HerniaNCT02720042
Study of Phasix™ Mesh for VHWG Grade 3 Midline Hernia Repair
A study testing Phasix™ Mesh in people with Hernia and Hernia, Abdominal, run by C. R. Bard at 15 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to collect additional data on safety and performance of Phasix™ Mesh in subjects requiring Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 midline hernia repair. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal, Hernia, Incisional
- What is being tested?
- Phasix™ Mesh
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Mar 2016to 20 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject must be diagnosed with incisional midline hernia.
- Subject has a VHWG Grade 3 hernia (as defined in the protocol).
- Size of hernia ≥ 10 cm2.
- Subject must be willing to undergo a planned retro-rectus hernia repair (onlay allowed as an exception when retro-rectus placement cannot be achieved; using absorbable suture) with or without Component Separation Technique.
Who cannot join
- Subject with > 4 previous repairs of the hernia under observation.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2.
- The subject is on, or suspected to be placed on, chemotherapy medications during any part of the study.
- The subject has peritonitis.
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (if documented in the subject's record).
- The subject has cirrhosis of the liver and/or ascites.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Subject is American Society of Anesthesiology Class 4 or 5.
- Complete removal of existing mesh from a prior hernia repair (in the same affected area) is not possible.
- The hernia repair requires more than a single piece mesh (with adequate overlap beyond the margins of the defect on all sides).
- Subject has intact permanent mesh adjacent to the current hernia to be repaired.
- Subject's hernia repair requires intraabdominal mesh placement.
- Surgical technique requires surgical bridge repair as the sole repair.
- Subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the use of the study device, or preclude the subject from completing the follow-up requirements.
- Subject is pregnant or has plans to become pregnant during the study period or is currently breastfeeding.
- Subject has an alcohol/substance abuse problem or has had a relapse within 12 months of the screening visit.
- Subject was involved in another interventional clinical study in the last 30 days prior to Informed Consent Form (ICF) signature.
- Subject is part of the site personnel directly involved with this study.
- Subject has a life expectancy of less than 2 years at the time of enrollment.
- Subject has a known sensitivity to Phasix™ Mesh or component materials (patients with known allergies to tetracycline hydrochloride or kanamycin sulfate should be avoided).
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 8 countries.
15 sites in 8 countries
Belgium3 sites
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden
UZ Gent
Ghent
UZ Leuven (Gasthuisberg)
Leuven
Germany3 sites
Vivantes Hospital
Berlin
Day Surgery and Hernia Center
Cottbus, Brandenburg
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt
Netherlands3 sites
IJsselland Ziekenhuis
Capelle aan den IJssel
Elkerliek Ziekenhuis
Helmond
Isala
Zwolle
France2 sites
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille
Lille
APHP Hôpital Cochin
Paris
United Kingdom1 site
University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
London
About this study
Official title: A Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Investigation of Phasix™ Mesh for VHWG Grade 3 Midline Hernia Repair
The purpose of this study is to collect additional data on safety and performance of Phasix™ Mesh in subjects requiring Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 midline hernia repair.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 85 subjects, at approximately 12 sites across Europe will be enrolled and treated to study the use of Phasix™ Mesh. All treated subjects will be followed for 2 years post-implantation.
- Conditions
- Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal, Hernia, Incisional
- Being tested
- Phasix™ Mesh
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal, Incisional Hernia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Phasix™ MeshDevice
A resorbable mesh prepared from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phasix™ Mesh | Experimental | Patients treated with Phasix™ Mesh for hernia repair Receives: Device: Phasix™ Mesh |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 3 Months of Index Procedure
Proportions of subjects with Surgical Site Occurrences, which are defined as hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistula requiring intervention. Occurrences at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 3 months. For analysis purposes, the aggregate Surgical Site Occurrence is defined as follows: "The question <Is there any evidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the same location as the index procedure?> is answered with <yes>
Measured: 3 Months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 24 Months of Index Procedure
Proportions of subjects with Surgical Site Occurrences, which are defined as hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistula requiring intervention. Occurrences at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 3 months. For analysis purposes, the aggregate Surgical Site Occurrence is defined as follows: "The question <Is there any evidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the same location as the index procedure?> is answered with <yes> "
Measured: 24 Months
Number of Participants With a Hernia Recurrence
Proportion of subjects with hernia recurrence. Hernia recurrence rates will be assessed by physical examination (or if standard of care via CT/MRI or ultrasonography) at each study visit through 24 months. A recurrent hernia will be defined as any hernia identified or confirmed by the investigator, during any study follow-up visit, in approximately the same position as the hernia repaired in the study procedure.
