Infection, Human Immunodeficiency VirusPhase 3NCT02831764
An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study Comparing Dolutegravir (DTG) Plus Lamivudine (3TC) With Dolutegravir Plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Treatment naïve HIV Infected Participants (Gemini 2)
A Phase 3 study testing Dolutegravir (DTG), Lamivudine (3TC) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC) in people with Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus and HIV Infections, run by ViiV Healthcare at 105 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
This study will compare safety, efficacy, and tolerability of a two drug regimen of dolutegravir (DTG) plus (+) lamivudine (3TC) administered once daily with DTG plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF]/emtricitabine [FTC] fixed dose combination [FDC]) administered once… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Dolutegravir (DTG), Lamivudine (3TC) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 722 participants
- Where
- 105 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 18 Jul 2016to 29 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be an HIV 1 infected adult >=18 years of age (or older, if required by local regulations) at the time of signing the informed consent
- An eligible female participant should not be pregnant (as confirmed by a negative serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test at Screening and negative urine test at Baseline), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies
- Non reproductive premenopausal women are those that have undergone documented tubal ligation or documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion or documented bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy
- Non reproductive premenopausal women are those with 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and >=45 years of age
- Women with reproductive potential agree to follow one of the protocol-defined methods for avoiding pregnancy
- Should have screening plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of 1000 c/mL to <=100,000 c/mL. If an independent review of accumulated data from other clinical trials investigating the DTG plus 3TC dual regimen is supportive of the DTG plus 3TC treatment regimen, enrolment will be opened to participants with Screening plasma HIV 1 RNA of 1000 c/mL to <=500,000 c/mL
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participant should be antiretroviral naïve (defined as <=10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV 1 infection). Participants who received HIV post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) or pre exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the past are allowed as long as the last PEP/PrEP dose was >1 year from HIV diagnosis or there is documented HIV seronegativity between the last prophylactic dose and the date of HIV diagnosis
- Participants or the participants legal representative capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and the protocol
- Participants enrolled in France: a participant will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category
Who cannot join
- Women who are breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
- Any evidence of an active centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) Stage 3 disease (CDC, 2014), except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy and historical or current CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/mm^3
- Participants with severe hepatic impairment (Class C) as determined by Child Pugh classification
- Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones
- Evidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs or HBsAb) based on:
- Participants positive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) at screening will be excluded Participants negative for HBV core antibody (anti HBs) but positive for anti HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for HBV deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) will be excluded; however, participants positive for anti HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for anti HBs (past and/or current evidence) are immune to HBV and will not be excluded
Show all 24Show fewer
- Anticipated need for any hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the first 48 weeks of the study and for HCV therapy based on interferon or any drugs that have a potential for adverse drug:drug interactions with study treatment throughout the entire study period
- Untreated syphilis infection positive RPR at Screening without clear documentation of treatment. Participants who are at least 14 days post completed treatment are eligible
- History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class
- Ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical, anal or penile intraepithelial neoplasia; other localised malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the Study Medical Monitor for inclusion of the participant
- Participants who in the Investigator's judgment, poses a significant suicidality risk. Recent history of suicidal behaviour and/or suicidal ideation may be considered as evidence of serious suicide risk
- Treatment with an HIV 1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening
- Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening:
- Radiation therapy,
- Cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents,
- Any systemic immune suppressant
- Treatment with any agent, except recognised ART as allowed above, with documented activity against HIV 1 in vitro within 28 days of first dose of study treatment
- Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study treatment
- Participants enrolled in France: the participant has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 60 days or 5 half lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the experimental drug or vaccine, whichever is longer, prior to screening for the study or the participant will participate simultaneously in another clinical study
- Any evidence of pre existing viral resistance based on the presence of any major resistance associated mutation in the Screening result or, if known, in any historical resistance test result
- Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. A single repeat test is allowed during the Screening period to verify a result
- Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the participants participation in the study of an investigational compound
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >=5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT >=3xULN and bilirubin >=1.5xULN (with >35% direct bilirubin)
- Creatinine clearance of <50 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 via the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD EPI) method
Trial locations and contacts
105 sites in 18 countries.
