AzTrials
AzTrials

Fluid ShiftsPOINCARENCT02765009

Effects of Fluid Balance Control in Critically Ill Patients

A study testing diuretics, albumin and fluid restriction in people with Fluid Shifts and Critical Care, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 11 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Most ICU patients develop a positive fluid balance, mainly during the two first weeks of their stay. The causes are multifactorial: a reduced urine output subsequent to shock state, positive pressure mechanical ventilation, acute renal failure, post-operative period of major surgical procedures, and simultaneous fluid… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Fluid Shifts, Critical Care
What is being tested?
diuretics, albumin and fluid restriction
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,411 participants
Where
11 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Jun 2016to 25 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients under mechanical ventilation, admitted for > 48h and <72h and no discharge planned for the next 24h

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Failure to weigh the patient
  • Multiple trauma
  • Transfer from another ICU with a previous stay > 24h
  • High probability of withdrawing treatment for ethical purposes within 7 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient refusal

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

France11 sites
  • Hopital Nord Franche-Comté

    Belfort, 90000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

    Dijon, 21000

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

    Lyon, 69000

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional

    Metz, 57000

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire

    Nancy, 54000

  • Groupe Hospitalier Saint Joseph

    Paris, 75000

  • Centre Hospitalier intercommunal

    Poissy, 78303

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • CentreHospitalier Régional et universitaire

    Strasbourg, 67000

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional

    Thionville, 57000

  • Centre Hospitalier

    Verdun, 55100

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Effects of Fluid Balance Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Study

Most ICU patients develop a positive fluid balance, mainly during the two first weeks of their stay. The causes are multifactorial: a reduced urine output subsequent to shock state, positive pressure mechanical ventilation, acute renal failure, post-operative period of major surgical procedures, and simultaneous fluid loading to maintain volemia and acceptable arterial pressure. Additionally, the efficacy of fluid loading is frequently suboptimal, in relation to severe hypoalbuminemia and inflammatory capillary leakage. This results usually in a cumulated positive fluid balance of more than 10 litres at the end of the first week of stay. A high number of studies have showed that such a positive fluid balance was an independent factor of worse prognosis in selected populations of ICU patients: acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, post-operative of high risk surgery. However, little is known about the putative causal role of positive fluid balance by itself on outcome. However, in two randomized controlled studies in patients with ARDS, a strategy of fluid balance control has been demonstrated to reduce time under mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay with no noticeable adverse effects. Although avoiding fluid overload is now recommended in ARDS management, there is no evidence that this approach would be beneficial in a more general population of ICU patients (i.e. with sepsis, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation). In addition, fluid restriction -mainly if applied early could be deleterious in reducing both tissue oxygen delivery and perfusion pressure. There is a place for a prospective study comparing a "conventional" attitude based on liberal fluid management throughout the ICU stay with a restrictive approach aiming at controlling fluid balance, at least as soon as the patient circulatory status is stabilized. The latter approach would use a simple algorithm using fluid restriction and diuretics based on daily weighing, a common procedure in the ICU, probably more reliable than cumulative measurement of fluid movements in patients whose limits have been underlined.

Being tested
diuretics, albumin, fluid restriction, renal replacement
Keywords
Fluid overload, Multiple organ failure, Diuretics, Fluid restriction, Body weight
Medical subject headings
Edema, Multiple Organ Failure, Body Weight

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • diureticsDrug

    Also called hydrochlorothiazide, bumetanide, furosemide

    Used to reduce fluid overload as evidenced by weight gain

  • albuminDrug

    Used to reduce fluid overload in addition with diuretics in hypoalbuminemic patients

  • fluid restrictionOther

    Used to reduce fluid overload

  • renal replacementDevice

    Also called ultrafiltration

    Used to reduce fluid overload in patients with renal replacement

Study groups in NCT02765009
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionUsual care provided according to the ward policy. Patients have to be weighed at least on admission (day 0), day 7 and day 14.
StrategyExperimentalPatients have to be weighed every day. Use of an algorithm based on weight changes from day 2 to day 14 in order to reduce weight gain (fluid overload) using diuretics, fluid restriction,albumin, and ultrafiltration (the latter when ongoing renal replacement)
Receives: Drug: diuretics; Drug: albumin; Other: fluid restriction; Device: renal replacement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All-cause mortality at 60 days after inclusion

