AzTrials
AzTrials

HerniaNCT02720042

Study of Phasix™ Mesh for VHWG Grade 3 Midline Hernia Repair

A study testing Phasix™ Mesh in people with Hernia and Hernia, Abdominal, run by C. R. Bard at 15 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to collect additional data on safety and performance of Phasix™ Mesh in subjects requiring Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 midline hernia repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal, Hernia, Incisional
What is being tested?
Phasix™ Mesh
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
15 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
23 Mar 2016to 20 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject must be diagnosed with incisional midline hernia.
  • Subject has a VHWG Grade 3 hernia (as defined in the protocol).
  • Size of hernia ≥ 10 cm2.
  • Subject must be willing to undergo a planned retro-rectus hernia repair (onlay allowed as an exception when retro-rectus placement cannot be achieved; using absorbable suture) with or without Component Separation Technique.

Who cannot join

  • Subject with > 4 previous repairs of the hernia under observation.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2.
  • The subject is on, or suspected to be placed on, chemotherapy medications during any part of the study.
  • The subject has peritonitis.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (if documented in the subject's record).
  • The subject has cirrhosis of the liver and/or ascites.
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Subject is American Society of Anesthesiology Class 4 or 5.
  • Complete removal of existing mesh from a prior hernia repair (in the same affected area) is not possible.
  • The hernia repair requires more than a single piece mesh (with adequate overlap beyond the margins of the defect on all sides).
  • Subject has intact permanent mesh adjacent to the current hernia to be repaired.
  • Subject's hernia repair requires intraabdominal mesh placement.
  • Surgical technique requires surgical bridge repair as the sole repair.
  • Subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the use of the study device, or preclude the subject from completing the follow-up requirements.
  • Subject is pregnant or has plans to become pregnant during the study period or is currently breastfeeding.
  • Subject has an alcohol/substance abuse problem or has had a relapse within 12 months of the screening visit.
  • Subject was involved in another interventional clinical study in the last 30 days prior to Informed Consent Form (ICF) signature.
  • Subject is part of the site personnel directly involved with this study.
  • Subject has a life expectancy of less than 2 years at the time of enrollment.
  • Subject has a known sensitivity to Phasix™ Mesh or component materials (patients with known allergies to tetracycline hydrochloride or kanamycin sulfate should be avoided).

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 8 countries.

15 sites in 8 countries

Belgium3 sites
  • Imelda Ziekenhuis

    Bonheiden

  • UZ Gent

    Ghent

  • UZ Leuven (Gasthuisberg)

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

Germany3 sites
  • Vivantes Hospital

    Berlin

  • Day Surgery and Hernia Center

    Cottbus, Brandenburg

  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität

    Frankfurt

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands3 sites
  • IJsselland Ziekenhuis

    Capelle aan den IJssel

  • Elkerliek Ziekenhuis

    Helmond

  • Isala

    Zwolle

Other trials in Netherlands

France2 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille

    Lille

  • APHP Hôpital Cochin

    Paris

Other trials in France

Austria1 site
  • Wilhelminenspital

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Denmark1 site
  • Bispebjerg Hospital

    Copenhagen

Other trials in Denmark

Italy1 site
  • Policlinico Umberto I

    Roma

Other trials in Italy

United Kingdom1 site
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Trust

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Investigation of Phasix™ Mesh for VHWG Grade 3 Midline Hernia Repair

The purpose of this study is to collect additional data on safety and performance of Phasix™ Mesh in subjects requiring Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 midline hernia repair.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 85 subjects, at approximately 12 sites across Europe will be enrolled and treated to study the use of Phasix™ Mesh. All treated subjects will be followed for 2 years post-implantation.

Being tested
Phasix™ Mesh
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal, Incisional Hernia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Phasix™ MeshDevice

    A resorbable mesh prepared from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB)

Study groups in NCT02720042
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phasix™ MeshExperimentalPatients treated with Phasix™ Mesh for hernia repair
Receives: Device: Phasix™ Mesh

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 3 Months of Index Procedure

    Proportions of subjects with Surgical Site Occurrences, which are defined as hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistula requiring intervention. Occurrences at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 3 months. For analysis purposes, the aggregate Surgical Site Occurrence is defined as follows: "The question <Is there any evidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the same location as the index procedure?> is answered with <yes>

    Measured: 3 Months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 24 Months of Index Procedure

    Proportions of subjects with Surgical Site Occurrences, which are defined as hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistula requiring intervention. Occurrences at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 3 months. For analysis purposes, the aggregate Surgical Site Occurrence is defined as follows: "The question <Is there any evidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the same location as the index procedure?> is answered with <yes> "

    Measured: 24 Months

  2. Number of Participants With a Hernia Recurrence

    Proportion of subjects with hernia recurrence. Hernia recurrence rates will be assessed by physical examination (or if standard of care via CT/MRI or ultrasonography) at each study visit through 24 months. A recurrent hernia will be defined as any hernia identified or confirmed by the investigator, during any study follow-up visit, in approximately the same position as the hernia repaired in the study procedure.

