Metastatic Spine TumorMTRONNCT02830451
Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcomes Network
An observational study of Metastatic Spine Tumor, run by AO Innovation Translation Center at 24 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The registry aims to collect patient information such as patient demographics, co-morbidities, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic data, as well as information on adverse events and HRQOL outcomes specific for patients with metastatic spine tumor(s). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Spine Tumor
- How many people
- 2,417 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2017to 18 Aug 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of the spine.
Who may be able to join
- Patient 18 or older.
- Patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of the spine
- Informed consent obtained, i.e.:
- Ability to understand the content of the patient information/ICF
- Willingness and ability to participate in the registry according to the Registry Plan
- Signed and dated EC/IRB approved written informed consent (if consent is required by the EC/ IRB at the registry site)
Who cannot join
- Patient diagnosed with a primary tumor of the spine.
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 10 countries.
24 sites in 10 countries
United States10 sites
Johns Hopkins University Department of Neurosurgery / Spine Division
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
Harvard Medical School Department of Neurosurgery
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Rush University Medical Center University Neurosurgery
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Neurosurgery
Houston, Texas, 77030
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center Department of Neurosurgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown university Department of Neurosurgery
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Mayo Clinic Department of Neurosurgery
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of California The UCSF Spine Center Department of Neurological Surgery
San Francisco, California, 94143
Canada5 sites
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
Toronto Western Hospital Department of Neurosurgery Division of Surgery
Toronto, Ontario, 4W449
University of Toronto Odette Cancer Centre - T2 158 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Ccenter
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
Winnipeg Spine Program University of Manitoba Department of Surgery
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9
Italy2 sites
Instituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Department of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40136
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi Centro die Chirurgia Ortopedica Oncologica e Ricostr
Milan, Lombardy, 20161
Germany1 site
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der Technischen Universität Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
Hungary1 site
National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center
Budapest, 1126
Japan1 site
Kanazawa Medical University Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Uchinoda, Ishikawa-ken, 920-0293
Singapore1 site
National University of Singapore Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Singapore, 119288
Switzerland1 site
Universitätsspital Basel Wirbelsäulenzentrum
Basel, Basel, 4031
About this study
Official title: Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcome Network A Multicenter Prospective Registry for the Management and Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumors
The registry aims to collect patient information such as patient demographics, co-morbidities, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic data, as well as information on adverse events and HRQOL outcomes specific for patients with metastatic spine tumor(s).
Read the detailed description
To prospectively determine the prognostic variables (clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic) within patients diagnosed with metastatic spine tumor(s) that are associated with:
- patient reported outcomes (HRQOL)
- morbidity data
- local tumor control
- survival
Outcome measures:
Variables which will be collected in the registry that are applicable to patients with metastatic spine tumor include:
- • Patient details
- Details of previous treatment
- Diagnosis
- Symptoms
- Treatment details for the index target
- Imaging information
The following outcome measures will be collected:
- Patient reported outcomes:
- Euroqol EQ-5D-3L
- Euroqol EQ-5D VAS - Quality of Life
- Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
- Arm Pain NRS
- Back Pain NRS
- Leg Pain NRS
- SOSGOQ
- Patient assessment
- Ambulation
- Pain medication
- Nutritional Status Tool (PG-SGA©)
- Morbidity data
- Local disease recurrence data
- Overall survival data
- Conditions
- Metastatic Spine Tumor
- Keywords
- Registry, Spine, Surgery, Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Neoplasms, Metastasis, Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, Tumor Markers
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient details
The following patient data will be collected:
- gender, year of birth, height, weight, race
- work status, education level, marital status
- smoking, alcohol and recreational drug use
- medication use
- nutrition and vitamin intake
- presence of osteoporosis
- comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index - CCI
Measured: collected at baseline
Tumor details
Primary cancer
- Site of the primary cancer
- Year of diagnosis
- Status of the tumor (removed completely, partially, or not removed)
- Signs of local control or tumor progression
- Tumor subtype
- Tumor markers
Spine metastases
- Date of initial diagnosis of spine metastases
- Identification of index target
- Vertebral location (i.e., C1, T3-T5, etc.)
