AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingMIStNCT02813291

MI Practice and tDCS With Aging

A study testing tDCS in people with Aging and Motor Learning, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The mental repetition of movements - or motor imagery (MI) practice - facilitates motor learning. It allows avoiding fatigue that occurs during physical practice; this method is thus particularly interesting for elderly people. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aging, Motor Learning
What is being tested?
tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
26 Apr 2017to 22 Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being aged between 20 and 35 years for the young subjects / between 65 and 80 years for the elderly subjects
  • For elderly subjects: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24
  • Being a male or a female
  • Being right handed
  • Taking an effective method of contraception for the women of childbearing age
  • Having signed the consent form
  • Being registered with a social security scheme

Who cannot join

  • Presenting a neurologic, psychiatric or motor trouble
  • Practicing or having practiced at least 5 hours by week an activity involving a high manual dexterity (e.g. piano)
  • Showing any contraindication to tDCS:
  • History of epilepsy
  • head trauma with loss of consciousness
  • Implanted material (pacemaker, surgical clips, metal specks in the skull, etc.)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Past neurosurgical intervention
  • Open sore on the scalp
  • Consumption of more than three glasses of alcohol daily
  • Use of drugs
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital des Charpennes - 27, rue Gabriel Péri

    Villeurbanne, 69100

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Effects of Motor Imagery Practice Combined With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Learning of a Complex Motor Sequence in Young and Elderly Subjects

The mental repetition of movements - or motor imagery (MI) practice - facilitates motor learning. It allows avoiding fatigue that occurs during physical practice; this method is thus particularly interesting for elderly people. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive method of neurostimulation during which a low direct current is applied to the brain via electrodes placed on the scalp. This method has been successfully used to enhance motor learning in both young and elderly subjects.

The main aim of this study is to assess the impact of MI practice combined with tDCS on the learning of a complex finger sequence, in young and elderly subjects.

Read more

For that purpose, young and elderly healthy subjects will be randomly assigned to Stimulation and Sham groups. There will thus be a total of four groups: Young Stim, Young Sham, Elderly Stim, and Elderly Sham.

All subjects will participate to three training sessions spread over five days, and a retention test one week after the third training session.

During training they will mentally repeat a complex finger sequence with the left hand, for 13 min:

  • Subjects of the Stimulation groups (Young Stim and Elderly Stim) will receive in parallel an anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
  • Subjects of the Sham groups (Young Sham and Elderly Sham) will receive in parallel a sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex.

Immediately before (pretest) and after (posttest) each training session, as well as during the retention test, subjects will repeat the sequence as many times of possible, for 1 min. During these tests (pretests, posttests and retention test) electroencephalographic activity will be recorded to assess the Mu rhythm power.

Being tested
tDCS, sham tDCS
Keywords
Motor imagery, transcranial direct current stimulation, motor learning, aging

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tDCSDevice

    All subjects will mentally repeat a complex finger sequence with the left hand, for 13 min:

    • Subjects of the Stimulation groups (Young Stim and Elderly Stim) will receive in parallel an anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
  • sham tDCSDevice

    All subjects will mentally repeat a complex finger sequence with the left hand, for 13 min:

    • Subjects of the Sham groups (Young Sham and Elderly Sham) will receive in parallel a sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
Study groups in NCT02813291
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stimulation group (Young Stim)ExperimentalSubjects of the Stimulation groups (Young Stim and Elderly Stim) will receive in parallel an anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
Receives: Device: tDCS
Stimulation group (Elderly Stim)ExperimentalSubjects of the Stimulation groups (Young Stim and Elderly Stim) will receive in parallel an anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
Receives: Device: tDCS
Sham group (Young Sham)Sham comparatorSubjects of the Sham groups (Young Sham and Elderly Sham) will receive in parallel a sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
Receives: Device: sham tDCS
Sham group (Elderly Sham)Sham comparatorSubjects of the Sham groups (Young Sham and Elderly Sham) will receive in parallel a sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex.
Receives: Device: sham tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the number of correct sequences between first pretest and retention test

    Change will be calculated using the following formulae: (number of correct sequences at retention test - number of correct sequences at first pretest) / number of correct sequences at first pretest × 100

    Measured: The number of correct sequences will be assessed at pretest of the first training session (day 1) and at retention test (day 10).

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in the number of correct sequences between first pretest and third posttest

    Change will be calculated using the following formulae: (number of correct sequences at third posttest - number of correct sequences at first pretest) / number of correct sequences at first pretest × 100

    Measured: The number of correct sequences will be assessed at pretest of the first training session (day 1) and at posttest of the third training session (day 3)

  2. Change in the power of the Mu rhythm between first pretest and retention test

    Change will be calculated using the following formulae: (power of the Mu rhythm at retention test - power of the Mu rhythm at first pretest) / power of the Mu rhythm at first pretest × 100

    Measured: The power of the Mu rhythm will be assessed at pretest of the first training session (day 1) and at retention test (day 10)

  3. Change in the power of the Mu rhythm between first pretest and third posttest

    Change will be calculated using the following formulae: (power of the Mu rhythm at third posttest - power of the Mu rhythm at first pretest) / power of the Mu rhythm at first pretest × 100

    Measured: The power of the Mu rhythm will be assessed at pretest of the first training session (day 1) and at posttest of the third session (day 3)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion22 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
64 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02813291
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL15_0719
Acronym
MISt
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
22 Jun 2016
Last updated
3 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Metais A., Muller C., Breuil C., Boublay N., di Rienzo F., Guillot A., Collet C., Krolak-Salmon P., Saimpont A. (2020). P143 Effects of Anodal tDCS combined with motor imagery on motor sequence learning in older adults. Clinical Neurophysiology 131(4):e93-e94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.12.254

  • Muller C., Breuil C., Boublay N., Metais A., di Rienzo F., Guillot A., Collet C., Krolak-Salmon P., Saimpont A. (2020). P47 Effects of motor imagery and anodal tDCS on motor sequence learning in healthy young adults. Clinical Neurophysiology 131(4):e38-e39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.12.158

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tDCS in people with Aging and Motor Learning, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the number of correct sequences between first pretest and retention test (time frame: The number of correct sequences will be assessed at pretest of the first training session (day 1) and at retention test (day 10).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02813291, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in