105 sites in 18 countries
United States25 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
GSK Investigational Site
Berkley, Michigan, 48072
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-3300
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0405
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
GSK Investigational Site
Ft. Pierce, Florida, 34982
GSK Investigational Site
Hillsborough, New Jersey, 08844
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77009
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77098
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90069
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33133
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
GSK Investigational Site
Newark, New Jersey, 07102
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32803
GSK Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94109
GSK Investigational Site
San Leandro, California, 94577
GSK Investigational Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31401
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63139
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20005
GSK Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Spain13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alcorcón, 28922
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08003
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08035
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036
GSK Investigational Site
Granada, 18014
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28006
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28041
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28046
GSK Investigational Site
Málaga, 29010
GSK Investigational Site
Marid, 28040
GSK Investigational Site
Seville, 41013
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46010
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46026
Italy8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bergamo, 24128
GSK Investigational Site
Genoa, Liguria, 16128
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20142
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20157
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, 20162
GSK Investigational Site
Modena, Emilia-Romagna, 41100
GSK Investigational Site
Monza, 20900
GSK Investigational Site
Turin, Piedmont, 10149
United Kingdom7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brighton, BN2 5BE
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, L69 3GE
GSK Investigational Site
London, E1 1BB
GSK Investigational Site
London, NW3 2QG
GSK Investigational Site
London, SE13 6LR
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, M13 0FH
GSK Investigational Site
Woolwich, London, London, SE18 4QH
Russia6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Izhevsk, 426067
GSK Investigational Site
Kazan', 420061
GSK Investigational Site
Kemerovo, 650056
GSK Investigational Site
Krasnodar, 350015
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 193167
GSK Investigational Site
St.Peterburg, 190103
Taiwan6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 807
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 813
GSK Investigational Site
New Taipei City, 220
GSK Investigational Site
Tainan, 704
GSK Investigational Site
Taipei, 11490
GSK Investigational Site
Taoyuan, 330
Argentina5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425 AWK
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1426ABP
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000PBJ
Australia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
GSK Investigational Site
Fitzroy North, Victoria, 3068
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, Prahran 3181
GSK Investigational Site
Parramatta, New South Wales, 2150
GSK Investigational Site
Prahran, Victoria, 3181
Germany5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53127
GSK Investigational Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 20099
GSK Investigational Site
München, 81675
Belgium3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1090
GSK Investigational Site
Ghent, 9000
GSK Investigational Site
Lodelinsart, 6042
Canada3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2C7
France3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bobigny, 93009
GSK Investigational Site
Lyon, 69317
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75970
Mexico3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Distrito Federal, 03720
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280
GSK Investigational Site
México, 14000
Peru3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, 1
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Callao 2
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima 13
Portugal3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amadora, 2720-276
GSK Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1349-019
GSK Investigational Site
Porto, 4200-319
Romania3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 021105
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 30303
GSK Investigational Site
Iași, 700116
Switzerland3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bern, 3010
GSK Investigational Site
Geneva, CH-1205
GSK Investigational Site
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre, Parallel-group, Non-inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine Compared to Dolutegravir Plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected Treatment-naïve Adults
This study will compare safety, efficacy, and tolerability of a two drug regimen of dolutegravir (DTG) plus (+) lamivudine (3TC) administered once daily with DTG plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF]/emtricitabine [FTC] fixed dose combination [FDC]) administered once daily in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 infected adult participants that have not previously received antiretroviral therapy. The study is designed to demonstrate the non inferior antiviral activity of DTG + 3TC regimen to that of DTG + TDF/FTC FDC and will characterise the long term antiviral activity, tolerability and safety of DTG plus 3TC through Week 148. Approximately, 700 participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive DTG + 3TC or DTG + TDF/FTC FDC. Participants will be stratified by screening HIV 1 ribonucleotide nucleic acid (RNA) levels and by screening CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) cell count.
- Being tested
- Dolutegravir (DTG), Lamivudine (3TC), Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC)
- Keywords
- tolerability, HIV 1, efficacy, treatment naïve, two-drug regimen, safety, non inferiority
- Medical subject headings
- Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dolutegravir (DTG)Drug
DTG is available as 50 mg white, round, biconvex, film coated tablet debossed on one side with 'SV 572' and on the other side with '50'. The tablets are packaged into high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 45 ml bottle contains 30 tablets and a desiccant. DTG 50 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 148 weeks.
