AzTrials
AzTrials

Shock HemorrhagicPhase 3PREHO-PLYONCT02736812

Pre-hospital Administration of Lyophilized Plasma for Post-traumatic Coagulopathy Treatment (PREHO-PLYO)

A Phase 3 study testing French Lyophilized Plasma and Normale Saline Solution in people with Shock Hemorrhagic, run by French Defence Health Service at 22 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In severe bleeding due to trauma, a decrease in coagulation factors maintains and promotes bleeding. The plasma allows, through its contribution of coagulation factors, early prevention or correction of this post-trauma induced coagulopathy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Shock Hemorrhagic
What is being tested?
French Lyophilized Plasma and Normale Saline Solution
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
22 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Apr 2016to 30 Nov 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • hemorrhagic shock of traumatic origin
  • [Systolic Blood Pressure <70 mmHg] OR [Shock index > 1.1]

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate in the research
  • Unaffiliated to a social welfare system
  • Age under 18 years
  • Privation of person's liberty
  • Person subject to a safeguard measure of justice
  • Pregnancy
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Allergy known to Amotosalen® and psoralen
  • Contribution factor clotting other than Plyo
  • Patient initialy in cardiac arrest
  • Patient initially in cardiac arrest, followed by resumption of spontaneous circulation
  • People who could not have blood sample (required for the primary endpoint)

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

France22 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois

    Annecy, 74370

  • Samu 74 Annecy Genevois

    Annecy, 74

  • Samu de BREST

    Brest, 29200

  • Hopital d'instruction des Armées PERCY

    Clamart, 92140

  • Centre de Transfusion Sanguine des Armées

    Clamart, 92

  • Hopital Beaujon

    Clichy, 92110

  • Henri Mondor University Hospital

    Créteil

  • Hopital Kremlin Bicetre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

  • Centre Hospitalier EDOUARD HERRIOT

    Lyon, 69003

  • Samu de LYON

    Lyon, 69003

  • Centre Hospitalier LYON SUD

    Lyon, 69495

  • Hopital d'Instruction des Armées LAVERAN

    Marseille, 13013

  • Bataillon des marins-pompiers de Marseille

    Marseille, 13233

  • Hopital Nord de Marseille

    Marseille, 13915

  • Samu de Marseille

    Marseille, 13915

  • Hopital Pitié Salpétrière

    Paris, 75013

  • Hopital Europen Georges Pompidou

    Paris, 75015

  • Samu de Paris

    Paris, 75015

  • Fire Brigade Of Paris Emergency Medicine Dept

    Paris, 75017

  • Smur Lariboisiere

    Paris, 75475

  • Samu de PAU

    Pau, 64000

  • Hopital des Instructions des Armées BEGIN

    Saint-Mandé, 94

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Interest of Pre-hospital Administration of Lyophilized Plasma to Prevent or Treat Coagulopathy Associated With Post-traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock (PREHO-PLYO Study )

In severe bleeding due to trauma, a decrease in coagulation factors maintains and promotes bleeding. The plasma allows, through its contribution of coagulation factors, early prevention or correction of this post-trauma induced coagulopathy. This study aims to measure the effectiveness of pre-hospital FLYP administration in case of traumatic hemorrhagic shock, in the occurrence or the treatment of a post traumatic induced coagulopathy.

Study Design

Read more

This is a randomized controlled multicenter open label study in two parallel groups.

Eligibility criteria : adult, victim of a hemorrhagic shock of traumatic origin with [systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg] or Shock Index >1.1 The patients will receive either FLYP either the usual treatment as given in the recommendations for best practice.

The primary endpoint is the International Normalized Ratio (INR) at hospital admission.

The study must confirm the link between causality of early administration of plasma in improving post-traumatic coagulopathy. The study must show safe usage in out-of-hospital situations and the ability of medical staff to meet the requirements of the health authorities in terms of product use as well as in terms of traceability of the victims and the treatment they received.

Read the detailed description

In severe bleeding due to trauma, a fall in coagulation factors maintains and promotes bleeding. The plasma allows, through its contribution of coagulation factors, early prevention or correction of this post-traumatic coagulopathy.

