AzTrials
AzTrials

Multimodal InterventionPowerA-01NCT02772952

Effectiveness of a Multi-component Physical Training in Hyper-fragile Elders: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A study testing Multimodal Intervention in people with Multimodal Intervention and Fragility, run by University of Malaga at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective: To compare short-term and medium-term effectiveness of a multimodal program that integrates a program of therapeutic exercise, medication review, adequacy of diet and health education, compared with standard medical practice in improving neuromuscular and physiological status on frail elderly. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Multimodal Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Nov 2017to 1 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • People 65 years older than after screening of fragility as the test battery Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), can perform the therapeutic exercise program

Who cannot join

  • Presence in the medical history of neuromuscular , metabolic, hormonal and / or cardiovascular disorders.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Antonio Cuesta-Vargas

    Málaga, 29010

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of a Multi-componentphysical Training Integrated Into a Multimodal Program Based on the Evidence in Hiper-fragile Elders: A Randomized Clinical Trial STUDY POWER_AGING

Objective: To compare short-term and medium-term effectiveness of a multimodal program that integrates a program of therapeutic exercise, medication review, adequacy of diet and health education, compared with standard medical practice in improving neuromuscular and physiological status on frail elderly. Another aim is to analyze the maintenance of these effects by monitoring long-term (12 months) from the start of the intervention.

Design: Randomized controlled trial Scope / Study subjects: recruited frail elderly in Basic Health Zone of Malaga. Methods: The subjects to be included in the study (after meeting inclusion / exclusion) will be randomized into two groups: a control group whose intervention will be to review medication + adequacy of diet + health education (physical activity recommendation (within a comprehensive advice on healthy lifestyles) and an experimental group whose intervention will be a Multimodal Intervention: therapeutic exercise + review medication + adequacy of diet + health education program.

Read more

Sociodemographic, Clinical and monitoring Variables will be collected at baseline. Moreover, tracking variables will be collected at 2 and 6 months after starting the intervention and at 3 and 6 months after the end of the intervention (monitoring).

The monitoring variables that will be measured are: BMI , general health, fatigue, brittleness, Motor Control, Attention - Concentration - Memory, Motor Memory , spatial orientation, grip strength, balance (static - semi-static and dynamic ), gait speed and metabolomic variables.

One descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic variables of the participants will be performed. Further the change on the variables intra-subjects (pre-post intervention) and inter-subjects (experimental group vs control group) will be calculated. For the intra-subject analysis will be performed a ANOVA-one factor analysis. The intersubject outcome variables will be compared between the two groups in each moments of data collection, using the student t-test or Wilconxon (depending of the sample distribution). The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Being tested
Control Intervention, Multimodal Intervention
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Control InterventionOther

    Control Intervention: review medication + adequacy of diet + health education (physical activity recommendation (within a comprehensive advice on healthy lifestyles)

  • Multimodal InterventionOther

    Multimodal Intervention: therapeutic exercise + review medication + adequacy of diet + health education program

Study groups in NCT02772952
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupOthera control group whose intervention will be to review medication + adequacy of diet + health education (physical activity recommendation (within a comprehensive advice on healthy lifestyles)
Receives: Other: Control Intervention
Experimental GroupExperimentalExperimental group whose intervention will be a Multimodal Intervention: therapeutic exercise + review medication + adequacy of diet + health education program.
Receives: Other: Multimodal Intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Body mass index

    The measurements will be taken following the anthropometric parameter guidelines of The International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) (Ross et al., 1978).

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  2. Health Related Quality of Life SF-12

    General health condition was measured using the SF-12 short form questionnaire, adapted from the extended SF-36 version. Both physical and mental components are evaluated. The higher the score the better the condition. SF-12 reliability has proven a high internal consistency demonstrating an approximate ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) of 0.9. (Vigalut et al., 2008).

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  3. Fatigue State POMS (Profile of Mood States)

    The Spanish version of POMS published by Andrade et al. (2010) was used, with 44 items that represented six conceptual dimensions: anger (11 items), fatigue (6 items), vigour (5 items), friendship (6 items), stress (7 items) and depressed state (9 items). As usual, the answer format consisted of a 5 ordered category response, assigned with values 0 (nothing) to 4 (a lot). All the items were put forward in the same trend except for the item 29-relaxed (corresponding to the state of stress) scores, that were inverted after the test.

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  4. Frailty Questionnaire

    The auto-administrated survey based in 10 dichotomous questions in order to detect elder frail people will be carried out (Di Bari et al.2014).

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  5. MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) - MEC-30 (Mini Cognitive Examination

    The MEC consists of 30 items grouped into 11 sections (Fig. 1), the clinician could carry out in 5-15 min based on the following indications; note that those responsible for carrying out this instrument, both in its original version (Folstein) and its Spanish adaptation (Lobo et al, 2002), warn that the professional should stick to these criteria as far as possible, ensuring maximum objectivity in registering the subject's responses. The eleven sections are: Orientation to time, Orientation to space, Registration, Attention and Calculation, Memory, Nomination, Repetition (Recall), Comprehension, Reading, Writing and Drawing.

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  6. Motor memory test

    Motor skill memory and body awareness will be measured directing a test that consists of performing ten static positions. The examiner executes 10 positions holding each one of them for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the patient imitates the position in the opposite way, analogous to a mirror. The test ends when the 10 positions have been carried out. This test is included in the "Memory in movement" program, used as a cognitive intervention tool (Rey Cao, Canales Lacruz, Táboas País, \& Cancela Carra, 2008).

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  7. Spatial orientation test

    The SODT-R (Spatial Orientation Dynamic Test-Revised, SODT-R, Colom, Contreras, Shih and Santacreu, 2003) task is to direct two moving objects to a given destination. There are two buttons for each of the moving objects in order to control their course, as shown in Figure 1. Pressing the buttons changes the object's course in one direction, reducing or increasing the angular discrepancy between the current course compared to the ideal course that would stand for 0 deviation.

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  8. Grip strength test

    Hand grip strength test will examine the peak of strength and fatigue resistance. The test is performed with the participant in a sitting position and 90 degree elbow flexion, neutral pronosupination and flexion, extension or inclination of the wrist will not be allowed. The patient will be asked to hand grip, which will be evaluated with a hydraulic dynamometer JAMAR (Bellace, Healy, Besser, Byron, \& Hohman, 2000).

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

  9. Balance (static - semi-static and dynamic) test

    Expanded TUG is a test to assess mobility, balance and risk of falls in the elderly. (Podsiadlo and Richardson, 2015). The test consists of timing how long the seated patient takes to get up, walk ten metres, return and sit back again on the chair.

    Measured: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02772952
Sponsor's protocol ID
Power-Aging-01
Acronym
PowerA-01
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
2 Dec 2015
Last updated
4 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Del Mar Rodriguez Gonzalez M, Caro ED, Nunez GO, Galan-Mercant A, Belmonte JJB. Effectiveness of a muticomponent workout program integrated in an evidence based multimodal program in hyperfrail elderly patients: POWERAGING randomized clinical trial protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1188-x.

    PubMed 31226936

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Multimodal Intervention in people with Multimodal Intervention and Fragility, run by University of Malaga at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Body mass index (time frame: Baseline - 6 months after the end of the intervention). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02772952, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in