AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesSONICSNCT02760654

Self-Guided Online Cognitive Behavioral Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

A study testing Proactive Self Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment in people with Peripheral Nervous System Diseases and Pain Management, run by University of Michigan at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this pilot randomized wait-list controlled trial is to test the efficacy of an online cognitive behavioral pain management website called Proactive Self-Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment (PROPSECT) to reduce worst pain intensity for individuals with chronic painful chemotherapy-induced… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 years and older
What is being tested?
Proactive Self Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2016to Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • over 25 years of age
  • self-report 4/10 worst CIPN pain that has persisted three months or longer after the cessation of their neurotoxic chemotherapy regimen
  • have at least grade one sensory CIPN as defined by their oncology provider using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
  • have a stable analgesic medication regimen as evidenced by a less than 10% increase or decrease in their analgesic medication dosage in the two weeks leading up to their enrollment in the study
  • have internet access
  • self-report the ability to use a computer
  • signed informed consent
  • willingness to participate in all study activities.

Who cannot join

  • prognosis of less than three months
  • documented peripheral neuropathy due to other causes (diabetes, alcohol abuse, Central Nervous System malignancy, vitamin B deficiency, hereditary, nerve compression injury)
  • neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment regimens are planned to occur while enrolled in the study
  • have participated in cognitive behavioral pain management in the past or plan to enroll in cognitive behavioral pain management during the course of the intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • St. Joseph Mercy Canton

    Canton, Michigan, 48188

  • St. Joseph Mercy Chelsea

    Chelsea, Michigan, 48118

  • St. Joseph Mercy Livingston

    Howell, Michigan, 48843

  • St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor

    Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48104

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this pilot randomized wait-list controlled trial is to test the efficacy of an online cognitive behavioral pain management website called Proactive Self-Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment (PROPSECT) to reduce worst pain intensity for individuals with chronic painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and to explore the mediating effect of PROSPECT-induced changes in anxiety, fatigue, depression, and sleep disturbance on worst pain intensity. Another aim of this study is to determine whether PROSPECT will decrease CIPN symptom severity (e.g. non-painful numbness and tingling), average pain severity, and physical impairment. Lastly, since this intervention has never been tested in individuals with painful CIPN, the investigators will assess patients' perceptions of acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention.

Being tested
Proactive Self Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proactive Self Management Program for Effects of Cancer TreatmentDevice

Study groups in NCT02760654
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Online Self ManagementExperimentalParticipants will interact with an online self management program based on cognitive behavioral principles for 8 weeks as much as they want.
Receives: Device: Proactive Self Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment
ControlNo interventionTreatment as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in 0 - 10 Numerical Rating Scale of Worst Pain Intensity Scores at 8 Weeks

    Pain is measured on the numerical rating scale of 0 - 10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in PROMIS Short Form Emotional Distress - Depression 4a Scores at 8 Weeks

    The PROMIS short form emotional distress depression 4a Scores are measured on a scale whose lowest possible score is 41.0 and highest is 79.4 where 41 is no emotional distress and 79.4 is extreme distress.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

  2. PROMIS Short Form Anxiety 4a

    The PROMIS Short Form Anxiety 4a is scored on a scale of 40.3 - 81.6, with a score of 40.3 meaning no anxiety and a score of 81.6 meaning high anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

  3. Change in PROMIS Short Form Fatigue 4a Scores at 8 Weeks

    The PROMIS Short Form Fatigue 4a is scored on a scale of 33.7 to 75.8, with a score of 33.7 meaning no fatigue and a score of 75.8 meaning high fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

  4. Change in PROMIS Short Form Sleep-Related Impairment 8a Scores at 8 Weeks

    The PROMIS Short Form Sleep-Related Impairment 8a is scored on a scale of 30.0 to 80.1 with a score of 30.0 meaning no sleep-related impairment and a score of 80.1 meaning a high degree of impairment in daily activities due to poor sleep.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change

    The Patient Global Impression of Change is scored on a scale of 1 - 7, with a score of 1 representing that the patient was very much worse following the trial, and a score of 7 representing that the patient was very much improved following the course of the trial.

    Measured: 8 week

  6. Change in 0 - 10 Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale Scores at 8 Weeks

    The 0 - 10 Average Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale was scored on a scale of 0 - 10, with a score of 0 meaning no pain, and a score of 10 meaning worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

  7. Adapted Acceptability E-Scale

    The Adapted Acceptability E- Scale contains 7 items that are scored on a 1 - 5 scale, with a score of 1 representing low ratings of acceptability and satisfaction with the online self management program, and a score of 5 representing high ratings of acceptability and satisfaction with the online self management program. This measure was only administered to individuals participating in the online self management program.

    Measured: 8 week

  8. Change in European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale Scores at 8 Weeks

    The European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy contains three subscales: Sensory, Motor, and Autonomic. Each subscale is scored on a scale of 0 - 100, with a score of 0 representing no neuropathy symptoms and functional impairment due to neuropathy, and a score of 100 represents severe neuropathy symptoms and functional impairment due to neuropathy. Only the Sensory and Motor subscales were used in this current study.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

  9. Change in PROMIS Pain Interference 4a Scores at 8 Weeks

    The PROMIS Pain Interference 4a is scored on a scale of 41.6 to 75.6, with a score of 41.6 meaning little or no interference with daily activities due to pain severity, and a score of 75.6 meaning a high degree of interference with daily activities due to pain severity.

    Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02760654
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00104185
Acronym
SONICS
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
28 Apr 2016
Last updated
13 Nov 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Proactive Self Management Program for Effects of Cancer Treatment in people with Peripheral Nervous System Diseases and Pain Management, run by University of Michigan at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in 0 - 10 Numerical Rating Scale of Worst Pain Intensity Scores at 8 Weeks (time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in