AzTrials
AzTrials

Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or VentilationNCT02823392

Difficult Bag Mask Ventilation and Difficult Intubation in Children

An observational study of Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation and Difficult Intubation, run by Prince of Songkla University at 1 site in Thailand.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Unanticipated difficult airway comprises of unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation or unforeseen difficult laryngoscopy. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or unanticipated difficult intubation in children was varied from 1.2 %to 4.77% depending on general or specific population and type of surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 9 years
What is being tested?
DBMV
How many people
765 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Sep 2008to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: We recruited children aged up to 9 years, ASA physical status of 1-3, who came for general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation (OETT) for elective surgery at Songklanajarind Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • aged up to 9 years
  • ASA physical status of 1-3
  • came for general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation
  • elective surgery

Who cannot join

  • had difficult airway or having airway anomaly or syndrome related difficult airway
  • presence of active pulmonary disease
  • had preoperative oxygen saturation at room air < 95%

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University

    Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Difficult Bag Mask Ventilation and Unanticipated Difficult Intubation in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study

Unanticipated difficult airway comprises of unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation or unforeseen difficult laryngoscopy. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or unanticipated difficult intubation in children was varied from 1.2 %to 4.77% depending on general or specific population and type of surgery. The known risk factors of difficult intubation in children were young age, associated syndrome or congenital abnormality and obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, the predictors of difficult laryngoscopy by physical examination were associated with short interincisors distance, high frontal plane to chin distance, short thyromental distance and Cormack \& Lehane classification 3 or 4. However, little knowledge is known regarding difficult bag mask ventilation in children. The incidence of difficult bag mask ventilation was 6.6% according to the single study. A few study reported the independent risk factor of difficult bag mask ventilation in children which were young age, obesity, use of neuromuscular blocking agent and airway surgery. In addition, the association between difficult bag mask ventilation and difficult intubation are still unknown. To understand more of difficult bag mask ventilation in children and factor-association may reduce incidence of morbidity and mortality by identifying difficult airway, preparing personnel and equipment tool in order to improve clinical outcome in pediatric anesthesia. The objectives of the study were to determine the predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation and the association with unexpected difficult intubation in children who came for elective surgery in tertiary care hospital of southern Thailand.

Read the detailed description

Study protocol and anesthesia practice Patient's demographic and history of snoring or asthma/hyper-reactive airway were obtained by research assistant at preinduction period. Standard monitoring including non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and capnography were applied to all patients before starting general anesthesia. All patients were received general anesthesia with oroendotracheal tube intubation. Induction techniques were either inhalation anesthetic agent by N2O-O2-sevoflurane or intravenous agent with 100% O2. Type of anesthetic circuit used (Circle or Jackson-Rees) was depending on anesthesiologist in charge. Patients head position were in neutral under small head ring to prevent head movement during induction. Maneuvers on bag mask ventilation such as application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, oropharyngeal airway or two person ventilations were recorded by research assistant at induction period. When positive pressure ventilation was difficult after the patients had been slept, the CPAP ≥5 cmH2O was applied incorporated with opening airway by head tilt/chin lip or jaw thrust until assisted spontaneous ventilation was successful. BMV was performed during induction with 100% O2. If performing BMV was possible, a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant was administered to facilitate the laryngoscopy procedure. If performing BMV was difficult, deep anesthesia using propofol, or a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant, or succinylcholine was given to facilitate the BMV procedure. The anesthesia personnel who handled the BMV also performed the first laryngoscopy. The laryngoscopists included anesthesia residents (more than 1-year experience), nurse anesthetists (at least 1-year training), and anesthesiologist attendants. Number of intubation attempts, Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view, intubation time in second and presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) were recorded by research assistant at intubation period. There were many optioned used to aid successful intubation such as applying BURP maneuver, endotracheal tube with stylet used, change to smaller endotracheal tube size, change laryngoscope type or change to more experience laryngoscopists. Attending anesthesiologists take responsibility over anesthesia resident and nurse anesthetists for first or second failure of intubation attempts.

Outcome of interest Primary outcomes were to determine the predictors of difficult bag mask ventilation. The difficult bag mask ventilation was defined as the occurrence at least 2 following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway or nasopharyngeal airway, requiring 2- person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).

Secondary outcome was to find out the association between difficult bag mask ventilation and unexpected difficult laryngoscopy/intubation.

Difficult laryngoscopy was defined as the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view grade 3 or 4. Difficult intubation was defined as the occurrence of at least two of the following: 1) at least three intubation attempts using a conventional laryngoscope blade, either Miller or Macintosh; 2) intubation time (the summation of all attempts from applying a laryngoscope to the endotracheal tube that passed the vocal cords) >300 seconds; and 3) the occurrence of desaturation (SpO2 <95%)The intubation time was defined as the time starting from applying laryngoscope to presence of positive capnography wave form. In case of fail intubation, the intubation time started from applying laryngoscope to remove laryngoscope from children's mouth. The total intubation time was the combined timing of each intubation attempts

Being tested
DBMV
Keywords
unexpected difficult bag mask ventilation, difficult intubation, predictors, pediatric anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DBMVOther

    the occurrence of at least two following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway, requiring two-person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difficult bag mask ventilation

    the occurrence of at least two following events which were requiring application of CPAP with opening airway maneuvers, requiring oropharyngeal airway, requiring two-person bag mask ventilation, unable to perform bag mask ventilation or presence of desaturation (SpO2 < 95%).

    Measured: 4 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. difficult laryngoscopy

    laryngoscopic view 3 or 4

    Measured: 4 years

  2. difficult intubation

    The occurrence of at least two of the following: 1) at least three intubation attempts using a conventional laryngoscope blade, either Miller or Macintosh [5]; 2) intubation time (the summation of all attempts from applying a laryngoscope to the endotracheal tube that passed the vocal cords) >300 seconds; and 3) the occurrence of desaturation (SpO2 <95%)

    Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
765 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02823392
Sponsor's protocol ID
DBMV765
Other IDs
DI51
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
30 Jun 2016
Last updated
9 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: data was also sent to Anesthesia Department, McGill University, Canada

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation and Difficult Intubation, run by Prince of Songkla University at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difficult bag mask ventilation (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in