Colorectal SurgeryPhase 4NCT02773173
Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Standard Therapy (IPPCollapse-II)
A Phase 4 study testing IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery and SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery in people with Colorectal Surgery and Laparoscopy, run by Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the post-operative recovery quality of the Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure Therapy in Colorectal laparoscopic surgery versus standard therapy using a quality validated scale of postoperative recovery of their stay in the Post-Anaesthesia Recovery Unit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Surgery, Laparoscopy
- What is being tested?
- IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery and SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 204 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2017to 19 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients older than 18 years
- Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA I-III)
- No cognitive deficits
- Signed informed consent prior to surgery
Who cannot join
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Immune disorders
- Kidney or liver disease or advanced-stage cardiopulmonary
- Patient refusal to participate in the study
- Patients under 18 years or inability to consent
- Associated neuromuscular disorders, contraindication for the use of rocuronium/ sugammadex, allergy or hypersensitivity to rocuronium / sugammadex
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Standard Therapy (IPPCollapse II)
The purpose of this study is to assess the post-operative recovery quality of the Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure Therapy in Colorectal laparoscopic surgery versus standard therapy using a quality validated scale of postoperative recovery of their stay in the Post-Anaesthesia Recovery Unit.
Read the detailed description
In the last two decades laparoscopic surgery has settled as a less invasive surgical approach compared to open surgery. It is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and hospital stay. There is growing evidence that increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), even for short periods of time, is associated with increased perioperative morbidity (pain, increased inflammatory markers peritoneal injury worse splanchnic perfusion abnormalities hemodynamic and ventilatory ...).
The study is a prospective multicenter randomized clinical intervention trial to assess the impact of IAP individualization strategy (IPP-Individualized pneumoperitoneum Pressure) relative to a IAP standard strategy (SPP-Standard pneumoperitoneum Pressure) using a validated scale (VAS) (PQRS- Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale). Postoperative pain in the first 24 hours (area under VAS curve , opioid rescue, referred pain to the shoulder) and surgical stress and inflammatory markers (neutrophil/lymphocyte, ratio,C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, procalcitonin) are also measured. Postoperative complications are evaluated by Clavier-Dindo classification.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Surgery, Laparoscopy
- Being tested
- IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery, SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery
- Keywords
- Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgeryProcedure or surgery
Deep neuromuscular blockade can only be reversed with sugammadex, so in the IPP group, it will be used as neuromuscular blocking agent and its effect will be reversed with sugammadex (4mg / kg) at the end of the surgery. During surgery: deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 1-5), Protective ventilation strategy, Optimal position and Pre stretching as a tool to decrease intraabdominal pressure maintaining optimal workspace.
SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgeryProcedure or surgery
A depolarizing neuromuscular blocking will be used (as routine clinical practice at each center) to maintain moderate neuromuscular blockade and its effect will be reversed with anticholinesterase at the end of the surgery. During surgery: Moderate neuromuscular blockade ( TOF 2-4) , position to surgeon criteria, no prestretching and Protective ventilation. Fixed IAP (12mmHg).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure | Experimental | In Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure (IPP) group, measures to optimize and individualize intra-abdominal pressure (PIA) will be apply. Receives: Procedure: IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery |
| Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure | Other | In Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure (SPP) group, a conventional operation without optimization measures and PIA preset to 12 mmHg will be conducted. Receives: Procedure: SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) Physiologic Domain
The primary outcome of the IPPCollapse II study is the recovery of the Physiologic' component of the PQRS score over the assessed time points. The PQRS is a validated multidimensional patient Reported Outcome (PRO) tool designed to assess patients' recovery to baseline status in the postoperative period (www.postopqrs.com). In every patient a baseline measurement of PQRS is performed prior to surgery. After surgery, the measurement of the PQRS is repeated at 15 min (T15) and at 40 min (T40) after arrival in the PACU, as well as in the ward on the morning of postoperative day ( POD) one and three. Physiologic domain includes 9 variables scored from 1-3, 9 is the minimum and worse recover and 27 is the maximum and full recover. But recovery is related to baseline. Each patient is scored at the predefined time points and is classified as either 'recovered' if the score reaches at least the predetermined baseline score or 'not recovered' .