- Details of spine metastases and other metastases, if any
- Activity of systemic metastases
- Local control of metastatic tumor
- Presence of pathologic fracture
- Radiographic evidence of new spine metastatic disease
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and follow-up
Symptoms
For patients with metastatic spine tumor, it is important to understand the occurrence, location, and type of pain patients have at baseline and at follow-up visits. Pain symptoms assessed by the physician will therefore be collected in addition to the pain specific PROs.
Bowel and bladder function will be assessed by the physician.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and follow-up
Treatment details - previous treatment of the index of the spine
If the patient had previous treatment (surgery, radiation or systemic oncologic therapy) for the index target, the following information about the previous treatment will be collected at baseline:
- Type(s) of treatment
- Date(s) of treatment
- Treated vertebrae level(s)
- Procedure details
- Hospital/center where the treatment was administered
- ASIA impairment scale (applies only to previous surgical patients)
Measured: Collected at baseline
Imaging information
Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements will be made from CT scans. One transverse CT image of the inferior surface of L3 will be assessed by an independent assessor to calculate the visceral fat area to subcutaneous fat ratio (VFA/SFA ratio). This measurement will only be collected if the CT scan is according to standard of care and the method is described in a separate imaging manual. Additional CT scans will not be performed for this Registry.
Imaging is critical to select the biopsy technique and for disease diagnosis. Follow-up imaging also plays an important role in monitoring disease status. Imaging data will be collected to serve as a data repository, so that images may be more easily retrieved later if necessary.
Imaging data
- Image type (e.g. MRI, CT, PET, etc.)
- Date taken
- Name of institution storing image
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Euroqol EQ-5D-3L / - EQ-5D VAS
The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Ambulation
Details about the ability of the patient to walk, cause of ambulation loss, use of an assistive device, and timing will be collected.
10 meter walk test (10 MWT) If the patient is able to ambulate without physical assistance (i.e. without help of a person), ambulation will be assessed by the 10MWT (walking aids are allowed). The 10MWT evaluates the time required to walk 10 meters. Patients should walk 10 meters with 2 meters for acceleration and deceleration. The patient will be timed from when the patient's toes of the leading foot cross the 2 meter line to when the patient's toes of the leading foot cross the 8 meter line. The test should be performed three times and the results will be averaged. The patient should be instructed to perform the test at a comfortable walking pace.
Measured: collected at baseline, discharge and at follow-up.
Nutritional status tool
The Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) sets the standard of and is the preeminent interdisciplinary patient assessment (weight, intake, symptoms, functional status, disease state, metabolic stress and nutritional physical examination) in oncology and other chronic catabolic conditions.
The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components ('Weight History', 'Food Intake', 'Symptoms' and 'Activities and Function'), the professional part (Diagnosis, Age, Metabolic stress, and Physical Exam), the Global Assessment (A = well nourished, B = moderately malnourished or suspected malnutrition, C = severely malnourished), the total numerical score, and nutritional triage recommendations. Subsequently, the Scored PG-SGA© allows for triaging of specific nutrition interventions, as well as facilitating quantitative outcomes data collection.
This assessment is available in a variety of languages and as a metric as well as a non-metric version.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Morbidity data - Adverse events
- related to surgery Intra- and postoperative complication data will be recorded for all surgically treated patients during the standard of care scheduled follow-up visits. Complications will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical files from the time treatment was initiated until the day of follow-up. The Spine AdVerse Events Severity system, version 2 (SAVES V2) AE abstraction tool will be used to record the morbidity data.
- related to radiation and/or systemic oncologic therapy
For patients treated with RT and/or systemic oncologic therapy, complications and severity grade related to the treatment will be recorded during the standard of care scheduled follow-up visits according to a predefined list:
The predefined list and severity grading system are according to the National Cancer Institute Guidelines.
Measured: collected at first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Local disease recurrence data
At every FU visit, each patient, regardless of which stage they are at in their treatment, will be evaluated for local disease control. Presence or absence of local control and distant metastases should be confirmed through imaging. The timing of the assessment will be performed in accordance with local standard of care scheduled FU visits.
