AzTrials
AzTrials

AngioplastyPhase 3ABISSNCT02753998

Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Standard Angioplasty for the Treatment of Stenosis of Arteriovenous Fistula

A Phase 3 study testing Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon and Conventional angioplasty in people with Angioplasty and Stenosis of Arteriovenous Fistula, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this double-blind study is to compare the frequency of primary patency at 6 months in patients with stenosis of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) treated either by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with balloon impregnated with paclitaxel or by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon and Conventional angioplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
145 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Dec 2016to Mar 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years, man or woman.
  • Chronic Hemodialysis.
  • Native autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF).
  • AVF used at least once for hemodialysis.
  • Preoperative flow measurement of AVF performed by Doppler.
  • Length of the stenosis <120 mm.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Outer diameter of the target vein <12mm.
  • Hemodynamically significant Stenosis on AV fistula, defined according to international recommendations with the following two criteria:
  • stenosis> 50% by Doppler or angiography,
  • presenting at least one of the following :
  • increased venous pressure during dialysis (venous pressure > 150 mmHg when blood flow measured at 200-225 ml / min, or venous pressure > 230 mmHg when blood flow measured at 400 ml / min);
  • disappearance of thrill of AV fistula;
  • increasing hemostasis time at the end of dialysis (> 20 minutes or increase by >=50% from usual hemostasis time);
  • recirculation rate > 20%;
  • flow of AVF < 500 ml / min responsible for a reduction of the flow of the dialysis circuit.
  • Only one stenosis with significant impact hemodynamically.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Patient has a health insurance.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Severe allergy to iodinated contrast agents, or to heparin, or to paclitaxel.
  • Anastomotic stenosis involving the afferent artery.
  • Multiple hemodynamically significant stenoses.
  • Hemodynamically significant central venous stenosis.
  • Stent already in place in treated vascular site.
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Diameter of the vein immediately upstream of stenosis greater than the maximum diameter of active balloon.
  • AVF in lower limb.
  • Coagulation disorder (outside of VKA use).
  • Active infection.
  • Inability to comply with the protocol requirements.
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year due to progressive disease (neoplasia, severe organ failure).
  • Follow-up expected to be difficult.
  • Patient under guardianship.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service chirurgie vasculaire, Hôpital Ambroise Paré

    Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, 92100

Other trials in France

About this study

The primary objective of this double-blind study is to compare the frequency of primary patency at 6 months in patients with stenosis of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) treated either by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with balloon impregnated with paclitaxel or by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with placebo balloon (balloon not impregnated with paclitaxel).

The other objectives of the study are:

  1. To compare the frequency of primary patency at 3 months and 12 months.
  2. To compare the rate of restenosis > 50% at the site of angioplasty at 3, 6 and 12 months.
  3. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the proportion of patients with arteriovenous fistula deteriorating back to preoperative flow rate (within 20% of preoperative flow rate).
  4. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the proportion of AVF with a flow rate < 500 ml / min.
  5. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the cumulative rate of thrombosis.
  6. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the medical costs related to direct medical care, initial treatments, monitoring, diagnosis and treatments of complications.
Read the detailed description

Experimental design: prospective randomized, double blind, multicenter controlled study, with 2 experimental arms.

12 centers will participate in France, targeting to enrol 150 patients in total. Each patient will undergo angiography at the beginning of the intervention in order to confirm the presence of only one stenosis, to assess the degree of stenosis and to evaluate the vascular diameter.

All patients will first undergo angioplasty using standard balloons. thereafter, depending on randomization arm, an additional angioplasty will be performed during 1 minute with a paclitaxel impregnated balloon (active arm) or with a placebo balloon (placebo arm).

The duration of inclusion is planned for 18 months.

Each patient will have a 12-month follow-up.