    Vital status collected 60 days after admission; if the patient was dead at the time of assessment, date of death was collected

    Measured: 60 days

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Fluid balance control at day 7

    Mean differences of patient body weight between Day 7 and admission (Day 0)

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Fluid balance control at day 14

    Mean differences of patient body weight between Day 14 and admission (Day 0)

    Measured: 14 days

  3. All-cause mortality at 28-day after inclusion

    Vital status collected 28 days after admission

    Measured: 28 days

  4. All-cause in-hospital mortality

    Death during the hospital stay where the patient was included in the study

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks

  5. All-cause mortality at 365 days after inclusion

    Vital status collected one year after admission

    Measured: 365 days

  6. Survival time period at Day 60

    Time-related mortality, calculated from admission to the date of death

    Measured: 60 days

  7. Survival time period at Day 365

    Time-related mortality, calculated from admission to the date of death

    Measured: 365 days

  8. Global end-organ damage assessment

    Time-related changes of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA score): SOFA is a score of organ failure with 6 subscales on organ dysfunction: respiratory, neurological, cardiovascular,hepatic,renal and coagulation. Each ranges from 0 to 4 and the total SOFA score is the sum of each subscale ; increasing severity from 0 (normal) to 24(moribund). Values of SOFA score are tightly correlated with mortality.

    Measured: 28 days

  9. Dependence on vasopressor drugs

    Cumulated number of vasopressor-free days alive from day 0 to day 28

    Measured: 28 days

  10. Dependence on mechanical ventilation

    Cumulated number of ventilator-free days alive from day 0 to day 28

    Measured: 28 days

  11. Dependence on renal replacement therapy

    Cumulated number of renal replacement-free days alive from day 0 to day 60

    Measured: 60 days

  12. Cumulated number of pre-defined adverse events

    Pre-defined adverse events include Systolic arterial pressure< 90 mm Hg, kalemia < 2,8 ,mmol/L, natremia >155 mmol/L, "injury" level of renal dysfunction (RIFLE scale), acute ischemic events (myocardial infarction, mesenteric ischemia)

    Measured: 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion25 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,411 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02765009
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-A00662-47
Acronym
POINCARE
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
29 Apr 2016
Last updated
22 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Agrinier N, Monnier A, Argaud L, Bemer M, Virion JM, Alleyrat C, Charpentier C, Ziegler L, Louis G, Bruel C, Jamme M, Quenot JP, Badie J, Schneider F, Bollaert PE. Effect of fluid balance control in critically ill patients: Design of the stepped wedge trial POINCARE-2. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

    PubMed 31260794
  • Buzzi M, Ricci L, Gibot S, Argaud L, Badie J, Bruel C, Charpentier C, Outin H, Louis G, Monnier A, Quenot JP, Schneider F, Minary L, Agrinier N. Implementation of a fluid balance control strategy in critically ill patients: POINCARE-2 trial process evaluation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02288-1.

    PubMed 39048932
  • Mansouri A, Buzzi M, Gibot S, Charpentier C, Schneider F, Louis G, Outin H, Monnier A, Quenot JP, Badie J, Argaud L, Bruel C, Soudant M, Agrinier N; the POINCARE-2 group. Fluid balance control in critically ill patients: results from as-treated analyses of POINCARE-2 randomized trial. Crit Care. 2023 Nov 6;27(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04701-5.

    PubMed 37932787
  • Bollaert PE, Monnier A, Schneider F, Argaud L, Badie J, Charpentier C, Meziani F, Bemer M, Quenot JP, Buzzi M, Outin H, Bruel C, Ziegler L, Gibot S, Virion JM, Alleyrat C, Louis G, Agrinier N. Fluid balance control in critically ill patients: results from POINCARE-2 stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial. Crit Care. 2023 Feb 21;27(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04357-1.

    PubMed 36810101

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing diuretics, albumin and fluid restriction in people with Fluid Shifts and Critical Care, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 11 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All-cause mortality at 60 days after inclusion (time frame: 60 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02765009, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in