Measured: collected at baseline and at follow-up.
Survival
FU visits will be scheduled and performed according to the local standard of care and at each scheduled visit the patient's survival will be documented. In case a patient misses a scheduled visit it will be assessed if the patient is still alive.
Measured: collected at first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Treatment details - Current treatment of the index target of the spine
Since there is a spectrum of different treatment options and combinations for patients with a metastatic spine tumor, detailed information about the three main treatment options (surgery, radiation, and systemic oncologic therapy) for the index target will be collected. The treatment intent, including administration (primary, neo-adjuvant, and adjuvant) will also be collected.
Measured: collected at first prospective treatment and at follow-up.
Treatment details - Current treatment for the primary cancer
Information on the status of the primary cancer as well as on ongoing treatment of the primary cancer will be collected at baseline and at follow-up.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Pain Numeric Rating Scale
The Pain NRS is an 11-point scale where the end points are the extremes of no pain (0 points), or worst imaginable pain (10 points). It measures subjective intensity of pain and the patient rates his/her overall or average daily pain.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire (SOSGOQ)
This is a new HRQOL outcome tool which was developed specifically for metastatic spine tumor. It is currently available in English and Hungarian. It contains 20 items representing all four domains of the International Classification of Function and Disability. Additionally there are seven follow-up questions referring to treatment satisfaction. It is made up of five domains: physical function, neural function, pain, mental health and social function. It was developed as a comparison to the SF-36 for patients with spine tumors.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Symptoms: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) ISNCSCI is a standardized examination to determine neurologic function and has been a standard clinical assessment for patients with neurological deficit. The modified ISNCSCI used in this study will assess the Motor Score and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Symptoms: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) classification
The ECOG developed a scale from 0 to 5 to assess the patient's disease progression and how the disease affects the patient's daily living abilities (9). The lower the score the better the status of the patient, being 0 fully active and 5 dead.
Measured: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, and at follow-up.
Symptoms: Epidural Compression Classification
The Spine Oncology Study Group developed and validated a 6-point grading system to describe the degree of epidural spinal cord compression based on axial T2-weighted MR images at the site of most severe compression. This assessment can be used to help guide treatment and can serve as a classification scheme.
Measured: Collected at baseline
Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)
The SOSG developed and validated a classification system to assist clinicians in defining tumor-related instability. It is assessed by adding together six individual component scores: spine location, pain, lesion bone quality, radiographic alignment, vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral involvement of the spinal elements. SINS has demonstrated clinically acceptable reliability among surgeons, radiation oncologists, and radiologists. The total SINS score can range from a score of 0 to 18. The total score has been divided into three categories of stability: stability (score of 0-6), indeterminate instability (score of 7-12), and instability (score of 13-18). Surgical consultation is recommended for patients with SINS scores ≥ 7. SINS will be assessed at baseline and/or prior to first prospective treatment. The most severe lesion within the index target should be assessed.
Measured: collected at baseline and first prospective treatment,
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study start15 Nov 2017
- Primary completion18 Aug 2026
- Study completion18 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Metastatic Spine TumorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,417 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AO Innovation Translation Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AO Foundation, AO Spine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charles G. Fisher, MD, Principal investigator, Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02830451
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MTRON
- Acronym
- MTRON
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Metastatic Tumor Research and Outcome Network A Multicenter Prospective Registry for the Management and Outcome of Metastatic Spine Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02830451
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MTRON / MTRON
- Conditions
- Metastatic Spine Tumor
- Keywords
- Registry, Spine, Surgery, Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Neoplasms, Metastasis, Chemotherapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,417 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AO Innovation Translation CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AO Foundation, AO Spine
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The registry aims to collect patient information such as patient demographics, co-morbidities, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic data, as well as information on adverse events and HRQOL outcomes specific for patients with metastatic spine tumor(s).
