AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriasis VulgarisNCT02735187

Efficacy and Safety of Blue Light (453 nm) Treatment for Mild Psoriasis Vulgaris Over Three Months Compared to Vitamin D.

A study testing Blue light treatment and Vitamin D in people with Psoriasis Vulgaris, run by Philips Electronics Nederland BV at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients will be screened up to 28 days before start of treatment. During the screening visit, the purpose and procedures of the study will be explained to potential patients and informed consent will be obtained. At the baseline visit, all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be re-assessed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 74 years
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis Vulgaris
What is being tested?
Blue light treatment and Vitamin D
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
51 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Mar 2016to Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 74 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed and dated informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure
  • Good health as determined by the Investigator
  • Willing and able to comply with study requirements
  • Skin type I-IV according to Fitzpatrick
  • Mild plaque-type psoriasis vulgaris with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 10 and body surface area (BSA) ≤ 10 at screening.
  • Presence of two comparable psoriatic plaques suitable to be defined as study areas as follows:
Show all 15Show fewer
  • located on extremities (plaques located on the palms or sole of the feet are not suitable)
  • Both areas located either on lower or upper extremity
  • Can be located on the same extremity
  • Distance between the two study areas ≥ 11cm (border to border)
  • If lesion is too large to be fully covered, partial treatment possible
  • Otherwise healthy according to physical examination
  • Aged 18 years up to ≤74 years
  • Reliable method of contraception for women of childbearing potential (i.e. low failure rate less than 1per cent per year; e.g. oral contraceptives, intra-uterine device (IUD) or transdermal contraceptive patch)
  • Willing to abstain from excessive sun / UV exposure (e.g. sunbath, solarium) during the course of the study

Who cannot join

  • General
  • Inmates of psychiatric wards, prisons, or other state institutions
  • Investigator or any other team member involved directly or indirectly in the conduct of the clinical study
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days
  • Pregnant or lactating women Medical History
  • Photodermatosis and/or Photosensitivity
Show all 36Show fewer
  • Porphyria and/or hypersensitivity to porphyrins
  • Patients with current diagnosis of erythrodermic, exfoliative or pustular psoriasis
  • Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency
  • Patients with any of the following conditions present on the study areas: naevi or signs of hyperpigmentation, viral (e.g. herpes or varicella) lesions of the skin, fungal and bacterial skin infections, parasitic infections and atrophic skin
  • Patients with any of the following conditions present or who have been diagnosed in the past with any of the following conditions on the study areas: skin cancer, severe actinic damage and other precancerous lesions
  • Patients with genetic deficiencies attached with increased sensitivity to light or increased risk to dermatologic cancer ( i.e. Xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne Syndrome, Bloom-Syndrome) Concomitant medication/treatment in medical history and during the study Required
  • Treatment of target and control area with Excipial U10 Lipolotio (Galderma)
  • Treatment of control area with Daivonex (Leo Pharma) Allowed
  • Topical treatment of non-study areas with Vitamin D or WHO group I-II corticosteroids or mometasone Not allowed Within 3 months prior to baseline
  • ustekinumab Within 2 months prior to baseline
  • adalimumab, alefacept, infliximab Within 1 month prior to baseline
  • Etanercept
  • Systemic corticosteroids
  • Retinoids
  • Immunosuppressants (e.g. methotrexate, ciclosporin, azathioprine, chemotherapeutics)
  • oral psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA)
  • Topical or intranasal/inhalation therapy with potent or very potent (WHO group III-IV) corticosteroids
  • Within 2 weeks prior to baseline
  • ultraviolet B light (UVB) / ultraviolet A light (UVA)
  • Topical therapy with
  • WHO group I-II corticosteroids
  • Topical retinoids
  • Vitamin D analogues
  • Topical immunomodulators (e.g. calcineurin inhibitors)
  • Anthracen derivatives
  • Tar
  • Salicylic acid
  • Intranasal/inhalation therapy with WHO group I-II corticosteroids At baseline
  • Photo-sensitizing medication (e.g. psoralen, tetracycline, nalidixic acid, furosemide, amiodarone, phenotiacine, chinclone, fibrates, hypericumperforatum, arnica, valerian, tar, psoralen, ketoprofen) or colours (e.g. thiazide, toluidine blue, eosin, methylene blue, rose Bengal, acridine)
  • Initiation of, or expected changes in concomitant medication that may affect psoriasis vulgaris (e.g., beta blockers, anti-malaria drugs, lithium and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Medical faculty of the RWTH Aachen

    Aachen, 52074

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Monocenter, Randomized, Blinded, Intraindividual Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Blue Light (453 nm) Treatment for Mild Psoriasis Vulgaris Over Three Months Compared to Vitamin D

Patients will be screened up to 28 days before start of treatment. During the screening visit, the purpose and procedures of the study will be explained to potential patients and informed consent will be obtained.

