) Communicate in English verbally or using other means as needed, 4) Able to attend to a task for 10 minutes and follow a two-step direction with support, 5) Able to categorize objects and concepts, and 6) Self-identify as a youth with a disability as reported on a modified functional strengths and challenges questionnaire
Who cannot join
- Learning disabilities without any other co-occuring diagnosis.
- living outside of the university recruitment regions
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Project TEAM (Teens Making Environmental and Activity Modifications) - Effectiveness, Social Validity and Feasibility
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which Project TEAM (Teens making Environment and Activity Modifications) is an effective, socially valid, and feasible intervention that prepares youth with developmental disabilities ages 14-21 to respond to environmental barriers and increases participation in school, work, and the community. Project TEAM is a manualized intervention co- facilitated by a disability advocate and a licensed professional. The intervention includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips. In addition, young adults with disabilities serve as peer mentors on field trips and contact youth weekly to support attainment of goals. Project TEAM outcomes are to: increase youths' knowledge of environmental factors and modification strategies; reduce the impact of environmental barriers on participation; increase self-efficacy and self-determination; and increase participation in a personal activity goal in the area of education, employment, or community life. This project builds on a participatory action research partnership with disability community stakeholders to address the following research questions: (1) To what extent do youth with disabilities participating in Project TEAM achieve intervention outcomes? (2) What are the characteristics of youth with disabilities who most benefit from Project TEAM? (3) To what extent are goals, procedures, and outcomes of Project TEAM important and acceptable (socially valid) to youth with disabilities?.
Read the detailed description
Disparities in school, work, and community participation impact the 15% of youth in the United States estimated to have a developmental disability. A growing body of literature suggests disparities in participation are due to barriers in the physical and social environment. Practitioners and advocates have developed skill and advocacy interventions in an attempt to increase the participation of youth with disabilities. Yet none of these interventions focus specifically on acquiring the problem-solving skills needed to identify environmental barriers and generate modification strategies to resolve barriers to participation. Research indicates that there is a vital need to develop manualized, theory-based interventions that empower youth with developmental disabilities to identify and advocate for environments that support their participation in school, work, and the community.
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which Project TEAM is an effective, socially valid, and feasible intervention that prepares youth with developmental disabilities ages 14-21 to respond to environmental barriers and increases participation in school, work and the community. Project TEAM is a manualized intervention co- facilitated by a disability advocate and a licensed professional. The intervention includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips. In addition, young adults with disabilities serve as peer mentors on field trips and contact youth weekly to support attainment of goals. Project TEAM outcomes are to: increase youths' knowledge of environmental factors and modification strategies; reduce the impact of environmental barriers on participation; increase self-efficacy and self-determination; and increase participation in a personal activity goal in the area of education, employment, or community life. Pilot research showed that Project TEAM participants (N=20) had a significant increase in knowledge of environmental barriers and modification strategies (t(19) = -6.37, p=.00), and 57% increased their participation in one activity.
This project builds on a Participatory Action Research (PAR) partnership with disability community stakeholders to address the following research questions: 1) To what extent do youth with disabilities participating in Project TEAM achieve intervention outcomes? 2) What are the characteristics of youth with disabilities who most benefit from Project TEAM? 3) To what extent are goals, procedures, and outcomes of Project TEAM important and acceptable (socially valid) to youth with disabilities? This project uses a multi-site, quasi-experimental repeated measures design with matched controls to evaluate Project TEAM. Sixty-four youth ages 14-21 with developmental disabilities will participate in Project TEAM and complete outcome measures at three time points: 2 weeks pre-intervention, 2 weeks post- intervention, and follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention. A control group of 64 youth, matched to intervention participant characteristics using a three tiered approach, will complete outcome measures at time points that correspond with the intervention group. Outcome measures assess goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scaling), knowledge and application of skills acquired during intervention (Project TEAM Knowledge Test), changes in participation and impact of barriers on participation (Participation and Environment Measure- Child \&Youth), self-efficacy (Generalized Self Efficacy Scale), and self-determination (AIR Self-Determination Scale). Characteristics that may influence the extent to which youth benefit from Project TEAM will be assessed using a battery of descriptive measures. Outcomes will be analyzed within and across groups to evaluate the effectiveness of Project TEAM. Feasibility and adherence to the proposed design will be evaluated using a process evaluation.