Detailed description
To prospectively determine the prognostic variables (clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic) within patients diagnosed with metastatic spine tumor(s) that are associated with:
- patient reported outcomes (HRQOL)
- morbidity data
- local tumor control
- survival
Outcome measures:
Variables which will be collected in the registry that are applicable to patients with metastatic spine tumor include:
- • Patient details
- Details of previous treatment
- Diagnosis
- Symptoms
- Treatment details for the index target
- Imaging information
The following outcome measures will be collected:
- Patient reported outcomes:
- Euroqol EQ-5D-3L
- Euroqol EQ-5D VAS - Quality of Life
- Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
- Arm Pain NRS
- Back Pain NRS
- Leg Pain NRS
- SOSGOQ
- Patient assessment
- Ambulation
- Pain medication
- Nutritional Status Tool (PG-SGA©)
- Morbidity data
- Local disease recurrence data
- Overall survival data
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of the spine.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient 18 or older.
- Patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of the spine
- Informed consent obtained, i.e.:
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient diagnosed with a primary tumor of the spine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Patient details
Time frame: collected at baseline
The following patient data will be collected: * gender, year of birth, height, weight, race * work status, education level, marital status * smoking, alcohol and recreational drug use * medication use * nutrition and vitamin intake * presence of osteoporosis * comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index - CCI
Tumor details
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and follow-up
Primary cancer * Site of the primary cancer * Year of diagnosis * Status of the tumor (removed completely, partially, or not removed) * Signs of local control or tumor progression * Tumor subtype * Tumor markers Spine metastases * Date of initial diagnosis of spine metastases * Identification of index target * Vertebral location (i.e., C1, T3-T5, etc.) * Details of spine metastases and other metastases, if any * Activity of systemic metastases * Local control of metastatic tumor * Presence of pathologic fracture * Radiographic evidence of new spine metastatic disease
Symptoms
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and follow-up
For patients with metastatic spine tumor, it is important to understand the occurrence, location, and type of pain patients have at baseline and at follow-up visits. Pain symptoms assessed by the physician will therefore be collected in addition to the pain specific PROs. Bowel and bladder function will be assessed by the physician.
Treatment details - previous treatment of the index of the spine
Time frame: Collected at baseline
If the patient had previous treatment (surgery, radiation or systemic oncologic therapy) for the index target, the following information about the previous treatment will be collected at baseline: * Type(s) of treatment * Date(s) of treatment * Treated vertebrae level(s) * Procedure details * Hospital/center where the treatment was administered * ASIA impairment scale (applies only to previous surgical patients)
Imaging information
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue measurements will be made from CT scans. One transverse CT image of the inferior surface of L3 will be assessed by an independent assessor to calculate the visceral fat area to subcutaneous fat ratio (VFA/SFA ratio). This measurement will only be collected if the CT scan is according to standard of care and the method is described in a separate imaging manual. Additional CT scans will not be performed for this Registry. Imaging is critical to select the biopsy technique and for disease diagnosis. Follow-up imaging also plays an important role in monitoring disease status. Imaging data will be collected to serve as a data repository, so that images may be more easily retrieved later if necessary. Imaging data * Image type (e.g. MRI, CT, PET, etc.) * Date taken * Name of institution storing image
Patient reported outcomes - Euroqol EQ-5D-3L / - EQ-5D VAS
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.
Ambulation
Time frame: collected at baseline, discharge and at follow-up.
Details about the ability of the patient to walk, cause of ambulation loss, use of an assistive device, and timing will be collected. 10 meter walk test (10 MWT) If the patient is able to ambulate without physical assistance (i.e. without help of a person), ambulation will be assessed by the 10MWT (walking aids are allowed). The 10MWT evaluates the time required to walk 10 meters. Patients should walk 10 meters with 2 meters for acceleration and deceleration. The patient will be timed from when the patient's toes of the leading foot cross the 2 meter line to when the patient's toes of the leading foot cross the 8 meter line. The test should be performed three times and the results will be averaged. The patient should be instructed to perform the test at a comfortable walking pace.
