AzTrials
AzTrials

BronchiectasisNCT02823587

Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

A study testing Pulmonary Rehabilitation in people with Bronchiectasis, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on the transport of secretions, inflammation and respiratory resistance, and its repercussions on the quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bronchiectasis
What is being tested?
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Jul 2016to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • clinically stable patients
  • both sexes
  • aged between 18-60 years
  • not due to cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis diagnosis
  • non smokers
  • no pulmonary disease

Who cannot join

  • asthma or other restrictive conditions
  • smokers assets
  • decompensated cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, neuromuscular or musculoskeletal that impede the realization of the Protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ada C Gastaldi, PhD contact

55 16 33150473

ada@fmrp.usp.br

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Ribeirão Preto Medical School

    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900

    Ada C Gastaldi, Phd, ada@fmrp.usp.br

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Secretion Transport, Inflammation and Respiratory System Strength and Quality of Life in Patients With Bronchiectasis

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on the transport of secretions, inflammation and respiratory resistance, and its repercussions on the quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis.

Read the detailed description

Bronchiectasis is characterized by pathological and irreversible dilation of bronchi caused by the inefficient removal of secretions and microorganisms and the perpetuation of inflammatory processes induced by chronic or recurrent infections, causing more damage to the airways that result in infections, and greater lesion airways and lung parenchyma. Pulmonary rehabilitation in people with bronchiectasis aims to improve exercise capacity, through effects on aerobic capacity and peripheral muscles, and to improve disease control and quality of life. The aim this study is to evaluate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on the transport of secretions, inflammation and respiratory resistance, and its repercussions on the quality of life in patients with bronchiectasis. In this study 60 volunteers, of both sexes, aged between 18-60 years, adequate the inclusion criteria, which will be assessed by lung function tests, the saccharin transport time, the inflammatory markers in the airways, the respiratory system resistance and quality of life scales. Volunteers will be randomly divided in pulmonary rehabilitation (PRG) and control groups (CG) that will be subdivided in bronchiectasis and healthy subgroups. In the PRG group they will receive supervised physical training twice a week and will be instructed to adopt a routine of home exercises, while CG will be informed about the benefits of physical activities. All volunteers will be evaluated after 8 weeks of the baseline and at the end of the research. Data evolution will be collected from medical records and notes of the medical team and physical therapy that will follow the routine of these participants

Conditions
Bronchiectasis
Being tested
Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Control
Keywords
Bronchiectasis, Mucociliary clearance, Exercise, Inflammation
Medical subject headings
Bronchiectasis, Motor Activity, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pulmonary RehabilitationOther

    The exercise program will consist of an individual exercise prescription on the treadmill or bike, the initial intensity of 85% VO2max and active exercises or active-resistance for upper and lower limbs according to the capacity of each volunteer.

  • ControlOther

    No supervised exercise session, only will be informed at the beginning of the study to perform thirty minutes of physical activity of moderate intensity several days a week is associated with health benefits

Study groups in NCT02823587
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bronchiectasis Pulmonary RehabilitationExperimentalThe volunteers will receive supervised physical training twice a week and will be instructed to adopt a routine of home exercises, for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Healthy Pulmonary RehabilitationExperimentalIn this arm, the volunteers healthy will receive supervised physical training twice a week and will be instructed to adopt a routine of home exercises, for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Bronchiectasis Group ControlSham comparatorThe volunteers with bronchiectasis will be informed only about the benefits of physical activities
Receives: Other: Control
Healthy Group ControlSham comparatorVolunteers healthy will be informed only about the benefits of physical activities
Receives: Other: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mucociliary transport in vivo

    This measurement it will be evaluated by the saccharine transport time, according to methodology (Stanley, 1984)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Mucociliary transport in vitro

    This measurement it will be evaluated by the transport properties in vitro, according to methodology (Trindade, 1997)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  2. Quality of Life in Bronchiectasis

    For this evaluation the investigators will use the Quality of life in bronchiectasis (QOLB) (Chalmers, 2014)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  3. Cough Impact Assessment

    For this evaluation the investigators will use the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), (Murray, 2009).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  4. Health-Related Quality of Life