Lamivudine (3TC)Drug
Lamivudine is available as swedish orange, 'AA' sized elongated double blind HPMC capsules containing 300 mg lamivudine to visually match overencapsulated TDF/FTC FDC tablet. The capsules are packaged into HDPE bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 150 mL bottle contains 30 capsules and a desiccant. Overencapsulated 3TC 300 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 96 weeks. From Week 96 to Week 148, lamivudine will be dispensed as 300 mg white, diamond shaped, scored, film coated tablets debossed with 'GX CJ7' on both sides, packed in over labelled HDPE bottles with child-resistant closures each containing 30 tablets.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC)Drug
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and Emtricitabine are available as swedish orange, 'AA' sized elongated double blind HPMC capsules containing 300 mg TDF and 200 mg FTC to visually match overencapsulated 3TC tablet. The capsules are packaged into HDPE bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 150 mL bottle contains 30 capsules and a desiccant. Overencapsulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 96 weeks. From Week 96 to Week 148, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine will be dispensed as 300/200 mg white, blue, capsule shaped, film coated tablets debossed with 'GILEAD' on one side and '701' on another side, packed in overlabelled HDPE bottles with polypropylene childresistant closures each containing 30 tablets and a desiccant.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DTG + 3TC (50 mg+300 mg | Experimental | Eligible participants will receive one 50 mg tablet of DTG plus one overencapsulated 300 mg 3TC tablet orally once daily upto 96 weeks; thereafter will receive DTG plus 3TC tablet upto Week 148 and will continue to receive this schedule until (i) DTG and 3TC are both locally approved for use as part of a dual regimen, and the single entities of DTG and 3TC are available to patients (e.g. through public health services), or (ii) the DTG/3TC FDC tablet, if required by local regulations, is available, , or (iii) the participant no longer derives clinical benefit, or (iv) the participant meets a protocol defined reason for discontinuation, or (v) development of the DTG plus 3TC dual regimen is terminated. Receives: Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG); Drug: Lamivudine (3TC) |
| DTG + TDF/FTC FDC (50 mg+300/200 mg) | Active comparator | Eligible participants will receive one 50 mg tablet of DTG plus one overencapsulated TDF/ FTC FDC (300/200 mg) tablet orally once daily upto 96 weeks; thereafter will receive DTG plus TDF/FTC FDC tablets upto Week 148 (open-label randomised phase). Receives: Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG); Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL (c/mL) at Week 48
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Intent-To-Treat Exposed (ITT-E) Population was used which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Percentage values are rounded off.
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (63)
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 24
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with CMH weights. Percentage values are rounded off.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with CMH weights. Percentage values are rounded off.
Measured: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 144
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with CMH weights. Percentage values are rounded off.
Measured: Week 144
Time to Viral Suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) up to Week 144
Time of viral suppression is defined as the first viral load value <50 c/mL. Nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was performed. Participants who withdrew for any reason without being suppressed were censored at date of withdrawal. Participants who have not been withdrawn and have not had viral suppression at time of the analysis were censored at last viral load date. Confidence Interval (CI) was estimated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.
Measured: Up to Week 144
CD4+ Cell Counts at Weeks 24 and 48
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry.
Measured: Weeks 24 and 48
CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry.
Measured: Week 96
CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry.
Measured: Week 144
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 24 and 48
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted least mean and standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count and visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 48
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count and visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and Week 96
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count and visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and Week 144
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Disease Progression up to Week 144
HIV-associated conditions were recorded during the study and was assessed according to the 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Classification System for HIV Infection in Adults. Disease progressions summarize participants who had HIV infection stage 3 associated conditions or death. Indicators of clinical disease progression were defined as: CDC Category Stage 1 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 2 at enrolment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 3 at enrollment to New Stage 3 Event; CDC Category Stage 1, 2 or 3 at enrolment to Death. Participants may have more than one indicators of clinical disease progression including death, hence they may contribute to data in more than one categories.
Measured: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Genotypic Resistance up to Week 144
Number of participants, who met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria, with treatment emergent genotypic resistance to Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and/or Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) was summarized. The Viral Genotypic Population comprised of all participants in the ITT-E population who have available on-treatment genotypic resistance data.