Being tested
Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon, Additional angioplasty with placebo balloon, Conventional angioplasty
Keywords
Stenosis of arteriovenous fistula, Angioplasty, Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloonCombination product

    Also called Lutonix® 035 balloon

    Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon after conventional angioplasty

  • Additional angioplasty with placebo balloonCombination product

    Also called ClearPAC Omega® balloon

    Additional angioplasty with placebo balloon after conventional angioplasty

  • Conventional angioplastyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT02753998
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional angioplasty + paclitaxel-coated balloonExperimentalTreatment of stenosis of AVF by conventional angioplasty + 1 minute additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon
Receives: Combination Product: Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon; Procedure: Conventional angioplasty
Conventional angioplasty + placebo balloonPlacebo comparatorTreatment of stenosis of AVF by conventional angioplasty + 1 minute additional angioplasty with placebo balloon.
Receives: Combination Product: Additional angioplasty with placebo balloon; Procedure: Conventional angioplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulated incidence of loss of primary patency of AVF

    Double-blind comparison of cumulated incidence of primary patency at 6 months after treatment of stenosis of AVF by conventional angioplasty + additional angioplasty.

    Cumulated incidence of primary patency loss of AVF at 6 months post procedure.

    Measured: At 6 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Cumulated incidence of primary patency loss of the target lesion

    Comparison between arms of cumulated incidence of primary patency loss of treated lesion at 3 and 12 months after treatment of stenosis.

    By cumulated incidence with no need for target lesion revascularization.

    Measured: At 3 months and 12 months

  2. Cumulated incidence of restenosis > 50% at the site of angioplasty

    Comparison between the arms of cumulated incidence of restenosis > 50% at the site of angioplasty of treated lesion of AVF, by cumulated incidence with at least one restenosis at angioplasty site at 3, 6 and 12 months.

    Measured: At 3, 6 and 12 months

  3. Cumulated incidence of deteriorating flow rate

    Cumulated incidence at 3, 6 and 12 months of deteriorating back to preoperative flow rate of AVF: defined by the difference of flow rate < 20% between preoperative measurement and follow-up measurement.

    Incidence of back to preoperative flow rate will be cumulated.

    Measured: At 3, 6 and 12 months

  4. Cumulated incidence of patients with a flow rate < 500 ml / min

    Comparison between the arms of cumulated incidence with a flow rate < 500 ml/min after treatments of stenosis.

    Measured: At 3, 6 and 12 months

  5. Cumulative rate of thrombosis

    Comparison between the arms at 3, 6 and 12 months cumulative rate of thrombosis, by the proportion of thrombosis of AVF, number of restenosis and number of thrombosis.

    Measured: At 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Time period before event's appearance

    Comparison between the arms time periods before the events' appearance: restenosis at the same site, stenosis at another site, thrombosis of AVF, death.

    Measured: At 12 months

  7. Cumulated incidence of adverse event (AE)

    Comparison between the arms post procedure AE, by cumulated incidences of AE in 12 months post procedure.

    Measured: At 12 months

  8. Medical costs

    Comparison between the arms at 3, 6 and 12 months the costs of treatments of AVF, by direct medical care, initial treatments, monitoring, diagnosis and treatment of complications.

    Measured: At 3, 6 and 12 months

  9. Cumulative incidence of cardiovascular serious adverse event (SAE)

    Comparison between the arms at 12 months the cumulative incidence of cardiovascular SAE.

    Measured: At 12 months

  10. Cumulative incidence of death

    Comparison between the arms at 12 months the cumulative incidence of death.

    Measured: At 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completionFeb 2022
  4. Study completionMar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
145 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02753998
Sponsor's protocol ID
P150908
Acronym
ABISS
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
25 Apr 2016
Last updated
22 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Coscas R, Grimaldi L, Mercier L, Picard E, Ferrario A, Touma J, Mallios A, Sznajder M, Nkam L, Massy ZA; ABISS Investigators. A Randomised Trial of Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis with Blinded Re-intervention Criteria. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2026 Jun 30:S1078-5884(26)00629-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2026.06.048. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42379345

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Additional angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloon and Conventional angioplasty in people with Angioplasty and Stenosis of Arteriovenous Fistula, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulated incidence of loss of primary patency of AVF (time frame: At 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02753998, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in