Measured: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.
Secondary outcomes (8)
Chnge Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)
The PQRS domains, 'nociceptive', 'emotional', 'cognitive', and 'functional' components, as well as the 'overall score' are used as secondary outcomes. In every patient a baseline measurement of PQRS is performed prior to surgery. After surgery, the measurement of the PQRS is repeated at 15 min (T15) and at 40 min (T40) after arrival in the PACU, as well as in the ward on the morning of postoperative day ( POD) one and three. Nociceptive and emotional domains are scored from 1-5 ( from worse to better) and include 4 variables. Functional domain is scored from 1-3 ( From worse to better) and include 4 variables, and cognitive is depicted as recover or not versus baseline score.
Measured: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.
Daily postoperative complications until hospital discharge (Clavien-Dindo)
Postoperative complications clavien dindo classification
Measured: Up to postoperative day 28
Basic features of airway pressures (plateauP, peakP, pulmonary Compliance)
Airway pressures in cmH2O
Measured: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Intraabdominal pressure
Intraabdominal pressures in mm Hg
Measured: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Intraabdominal volume
Intraabdominal pressures in ml
Measured: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Spontaneous / coughing movements .
yes or no
Measured: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Substudy- Hepatic perfusion during pneumoperitoneum.Plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green (PDRICG)
Plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green
Measured: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Change in Surgical stress and inflammatory markers
(neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein,interleukin-6 and procalcitonin).
Measured: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study start25 Jan 2017
- Primary completion19 Nov 2018
- Study completion19 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- neuromuscular blocking agents as type of drug
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Óscar Díaz, Principal investigator, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02773173
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IPPCollapse-II
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 2 May 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Diaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Flor Lorente B, Garcia Gregorio N, Robles-Hernandez D, Olmedilla Arnal LE, Martin de Pablos A, Schultz MJ, Errando CL, Argente Navarro MP; IPPColLapSe II study investigators. Effect of an individualized versus standard pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy on postoperative recovery: a randomized clinical trial in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):1605-1614. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11736. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PubMed 32506481Diaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Errando CL, Schultz MJ, Flor Lorente B, Garcia-Gregorio N, Vila Montanes M, Robles-Hernandez D, Olmedilla Arnal LE, Martin-De-Pablos A, Marques Mari A, Argente Navarro MP; IPPCollapse-II study group. An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study. Trials. 2019 Apr 3;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3255-1.
PubMed 30944044
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure in Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Standard Therapy (IPPCollapse II)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02773173
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IPPCollapse-II
- Conditions
- Colorectal Surgery, Laparoscopy
- Keywords
- Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La FeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the post-operative recovery quality of the Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure Therapy in Colorectal laparoscopic surgery versus standard therapy using a quality validated scale of postoperative recovery of their stay in the Post-Anaesthesia Recovery Unit.
Detailed description
In the last two decades laparoscopic surgery has settled as a less invasive surgical approach compared to open surgery. It is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and hospital stay. There is growing evidence that increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), even for short periods of time, is associated with increased perioperative morbidity (pain, increased inflammatory markers peritoneal injury worse splanchnic perfusion abnormalities hemodynamic and ventilatory ...).