Measured: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Phenotypic Resistance up to Week 144
Number of participants, who met CVW criteria, with treatment emergent phenotypic resistance to INSTI and/or NRTI were summarized. Assessment of antiviral activity of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) using phenotypic test results were interpreted through a proprietary algorithm (from Monogram Biosciences) and provides the overall susceptibility of the drugs (DTG, 3TC, Abacavir [ABC], elvitegravir [EGV], raltegravir [RAL], zidovudine [AZT], stavudine [D4T], didanosine [DDI]), emtricitabine [FTC], tenofovir disiproxil fumarate [TDF]). Partially sensitive and resistant cells were considered resistant in this analysis. The Viral Phenotypic Population comprised of all participants in the ITT-E population who have available on-treatment phenotypic resistance data.
Measured: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Serious AE (SAE) up to Week 148
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or protocol-defined event associated with liver injury and impaired liver function were categorized as SAE. Safety Population was used which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Measured: Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With AEs by Maximum Severity Grades up to Week 148
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.
Measured: Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With Any Drug Related AEs and Drug Related AEs by Maximum Grade up to Week 148
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5. (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with drug related AEs and drug related AEs by by maximum grade have been presented.
Measured: Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities up to Week 144
Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for assessment of hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils and platelet count. Any abnormality was graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities in any of the listed hematology parameters have been presented.
Measured: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Chemistry Toxicities up to Week 144
Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for assessment of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Bilirubin, Carbon dioxide (CO2), Cholesterol, Creatine kinase (CK), Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), Hypercalcemia, Hyperglycemia, Hyperkalemia, Hypernatremia, Hypocalcemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypokalemia, Hyponatremia, Low density lipid (LDL) Cholesterol, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Lipase, Phosphate, and Triglycerides. Any abnormality was graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent chemistry toxicities in any of the chemistry parameters have been presented.
Measured: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to AEs Over Weeks 24, 48, 96
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants who discontinued treatment due to AEs have been reported.
Measured: Up to Weeks 24, 48 and 96
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to AEs Over Week 144
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants who discontinued treatment due to AEs have been reported.
Measured: Up to Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum Cystatin C and Serum Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) at Weeks 24, 48
Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum Cystatin C and Serum RBP. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum Cystatin C at Week 96
Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum Cystatin C. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum Cystatin C at Week 144
Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum Cystatin C. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum RBP at Week 96
Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum RBP. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum RBP at Week 144
Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum RBP. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24, 48
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI (GFR-cystatin C adjusted) and Serum or Plasma GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose Assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted for BSA Using CKD-EPI Method at Week 96
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose Assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted for BSA Using CKD-EPI Method at Week 144
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose Assessment. Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Weeks 24, 48
Blood and samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarker which included Serum or Plasma Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the inidcated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Week 96
Blood and samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarker which included Serum or Plasma Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the inidcated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Week 144
Blood and samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarker which included Serum or Plasma Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the inidcated time point minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 144
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Urine and Serum Beta-2 Microglobulin (B2M), Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24, 48
Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers: Urine and Serum B2M, Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was performed on log-transformed data. Ratio to Baseline was calculated as ratio of post-dose visit value over Baseline value. Geometric mean ratio and 95% CI of geometric mean ratio have been presented. Biomarkers were Adjusted for treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, loge transformed Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and loge transformed Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 24, 48
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Week 96
Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers: Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was performed on log-transformed data. Ratio to Baseline was calculated as ratio of post-dose visit value over Baseline value. Biomarkers were Adjusted for treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, loge transformed Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and loge transformed Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and Week 96
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Week 144
Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers: Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine. Baseline value was the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was performed on log-transformed data. Ratio to Baseline was calculated as ratio of post-dose visit value over Baseline value. Biomarkers were Adjusted for treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, loge transformed Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and loge transformed Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (Bone-ALP), Serum Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) and Serum Type I Collagen C-Telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24, 48
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarkers which included bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, PINP and CTX-1. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type I CTX-1 at Week 96
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarkers which included bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type CTX-1. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current vitamin D use (factor), Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type I CTX-1 at Week 144
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarkers which included bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type CTX-1. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current vitamin D use (factor), Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Weeks 24, 48
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarker serum vitamin D. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Week 96
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarker serum vitamin D. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Week 144
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarker serum vitamin D. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 144
Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids-Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides at Weeks 24, 48
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipids which included Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as 100 multiplied by ([post-dose visit value minus Baseline value] divided by Baseline value).
