AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderPhase 4NCT02744391

A Study of L-DOPA for Depression and Slowing in Older Adults

A Phase 4 study testing Levodopa in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Dysthymia, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Individuals with Late Life Depression (LLD) often have cognitive problems, particularly problems with memory, attention, and problem solving, all of which contribute to antidepressant non-response. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
What is being tested?
Levodopa
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
47 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
24 Aug 2016to 30 Nov 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >59 years
  • DSM 5 non-psychotic Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymia, or Depression Not Otherwise Specified
  • Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Rating Scale > 9
  • Decreased processing speed (defined as 0.5 SD below age-adjusted norms on the Digit Symbol Test) and decreased gait speed (defined as average walking speed over 15' course < 1 m/s)
  • Willing and capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures
  • Prefer not to be treated with a standard treatment for MDD, Dysthymia, or Depression NOS (e.g., antidepressant medication or psychotherapy)

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (excluding Tobacco Use Disorder) within the past 12 months
  • History of or current psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder
  • Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's Disease, Vascular Dementia, or PD
  • Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) < 25
  • HRSD ≥ 25 or the presence of significant suicide risk
  • Current or recent (within the past 4 weeks) treatment with antidepressants, antipsychotics, dopaminergic agents, or mood stabilizers
Show all 13Show fewer
  • History of allergy, hypersensitivity reaction, or severe intolerance to LDOPA
  • Acute, severe, or unstable medical or neurological illness
  • Mobility limiting osteoarthritis of any lower extremity joints, symptomatic lumbar spine disease, history of joint replacement surgery, or history of spine surgery
  • Hypotension (SBP<90), hypertension (SBP >150 or DBP > 90), past stroke causing sensory or movement deficits, cardiac arrhythmias, or any other severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Having contraindication to MRI scanning (such as metal in body) or unable to tolerate the scanning procedures
  • History of significant radioactivity exposure (nuclear medicine studies or occupational exposure)
  • Presence of a clinically significant brain abnormality, significant anemia, insulin dependent diabetes, a history of cardiovascular disease, or uncontrolled/untreated risk factors for coronary artery disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

Individuals with Late Life Depression (LLD) often have cognitive problems, particularly problems with memory, attention, and problem solving, all of which contribute to antidepressant non-response. Our group and others have shown that decreased thinking speed is the central cause of functional problems in patients with LLD. Similarly, decreased walking speed is associated with depression and carries additional risk for falls, hospitalization, and death. Available evidence suggests that declining functionality in the brain's dopamine system contributes to age-related cognitive and motor slowing. The central hypothesis of this R61/R33 Phased Innovation Award is that by enhancing dopamine functioning in the brain and improving cognitive and motor slowing, administration of carbidopa/levodopa (L-DOPA) will improve depressive symptoms in older adults.

Read the detailed description

This study will elucidate the neurobiology of slowing and LLD, identify a novel therapeutic target for depression, and contribute to the development of personalized treatment regimens for LLD. The multimodal neuroimaging methods detailed in this application will provide information about the neurobiology of aging-associated slowing and LLD at molecular, structural, and functional levels of analysis. These data will fill a crucial gap in our knowledge regarding what are the physiologic and functional consequences of dopamine depletion occurring across the lifespan in individuals without PD. Results from this project also will allow us to evaluate a novel therapeutic approach to LLD, which could have large public health ramifications given the prevalence, frequent treatment resistance, and chronicity characteristic of LLD. Even apart from patients with LLD, cognitive and motor slowing exact a large public health burden in terms of impaired functioning and increased morbidity and mortality, and this burden will only grow as the population ages. It is critical to develop treatments capable of altering the negative health trajectories associated with slowing in order to help older adults maintain independent functioning and live longer with an increased quality of life. Finally, while PET and MRI may prove critical to understand the neurobiology of slowing and LLD, their invasiveness and expense limit their roles in informing treatment decisions in clinical practice settings. For this reason the investigators are also assessing the influence of genetic moderators such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and catechol-O-methyl-transferase (COMT) genotype on baseline dopamine functioning and response to L-DOPA. This may facilitate the identification of both high-risk individuals and those most likely to benefit from treatment interventions.

Being tested
Levodopa
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Dysthymic Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LevodopaDrug

    Also called L-Dopa

Study groups in NCT02744391
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
L-DOPAExperimentalPatients will receive titration of L-DOPA from 150 mg to 450 mg.
Receives: Drug: Levodopa

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (24 Item)

    Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluate recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score of 16 or above is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 3

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Digit Symbol Substitution Test

    Digit symbol substitution test (DSST) is a neuropsychological test sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age and depression. The test is not sensitive to the location of brain-damage (except for damage comprising part of the visual field). It consists of (e.g. nine) digit-symbol pairs (e.g. 1/-,2/┴ ... 7/Λ,8/X,9/=) followed by a list of digits. Under each digit the subject should write down the corresponding symbol as fast as possible. The number of correct symbols within the allowed time (e.g. 90 or 120 sec) is measured. The higher the number, the better the score.

    Measured: Screening

  2. Digit Symbol Substitution Test

    Digit symbol substitution test (DSST) is a neuropsychological test sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age and depression. The test is not sensitive to the location of brain-damage (except for damage comprising part of the visual field). It consists of (e.g. nine) digit-symbol pairs (e.g. 1/-,2/┴ ... 7/Λ,8/X,9/=) followed by a list of digits. Under each digit the subject should write down the corresponding symbol as fast as possible. The number of correct symbols within the allowed time (e.g. 90 or 120 sec) is measured. The higher the number, the better the score.

