AzTrials
AzTrials

Fragile X SyndromeNCT02747394

Cognitive Training for Fragile X Syndrome

A study testing Working Memory Training in people with Fragile X Syndrome, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) demonstrate profound executive function deficits that interfere with learning, socialization and emotion regulation. Extensive research focused on the animal models of FXS show that targeted pharmacological agents can normalize synaptic connectivity and reverse cognitive and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Fragile X Syndrome
What is being tested?
Working Memory Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
106 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2013to 18 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • fragile X full mutation
  • normal or corrected vision
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • ability to pass three-span items following completion of a Cogmed training session at baseline
  • parental agreement to maintain adherence to the training schedule and to not alter other treatments during the study unless medically necessary

Who cannot join

  • previous Cogmed training
  • significant medical problems that would interfere with the study or significant brain trauma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • M.I.N.D. Institute, U.C. Davis

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) demonstrate profound executive function deficits that interfere with learning, socialization and emotion regulation. Extensive research focused on the animal models of FXS show that targeted pharmacological agents can normalize synaptic connectivity and reverse cognitive and behavioral deficits. This translational work has led to multiple national and international controlled trials in humans with FXS now underway. However, in contrast to the heavy focus on medication treatments, there have been no controlled trials to empirically-validate cognitive or behavioral interventions for FXS. The proposed study, the first non-pharmacological controlled trial for FXS, will evaluate the efficacy of Cogmed, a cognitive training program proven to enhance working memory and executive/frontal function in a variety of clinical populations. Demonstration of effective Cogmed training for FXS would represent a major advance in the field, one that may also generalize to other forms of intellectual disability. Furthermore, it is critical to determine whether the targeted pharmacological treatments can accelerate learning and cognitive development. Thus, the validation of Cogmed for FXS will provide a paradigm for testing hypotheses focused on combined efficacy of medication and cognitive training.

Being tested
Working Memory Training
Medical subject headings
Fragile X Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Working Memory TrainingOther

    Also called Cogmed

Study groups in NCT02747394
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adaptive CogmedExperimental5 days per week for 5-6 weeks of parent aided visual working memory training, consisting of adaptive Cogmed
Receives: Other: Working Memory Training
Non-Adaptive CogmedOther5 days per week for 5-6 weeks of parent aided visual working memory training, consisting of non-adaptive Cogmed
Receives: Other: Working Memory Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite of Stanford Binet, Fifth Edition Block Span and Leiter-R Spatial Working Memory

    Average of z scores obtained from Block Span and Leiter-R Spatial Working Memory

    Measured: 5-6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV Digit Span

    Measured: 5-6 weeks

  2. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV Digit Span

    Measured: 3 month followup

  3. Kiddie Test of Attentional Performance (KiTAP)

    Measured: 5-6 weeks

  4. Kiddie Test of Attentional Performance (KiTAP)

    Measured: 3 month followup

  5. Behavior Rating Inventory Rating of Executive Function (BRIEF; Teacher and Caregiver Reports)

    Measured: 5-6 weeks

  6. Behavior Rating Inventory Rating of Executive Function (BRIEF; Teacher and Caregiver Reports)

    Measured: 3 month followup

  7. Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP-IV)

    Measured: 5-6 weeks

  8. Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP-IV)

    Measured: 3 month followup

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completion18 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion18 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
106 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02747394
Sponsor's protocol ID
428005
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
5 Apr 2016
Last updated
3 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Hessl D, Schweitzer JB, Nguyen DV, McLennan YA, Johnston C, Shickman R, Chen Y. Cognitive training for children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome: a randomized controlled trial of Cogmed. J Neurodev Disord. 2019 Apr 15;11(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s11689-019-9264-2.

    PubMed 30982467

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Working Memory Training in people with Fragile X Syndrome, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite of Stanford Binet, Fifth Edition Block Span and Leiter-R Spatial Working Memory (time frame: 5-6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02747394, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in