Hearing LossC950NCT02727842
Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor
A study testing CP950 Sound Processor and Wireless programming pod in people with Hearing Loss, run by Cochlear at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Studying usability and gaining feedback of the CP950 Sound Processor in experienced cochlear implant recipients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hearing Loss
- What is being tested?
- CP950 Sound Processor and Wireless programming pod
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear
- Subjects age 12 and older who are cognitively and developmentally able to complete all study related questionnaires as deemed by the principal investigator or delegated staff
- At least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor
- Ability to use 2 zinc air batteries with their current program (MAP)
- Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol for the duration of the trial
Who cannot join
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device
- Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations
- Implant types not currently supported by the CP950 sound processor (i.e.,N22)
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80013
NYU
New York, New York, 10523
Hearts for Hearing
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
About this study
Official title: Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor With Experienced Cochlear Implant Users
Studying usability and gaining feedback of the CP950 Sound Processor in experienced cochlear implant recipients.
Read the detailed description
One month protocol, with 2 study visits. The aim of the study to is to gain patient and audiologist feedback on their experience and usability with the device and wireless programming pod.
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Being tested
- CP950 Sound Processor, Wireless programming pod
- Keywords
- cochlear implant, Sound Processor
- Medical subject headings
- Hearing Loss
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CP950 Sound ProcessorDevice
An off-the-ear processor configuration with identical functionality to the commercially approved CP910/920 processor
Wireless programming podDevice
The CP950 Sound Processor will be programmed by the wireless programming pod, which is needed as the interface to commercially approved programming software
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Experimental | All patients will receive the CP950 Sound Processor and be part of the treatment group for one month which is programmed via the wireless programming pod Receives: Device: CP950 Sound Processor; Device: Wireless programming pod |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire
To evaluate usability of the CP950 sound processor using the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire for existing cochlear implant users.
Specifically:
- Patient Reported Hearing Performance
- Retention \& Comfort
- Ease of use
- Use of remote controls
- Look \& feel
- Reliability
- Maintenance \& use
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hearing LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cochlear
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02727842
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAM5657
- Acronym
- C950
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor With Experienced Cochlear Implant Users
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02727842
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C950 / CAM5657
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Keywords
- cochlear implant, Sound Processor
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CochlearIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Sep 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Studying usability and gaining feedback of the CP950 Sound Processor in experienced cochlear implant recipients.
Detailed description
One month protocol, with 2 study visits. The aim of the study to is to gain patient and audiologist feedback on their experience and usability with the device and wireless programming pod.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Experimental | Device: CP950 Sound Processor, Device: Wireless programming podAll patients will receive the CP950 Sound Processor and be part of the treatment group for one month which is programmed via the wireless programming pod |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- At least 6 months experience with a Nucleus 24 series or later implant in at least one implanted ear
- Subjects age 12 and older who are cognitively and developmentally able to complete all study related questionnaires as deemed by the principal investigator or delegated staff
- At least 3 months experience with the CP810,CP920 or CP910 sound processor
- Ability to use 2 zinc air batteries with their current program (MAP)
- Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol for the duration of the trial
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device
- Additional disabilities that would prevent participation in evaluations
- Implant types not currently supported by the CP950 sound processor (i.e.,N22)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CP950 Sound ProcessorAn off-the-ear processor configuration with identical functionality to the commercially approved CP910/920 processor | Device | Treatment group |
| Wireless programming podThe CP950 Sound Processor will be programmed by the wireless programming pod, which is needed as the interface to commercially approved programming software | Device | Treatment group |
Primary outcome
Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire
Time frame: 1 month
To evaluate usability of the CP950 sound processor using the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire for existing cochlear implant users. Specifically: 1. Patient Reported Hearing Performance 2. Retention \& Comfort 3. Ease of use 4. Use of remote controls 5. Look \& feel 6. Reliability 7. Maintenance \& use
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Hearing Loss
Recruiting
Investigating Auditory Processing in the Users of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implants
Deafness
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Clinical Data and Specimens for Research in Hearing, Balance, Taste, Smell, Voice, Speech, and Language Disorders.
Hearing Loss, Deafness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Mi2000 TICI Follow-up
Hearing Loss, Binaural, Cochlear Implantation
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Recruiting
Fall Risk Assessment and Speech Intelligibility Enhancement Using In-ear Device
Hearing Loss, Dizziness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CP950 Sound Processor and Wireless programming pod in people with Hearing Loss, run by Cochlear at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Satisfaction Through Usability of the CP950 Sound Processor as Measured by the CP950 Take Home Questionnaire (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2018.