    Measured: 24 Months

  3. Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Infection

    Proportion of subjects with surgical site infections. Infections at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 24 months. If an infection is suspected, a routine culture, obtained via each site's standard protocol, should be obtained to determine cell count and type (i.e. yeast, gram positive or gram negative bacteria, or other). If genus and species of the culture are identified as part of the routine practice at the site, that information should be recorded. Classification will follow the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for superficial, deep and organ/space surgical site infections.

    Measured: 24 Months

  4. Mean Change in Pain Between Baseline (Pre-Index Procedure) and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure, as Measured by a 10.0 cm Visual Analogue Scale

    Mean change in self-reported pain measured on a Visual Analog Scale between Baseline and 24-month follow up. Scores are measured on a 10.0 cm line, lower values correspond with low pain perception. The outcome measure is presented as the absolute difference between the pain perception at Baseline and the pain perception at 24-month follow up. A negative score means a decrease in pain perception.

    Measured: 24 Months

  5. Number of Participants With One or More Device-related Adverse Event

    Incidence Device-related Adverse Events: number of subjects with one or more possibly or definitely device-related Adverse Event.

    Measured: 24 Months

  6. Number of Participants Requiring Reoperation Due to Index Hernia Repair

    Rate of reoperation due to the index hernia repair: the proportion of subjects with post-procedure reoperation due to the index hernia repair.

    Measured: 24 Months

  7. Mean Patient Reported Outcomes on Quality of Life Parameters as Measured by the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 1, 3, 12 and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure

    Each scale score (sensation of mesh, pain or movement limitations) ranges from 0-5 and is the average across the domains. The Total CCS Score ranges from 0-5 and is the average of the 3 scale scores. Low scores represent fewer symptoms or difficulties.

    Absolute values of the Total CCS Score at 1-Month follow-up, at 3-Month follow-up, at 12-Month follow-up and at 24-Month follow up are reported.

    The absolute value at Baseline, or a change in self-reported quality of life measured by Carolinas Comfort Scale® cannot be reported, as subjects had incorrectly answered the questions on Sensation of Mesh at Baseline where no Phasix Mesh was yet implanted, thereby creating a bias in the results.

    Measured: 24 Months

  8. Mean Change in Quality of Life Assessments as Measured by the EQ-5D Between Baseline (Pre-Index Procedure) and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure

    Change in self-reported quality of life measured by EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D™). Each of the 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) has 3 levels (no problems, some problems and extreme problems). The data is converted into a summary index number between 0 and 1, whereby 1 corresponds with the highest perception of Quality of Life. The outcome measure reports the absolute change from Baseline until 24-months follow up. A positive value corresponds with an increase in Quality of Life.

    Measured: 24 Months

  9. Mean Surgical Procedure Time of the Index Procedure as Measured From Incision to Closure

    Surgical procedure time as measured from incision to closure (skin to skin)

    Measured: 1 day

  10. Mean Time Until Participants Were Able to Return to Work

    The number of days until subject returned to work, calculated as the date when employed subjects were able to fully get back to work minus the date of surgery.

    Measured: 24 Months

  11. Mean Length of Hospital Stay Related to Index Procedure

    The length of hospital stay for the index procedure is calculated as the date of hospital discharge minus the date of hospital admission. Days in intensive care unit, days in step down unit (medium care) and days in the ward will be summarized as well.

    Measured: 1 Month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion20 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02720042
Sponsor's protocol ID
DVL-HE-016
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
11 Feb 2016
Last updated
25 Sep 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Van Rooijen MMJ, Tollens T, Jorgensen LN, de Vries Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Kockerling F, Miserez M, Windsor ACJ, Berrevoet F, Fortelny RH, Dousset B, Woeste G, van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Lange JF, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Jeekel J. Slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh: 2-year results in VHWG grade 3 hernia repair. Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02453-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

    PubMed 34282506
  • van Rooijen MMJ, Jairam AP, Tollens T, Jorgensen LN, de Vries Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Kockerling F, Miserez M, Windsor ACJ, Berrevoet F, Fortelny RH, Dousset B, Woeste G, van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Lange JF, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Kroese LF, Jeekel J. A post-market, prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical investigation of Phasix mesh for VHWG grade 3 midline incisional hernia repair: a research protocol. BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0439-7.

    PubMed 30458747

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Phasix™ Mesh in people with Hernia and Hernia, Abdominal, run by C. R. Bard at 15 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, France, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 3 Months of Index Procedure (time frame: 3 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02720042, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in