AzTrials
AzTrials

Therapeutic Procedural ComplicationNCT02792855

Comparing the "sniffing Position" , "Simple Head Extension" and "Neutral Position"

A study testing sniffing Position(place a 7-cm cushion under head ) and Simple Head Extension(without cushion) in people with Therapeutic Procedural Complication, run by The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The simple head extension is recommended for optimization of glottic visualization during awake orotracheal intubation whith fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) . However, no study to date has confirmed its superiority over "sniffing position" . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Therapeutic Procedural Complication
What is being tested?
sniffing Position(place a 7-cm cushion under head ) and Simple Head Extension(without cushion)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Jun 2017to 30 Aug 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • BMI greater than 30 kg/m2
  • ASA classifications of I-II, modified Mallampati classification of 3 or 4, requiring general anesthesia were included.

Who cannot join

  • ASA class IV or V
  • Abnormalities of the heart, brain, liver, lung, kidney and coagulation functions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • 中国

    Qinhuangdao, Hebei, 066000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Randomized Study Comparing the "sniffing Position" , "Simple Head Extension" and "Neutral Position" for Awake Orotracheal Intubation With Fiberoptic in Anticipate Difficult Airway Patients

The simple head extension is recommended for optimization of glottic visualization during awake orotracheal intubation whith fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) . However, no study to date has confirmed its superiority over "sniffing position" . In a prospective, randomized study, the authors compared the sniffing position , simple head extension and "Neutral Position" in awake orotracheal Intubation.

Read the detailed description

The study included seventy-five patients with anticipated difficult airways. The sniffing position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the head of the patient. The extension head position was obtained by by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the shoulder.

The head position was randomized as follows: neutral position group (NP group), sniffing position group (SP group) or extension position group (EP group) Randomization was performed by placing index cards with the letter NP or SP or EP into75 sealed envelopes , which were then placed in random order. At the time of a patient's enrollment, the next available envelope was placed with the patient's chart. At the time of intubation, the envelope was opened and the sequence was thus determined.

Being tested
sniffing Position(place a 7-cm cushion under head ), Simple Head Extension(without cushion)
Keywords
Sniffing Position, Simple Head Extension, neutral position

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • sniffing Position(place a 7-cm cushion under head )Device

    Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope(FOB) orotracheal under sniffing position.The sniffing position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the head of the patient. When the FOB was inserted into oral cavity, and the epiglottis and glottis were identified by the FOB. The anterior of FOB was inserted deep into tracheal after the glottis was exposed sufficiently then the tracheal tube was pushed into the trachea via the FOB

  • Simple Head Extension(without cushion)Device

    Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope(FOB) orotracheal under Head Extension position.The Head Extension position was obtained by simple head extension.When the FOB was inserted into oral cavity, and the epiglottis and glottis were identified by the FOB. The anterior of FOB was inserted deep into tracheal after the glottis was exposed sufficiently then the tracheal tube was pushed into the trachea via the FOB

Study groups in NCT02792855
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
sniffing PositionExperimentalAwake fiberoptic bronchoscope(FOB) orotracheal under sniffing position.The sniffing position was obtained by placement of a 7-cm cushion under the head of the patient. When the FOB was inserted into oral cavity, and the epiglottis and glottis were identified by the FOB. The anterior of FOB was inserted deep into tracheal after the glottis was exposed sufficiently then the tracheal tube was pushed into the trachea via the FOB
Receives: Device: sniffing Position(place a 7-cm cushion under head )
Simple Head ExtensionExperimentalAwake fiberoptic bronchoscope(FOB) orotracheal under Head Extension position.The Head Extension position was obtained by simple head extension.When the FOB was inserted into oral cavity, and the epiglottis and glottis were identified by the FOB. The anterior of FOB was inserted deep into tracheal after the glottis was exposed sufficiently then the tracheal tube was pushed into the trachea via the FOB
Receives: Device: Simple Head Extension(without cushion)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intubation Time

    The primary endpoints were the time to view the vocal cords (TVC) which was taken when the operator indicated verbally that he view the vocal cords and the time to successful tracheal intubation (TSI). TSI was defined as the time taken from insertion of the FOB between the teeth until the appearance of a capnograhy curve.

    Measured: Ten minutes

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Occurrence of throat pain measured by VAS

    Measured: one day Postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02792855
Sponsor's protocol ID
9958
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
31 May 2016
Last updated
11 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Liu Z, Zhao L, Ma Z, Liu M, Qi X, Jia Q, Liang S, Yang X. Effects of head positions on awake fiberoptic bronchoscope oral intubation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01397-4.

    PubMed 34162330

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing sniffing Position(place a 7-cm cushion under head ) and Simple Head Extension(without cushion) in people with Therapeutic Procedural Complication, run by The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intubation Time (time frame: Ten minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02792855, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in