Measured: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids-Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides at Week 96
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipids which included Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids-Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides at Week 144
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipids which included Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio at Weeks 24, 48
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as 100 multiplied by ([post-dose visit value minus Baseline value] divided by Baseline value). Lipid last observation carried forwarded (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Participants on lipid-lowering agents at Baseline were excluded.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio at Week 96
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio at Week 144
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Laboratory Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol by Weeks 24, 48
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting LDL cholesterol. Any abnormalities were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Percentage of participants with Grade 2 or greater laboratory abnormalities in fasting LDL cholesterol by Weeks 24 and 48 have been presented. Participants without any post-Baseline fasting LDL cholesterol value prior to Week 48 or those who had Baseline lipids-lowering agents were not included. Lipid Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Laboratory Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol by Week 96
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting LDL cholesterol. Any abnormalities were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Percentage of participants with Grade 2 or greater laboratory abnormalities in fasting LDL cholesterol by Week 96 have been presented. Participants without any post-Baseline fasting LDL cholesterol value prior to Week 96 or those who had Baseline lipids-lowering agents were not included. Lipid Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Laboratory Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol by Week 144
Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting LDL cholesterol. Any abnormalities were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). Percentage of participants with Grade 2 or greater laboratory abnormalities in fasting LDL cholesterol by Week 144 have been presented. Participants without any post-Baseline fasting LDL cholesterol value prior to Week 144 or those who had Baseline lipids-lowering agents were not included. Lipid Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Week 144
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 24
Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200 cells/mm^3, >200 cells/mm^3 for group-1), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000 c/mL) and Race (White, African American/African heritage (H.), Asian other). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48
Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200 cells/mm^3, >200 cells/mm^3 for group-1), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian and other). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Week 48
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96
Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200 cells/mm^3, >200 cells/mm^3), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian and other). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Week 96
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 144
Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200 cells/mm^3, >200 cells/mm^3), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian and other). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Measured: Week 144
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 24 by Subgroups
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from ANCOVA model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 48 by Subgroups
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96 by Subgroups
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from ANCOVA model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144 by Subgroups
CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from ANCOVA model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life [EuroQoL] - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Weeks 4, 24, 48
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. MMRM was run on LOCF dataset. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 24, 48
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Week 96
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. MMRM was run on LOCF dataset. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Week 144
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. MMRM was run on LOCF dataset. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Change From Baseline in EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Thermometer Scores at Weeks 4, 24, 48
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provided a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset, using the observed margins (OM) option. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 24, 48
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 96
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provided a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset, using the observed margins (OM) option. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 144
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provided a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset, using the observed margins (OM) option. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study start18 Jul 2016
- Primary completion4 Apr 2018
- Study completion29 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infection, Human Immunodeficiency VirusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ViiV HealthcareThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 722 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ViiV Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, ViiV Healthcare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02831764
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 205543
- Other IDs
- 2016-000459-28, 2016
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents of the eligible studies via the Data Sharing Portal. Details on ViiV's data sharing criteria can be found at: https://viivhealthcare.com/about-viiv/corporate-ethics-compliance/commitment-to-data-transparency/
Publications
Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, Antinori A, Ortiz R, Clarke AE, Hung CC, Rockstroh JK, Girard PM, Sievers J, Man C, Currie A, Underwood M, Tenorio AR, Pappa K, Wynne B, Fettiplace A, Gartland M, Aboud M, Smith K; GEMINI Study Team. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):143-155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32462-0. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
PubMed 30420123Rolle CP, Arribas JR, Ortiz R, Underwood M, Parry CM, Grove R, DiMondi VP, Jones B, Kisare M. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Adults Initiating Dolutegravir/Lamivudine With High Viral Load in the GEMINI-1/-2 and STAT Trials. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 7;12(3):ofaf135. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf135. eCollection 2025 Mar.