Nutritional status tool
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
The Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) sets the standard of and is the preeminent interdisciplinary patient assessment (weight, intake, symptoms, functional status, disease state, metabolic stress and nutritional physical examination) in oncology and other chronic catabolic conditions. The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components ('Weight History', 'Food Intake', 'Symptoms' and 'Activities and Function'), the professional part (Diagnosis, Age, Metabolic stress, and Physical Exam), the Global Assessment (A = well nourished, B = moderately malnourished or suspected malnutrition, C = severely malnourished), the total numerical score, and nutritional triage recommendations. Subsequently, the Scored PG-SGA© allows for triaging of specific nutrition interventions, as well as facilitating quantitative outcomes data collection. This assessment is available in a variety of languages and as a metric as well as a non-metric version.
Morbidity data - Adverse events
Time frame: collected at first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
* related to surgery Intra- and postoperative complication data will be recorded for all surgically treated patients during the standard of care scheduled follow-up visits. Complications will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical files from the time treatment was initiated until the day of follow-up. The Spine AdVerse Events Severity system, version 2 (SAVES V2) AE abstraction tool will be used to record the morbidity data. * related to radiation and/or systemic oncologic therapy For patients treated with RT and/or systemic oncologic therapy, complications and severity grade related to the treatment will be recorded during the standard of care scheduled follow-up visits according to a predefined list: The predefined list and severity grading system are according to the National Cancer Institute Guidelines.
Local disease recurrence data
Time frame: collected at baseline and at follow-up.
At every FU visit, each patient, regardless of which stage they are at in their treatment, will be evaluated for local disease control. Presence or absence of local control and distant metastases should be confirmed through imaging. The timing of the assessment will be performed in accordance with local standard of care scheduled FU visits.
Survival
Time frame: collected at first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
FU visits will be scheduled and performed according to the local standard of care and at each scheduled visit the patient's survival will be documented. In case a patient misses a scheduled visit it will be assessed if the patient is still alive.
Treatment details - Current treatment of the index target of the spine
Time frame: collected at first prospective treatment and at follow-up.
Since there is a spectrum of different treatment options and combinations for patients with a metastatic spine tumor, detailed information about the three main treatment options (surgery, radiation, and systemic oncologic therapy) for the index target will be collected. The treatment intent, including administration (primary, neo-adjuvant, and adjuvant) will also be collected.
Treatment details - Current treatment for the primary cancer
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment and at follow-up.
Information on the status of the primary cancer as well as on ongoing treatment of the primary cancer will be collected at baseline and at follow-up.
Patient reported outcomes - Pain Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
The Pain NRS is an 11-point scale where the end points are the extremes of no pain (0 points), or worst imaginable pain (10 points). It measures subjective intensity of pain and the patient rates his/her overall or average daily pain.
Patient reported outcomes - Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire (SOSGOQ)
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
This is a new HRQOL outcome tool which was developed specifically for metastatic spine tumor. It is currently available in English and Hungarian. It contains 20 items representing all four domains of the International Classification of Function and Disability. Additionally there are seven follow-up questions referring to treatment satisfaction. It is made up of five domains: physical function, neural function, pain, mental health and social function. It was developed as a comparison to the SF-36 for patients with spine tumors.
4 secondary outcomes
Symptoms: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, discharge and at follow-up.
Symptoms: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) classification
Time frame: collected at baseline, first prospective treatment, and at follow-up.
Symptoms: Epidural Compression Classification
Time frame: Collected at baseline
Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)
Time frame: collected at baseline and first prospective treatment,
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Metastatic Spine Tumor
RecruitingPhase 3
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases
Cancer Metastatic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Thermal Ablation and Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Treating Patients With Spine Metastases at Risk for Compressing the Spinal Cord
Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm, Metastatic Head and Neck Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Cement Augmentation in Preventing Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Following Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Solid Tumors and Spinal Metastases
Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Spine, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Evaluation of a Novel CT-On-Rails or Trilogy Stereotactic Spine Radiotherapy System (SSRS)
Spinal Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Single Versus Multifraction Salvage Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Previously Irradiated Spinal Metastases
Malignant Neoplasms of Eye Brain and Other Parts of Central Nervous System
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles G. Fisher, MD principal investigator
Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia
24 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Metastatic Spine Tumor, run by AO Innovation Translation Center at 24 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada, Italy, Australia, Germany and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient details (time frame: collected at baseline). The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2026.