    For this evaluation the investigators will use the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Ware, 1992)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  5. Impulse Oscillometry System (IOS)

    To perform this measure, it is been used Jaeger® IOS(Jaeger, Wurzburg, Germany) with daily volume and resistance calibration. The parameters are calculated at frequencies between 5 and 35 hertz, and will be analyzed the following parameters in this test: resistance (R), reactance (X), reactance area (AX) and resonant frequency (Fres).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  6. Pulmonary Function Test

    This test is realized by using KoKo Spirometer™ according American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ATS)recommendations. The analyzed parameters in this test are: forced vital capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  7. Six Minute Walking Test

    Patients walk through a 30 meter corridor faster than they can for 6 minutes, according to ATS considerations.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  8. Maximal Static Respiratory Pressures

    It has beem used a digital manometer (MVD300, Global Med, São Paulo, Brazil) with graduation ranging from 0 to ± 300 centimeters of water (cmH2O) and adjusted to a rigid mouthpiece, following the proposed model by Black and Hyatt in 1969.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  9. Viscosity

    To perform this measure, it is been used a capillary viscometer dual-chamber is used for measuring viscosity of bronchial mucus (Barnett et al, 1970)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  10. Elasticity

    To perform this measure, it is been used a capillary viscometer dual-chamber is used for measuring elasticity of bronchial mucus (Kim, 1988)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  11. Exhaled breath condensate

    It will be collected as previously described (Koczulla et al., 2009).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  12. Exhaled Nitric Oxide Fraction (FeNO)

    It will be performed according to protocol defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS, 2011), using the device NioxMino™.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  13. Cytokine Analysis TNF-α

    The tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations (TNF-α) in the nasal lavage fluid(NFL) (samples will be determined using immunohistochemistry high sensitivity assays(ELISA), which will be performed according to the instructions the kit supplier.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  14. Cytokine Analysis IL-6

    The interleukins(IL) - IL-6 in the NFL samples will be determined using immunohistochemistry high sensitivity assays(ELISA), which will be performed according to the instructions the kit supplier.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  15. Cytokine Analysis IL-10

    The interleukins - IL-10 in the NFL samples will be determined using immunohistochemistry high sensitivity assays(ELISA), which will be performed according to the instructions the kit supplier.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionJul 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02823587
Sponsor's protocol ID
USP 2016-1
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
19 May 2016
Last updated
21 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Chalmers JD, Goeminne P, Aliberti S, McDonnell MJ, Lonni S, Davidson J, Poppelwell L, Salih W, Pesci A, Dupont LJ, Fardon TC, De Soyza A, Hill AT. The bronchiectasis severity index. An international derivation and validation study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar 1;189(5):576-85. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1575OC.

    PubMed 24328736
  • Stanley P, MacWilliam L, Greenstone M, Mackay I, Cole P. Efficacy of a saccharin test for screening to detect abnormal mucociliary clearance. Br J Dis Chest. 1984 Jan;78(1):62-5.

    PubMed 6691910
  • Mandal P, Sidhu MK, Kope L, Pollock W, Stevenson LM, Pentland JL, Turnbull K, Mac Quarrie S, Hill AT. A pilot study of pulmonary rehabilitation and chest physiotherapy versus chest physiotherapy alone in bronchiectasis. Respir Med. 2012 Dec;106(12):1647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

    PubMed 22947443
  • Trindade SH, de Mello JF Jr, Mion Ode G, Lorenzi-Filho G, Macchione M, Guimaraes ET, Saldiva PH. Methods for studying mucociliary transport. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep-Oct;73(5):704-12. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30133-6.

    PubMed 18094814
  • Koczulla R, Dragonieri S, Schot R, Bals R, Gauw SA, Vogelmeier C, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ, Hiemstra PS. Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients. Respir Res. 2009 Aug 24;10(1):78. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-10-78.

    PubMed 19703285

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pulmonary Rehabilitation in people with Bronchiectasis, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ada C Gastaldi, PhD (55 16 33150473, ada@fmrp.usp.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mucociliary transport in vivo (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02823587, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in