Measured: 24 Months
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Infection
Proportion of subjects with surgical site infections. Infections at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 24 months. If an infection is suspected, a routine culture, obtained via each site's standard protocol, should be obtained to determine cell count and type (i.e. yeast, gram positive or gram negative bacteria, or other). If genus and species of the culture are identified as part of the routine practice at the site, that information should be recorded. Classification will follow the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for superficial, deep and organ/space surgical site infections.
Measured: 24 Months
Mean Change in Pain Between Baseline (Pre-Index Procedure) and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure, as Measured by a 10.0 cm Visual Analogue Scale
Mean change in self-reported pain measured on a Visual Analog Scale between Baseline and 24-month follow up. Scores are measured on a 10.0 cm line, lower values correspond with low pain perception. The outcome measure is presented as the absolute difference between the pain perception at Baseline and the pain perception at 24-month follow up. A negative score means a decrease in pain perception.
Measured: 24 Months
Number of Participants With One or More Device-related Adverse Event
Incidence Device-related Adverse Events: number of subjects with one or more possibly or definitely device-related Adverse Event.
Measured: 24 Months
Number of Participants Requiring Reoperation Due to Index Hernia Repair
Rate of reoperation due to the index hernia repair: the proportion of subjects with post-procedure reoperation due to the index hernia repair.
Measured: 24 Months
Mean Patient Reported Outcomes on Quality of Life Parameters as Measured by the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 1, 3, 12 and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure
Each scale score (sensation of mesh, pain or movement limitations) ranges from 0-5 and is the average across the domains. The Total CCS Score ranges from 0-5 and is the average of the 3 scale scores. Low scores represent fewer symptoms or difficulties.
Absolute values of the Total CCS Score at 1-Month follow-up, at 3-Month follow-up, at 12-Month follow-up and at 24-Month follow up are reported.
The absolute value at Baseline, or a change in self-reported quality of life measured by Carolinas Comfort Scale® cannot be reported, as subjects had incorrectly answered the questions on Sensation of Mesh at Baseline where no Phasix Mesh was yet implanted, thereby creating a bias in the results.
Measured: 24 Months
Mean Change in Quality of Life Assessments as Measured by the EQ-5D Between Baseline (Pre-Index Procedure) and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure
Change in self-reported quality of life measured by EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D™). Each of the 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) has 3 levels (no problems, some problems and extreme problems). The data is converted into a summary index number between 0 and 1, whereby 1 corresponds with the highest perception of Quality of Life. The outcome measure reports the absolute change from Baseline until 24-months follow up. A positive value corresponds with an increase in Quality of Life.
Measured: 24 Months
Mean Surgical Procedure Time of the Index Procedure as Measured From Incision to Closure
Surgical procedure time as measured from incision to closure (skin to skin)
Measured: 1 day
Mean Time Until Participants Were Able to Return to Work
The number of days until subject returned to work, calculated as the date when employed subjects were able to fully get back to work minus the date of surgery.
Measured: 24 Months
Mean Length of Hospital Stay Related to Index Procedure
The length of hospital stay for the index procedure is calculated as the date of hospital discharge minus the date of hospital admission. Days in intensive care unit, days in step down unit (medium care) and days in the ward will be summarized as well.
Measured: 1 Month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start23 Mar 2016
- Primary completion31 Jul 2017
- Study completion20 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by C. R. BardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. Bard
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hans Jeekel, Principal investigator, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02720042
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DVL-HE-016
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Van Rooijen MMJ, Tollens T, Jorgensen LN, de Vries Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Kockerling F, Miserez M, Windsor ACJ, Berrevoet F, Fortelny RH, Dousset B, Woeste G, van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Lange JF, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Jeekel J. Slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh: 2-year results in VHWG grade 3 hernia repair. Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02453-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
PubMed 34282506van Rooijen MMJ, Jairam AP, Tollens T, Jorgensen LN, de Vries Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Kockerling F, Miserez M, Windsor ACJ, Berrevoet F, Fortelny RH, Dousset B, Woeste G, van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Lange JF, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Kroese LF, Jeekel J. A post-market, prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical investigation of Phasix mesh for VHWG grade 3 midline incisional hernia repair: a research protocol. BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0439-7.