To evaluate social validity, a Youth Research Panel (YRP) of 6 youth with disabilities ages 14-21 and a Consumer Research Specialist will administer a satisfaction survey and focus group interview to Project TEAM participants. Parents (n= 64) will also participate in on-line focus groups to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of Project TEAM. The YRP and other members of the research team will use an action/reflection process to interpret data and revise Project TEAM to maximize outcomes for future implementation. The YRP will disseminate information about Project TEAM to local and national capacity- building organizations targeted to youth with disabilities. The PI will also disseminate findings to professionals and the disability community via a website, presentations, and peer- reviewed journals.
- Conditions
- Transition-age Youth, Developmental Disabilities, Cerebral Palsy, Autism, Intellectual Disability
- Being tested
- Project TEAM, Matched Comparison
- Keywords
- repeated measures, matched comparison, manualized intervention, self-determination, participation, advocacy, problem-solving, commuinity participation, occupational therapy, environment
- Medical subject headings
- Developmental Disabilities, Cerebral Palsy, Autistic Disorder, Intellectual Disability
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Project TEAMBehavioural
Project TEAM is a manualized, group-based intervention designed to be co-facilitated by an experienced leader with a disability (disability advocate) and a licensed service provider (such as an occupational therapist, social worker, or educator). Project TEAM includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips for each participant. Weekly phone calls with peer mentors with disabilities support achievement of each participant's personal activity goal.
Matched ComparisonBehavioural
Participants set goal to try a new activity in the community
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Project TEAM Intervention | Experimental | Project TEAM is a manualized intervention co- facilitated by a disability advocate and a licensed professional. The intervention includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips. In addition, young adults with disabilities serve as peer mentors on field trips and contact youth weekly to support attainment of goals. Project TEAM outcomes are to: increase youths' knowledge of environmental factors and modification strategies; reduce the impact of environmental barriers on participation; increase self-efficacy and self-determination; and increase participation in a personal activity goal in the area of education, employment, or community life. Receives: Behavioral: Project TEAM |
| Matched comparison | Active comparator | Youth with disabilities who are matched controls will receive their typical educational or therapeutic services. Youth will receive a stipend to participate in a preferred activity in the community; youth will document what they did and with whom they participated. Attempts to control for the impact of resources on participation and goal achievement. Receives: Behavioral: Matched Comparison |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)
All youth had four goals in the following areas: 1) a participation goal, 2) their ability to identify environmental barriers to their goal, 3) their ability to generate solutions to barriers, and 4) their ability to advocate for needed changes to achieve their goal. Each goal used a five-point goal attainment scale with baseline at -1. Goals levels were created at intake (initial assessment). For the knowledge application goals (goal 2-4), we created standardized goal levels to ensure content validity and reliability within and across youth. Goal attainment for all four goals was rated 12 weeks following intake (outcome) and transformed into a t-score. A t-score of 50 indicates all goals were achieved at the expected level; t-scores greater than 50 indicate individuals exceeded the expected level of goal attainment. Scores range from 0-100 (100 indicates greater than expected goal attainment).
Measured: 12 weeks following intake (outcome)
Project TEAM Knowledge Test
Part I: Knowledge of parts of the environment, modification strategies, and the "Game Plan." Higher scores indicate more correct responses.
Part I responses were independently coded as correct/incorrect by the study facilitator and a trained graduate student; discrepancies were resolved by a third scorer (the PI). To establish unidimensionality, we applied a dichotomous Rasch model and removed 24% of the items with Outfit Mean Square >2; values higher than 2 can indicate guessing. The resulting interval sum scores, in logits, were used for analysis; higher logit scores indicate more knowledge (Minimum: -4.05 to maximum 6.69). Higher scores indicate greater problem solving.
Measured: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome), 18 weeks following intake (6 week follow up)
AIR Self-Determination Scale (American Institutes on Research- AIR)
The AIR measured the capacity and opportunity to act in a self-determined manner at home and school. Parallel youth and parent forms used a 5-point frequency scale (never-always), with higher scores reflecting more self-determination. Reported here are parent self-reported sum scores at outcome. Sum scores range from minimum 18- to maximum 90 (90/higher scores = more self determination)
Measured: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome), 18 weeks following intake (6 week follow up)
Generalized Self Efficacy Scale (GSES)
We revised a disability self-efficacy scale for this study and created additional questions to assess self-efficacy for addressing environmental barriers. We used a modified three point response scale (Not like me, Sort of like me, Really like me) that incorporated visuals to support comprehension. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy. Sum scores range from minimum 11 to maximum 33.
