AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 3SAPHENERONCT02826850

Saphenous Nerve Radiofrequency for Knee Osteoarthritis Trial

A Phase 3 study testing Saphenous Nerve and Genicular nerves in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project is one of four components of a thematic project that aims to evaluate the use of ultrasound in regional and infiltration blocks, called "Use of ultrasound in regional blocks and infiltration for the treatment of acute and chronic pain". Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Knee
What is being tested?
Saphenous Nerve and Genicular nerves
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Sep 2016to Mar 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Will be included patients older than 18 years, who have moderate to strong chronic pain in knee on most of the days days for at least 3 months, with osteoarthritis of the knee documented by graded radiologically at 3 to 4 in Kellgren-Lawrence rating, refractory to medical treatment (physical therapy, oral analgesics, intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids).

Who cannot join

  • The exclusion criteria are: acute knee pain, prior surgery on the knee, another connective tissue disease affecting the knee, psychiatric or neurological disorders, intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid for less than 3 months, pain related to nerve sciatic, use of anticoagulants and pacemaker.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hermann S Fernandes, M.D. contact

+55 84 988966348

hermann.fernandes@hc.fm.usp.br

Shirley A Santos, M.D. contact

+55 11 985733798

shirleyandrade.s@gmail.com

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403000

    Hermann S Fernandes, M.D., +55 84 988966348, hermann.fernandes@hc.fm.usp.br

    Shirley A Santos, M.D., +55 11 985733798, shirleyandrade.s@gmail.com

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study of Neurotomy by Radiofrequency of Genicular Nerves, Guided by Fluoroscopy, and Neurotomy by Radiofrequency of Saphenous Nerve, Guided by Ultrasound, for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis .

This project is one of four components of a thematic project that aims to evaluate the use of ultrasound in regional and infiltration blocks, called "Use of ultrasound in regional blocks and infiltration for the treatment of acute and chronic pain".

It aims to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively the knee pain control in patients with osteoarthritis after neurotomy by saphenous nerve radiofrequency guided by ultrasound , compared to neurotomy by radiofrequency of genicular nerves guided by fluoroscopy .

Differences between total consumption of analgesics, side effects of medications , impact on quality of life and functional capacity in patients undergoing saphenous nerve neurotomy by radiofrequency guided by ultrasound compared to neurotomy by radiofrequency of genicular nerves guided by fluoroscopy, will also be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knees is currently a major public health problem, with patients suffering from pain and functional limitation. Depending on the severity of the impairment, the definitive treatment is surgical, but the old ages often associated and morbidities present in these patients some times limit such conduct. More effective treatments for pain control are necessary.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quantitative and qualitative pain control in patients with osteoarthritis in knees after neurotomy of saphenous nerve by radiofrequency guided by ultrasound, compared to neurotomy by radiofrequency of genicular nerves guided by fluoroscopy.

METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized clinical study and blind to the evaluators. Will include 20 patients with knee osteoarthritis grade III or IV, refractory to medical treatment. A group will be submitted to neurotomy by radiofrequency of genicular nerves guided by fluoroscopy and the other group will receive neurotomy by radiofrequency of saphenous nerve, guided by ultrasound. They will be assessed in pain intensity at rest and movement, functionality, satisfaction and adverse effects related to treatment. Patients will be evaluated 15 days, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure.

Being tested
Saphenous Nerve, Genicular nerves
Keywords
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment, Ultrasonography, Interventional
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Saphenous NerveProcedure or surgery

    Saphenous nerve neurotomy by radiofrequency, guided by ultrasound.

  • Genicular nervesProcedure or surgery

    Genicular nerves neurotomy by radiofrequency, guided by fluoroscopy

Study groups in NCT02826850
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Genicular nervesSham comparatorNeurotomy by radiofrequency of genicular nerves knee guided by fluoroscopy
Receives: Procedure: Genicular nerves
Saphenous NerveActive comparatorNeurotomy of saphenous nerve by radiofrequency on the distal third of the thigh, guided by ultrasound
Receives: Procedure: Saphenous Nerve

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain scores

    Number verbal scale

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Opioids consumption

    Morphine oral equivalent dose needed

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Side effects

    Nausea, vomiting, sedation

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Functional capacity

    WOMAC score

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02826850
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAAE: 55153516.0.0000.0068
Acronym
SAPHENERO
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
5 Jul 2016
Last updated
11 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Andrianakos AA, Kontelis LK, Karamitsos DG, Aslanidis SI, Georgountzos AI, Kaziolas GO, Pantelidou KV, Vafiadou EV, Dantis PC; ESORDIG Study Group. Prevalence of symptomatic knee, hand, and hip osteoarthritis in Greece. The ESORDIG study. J Rheumatol. 2006 Dec;33(12):2507-13.

    PubMed 17143985
  • Mannoni A, Briganti MP, Di Bari M, Ferrucci L, Costanzo S, Serni U, Masotti G, Marchionni N. Epidemiological profile of symptomatic osteoarthritis in older adults: a population based study in Dicomano, Italy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jun;62(6):576-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.6.576.

    PubMed 12759299
  • Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Aug;30(8):914-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780300811.

    PubMed 3632732
  • Ikeuchi M, Ushida T, Izumi M, Tani T. Percutaneous radiofrequency treatment for refractory anteromedial pain of osteoarthritic knees. Pain Med. 2011 Apr;12(4):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01086.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

    PubMed 21463469
  • Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

    PubMed 21055873
  • Akbas M, Luleci N, Dere K, Luleci E, Ozdemir U, Toman H. Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency treatment on the saphenous nerve in patients with chronic knee pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(2):77-82. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0277.

    PubMed 21558611
  • Jin SQ, Ding XB, Tong Y, Ren H, Chen ZX, Wang X, Li Q. Effect of saphenous nerve block for postoperative pain on knee surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):368-76. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25785007

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Saphenous Nerve and Genicular nerves in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hermann S Fernandes, M.D. (+55 84 988966348, hermann.fernandes@hc.fm.usp.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain scores (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02826850, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in