Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or VentilationNCT02823392
Difficult Bag Mask Ventilation and Difficult Intubation in Children
An observational study of Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation and Difficult Intubation, run by Prince of Songkla University at 1 site in Thailand.
Trial summary
Unanticipated difficult airway comprises of unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation or unforeseen difficult laryngoscopy. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or unanticipated difficult intubation in children was varied from 1.2 %to 4.77% depending on general or specific population and type of surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 9 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation, Difficult Intubation, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
- What is being tested?
- DBMV
- How many people
- 765 participants
- Where
- 1 siteThailand
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 9 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: We recruited children aged up to 9 years, ASA physical status of 1-3, who came for general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation (OETT) for elective surgery at Songklanajarind Hospital
Who may be able to join
- aged up to 9 years
- ASA physical status of 1-3
- came for general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation
- elective surgery
Who cannot join
- had difficult airway or having airway anomaly or syndrome related difficult airway
- presence of active pulmonary disease
- had preoperative oxygen saturation at room air < 95%
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Thailand1 site
Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110
About this study
Official title: Difficult Bag Mask Ventilation and Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study
Unanticipated difficult airway comprises of unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation or unforeseen difficult laryngoscopy. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or unanticipated difficult intubation in children was varied from 1.2 %to 4.77% depending on general or specific population and type of surgery. The known risk factors of difficult intubation in children were young age, associated syndrome or congenital abnormality and obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, the predictors of difficult laryngoscopy by physical examination were associated with short interincisors distance, high frontal plane to chin distance, short thyromental distance and Cormack \& Lehane classification 3 or 4. However, little knowledge is known regarding difficult bag mask ventilation in children. The incidence of difficult bag mask ventilation was 6.6% according to the single study. A few study reported the independent risk factor of difficult bag mask ventilation in children which were young age, obesity, use of neuromuscular blocking agent and airway surgery. In addition, the association between difficult bag mask ventilation and difficult intubation are still unknown. To understand more of difficult bag mask ventilation in children and factor-association may reduce incidence of morbidity and mortality by identifying difficult airway, preparing personnel and equipment tool in order to improve clinical outcome in pediatric anesthesia. The objectives of the study were to determine the predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation and the association with unexpected difficult intubation in children who came for elective surgery in tertiary care hospital of southern Thailand.
Read the detailed description
Study protocol and anesthesia practice Patient's demographic and history of snoring or asthma/hyper-reactive airway were obtained by research assistant at preinduction period. Standard monitoring including non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and capnography were applied to all patients before starting general anesthesia. All patients were received general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation. Induction techniques were either inhalation anesthetic agent by N2O-O2-sevoflurane or intravenous agent with 100% O2. Type of anesthetic circuit used (Circle or Jackson-Rees) was depending on anesthesiologist in charge. Patients head position were in neutral under small head ring to prevent head movement during induction. Maneuvers on bag mask ventilation such as application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, oropharyngeal airway or two person ventilations were recorded by research assistant at induction period. When positive pressure ventilation was difficult after the patients had been slept, the CPAP ≥5 cmH2O was applied incorporated with opening airway by head tilt/chin lip or jaw thrust until assisted spontaneous ventilation was successful. BMV was performed during induction with 100% O2. If performing BMV was possible, a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant was administered to facilitate the laryngoscopy procedure. If performing BMV was difficult, deep anesthesia using propofol, or a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant, or succinylcholine was given to facilitate the BMV procedure. The anesthesia personnel who handled the BMV also performed the first laryngoscopy. The laryngoscopists included anesthesia residents (more than 1-year experience), nurse anesthetists (at least 1-year training), and anesthesiologist attendants. Number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view, intubation time in second and presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) were recorded by research assistant at intubation period. There were many optioned used to aid successful intubation such as applying BURP maneuver, endotracheal tube with stylet used, change to smaller endotracheal tube size, change laryngoscope type or change to more experience laryngoscopists. Attending anesthesiologists take responsibility over anesthesia resident and nurse anesthetists for first or second failure of intubation attempts.
Outcome of interest Primary outcomes were to determine the predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation. The difficult bag mask ventilation was defined as the occurrence at least 2 following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway or nasopharyngeal airway, requiring 2- person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).
Secondary outcome was to find out the association between difficult bag mask ventilation and unexpected difficult laryngoscopy/intubation.
Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view grade 3 or 4. Difficult intubation was defined as the occurrence of at least two of the following: 1) at least three intubation attempts using a conventional laryngoscope blade, either Miller or Macintosh; 2) intubation time (the summation of all attempts from applying a laryngoscope to the endotracheal tube that passed the vocal cords) >300 seconds; and 3) the occurrence of desaturation (SpO2 <95%)The intubation time was defined as the time starting from applying laryngoscope to presence of positive capnography wave form. In case of fail intubation, the intubation time started from applying laryngoscope to remove laryngoscope from children's mouth. The total intubation time was the combined timing of each intubation attempts
- Conditions
- Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation, Difficult Intubation, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
- Being tested
- DBMV
- Keywords
- unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation, difficult intubation, predictors, pediatric anesthesia
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Aspiration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DBMVOther
the occurrence of at least two following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway, requiring two-person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difficult bag mask ventilation
the occurrence of at least two following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway, requiring two-person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
difficult laryngoscopy
laryngoscopic view 3 or 4
Measured: 4 years
difficult intubation
The occurrence of at least two of the following: 1) at least three intubation attempts using a conventional laryngoscope blade, either Miller or Macintosh [5]; 2) intubation time (the summation of all attempts from applying a laryngoscope to the endotracheal tube that passed the vocal cords) >300 seconds; and 3) the occurrence of desaturation (SpO2 <95%)
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or VentilationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 765 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Prince of Songkla University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, maliwan oofuvong, Prince of Songkla University
- Investigators
- maliwan s oofuvong, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Faculty Of Medicine, Prince Of Songkla University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02823392
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DBMV765
- Other IDs
- DI51
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: data was also sent to Anesthesia Department, McGill University, Canada
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Difficult Bag Mask Ventilation and Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02823392
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DBMV765
- Conditions
- Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation, Difficult Intubation, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
- Keywords
- unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation, difficult intubation, predictors, pediatric anesthesia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 765 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Prince of Songkla UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Unanticipated difficult airway comprises of unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation or unforeseen difficult laryngoscopy. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or unanticipated difficult intubation in children was varied from 1.2 %to 4.77% depending on general or specific population and type of surgery. The known risk factors of difficult intubation in children were young age, associated syndrome or congenital abnormality and obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, the predictors of difficult laryngoscopy by physical examination were associated with short interincisors distance, high frontal plane to chin distance, short thyromental distance and Cormack \& Lehane classification 3 or 4. However, little knowledge is known regarding difficult bag mask ventilation in children. The incidence of difficult bag mask ventilation was 6.6% according to the single study. A few study reported the independent risk factor of difficult bag mask ventilation in children which were young age, obesity, use of neuromuscular blocking agent and airway surgery. In addition, the association between difficult bag mask ventilation and difficult intubation are still unknown. To understand more of difficult bag mask ventilation in children and factor-association may reduce incidence of morbidity and mortality by identifying difficult airway, preparing personnel and equipment tool in order to improve clinical outcome in pediatric anesthesia. The objectives of the study were to determine the predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation and the association with unexpected difficult intubation in children who came for elective surgery in tertiary care hospital of southern Thailand.
Detailed description
Study protocol and anesthesia practice Patient's demographic and history of snoring or asthma/hyper-reactive airway were obtained by research assistant at preinduction period. Standard monitoring including non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and capnography were applied to all patients before starting general anesthesia. All patients were received general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation. Induction techniques were either inhalation anesthetic agent by N2O-O2-sevoflurane or intravenous agent with 100% O2. Type of anesthetic circuit used (Circle or Jackson-Rees) was depending on anesthesiologist in charge. Patients head position were in neutral under small head ring to prevent head movement during induction. Maneuvers on bag mask ventilation such as application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, oropharyngeal airway or two person ventilations were recorded by research assistant at induction period. When positive pressure ventilation was difficult after the patients had been slept, the CPAP ≥5 cmH2O was applied incorporated with opening airway by head tilt/chin lip or jaw thrust until assisted spontaneous ventilation was successful. BMV was performed during induction with 100% O2. If performing BMV was possible, a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant was administered to facilitate the laryngoscopy procedure. If performing BMV was difficult, deep anesthesia using propofol, or a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant, or succinylcholine was given to facilitate the BMV procedure. The anesthesia personnel who handled the BMV also performed the first laryngoscopy. The laryngoscopists included anesthesia residents (more than 1-year experience), nurse anesthetists (at least 1-year training), and anesthesiologist attendants. Number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view, intubation time in second and presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) were recorded by research assistant at intubation period. There were many optioned used to aid successful intubation such as applying BURP maneuver, endotracheal tube with stylet used, change to smaller endotracheal tube size, change laryngoscope type or change to more experience laryngoscopists. Attending anesthesiologists take responsibility over anesthesia resident and nurse anesthetists for first or second failure of intubation attempts.
Outcome of interest Primary outcomes were to determine the predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation. The difficult bag mask ventilation was defined as the occurrence at least 2 following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway or nasopharyngeal airway, requiring 2- person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).
Secondary outcome was to find out the association between difficult bag mask ventilation and unexpected difficult laryngoscopy/intubation.
Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view grade 3 or 4. Difficult intubation was defined as the occurrence of at least two of the following: 1) at least three intubation attempts using a conventional laryngoscope blade, either Miller or Macintosh; 2) intubation time (the summation of all attempts from applying a laryngoscope to the endotracheal tube that passed the vocal cords) >300 seconds; and 3) the occurrence of desaturation (SpO2 <95%)The intubation time was defined as the time starting from applying laryngoscope to presence of positive capnography wave form. In case of fail intubation, the intubation time started from applying laryngoscope to remove laryngoscope from children's mouth. The total intubation time was the combined timing of each intubation attempts
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 9 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- We recruited children aged up to 9 years, ASA physical status of 1-3, who came for general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation (OETT) for elective surgery at Songklanajarind Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- aged up to 9 years
- ASA physical status of 1-3
- came for general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation
- elective surgery
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- had difficult airway or having airway anomaly or syndrome related difficult airway
- presence of active pulmonary disease
- had preoperative oxygen saturation at room air < 95%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DBMVthe occurrence of at least two following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway, requiring two-person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%). | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Difficult bag mask ventilation
Time frame: 4 years
the occurrence of at least two following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway, requiring two-person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).
2 secondary outcomes
difficult laryngoscopy
Time frame: 4 years
difficult intubation
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. data was also sent to Anesthesia Department, McGill University, Canada
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
maliwan s oofuvong, MD, PhD principal investigator
Faculty Of Medicine, Prince Of Songkla University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation and Difficult Intubation, run by Prince of Songkla University at 1 site in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difficult bag mask ventilation (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2019.