The study is a prospective multicenter randomized clinical intervention trial to assess the impact of IAP individualization strategy (IPP-Individualized pneumoperitoneum Pressure) relative to a IAP standard strategy (SPP-Standard pneumoperitoneum Pressure) using a validated scale (VAS) (PQRS- Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale). Postoperative pain in the first 24 hours (area under VAS curve , opioid rescue, referred pain to the shoulder) and surgical stress and inflammatory markers (neutrophil/lymphocyte, ratio,C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, procalcitonin) are also measured. Postoperative complications are evaluated by Clavier-Dindo classification.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- neuromuscular blocking agents as type of drug
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure | Experimental | Procedure: IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgeryIn Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure (IPP) group, measures to optimize and individualize intra-abdominal pressure (PIA) will be apply. |
| Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure | Other | Procedure: SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgeryIn Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure (SPP) group, a conventional operation without optimization measures and PIA preset to 12 mmHg will be conducted. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients older than 18 years
- Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA I-III)
- No cognitive deficits
- Signed informed consent prior to surgery
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Immune disorders
- Kidney or liver disease or advanced-stage cardiopulmonary
- Patient refusal to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgeryDeep neuromuscular blockade can only be reversed with sugammadex, so in the IPP group, it will be used as neuromuscular blocking agent and its effect will be reversed with sugammadex (4mg / kg) at the end of the surgery. During surgery: deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 1-5), Protective ventilation strategy, Optimal position and Pre stretching as a tool to decrease intraabdominal pressure maintaining optimal workspace. | Procedure or surgery | Individualized Pneumoperitoneum Pressure |
| SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgeryA depolarizing neuromuscular blocking will be used (as routine clinical practice at each center) to maintain moderate neuromuscular blockade and its effect will be reversed with anticholinesterase at the end of the surgery. During surgery: Moderate neuromuscular blockade ( TOF 2-4) , position to surgeon criteria, no prestretching and Protective ventilation. Fixed IAP (12mmHg). | Procedure or surgery | Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure |
Primary outcome
Change in Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) Physiologic Domain
Time frame: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.
The primary outcome of the IPPCollapse II study is the recovery of the Physiologic' component of the PQRS score over the assessed time points. The PQRS is a validated multidimensional patient Reported Outcome (PRO) tool designed to assess patients' recovery to baseline status in the postoperative period (www.postopqrs.com). In every patient a baseline measurement of PQRS is performed prior to surgery. After surgery, the measurement of the PQRS is repeated at 15 min (T15) and at 40 min (T40) after arrival in the PACU, as well as in the ward on the morning of postoperative day ( POD) one and three. Physiologic domain includes 9 variables scored from 1-3, 9 is the minimum and worse recover and 27 is the maximum and full recover. But recovery is related to baseline. Each patient is scored at the predefined time points and is classified as either 'recovered' if the score reaches at least the predetermined baseline score or 'not recovered' .
8 secondary outcomes
Chnge Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)
Time frame: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.
Daily postoperative complications until hospital discharge (Clavien-Dindo)
Time frame: Up to postoperative day 28
Basic features of airway pressures (plateauP, peakP, pulmonary Compliance)
Time frame: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Intraabdominal pressure
Time frame: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Intraabdominal volume
Time frame: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Spontaneous / coughing movements .
Time frame: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Substudy- Hepatic perfusion during pneumoperitoneum.Plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green (PDRICG)
Time frame: Up to 300 minutes during surgical intervention
Change in Surgical stress and inflammatory markers
Time frame: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32506481Diaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Flor Lorente B, Garcia Gregorio N, Robles-Hernandez D, Olmedilla Arnal LE, Martin de Pablos A, Schultz MJ, Errando CL, Argente Navarro MP; IPPColLapSe II study investigators. Effect of an individualized versus standard pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy on postoperative recovery: a randomized clinical trial in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):1605-1614. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11736. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30944044Diaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Errando CL, Schultz MJ, Flor Lorente B, Garcia-Gregorio N, Vila Montanes M, Robles-Hernandez D, Olmedilla Arnal LE, Martin-De-Pablos A, Marques Mari A, Argente Navarro MP; IPPCollapse-II study group. An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study. Trials. 2019 Apr 3;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3255-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Tailored Nutrition vs. Exercise Prehabilitation Before Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruiting
Nurse-Led Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of Total Ablative Therapy to Usual Systemic Therapy Treatment for Limited Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, ERASur Trial
Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Óscar Díaz principal investigator
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing IPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery and SPP in colorectal laparoscopic surgery in people with Colorectal Surgery and Laparoscopy, run by Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) Physiologic Domain (time frame: Up to postoperative day 3. This is a longitudinal outcome.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02773173, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2020.