Measured: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome), 18 weeks following intake (6 week follow up)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth (PEM-CY)
Frequency of participation in home, school, and the community. Parent report. We examined change in scores between baseline and outcome only for the context in which the individuals' goal occurred (e.g., for GAS goals regarding going to a concert, the parent only completed "community" at outcome. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of participation. Below, we only report outcomes for the youth with community data at outcome, as it was the most frequently occurring goal context . 0 is do not ever participate, and 7 is participate daily. HIgher scores indicate more frequent participation in the context
Measured: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome)
Readiness for Advocacy
readiness to engage in advocacy based on transtheoretical model of change. This is a single question with a 5 possible responses (1= minimum, 5= maximum), where higher responses (5) indicate higher readiness for advocacy. Data is reported as increase (improvement in readiness), no change, or decrease (decline in readiness). Improvement is a better outcome. Below, reported for number of participants in each group with improvement between intake and 12 weeks following intake (outcome).
Measured: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2012
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completion31 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Transition-age YouthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston University Charles River Campus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wayne State University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jessica M. Kramer, Boston University Charles River Campus
- Investigators
- Jessica Kramer, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistant Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714868
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H133G120091
- Other IDs
- 90IF0032-01-00
- Acronym
- ProjectTEAM
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No data sharing is required under this grant
Publications
Levin MR, Kramer JM. Key elements supporting goal attainment for transition-age young adults: A case illustration from Project TEAM. Inclusion 3: 145-161, 2015
Kramer J, Hwang I, Helfrich C, Samuel P, Carralles A, YELL Youth Research Team. Evaluating the social validity of Project TEAM: A problem-solving intervention to teach transition age youth with developmental disabilities to resolve environmental barriers. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education 65(1): 57-75, 2018
Schwartz AE, Kramer JM. "I just had to be flexible and show good patience": management of interactional approaches to enact mentoring roles by peer mentors with developmental disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(20):2364-2371. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1334835. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PubMed 28592154Kramer JM, Ryan CT, Moore R, Schwartz A. Feasibility of electronic peer mentoring for transition-age youth and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Project Teens making Environment and Activity Modifications. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):e118-e129. doi: 10.1111/jar.12346. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
PubMed 28247558Ryan CT, Kramer JM, Cohn ES. Exploring the Self-Disclosure Process in Peer Mentoring Relationships for Transition-Age Youth With Developmental Disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;54(4):245-59. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.4.245.
PubMed 27494124
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Project TEAM (Teens Making Environmental and Activity Modifications) - Effectiveness, Social Validity and Feasibility
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714868
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ProjectTEAM / H133G120091
- Conditions
- Transition-age Youth, Developmental Disabilities, Cerebral Palsy, Autism, Intellectual Disability
- Keywords
- repeated measures, matched comparison, manualized intervention, self-determination, participation, advocacy, problem-solving, commuinity participation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston University Charles River CampusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wayne State University
- Study start
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which Project TEAM (Teens making Environment and Activity Modifications) is an effective, socially valid, and feasible intervention that prepares youth with developmental disabilities ages 14-21 to respond to environmental barriers and increases participation in school, work, and the community. Project TEAM is a manualized intervention co- facilitated by a disability advocate and a licensed professional. The intervention includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips. In addition, young adults with disabilities serve as peer mentors on field trips and contact youth weekly to support attainment of goals. Project TEAM outcomes are to: increase youths' knowledge of environmental factors and modification strategies; reduce the impact of environmental barriers on participation; increase self-efficacy and self-determination; and increase participation in a personal activity goal in the area of education, employment, or community life. This project builds on a participatory action research partnership with disability community stakeholders to address the following research questions: (1) To what extent do youth with disabilities participating in Project TEAM achieve intervention outcomes? (2) What are the characteristics of youth with disabilities who most benefit from Project TEAM? (3) To what extent are goals, procedures, and outcomes of Project TEAM important and acceptable (socially valid) to youth with disabilities?.
Detailed description
Disparities in school, work, and community participation impact the 15% of youth in the United States estimated to have a developmental disability. A growing body of literature suggests disparities in participation are due to barriers in the physical and social environment. Practitioners and advocates have developed skill and advocacy interventions in an attempt to increase the participation of youth with disabilities. Yet none of these interventions focus specifically on acquiring the problem-solving skills needed to identify environmental barriers and generate modification strategies to resolve barriers to participation. Research indicates that there is a vital need to develop manualized, theory-based interventions that empower youth with developmental disabilities to identify and advocate for environments that support their participation in school, work, and the community.