This labile blood product has so far only been used in armed conflicts by military medical and surgical units deployed in External Operations (EXOP) to meet the logistical constraints of the operating environment and the need to have, without delay, therapeutic plasma to treat bleeding casualties. Unlike frozen plasma used in hospitals, FLYP is stored at room temperature and is reconstituted in less than 6 mins.

In the civilian world, FLYP could be used by health institutions who have major logistical difficulties which do not allow them to ensure a cold chain of sub-zero temperatures, or in extreme emergency situations with the need for an immediate therapeutic plasma supply. In this second indication, FLYP should be used until the fresh frozen plasma is thawed and available. Its use in pre-hospital situations is also justified due to its immediate availability and storage conditions.

FLYP is sterile and is in powder-form with a residual humidity not exceeding 2%. It is packaged in a sterile and pyrogenic glass vial.

The main objective is to measure the effectiveness of pre-hospital FLYP administration in case of traumatic hemorrhagic shock, in the occurrence or the treatment of a post traumatic coagulopathy.

The secondary objectives consist in assessing the following outcomes :

(1) the need for massive transfusion (3) the ICU length of stay (4) the survival rate on day 30 (5) FLYP prehospital usability in civilian population (the compilation of technical and logistical difficulties encountered with administration of FLYP) (6) the Prothrombin time (PT) at hospital admission. Normal values for PT are 70 - 130%.

(7) the fibrinogen level at hospital admission (8) the variation in the level of PT, between the pre-hospital setting and the hospital admission .

(9) the variation in the level of INR, between the pre-hospital setting and the hospital admission .

(10) the variation in the fibrinogen level between the pre-hospital setting and the hospital admission .

Method

The attribution of the experimental treatment (FLYP or saline), to each patient who will receive a treatment numbered from 1 to 140, was carried out in advance using STATA 14.0 software.

Type of randomisation : randomisation in blocks of 2, stratified by center.

Treatments are allocated to participants in each "pre-hospital" center by ascending number.

Participants and investigators are therefore not blinded to the allocated treatment.However, the statistical analysis is planned to be carried out as a blind study regarding knowledge of the allocated treatment.

The planned experimental design is identical for each pre-hospital investigation centre.

Care of a patient in traumatic hemorrhagic shock is identical from one investigating centre to another: it is based on formalized expert recommendations on hemorrhagic shock resuscitation.

Determination of the number of subjects required

Coagulation factors were measured in a pre-after study in 2010 in the army in severely traumatized patients. The "before" period consisted of an isotonic infusion of saline saline chlorine, the "after" period of FLYP transfusion. In total, the inclusion of 124 patients showed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of PT value. In the absence of any other data available at the time of writing the protocol, we have brought the number of subjects required to 140 (= 2X 70) according to a 10% in the follow-up.

There is no planned interim analysis.

The administration of the treatment in the study is stopped if any adverse event (AE) occurs (abnormal clinical manifestation,...) and the offending experimental treatment is retained. Usual care and corrective actions are continued in the field, during transport and at the receiving hospital. An independent oversight committee meeting is organized to discuss the stopping or the continuation of the study according to the nature of the AE.

Comparability of the 2 groups for the primary endpoint:

The median INR values are compared between the two groups, after adjustment on other variables if necessary.

Comparability of the 2 groups for the secondary endpoints:

  • Transfusion requirement will be judged by the number of units transfused after arrival at the hospital: packed red blood cells (RBC), platelet concentrates, fibrinogen, coagulation factors and plasma. The transfusion requirement will be measured over a period of 24 to 48 hours.
  • The median number of days in the ICU between the two groups will use the medians test
  • Survival analysis up to 30 days will be based on the comparison of Kaplan-Meier curves, by the log-rank test, and a Cox model to estimate the role of administration of FLYP on survival, taking into account potential confounding factors.
  • The usability of administering FLYP will be judged on the grounds of interruption or non-administration of the experimental treatment, depending on the ability to respect the procedure and the use of a Labile Blood Product according to the rules of good practice.
  • The average differential (pre-hospital -hospital) of coagulation parameters between the two groups will be compared by an ANCOVA adjusted on other variables if needed.

INTERRUPTION OR STOPPING OF THE STUDY

The sponsor has the responsibility to report, to the national health authority , any serious and unexpected adverse events attributable to the labile blood product of cell therapy and/or protocol within 15 days (7 days in case of death and life-threatening situations).