PubMed 40134635Ait-Khaled M, Sierra Madero J, Estrada V, Gulminetti R, Hagins D, Tsai HC, Man C, Sievers J, Grove R, Zolopa A, Wynne B, van Wyk J. Impact of treatment adherence on efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine and dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine: pooled analysis of the GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 clinical studies. HIV Res Clin Pract. 2021 Dec 9;23(1):9-14. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
PubMed 34913844
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre, Parallel-group, Non-inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine Compared to Dolutegravir Plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected Treatment-naïve Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02831764
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 205543
- Keywords
- tolerability, HIV 1, efficacy, treatment naïve, two-drug regimen, safety, non inferiority
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 722 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ViiV HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- 18 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare safety, efficacy, and tolerability of a two drug regimen of dolutegravir (DTG) plus (+) lamivudine (3TC) administered once daily with DTG plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF]/emtricitabine [FTC] fixed dose combination [FDC]) administered once daily in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 infected adult participants that have not previously received antiretroviral therapy. The study is designed to demonstrate the non inferior antiviral activity of DTG + 3TC regimen to that of DTG + TDF/FTC FDC and will characterise the long term antiviral activity, tolerability and safety of DTG plus 3TC through Week 148. Approximately, 700 participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive DTG + 3TC or DTG + TDF/FTC FDC. Participants will be stratified by screening HIV 1 ribonucleotide nucleic acid (RNA) levels and by screening CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) cell count.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DTG + 3TC (50 mg+300 mg | Experimental | Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG), Drug: Lamivudine (3TC)Eligible participants will receive one 50 mg tablet of DTG plus one overencapsulated 300 mg 3TC tablet orally once daily upto 96 weeks; thereafter will receive DTG plus 3TC tablet upto Week 148 and will continue to receive this schedule until (i) DTG and 3TC are both locally approved for use as part of a dual regimen, and the single entities of DTG and 3TC are available to patients (e.g. through public health services), or (ii) the DTG/3TC FDC tablet, if required by local regulations, is available, , or (iii) the participant no longer derives clinical benefit, or (iv) the participant meets a protocol defined reason for discontinuation, or (v) development of the DTG plus 3TC dual regimen is terminated. |
| DTG + TDF/FTC FDC (50 mg+300/200 mg) | Active comparator | Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG), Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC)Eligible participants will receive one 50 mg tablet of DTG plus one overencapsulated TDF/ FTC FDC (300/200 mg) tablet orally once daily upto 96 weeks; thereafter will receive DTG plus TDF/FTC FDC tablets upto Week 148 (open-label randomised phase). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Must be an HIV 1 infected adult >=18 years of age (or older, if required by local regulations) at the time of signing the informed consent
- An eligible female participant should not be pregnant (as confirmed by a negative serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test at Screening and negative urine test at Baseline), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies
- Should have screening plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of 1000 c/mL to <=100,000 c/mL. If an independent review of accumulated data from other clinical trials investigating the DTG plus 3TC dual regimen is supportive of the DTG plus 3TC treatment regimen, enrolment will be opened to participants with Screening plasma HIV 1 RNA of 1000 c/mL to <=500,000 c/mL
- Participant should be antiretroviral naïve (defined as <=10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV 1 infection). Participants who received HIV post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) or pre exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the past are allowed as long as the last PEP/PrEP dose was >1 year from HIV diagnosis or there is documented HIV seronegativity between the last prophylactic dose and the date of HIV diagnosis
- Participants or the participants legal representative capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and the protocol
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Women who are breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
- Any evidence of an active centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) Stage 3 disease (CDC, 2014), except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy and historical or current CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/mm^3
- Participants with severe hepatic impairment (Class C) as determined by Child Pugh classification
- Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones
- Evidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs or HBsAb) based on:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dolutegravir (DTG)DTG is available as 50 mg white, round, biconvex, film coated tablet debossed on one side with 'SV 572' and on the other side with '50'. The tablets are packaged into high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 45 ml bottle contains 30 tablets and a desiccant. DTG 50 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 148 weeks. | Drug | DTG + 3TC (50 mg+300 mg, DTG + TDF/FTC FDC (50 mg+300/200 mg) |
| Lamivudine (3TC)Lamivudine is available as swedish orange, 'AA' sized elongated double blind HPMC capsules containing 300 mg lamivudine to visually match overencapsulated TDF/FTC FDC tablet. The capsules are packaged into HDPE bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 150 mL bottle contains 30 capsules and a desiccant. Overencapsulated 3TC 300 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 96 weeks. From Week 96 to Week 148, lamivudine will be dispensed as 300 mg white, diamond shaped, scored, film coated tablets debossed with 'GX CJ7' on both sides, packed in over labelled HDPE bottles with child-resistant closures each containing 30 tablets. | Drug | DTG + 3TC (50 mg+300 mg |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC)Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and Emtricitabine are available as swedish orange, 'AA' sized elongated double blind HPMC capsules containing 300 mg TDF and 200 mg FTC to visually match overencapsulated 3TC tablet. The capsules are packaged into HDPE bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 150 mL bottle contains 30 capsules and a desiccant. Overencapsulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 96 weeks. From Week 96 to Week 148, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine will be dispensed as 300/200 mg white, blue, capsule shaped, film coated tablets debossed with 'GILEAD' on one side and '701' on another side, packed in overlabelled HDPE bottles with polypropylene childresistant closures each containing 30 tablets and a desiccant. | Drug | DTG + TDF/FTC FDC (50 mg+300/200 mg) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL (c/mL) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Intent-To-Treat Exposed (ITT-E) Population was used which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Percentage values are rounded off.