PubMed 30458747
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Post-Market, Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Investigation of Phasix™ Mesh for VHWG Grade 3 Midline Hernia Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02720042
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DVL-HE-016
- Conditions
- Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal, Hernia, Incisional
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. BardIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to collect additional data on safety and performance of Phasix™ Mesh in subjects requiring Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3 midline hernia repair.
Detailed description
Approximately 85 subjects, at approximately 12 sites across Europe will be enrolled and treated to study the use of Phasix™ Mesh. All treated subjects will be followed for 2 years post-implantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phasix™ Mesh | Experimental | Device: Phasix™ MeshPatients treated with Phasix™ Mesh for hernia repair |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject must be diagnosed with incisional midline hernia.
- Subject has a VHWG Grade 3 hernia (as defined in the protocol).
- Size of hernia ≥ 10 cm2.
- Subject must be willing to undergo a planned retro-rectus hernia repair (onlay allowed as an exception when retro-rectus placement cannot be achieved; using absorbable suture) with or without Component Separation Technique.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Subject with > 4 previous repairs of the hernia under observation.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2.
- The subject is on, or suspected to be placed on, chemotherapy medications during any part of the study.
- The subject has peritonitis.
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (if documented in the subject's record).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Phasix™ MeshA resorbable mesh prepared from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) | Device | Phasix™ Mesh |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 3 Months of Index Procedure
Time frame: 3 Months
Proportions of subjects with Surgical Site Occurrences, which are defined as hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis and fistula requiring intervention. Occurrences at the surgical site will be assessed by physical examination at each study visit through 3 months. For analysis purposes, the aggregate Surgical Site Occurrence is defined as follows: "The question <Is there any evidence of surgical site occurrence (SSO) in the same location as the index procedure?> is answered with <yes>
11 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 24 Months of Index Procedure
Time frame: 24 Months
Number of Participants With a Hernia Recurrence
Time frame: 24 Months
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Infection
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean Change in Pain Between Baseline (Pre-Index Procedure) and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure, as Measured by a 10.0 cm Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 24 Months
Number of Participants With One or More Device-related Adverse Event
Time frame: 24 Months
Number of Participants Requiring Reoperation Due to Index Hernia Repair
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean Patient Reported Outcomes on Quality of Life Parameters as Measured by the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 1, 3, 12 and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean Change in Quality of Life Assessments as Measured by the EQ-5D Between Baseline (Pre-Index Procedure) and 24 Months Post-Index Procedure
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean Surgical Procedure Time of the Index Procedure as Measured From Incision to Closure
Time frame: 1 day
Mean Time Until Participants Were Able to Return to Work
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean Length of Hospital Stay Related to Index Procedure
Time frame: 1 Month
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34282506Van Rooijen MMJ, Tollens T, Jorgensen LN, de Vries Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Kockerling F, Miserez M, Windsor ACJ, Berrevoet F, Fortelny RH, Dousset B, Woeste G, van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Lange JF, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Jeekel J. Slowly resorbable biosynthetic mesh: 2-year results in VHWG grade 3 hernia repair. Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):131-138. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02453-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30458747van Rooijen MMJ, Jairam AP, Tollens T, Jorgensen LN, de Vries Reilingh TS, Piessen G, Kockerling F, Miserez M, Windsor ACJ, Berrevoet F, Fortelny RH, Dousset B, Woeste G, van Westreenen HL, Gossetti F, Lange JF, Tetteroo GWM, Koch A, Kroese LF, Jeekel J. A post-market, prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical investigation of Phasix mesh for VHWG grade 3 midline incisional hernia repair: a research protocol. BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0439-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hernia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
North American Fetal Therapy Network Prospective Registry for Long-term Outcome Following Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion in Severe Left and Right Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Fetal Repair of Complex Gastroschisis: A Safety and Feasibility Trial
Gastroschisis
Recruiting
Duramesh Versus Minimally Invasive IPOM for High-Risk Umbilical Hernia Repairs
Umbilical Hernia, Ventral Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hans Jeekel principal investigator
Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam
15 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Phasix™ Mesh in people with Hernia and Hernia, Abdominal, run by C. R. Bard at 15 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, France, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With One or More Surgical Site Occurrence Within 3 Months of Index Procedure (time frame: 3 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02720042, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2020.