In the case of occurrence of an incident, accident, or event, interruption of the study is planned after analysis and decision by the hemovigilance and safety committee of the study.

RISKS

A full report on the risks, the description of incidents, accidents and adverse events will be the subject of a chapter in the results section and also in the discussion.

FINANCING

Funding for the study is provided by the Health Department of the Army (promoter, following the acceptance of the study in the context of Clinical research projects in the Health service of armies).

DISCUSSION

The study must confirm the link between causality of early administration of plasma in improving post-traumatic coagulopathy.

The study must show safe usage in out-of-hospital situations and the ability of medical staff to meet the requirements of the health authorities in terms of product use as well as in terms of traceability of the victims and the treatment they received.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that aims to assess the usability and efficiency of FLYP in prehospital situation.

Being tested
French Lyophilized Plasma, Normale Saline Solution
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial, Lyophilized Plasma, Advanced Trauma Life Support Care
Medical subject headings
Shock, Hemorrhagic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • French Lyophilized PlasmaBiological

    During the pre-hospital phase, the main events related to this arm are

    • Blood samples taken before treatment (TP, fibrinogen, platelets, RBC, grouping)
    • Usual pre-hospital care according to recommendations in best practices
    • Administration of FLYP
  • Normale Saline SolutionBiological

    During the pre-hospital phase, the main events related to this arm are

    • Blood samples taken before treatment (TP, fibrinogen, platelets, RBC, grouping)
    • Usual pre-hospital care according to recommendations in best practices
    • Administration of Normale Saline Solution
Study groups in NCT02736812
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
French Lyophilized PlasmaExperimentalreceives French Lyophilized Plasma with the usual treatment for post traumatic hemorrhagic shock as given in the recommendations for best practice
Receives: Biological: French Lyophilized Plasma
Normal Saline SolutionActive comparatorreceives Normale Saline Solution with the usual treatment of post traumatic hemorrhagic shock as given in the recommendations for best practice
Receives: Biological: Normale Saline Solution

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the International Normalized Ratio level (international unit IU) at hospital admission

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. number of plasma units administered at 24 and 48 hours

    Measured: 48 hours

  2. Number of RBC Concentrates units administered at 24 and 48 hours

    Measured: 48 hours

  3. Number of platelet concentrates units administered at 24 and 48 hours

    Measured: 48 hours

  4. Total Intensive care unit of stay (days)

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Survival

    Measured: 30 days

  6. FLYP prehospital usability in civilian population (questionnaire)

    Compilation of technical and logistical difficulties encountered before, during and after administration of FLYP

    Measured: 30 days

  7. Fibrinogen level (grams)

    Measured: 1 day

  8. Prothrombin level change (percentage)

    The difference in the level of Prothrombin (PT), between prehospital and hospital admission

    Measured: 48 hours

  9. the level of coagulation factors (international unit IU) at hospital admission

    Measured: 1 day

  10. Quantity of fibrinogen administered in grams at 24 and 48 hours

    Measured: 48 hours

  11. quantity of coagulation factors administered (international units IU)

    quantity of coagulation factors administered (international units IU)

    Measured: 48 hours

  12. Thromboelastometry median clotting time (CT) (minutes).

    Time in minutes and secondes for each step coming from rotational elastometry

    Measured: 1 hour

  13. Thromboelastometry median Clot Formation Time (CFT) in minutes and seconds

    Time in minutes and seconds for each step coming from rotational elastometry

    Measured: 1 hour

  14. Thromboelastometry median maximal lysis (ML) time in minutes ans seconds

    Time in minutes and seconds for each step coming from rotational elastometry

    Measured: 1 hour

  15. Thromboelastometry alpha angle (degrees)

    measure unit : degrees

    Measured: 1 hour

  16. Thromboelastometry median Maximal Clot Firmness (MCF) time in minutes and seconds

    Time in minutes and seconds for each step coming from rotational elastometry

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Apr 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02736812
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014RC04
Acronym
PREHO-PLYO
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
27 Mar 2016
Last updated
7 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Boutonnet M, Pasquier P, Salvadori A, Auroy Y, Tourtier JP. Advocacy to extend the use of continuous noninvasive hemoglobin measurement. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2783-4; author reply 2784-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822b3a22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22094519
  • Pasquier P, Boutonnet M, Giraud N, Salvadori A, Tourtier JP. Hypotension redefined, shock index and massive transfusion. J Trauma. 2011 Sep;71(3):784-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318228b83d. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21909011
  • Brohi K, Singh J, Heron M, Coats T. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2003 Jun;54(6):1127-30. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000069184.82147.06.

