AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral PalsyCLASS-MSNCT02834195

Types of Upper Limb and Hand in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

An observational study of Cerebral Palsy, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cerebral palsy (CP) has been defined as "a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture causing activity limitation(s) that are attributed to non-progressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain". Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Palsy
How many people
111 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2013to Jun 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with cerebral palsy

Who may be able to join

  • cerebral palsy

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale, Evaluation, Recherche - 162 avenue Lacassagne - Bâtiment A

    Lyon, 69424

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Validation of a Classification of Types of Upper Limb and Hand in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Cerebral palsy (CP) has been defined as "a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture causing activity limitation(s) that are attributed to non-progressive disturbances that occurred in the developing fetal or infant brain".

Investigators previously developed two classification systems, one for the upper limb and one for the hand, based on 100 films of patients with cerebral palsy. Separate classifications were developed following an initial study in which investigators found no correlations between upper limb and hand patterns, meaning that specific upper limb patterns are not always associated with specific hand patterns. Thumb patterns were not included in these classifications since robust classifications already exist, moreover thumb patterns are independent from hand patterns.

The aim is to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of two previously developed classifications of upper limb and hand patterns.

Conditions
Cerebral Palsy
Keywords
Cerebral palsy, reliability, upper limb and hand patterns, classification
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in upper limb pattern classification of each examiner between day 1 and month 2

    Intra-rater reliability of a classification of upper limb pattern in patients with cerebral palsy.

    Measured: examiner classification at day 1 and at month 2.

  2. Change in hand pattern classification of each examiner between day 1 and month 2

    Intra-rater reliability of a classification of hand pattern in patients with cerebral palsy.

    Measured: examiner classification at day 1 and at month 2.

  3. Change between examiner classification and the expert examiner classification

    Level of agreement will be determined with Fleiss's kappa (k) and its 95% confidence interval Inter-rater reliability of a classification of upper limb pattern in patients with cerebral palsy.

    Measured: Expert examiner classification (day 1) and examiner classification (week 4)

  4. Change between examiner classification and the expert examiner classification

    Level of agreement will be determined with Fleiss's kappa (k) and its 95% confidence interval.

    Inter-rater reliability of a classification of hand pattern in patients with cerebral palsy.

    Measured: Expert examiner classification (day 1) and examiner classification (week 4)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
111 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02834195
Sponsor's protocol ID
D21882
Acronym
CLASS-MS
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
4 Jul 2016
Last updated
19 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cerebral Palsy, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in upper limb pattern classification of each examiner between day 1 and month 2 (time frame: examiner classification at day 1 and at month 2.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in