The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which Project TEAM is an effective, socially valid, and feasible intervention that prepares youth with developmental disabilities ages 14-21 to respond to environmental barriers and increases participation in school, work and the community. Project TEAM is a manualized intervention co- facilitated by a disability advocate and a licensed professional. The intervention includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips. In addition, young adults with disabilities serve as peer mentors on field trips and contact youth weekly to support attainment of goals. Project TEAM outcomes are to: increase youths' knowledge of environmental factors and modification strategies; reduce the impact of environmental barriers on participation; increase self-efficacy and self-determination; and increase participation in a personal activity goal in the area of education, employment, or community life. Pilot research showed that Project TEAM participants (N=20) had a significant increase in knowledge of environmental barriers and modification strategies (t(19) = -6.37, p=.00), and 57% increased their participation in one activity.
This project builds on a Participatory Action Research (PAR) partnership with disability community stakeholders to address the following research questions: 1) To what extent do youth with disabilities participating in Project TEAM achieve intervention outcomes? 2) What are the characteristics of youth with disabilities who most benefit from Project TEAM? 3) To what extent are goals, procedures, and outcomes of Project TEAM important and acceptable (socially valid) to youth with disabilities? This project uses a multi-site, quasi-experimental repeated measures design with matched controls to evaluate Project TEAM. Sixty-four youth ages 14-21 with developmental disabilities will participate in Project TEAM and complete outcome measures at three time points: 2 weeks pre-intervention, 2 weeks post- intervention, and follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention. A control group of 64 youth, matched to intervention participant characteristics using a three tiered approach, will complete outcome measures at time points that correspond with the intervention group. Outcome measures assess goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scaling), knowledge and application of skills acquired during intervention (Project TEAM Knowledge Test), changes in participation and impact of barriers on participation (Participation and Environment Measure- Child \&Youth), self-efficacy (Generalized Self Efficacy Scale), and self-determination (AIR Self-Determination Scale). Characteristics that may influence the extent to which youth benefit from Project TEAM will be assessed using a battery of descriptive measures. Outcomes will be analyzed within and across groups to evaluate the effectiveness of Project TEAM. Feasibility and adherence to the proposed design will be evaluated using a process evaluation.
To evaluate social validity, a Youth Research Panel (YRP) of 6 youth with disabilities ages 14-21 and a Consumer Research Specialist will administer a satisfaction survey and focus group interview to Project TEAM participants. Parents (n= 64) will also participate in on-line focus groups to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of Project TEAM. The YRP and other members of the research team will use an action/reflection process to interpret data and revise Project TEAM to maximize outcomes for future implementation. The YRP will disseminate information about Project TEAM to local and national capacity- building organizations targeted to youth with disabilities. The PI will also disseminate findings to professionals and the disability community via a website, presentations, and peer- reviewed journals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Project TEAM Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Project TEAMProject TEAM is a manualized intervention co- facilitated by a disability advocate and a licensed professional. The intervention includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips. In addition, young adults with disabilities serve as peer mentors on field trips and contact youth weekly to support attainment of goals. Project TEAM outcomes are to: increase youths' knowledge of environmental factors and modification strategies; reduce the impact of environmental barriers on participation; increase self-efficacy and self-determination; and increase participation in a personal activity goal in the area of education, employment, or community life. |
| Matched comparison | Active comparator | Behavioral: Matched ComparisonYouth with disabilities who are matched controls will receive their typical educational or therapeutic services. Youth will receive a stipend to participate in a preferred activity in the community; youth will document what they did and with whom they participated. Attempts to control for the impact of resources on participation and goal achievement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) A developmental disability as defined by the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (Public Law No.106-402) 9(example diagnoses include autism, intellectual disability, and cerebral palsy), 2) Age 14 to 21 years at time of enrollment, 3) Communicate in English verbally or using other means as needed, 4) Able to attend to a task for 10 minutes and follow a two-step direction with support, 5) Able to categorize objects and concepts, and 6) Self-identify as a youth with a disability as reported on a modified functional strengths and challenges questionnaire
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Learning disabilities without any other co-occuring diagnosis.