63 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 144
Time frame: Week 144
Time to Viral Suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) up to Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
CD4+ Cell Counts at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame: Weeks 24 and 48
CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144
Time frame: Week 144
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 24 and 48
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 48
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and Week 96
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and Week 144
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Disease Progression up to Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Genotypic Resistance up to Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Phenotypic Resistance up to Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Serious AE (SAE) up to Week 148
Time frame: Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With AEs by Maximum Severity Grades up to Week 148
Time frame: Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With Any Drug Related AEs and Drug Related AEs by Maximum Grade up to Week 148
Time frame: Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities up to Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Chemistry Toxicities up to Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to AEs Over Weeks 24, 48, 96
Time frame: Up to Weeks 24, 48 and 96
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to AEs Over Week 144
Time frame: Up to Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum Cystatin C and Serum Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) at Weeks 24, 48
Time frame: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum Cystatin C at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum Cystatin C at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum RBP at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum RBP at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24, 48
Time frame: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted for BSA Using CKD-EPI Method at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted for BSA Using CKD-EPI Method at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Weeks 24, 48
Time frame: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 144
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Urine and Serum Beta-2 Microglobulin (B2M), Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24, 48
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24, 48
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and Week 96
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (Bone-ALP), Serum Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) and Serum Type I Collagen C-Telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24, 48
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type I CTX-1 at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type I CTX-1 at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Weeks 24, 48
Time frame: Baseline and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Week 144
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 144
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Dec 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 30420123Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, Antinori A, Ortiz R, Clarke AE, Hung CC, Rockstroh JK, Girard PM, Sievers J, Man C, Currie A, Underwood M, Tenorio AR, Pappa K, Wynne B, Fettiplace A, Gartland M, Aboud M, Smith K; GEMINI Study Team. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):143-155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32462-0. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40134635Rolle CP, Arribas JR, Ortiz R, Underwood M, Parry CM, Grove R, DiMondi VP, Jones B, Kisare M. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Adults Initiating Dolutegravir/Lamivudine With High Viral Load in the GEMINI-1/-2 and STAT Trials. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 7;12(3):ofaf135. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf135. eCollection 2025 Mar.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34913844Ait-Khaled M, Sierra Madero J, Estrada V, Gulminetti R, Hagins D, Tsai HC, Man C, Sievers J, Grove R, Zolopa A, Wynne B, van Wyk J. Impact of treatment adherence on efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine and dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine: pooled analysis of the GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 clinical studies. HIV Res Clin Pract. 2021 Dec 9;23(1):9-14. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents of the eligible studies via the Data Sharing Portal. Details on ViiV's data sharing criteria can be found at: https://viivhealthcare.com/about-viiv/corporate-ethics-compliance/commitment-to-data-transparency/
Related trials for Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
RecruitingPhase 2
Doravirine (DOR) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Children Aged 4 Weeks to <12 Years and <45 kg (MK-1439-066)
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Study of Islatravir and Ulonivirine for People With HIV-1 Who Have Not Been Treated Before (MK-8591B-062)
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Infection
Recruiting
Screening With Portable X-rays for Rapid Recognition of TB
Tuberculosis (TB), Tuberculosis Infection, Latent
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Innate-like and NK Signatures in Chronic-Treated HIV Infection INSTINCT-HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (HIV)
RecruitingPhase 2
Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes in Treating Patients With Malignancies With BK and/or JC Virus
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, BK Virus Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
ViiV Healthcare
105 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dolutegravir (DTG), Lamivudine (3TC) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC) in people with Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus and HIV Infections, run by ViiV Healthcare at 105 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 105 sites in United States, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom, Russia and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL (c/mL) at Week 48 (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02831764, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.