AzTrials
AzTrials

Mesenchymal TumorPhase 2NCT02766842

Evaluation of a New EUS Guided Biopsy Needle (SharkCore) Comparing to Standard EUS Needle (ProCore)

A Phase 2 study testing EUS-FNB with ProCore needle, EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle and ProCore needle in people with Mesenchymal Tumor and Autoimmune Pancreatitis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Diagnosis of lesions of pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, such as lymph nodes, is still showing advancements especially with the increased use of endoscopic ultrasound. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
What is being tested?
EUS-FNB with ProCore needle, EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle and ProCore needle
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2016to Feb 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age referred for EUS
  • Lesions requiring histologic diagnosis:
  • Mesenchymal tumors
  • Autoimmune pancreatitis
  • Granulomatous disease
  • Indeterminate hepatitis
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Confirmatory immunochemistry to establish a diagnosis (i.e. pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor)
  • Lymphoma
  • Solid tumors
  • Previously non-diagnostic FNA

Who cannot join

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
  • Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet < 50,000)
  • Uncooperative patients
  • Pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing, which is routine for all endoscopic procedures)
  • Refusal to consent form
  • Cystic lesions
  • Inaccessible lesions to EUS (proximal to sigmoid colon or distal to second duodenum)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a New EUS Guided Biopsy Needle (SharkCore) Comparing to Standard EUS Needle (ProCore): A Prospective Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Study

Diagnosis of lesions of pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, such as lymph nodes, is still showing advancements especially with the increased use of endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have become mainstay diagnostic techniques for these lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare between the currently used, ProCore needles and the new biopsy needle, SharkCore, for the histological diagnosis and evaluation of lesions.

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) have become mainstay diagnostic techniques for the diagnosis and evaluation of lesions of the pancreas, the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as adjacent structures, including lymph nodes. Cytology specimens provided from FNA cannot fully characterize certain neoplasms such as lymphomas or mesenchymal tumors. Core biopsy specimens for histological examinations are needed to provide accurate diagnoses.

ProCore needles (ProCore, Wilson-Cook Medical Inc. Winston-Salem, NC) were designed to obtain histological and cytological samples. Studies comparing ProCore needles with standard FNA needles showed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy, histological core tissue procurement or mean number of passes.

To overcome the above mentioned limitations (mainly suboptimal core tissue procurement rates), a new novel SharkCore needle (Beacon Endoscopic, Newton, MA, USA) has been designed and approved for clinical human use by the FDA.

The objective of the study is to compare the new EUS guided histology biopsy needle SharkCore to the currently used EUS histology needle, ProCore, for the histological diagnosis and evaluation of lesions.

Being tested
EUS-FNB with ProCore needle, EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle, ProCore needle, SharkCore needle
Keywords
SharkCore, ProCore
Medical subject headings
Autoimmune Pancreatitis, Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EUS-FNB with ProCore needleProcedure or surgery

    The use of the standard ProCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

  • EUS-FNB with SharkCore needleProcedure or surgery

    The use of new SharkCore needle to acquire diagnostic tissue

  • ProCore needleDevice

    This is the standard needle used currently to procure tissue from lesions under endoscopic ultrasound guidance

  • SharkCore needleDevice

    This is the new FDA approved needle for tissue procurement under endoscopic ultrasound guidance.

Study groups in NCT02766842
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EUS-FNB with ProCore needleActive comparatorGeneral anesthesia or conscious sedation will be started and an upper endoscopic ultrasound will be inserted into the participants mouth and advanced to the site of the lesion. The lesion will be punctured by the ProCore needle, then the stylet is completely removed, and negative suction pressure is applied using a 10 ml syringe for 30 seconds while the needle is stationary with the target. Then, the needle is moved back and forth several times within the target, utilizing the fanning technique. Finally, suction is released by closing the lock of the syringe and the needle is removed.
Receives: Procedure: EUS-FNB with ProCore needle; Device: ProCore needle
EUS-FNB with SharkCore needleActive comparatorThe procedure will be done in the same manner with same endoscopic technique and method of tissue procurement. The only difference will be using the SharkCore needle to acquire tissue.
Receives: Procedure: EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle; Device: SharkCore needle

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of needle as assessed by diagnostic yield of needle and final diagnosis method

    The final diagnosis of tissue from needle will be compared to the final diagnosis reached either by surgical removal of mass or other method of biopsy

    Measured: Up to 1 month

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of passes to procure core tissue from needle

    The number of passes needed to acquire core tissue as assessed by the pathologist in the room.

    Measured: During procedure

  2. Safety of tissue procurement by needle

    All complications related to needle used will be recorded with a preset questionnaire to measure the frequency of complications related to needle used.

    Measured: Up to 1 year

  3. Procedure time

    Time required to acquire tissue using each needle will be recorded from time of needle insertion to time of core tissue procurement as per pathologist.

    Measured: During procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionFeb 2017

Why it stopped: The reason was the fact that the ProCore needle was removed from clinical use

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02766842
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00095614
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
6 May 2016
Last updated
15 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing EUS-FNB with ProCore needle, EUS-FNB with SharkCore needle and ProCore needle in people with Mesenchymal Tumor and Autoimmune Pancreatitis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of needle as assessed by diagnostic yield of needle and final diagnosis method (time frame: Up to 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in