AzTrials
AzTrials

Severely Traumatized Patients in Emergency WardsECHOGUIDENCT02820909

Interest of the Ultrasound Guidance for the Laying of Femoral Arterial and Venous Catheters in Intensive Care Unit

A study testing venous and arterial catheter set-up using ultrasound guidance and Anatomical guidance. in people with Severely Traumatized Patients in Emergency Wards, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The femoral approach is the preferred vascular access for the set-up of emergency catheters in severely traumatized patient. This location combines simplicity and speed of installation, it allows the simultaneous set-up of arterial and venous catheters, and is a provider of few complications and failures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
venous and arterial catheter set-up using ultrasound guidance and Anatomical guidance.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jul 2016to 29 Mar 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult
  • Included in intensive care unit for severe trauma
  • Need for implementation of femoral arterial and venous catheters in accordance with the practices of the service.
  • Agreed to participate
  • Affiliation to national security

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication to the set-up of vascular access in femoral position (femoral Scarpa wound, aortic dissection)
  • Local infection
  • Hypothermia <32°C
  • Need for implementation of arterial catheter only
  • Need for implementation of venous catheter only

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Department of intensive care unit, Hospital Edouard Herriot- Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 Place d'Arsonval

    Lyon, 69003

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Interest of the Ultrasound Guidance for the Laying of Femoral Arterial and Venous Catheters in Intensive Care Unit: A Controlled, Randomized Trial: The ECHOGUIDE Study

The femoral approach is the preferred vascular access for the set-up of emergency catheters in severely traumatized patient. This location combines simplicity and speed of installation, it allows the simultaneous set-up of arterial and venous catheters, and is a provider of few complications and failures.

The ultrasound guidance has greatly reduced installation times, failures and complications related to the set-up of central venous catheter. This was amply demonstrated in the internal jugular and subclavian site outside of extreme emergency situations (Fragou M et al 2011, Farrell J et al 1997, Karakistos et al 2006). The benefit of ultrasound guidance for the set-up of arterial and venous catheters in the femoral emergency has not been evaluated in terms of reduction in complications.

Then the main objective of this study is to demonstrate that the ultrasound guidance reduces early complications related to the set-up of arterial and venous catheters in the femoral emergency, among severely traumatized patient compared to the reference anatomical technique.

Being tested
venous and arterial catheter set-up using ultrasound guidance, Anatomical guidance.
Keywords
ultrasound guidance, emergency wards, arterial and venous catheters, femoral, complications
Medical subject headings
Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • venous and arterial catheter set-up using ultrasound guidanceProcedure or surgery

    The insertion of the venous and arterial catheter will be done using ultrasound guidance. Vein and artery will be identified in cross section. In case of anatomical difficulties, complications of puncture with anatomical landmarks, or if installation time is greater than > 5 minutes, an intra-osseous catheter will be put in place to avoid delaying of treatment according to the current practice of the intensive care unit.

  • Anatomical guidance.Procedure or surgery

    In the anatomical group, catheter will be inserted using, as it is currently done in intensive care unit, anatomic landmarks. If catheterization according to the anatomic method is considered too difficult (> 3 punctures), a conversion to ultrasound guidance will be done.

    In case of anatomical difficulties, complications of puncture with anatomical landmarks, or if installation time is greater than > 5 minutes, an intra-osseous catheter will be put in place to avoid delaying of treatment according to the current practice of the intensive care unit.

Study groups in NCT02820909
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound guidanceExperimental46 patients in the experimental ultrasound group
Receives: Procedure: venous and arterial catheter set-up using ultrasound guidance
Anatomical guidanceActive comparator46 patients in the anatomical group
Receives: Procedure: Anatomical guidance.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of complications 1 week after catheter set-up.

    The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a complication one week after arterial and venous catheter set-up.

    Complications will be defined as follows:

    • mechanical immediate complications (hematoma, bleeding, dysfunction or non-function of the catheter, or aberrant course subcutaneous catheter)
    • Mechanical complications remote installation catheters (arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm), thrombotic complications.

    Vascular assessment will be conducted by an angiologist, using doppler ultrasound of the femoral vessels. Assessment will be made blind from the use of ultrasound guidance during installation.

    Measured: 1 week.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Cannulation time between the 2 groups

    Comparison of cannulation mean time between the ultrasound guidance group and anatomical guidance group.

    Cannulation time is defined as the time in seconds, from the first contact between the needle and the skin, and when the two guide wires are inserted into the vessels (artery and vein).

    Measured: the day of surgery (Day 1)

  2. total catheter set-up time between the 2 groups

    Comparison of total catheter set-up mean time between the ultrasound guidance group and anatomical guidance group.

    Total exposure time of the catheter is defined as the time, in seconds, from the first contact between the needle and the skin, and when the dressing is applied to both catheters in place and fixed.

    Measured: the day of intervention (Day 1)

  3. Success of cannulation

    Comparison of cannulation success proportion at first attempt between the 2 groups. Cannulation at first attempt is a success if the needle is inserted at first attempt. A cannulation is defined as successful if the needle is inserted without resistance

    Measured: the day of intervention (Day 1)

  4. Number of cannulation attempt

    Comparison of the number of attempt before cannulation success in between the 2 groups. Conversion to ultrasound guidance in the anatomical guidance group will be taken into account.

    Measured: the day of intervention (Day 1)

  5. Number of puncture attempt

    Comparison of the total number of puncture between the 2 groups. A puncture test is defined as the passage of the needle without changing direction or without new movement in depth. Each needle withdrawal, followed by a new movement to deep planes or redirection of the needle is regarded as a new test, with or without skin puncture. The number of tests will be evaluated by an observer.

    Measured: day of intervention (Day 1)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completion29 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02820909
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL16_0403
Acronym
ECHOGUIDE
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
29 Jun 2016
Last updated
19 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lazaar S, Mazaud A, Delsuc C, Durand M, Delwarde B, Debord S, Hengy B, Marcotte G, Floccard B, Dailler F, Chirossel P, Bureau-Du-Colombier P, Berthiller J, Rimmele T. Ultrasound guidance for urgent arterial and venous catheterisation: randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):871-878. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.07.023. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

    PubMed 34503827

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing venous and arterial catheter set-up using ultrasound guidance and Anatomical guidance. in people with Severely Traumatized Patients in Emergency Wards, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of complications 1 week after catheter set-up. (time frame: 1 week.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02820909, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in