    Measured: Week 3

  3. Pattern Comparison

    This test required participants to identify whether two visual patterns are the "same" or "not the same" (responses were made by pressing a "yes" or "no" button). Patterns were either identical or varied on one of three dimensions: color (all ages), adding/taking something away (all ages), or one versus many. Scores reflected the number of correct items (of a possible 130) completed in 90 s; items were designed to minimize the number of errors that were made.

    Measured: Screening

  4. Pattern Comparison

    This test required participants to identify whether two visual patterns are the "same" or "not the same" (responses were made by pressing a "yes" or "no" button). Patterns were either identical or varied on one of three dimensions: color (all ages), adding/taking something away (all ages), or one versus many. Scores reflected the number of correct items (of a possible 130) completed in 90 s; items were designed to minimize the number of errors that were made.

    Measured: Week 3

  5. Letter Comparison

    Subjects will be asked to determine whether two strings of letters are the same or different. There are 3 pages and the subject is given 30 seconds per page. Scoring is based on the number answered correctly. The higher the number, the better the score.

    Measured: Screening

  6. Letter Comparison

    Subjects will be asked to determine whether two strings of letters are the same or different. There are 3 pages and the subject is given 30 seconds per page. Scoring is based on the number answered correctly. The higher the number, the better the score.

    Measured: Week 3

  7. Single Task Gait Speed

    Patients' gait will be assessed as walking speed in m/s on a 15' walking course. Patients are instructed to walk at their usual or normal speed for a total of 27' (starting and ending at a point 6 feet prior to and after the 15' course to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects). Two trials will be completed, and gait speed will be based on the average of 2 trials.

    Measured: Screening

  8. Single Task Gait Speed

    Patients' gait will be assessed as walking speed in m/s on a 15' walking course. Patients are instructed to walk at their usual or normal speed for a total of 27' (starting and ending at a point 6 feet prior to and after the 15' course to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects). Two trials will be completed, and gait speed will be based on the average of 2 trials.

    Measured: Week 3

  9. Dual Task Gait Speed

    For the Dual Task, patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously verbally listing as many animals as possible. In addition, a counting Dual Task will be used in which patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously performing serial subtractions by three starting at 100. Patients will start and end at a point 2 meters from the Gaitrite mat to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects. Dual Task will be assessed two times with the average used in the analyses

    Measured: Screening

  10. Dual Task Gait Speed

    For the Dual Task, patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously verbally listing as many animals as possible. In addition, a counting Dual Task will be used in which patients are instructed to walk at their usual pace while simultaneously performing serial subtractions by three starting at 100. Patients will start and end at a point 2 meters from the Gaitrite mat to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects. Dual Task will be assessed two times with the average used in the analyse.

    Measured: Week 3

  11. Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report

    Rating scale for depressive symptoms based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria that has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each item, understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Patients will be asked to circle the one response to each item that best describes them for the past seven days. The answers range 0-84. The higher the score the greater the depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Screening

  12. Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report

    Rating scale for depressive symptoms based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria that has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies due to its equivalent weightings for each item, understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Patients will be asked to circle the one response to each item that best describes them for the past seven days. The answers range 0-84. The higher the score the greater the depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Week 3

  13. Pre-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Sensorimotor Striatum

    Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Post-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Sensorimotor Striatum

    Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.

    Measured: Week 3

  15. Pre-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Limbic Striatum

    Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Post-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Limbic Striatum

    Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.

    Measured: Week 3

  17. Pre-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Associative Striatum

    Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Post-Treatment [11C]-Raclopride Binding Potential: Associative Striatum

    Subjects received 2 [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET) scans: baseline and post-L-DOPA treatment. High resolution anatomical T1-weighted MRI scans were acquired for each subject and PET data were co-registered to the MRIs using maximization of mutual information (SPM12, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging). Regions of interest (ROIs) were applied to the MRIs and transferred to the PET data and included the sensorimotor striatum (post-commissural putamen, SMST), associative striatum (whole caudate and pre-commissural putamen, AST) and the limbic striatum (nucleus accumbens and the most ventral aspects of the pre-commissural caudate and putamen, LST). Additionally, an ROI was drawn on cerebellum as a reference tissue. ROI time activity curves were derived as the average activity in each ROI in each frame. The primary outcome measure was BPND, the binding potential with respect to the non-displaceable compartment, derived by the simplified reference tissue model.

    Measured: Week 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start24 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion14 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
47 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02744391
Sponsor's protocol ID
7270
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
13 Apr 2016
Last updated
13 Jun 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data obtained from this study will be shared with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) and will maintain patient confidentiality by ensuring exclusion of all 18 identifiers (outlined by HIPAA) prior to data sharing. All assessment outcomes will be shared twice a year as per NIMH Data Archive (NDA) guidelines.

Publications

  • Wengler K, Ashinoff BK, Pueraro E, Cassidy CM, Horga G, Rutherford BR. Association between neuromelanin-sensitive MRI signal and psychomotor slowing in late-life depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jun;46(7):1233-1239. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00860-z. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

    PubMed 32919398
  • Rutherford BR, Slifstein M, Chen C, Abi-Dargham A, Brown PJ, Wall MW, Vanegas-Arroyave N, Stern Y, Bailey V, Valente E, Roose SP. RETRACTED: Effects of L-DOPA Monotherapy on Psychomotor Speed and [11C]Raclopride Binding in High-Risk Older Adults With Depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;86(3):221-229. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

    PubMed 31178096

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Levodopa in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Dysthymia, run by New York State Psychiatric Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (24 Item) (time frame: Week 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02744391, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in