    PubMed 12813333
  • Martinaud C, Tourtier JP, Pasquier P, Ausset S, Sailliol A. The French freeze-dried plasma. J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):1091-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822a8fd5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21986756
  • Martinaud C, Ausset S, Deshayes AV, Cauet A, Demazeau N, Sailliol A. Use of freeze-dried plasma in French intensive care unit in Afghanistan. J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1761-4; discussion 1764-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822f1285.

    PubMed 22182886
  • Sailliol A, Martinaud C, Cap AP, Civadier C, Clavier B, Deshayes AV, Mendes AC, Pouget T, Demazeau N, Chueca M, Martelet FR, Ausset S. The evolving role of lyophilized plasma in remote damage control resuscitation in the French Armed Forces Health Service. Transfusion. 2013 Jan;53 Suppl 1:65S-71S. doi: 10.1111/trf.12038.

    PubMed 23301975
  • Martinaud C, Civadier C, Ausset S, Verret C, Deshayes AV, Sailliol A. In vitro hemostatic properties of French lyophilized plasma. Anesthesiology. 2012 Aug;117(2):339-46. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182608cdd.

    PubMed 22739764
  • Glassberg E, Nadler R, Gendler S, Abramovich A, Spinella PC, Gerhardt RT, Holcomb JB, Kreiss Y. Freeze-dried plasma at the point of injury: from concept to doctrine. Shock. 2013 Dec;40(6):444-50. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000047.

    PubMed 24089000
  • Brown JB, Guyette FX, Neal MD, Claridge JA, Daley BJ, Harbrecht BG, Miller RS, Phelan HA, Adams PW, Early BJ, Peitzman AB, Billiar TR, Sperry JL. Taking the Blood Bank to the Field: The Design and Rationale of the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) Trial. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3):343-50. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.995851. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

    PubMed 25658881
  • Kim BD, Zielinski MD, Jenkins DH, Schiller HJ, Berns KS, Zietlow SP. The effects of prehospital plasma on patients with injury: a prehospital plasma resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2 Suppl 1):S49-53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31826060ff.

    PubMed 22847094
  • Chapman MP, Moore EE, Moore HB, Gonzalez E, Morton AP, Chandler J, Fleming CD, Ghasabyan A, Silliman CC, Banerjee A, Sauaia A. The "Death Diamond": Rapid thrombelastography identifies lethal hyperfibrinolysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):925-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000871.

    PubMed 26488324
  • Floccard B, Rugeri L, Faure A, Saint Denis M, Boyle EM, Peguet O, Levrat A, Guillaume C, Marcotte G, Vulliez A, Hautin E, David JS, Negrier C, Allaouchiche B. Early coagulopathy in trauma patients: an on-scene and hospital admission study. Injury. 2012 Jan;43(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.003. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

    PubMed 21112053
  • Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Repine T, Beekley AC, Sebesta J, Jenkins D, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):805-13. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181271ba3.

    PubMed 18090009
  • de Biasi AR, Stansbury LG, Dutton RP, Stein DM, Scalea TM, Hess JR. Blood product use in trauma resuscitation: plasma deficit versus plasma ratio as predictors of mortality in trauma (CME). Transfusion. 2011 Sep;51(9):1925-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03050.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

    PubMed 21332727
  • Peltan ID, Vande Vusse LK, Maier RV, Watkins TR. An International Normalized Ratio-Based Definition of Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy Is Associated With Mortality, Venous Thromboembolism, and Multiple Organ Failure After Injury. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1429-38. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000981.

    PubMed 25816119

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing French Lyophilized Plasma and Normale Saline Solution in people with Shock Hemorrhagic, run by French Defence Health Service at 22 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the International Normalized Ratio level (international unit IU) at hospital admission (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02736812, which also lists 22 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in