At the baseline visit, all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be re-assessed. Eligible patients will be randomized to treatment of the target area with either 30 minutes (group30) or 15 minutes (group15) blue light at 600 milliwatt per square centimeter (mW/cm²). Additionally, two study areas with similar clinical symptomatology will be determined and will be randomized to blue light treated area and Daivonex (Vitamin D) treated area.

After randomization, patients will be trained on a demonstrator device (no actual treatment to ensure investigator is blinded as to which group the patient is randomized to) as well as the Daivonex cream. After patients have been instructed, treatment of the areas will be applied daily (once per day, 5-7 times / week) at home for a treatment period of 12 weeks. During those 12 weeks, patients will return to the study site for safety and effectiveness assessments at week 2, 4, 8 and week 12. A phone call visit will be performed after one week of treatment to check for any adverse events or problems in handling the device or the cream. The visit at week 12 serves as end of treatment visit. The patients will be followed-up for another 4 weeks. Treatment responses will be photo documented.

Being tested
Blue light treatment, Vitamin D

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blue light treatmentDevice

    Phototherapy of localized psoriasis vulgaris plaque with a wearable device emitting blue light at 453nm.

  • Vitamin DDrug

    Treatment of contralateral localized psoriasis vulgaris plaque with Vitamin D creme (Daivonex)

Study groups in NCT02735187
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
group30Active comparatorTreatment of the target area with 30 minutes of blue light at 453nm compared to Vitamin D creme Daivonex on contralateral Plaque of same patient.
Receives: Device: Blue light treatment; Drug: Vitamin D
group15Active comparatorTreatment of the target area with 15 minutes of blue light at 453nm compared to Vitamin D creme Daivonex on contralateral Plaque of same patient.
Receives: Device: Blue light treatment; Drug: Vitamin D

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline (Visit 2) of the Local PSI of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 30) as Compared to the VitaminD Treated Area (Control) at End of Treatment (Week 12).

    The local Psoriasis severity index (LPSI) was adapted from the well known PASI. The investigator evaluated and graded the severity of erythema, induration, and scaliness as the key symptoms of psoriasis on the study areas (0-4). A total severity score was calculated as the sum of the three symptom ratings (range 0-12). The measure reported is the change in LPSI at end of treatment versus baseline. A negative change indicates an improvement of the LPSI.

    Measured: week 12

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change From Baseline (Visit 2) of the Local PSI of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 15) as Compared to the VitaminD Treated (Control) Area at End of Treatment (Week 12).

    The local Psoriasis severity index (LPSI) was adapted from the well known PASI. The investigator evaluated and graded the severity of erythema, induration, and scaliness as the key symptoms of psoriasis on the study areas (0-4 each). A total severity score was calculated as the sum of the three symptom ratings (range 0-12). The measure reported is the change in LPSI at end of treatment versus baseline. A negative change indicates an improvement of the LPSI.

    Measured: week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Patient Self-assessment of Severity of Psoriasis of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 30) Compared to the VitaminD Treated (Control) Area at Week 12 (VAS Scale).

    Patient Rating of severity of Psoriasis Plaques on a 0-10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale. VAS = 0 cm corresponds to no pain,, VAS = 10 cm corresponds to maximal imaginable pain.

    Measured: week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient Self-assessment of Severity of Psoriasis of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 15) Compared to the VitaminD Treated (Control) Area at Week 12 (VAS Scale).

    Patient Rating of severity of Psoriasis Plaques on 0-10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale. VAS = 0 corresponds to no symptoms of Psoriasis, VAS = 10 corresponds to most severe symptoms of Psoriasis.

    Measured: week 12

  4. Lesional Erythema Measured by Mexameter Measured at End of Treatment.

    Lesional erythema was measured objectively with a measurement device (Mexameter). The Mexameter delivers a two digit number for the redness of the skin (range 0-99). 0 = no redness and 99 = maximal redness.

    Measured: week 12

  5. Patient Satisfaction (Week 12)

    Patient satisfaction will be measured by questionnaire using the System usability score (SUS). The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. The higher the score the better the patient satisfaction the better the outcome. The lower the score the worse the patient satisfaction the worse the outcome.

    Measured: week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionAug 2016
  4. Study completionAug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
51 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02735187
Sponsor's protocol ID
Psoriasis-CT03
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
16 Mar 2016
Last updated
8 Jan 2019

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blue light treatment and Vitamin D in people with Psoriasis Vulgaris, run by Philips Electronics Nederland BV at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 36 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline (Visit 2) of the Local PSI of the Blue Light Treated Area (Group 30) as Compared to the VitaminD Treated Area (Control) at End of Treatment (Week 12). (time frame: week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in