- living outside of the university recruitment regions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Project TEAMProject TEAM is a manualized, group-based intervention designed to be co-facilitated by an experienced leader with a disability (disability advocate) and a licensed service provider (such as an occupational therapist, social worker, or educator). Project TEAM includes eight group sessions and two experiential learning field trips for each participant. Weekly phone calls with peer mentors with disabilities support achievement of each participant's personal activity goal. | Behavioural | Project TEAM Intervention |
| Matched ComparisonParticipants set goal to try a new activity in the community | Behavioural | Matched comparison |
Primary outcome
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS)
Time frame: 12 weeks following intake (outcome)
All youth had four goals in the following areas: 1) a participation goal, 2) their ability to identify environmental barriers to their goal, 3) their ability to generate solutions to barriers, and 4) their ability to advocate for needed changes to achieve their goal. Each goal used a five-point goal attainment scale with baseline at -1. Goals levels were created at intake (initial assessment). For the knowledge application goals (goal 2-4), we created standardized goal levels to ensure content validity and reliability within and across youth. Goal attainment for all four goals was rated 12 weeks following intake (outcome) and transformed into a t-score. A t-score of 50 indicates all goals were achieved at the expected level; t-scores greater than 50 indicate individuals exceeded the expected level of goal attainment. Scores range from 0-100 (100 indicates greater than expected goal attainment).
Project TEAM Knowledge Test
Time frame: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome), 18 weeks following intake (6 week follow up)
Part I: Knowledge of parts of the environment, modification strategies, and the "Game Plan." Higher scores indicate more correct responses. Part I responses were independently coded as correct/incorrect by the study facilitator and a trained graduate student; discrepancies were resolved by a third scorer (the PI). To establish unidimensionality, we applied a dichotomous Rasch model and removed 24% of the items with Outfit Mean Square >2; values higher than 2 can indicate guessing. The resulting interval sum scores, in logits, were used for analysis; higher logit scores indicate more knowledge (Minimum: -4.05 to maximum 6.69). Higher scores indicate greater problem solving.
AIR Self-Determination Scale (American Institutes on Research- AIR)
Time frame: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome), 18 weeks following intake (6 week follow up)
The AIR measured the capacity and opportunity to act in a self-determined manner at home and school. Parallel youth and parent forms used a 5-point frequency scale (never-always), with higher scores reflecting more self-determination. Reported here are parent self-reported sum scores at outcome. Sum scores range from minimum 18- to maximum 90 (90/higher scores = more self determination)
Generalized Self Efficacy Scale (GSES)
Time frame: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome), 18 weeks following intake (6 week follow up)
We revised a disability self-efficacy scale for this study and created additional questions to assess self-efficacy for addressing environmental barriers. We used a modified three point response scale (Not like me, Sort of like me, Really like me) that incorporated visuals to support comprehension. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy. Sum scores range from minimum 11 to maximum 33.
2 secondary outcomes
Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth (PEM-CY)
Time frame: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome)
Readiness for Advocacy
Time frame: intake, 12 weeks following intake (outcome)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BackgroundLevin MR, Kramer JM. Key elements supporting goal attainment for transition-age young adults: A case illustration from Project TEAM. Inclusion 3: 145-161, 2015
- Results publicationKramer J, Hwang I, Helfrich C, Samuel P, Carralles A, YELL Youth Research Team. Evaluating the social validity of Project TEAM: A problem-solving intervention to teach transition age youth with developmental disabilities to resolve environmental barriers. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education 65(1): 57-75, 2018
- Results publication: PubMed 28592154Schwartz AE, Kramer JM. "I just had to be flexible and show good patience": management of interactional approaches to enact mentoring roles by peer mentors with developmental disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(20):2364-2371. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1334835. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 28247558Kramer JM, Ryan CT, Moore R, Schwartz A. Feasibility of electronic peer mentoring for transition-age youth and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Project Teens making Environment and Activity Modifications. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):e118-e129. doi: 10.1111/jar.12346. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 27494124Ryan CT, Kramer JM, Cohn ES. Exploring the Self-Disclosure Process in Peer Mentoring Relationships for Transition-Age Youth With Developmental Disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;54(4):245-59. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.4.245.
- Youth and Young Adult Empowerment, Leadership, and Learning (YELL) Lab WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Project TEAM WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No data sharing is required under this grant
Related trials for Transition-age Youth
Active, not recruiting
Aim 3: Pilot Study of a Serious Game to Promote Transition Readiness Skills
Serious Games, Transition-age Youth
Recruiting
Motivation for Daily Living Skills
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Motivation
Not yet recruiting
Metacognitive Strategy Training Intervention for Transition-Age Youth With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP)
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Enhance Coping and Help-seeking Among Youth in Foster Care
Adolescent Behavior, Psychosocial Functioning
Recruiting
rTMS for Depression in Young Adults With Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jessica Kramer, PhD principal investigator
Assistant Professor
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Project TEAM and Matched Comparison in people with Transition-age Youth and Developmental Disabilities, run by Boston University Charles River Campus.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) (time frame: 12 weeks following intake (outcome)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02714868, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2019.