Cervical Dystonia, PrimaryNCT02837185
Effects of Botulinum Toxin on Muscle and Brain Activity
A study testing Botulinum Toxin injection and Physiological measures in people with Cervical Dystonia, Primary, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will look into the effects of Botulinum Toxin in patients with primary cervical dystonia. The effects will be determined by neck muscle activity measurements and brain function activity measurements. The goal of the study is to try to identify markers of the effects of Botulinum toxin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia, Primary
- What is being tested?
- Botulinum Toxin injection and Physiological measures
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to 26 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Subject inclusion criteria:
- Diagnosis: PCD
- Receiving BoNT at the University of Florida (UF)
Subject exclusion criteria:
- Secondary torticollis
- Pregnancy
- Active seizure disorder
- Presence of metallic body such as pacemaker, implants, metal rods and hearing aid
Control inclusion criteria:
- Age 21-80 years
Control exclusion criteria:
- Any form of torticollis
- Pregnancy
- Active seizure disorder
- Presence of metallic body such as pacemaker, implants, metal rods and hearing aid
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Physiological Effects of Botulinum Toxin Therapy in Primary Cervical Dystonia
This study will look into the effects of Botulinum Toxin in patients with primary cervical dystonia. The effects will be determined by neck muscle activity measurements and brain function activity measurements. The goal of the study is to try to identify markers of the effects of Botulinum toxin.
Read the detailed description
Primary Cervical Dystonia (PCD) is the most common type of focal dystonia. In addition to pain, PCD is associated with disability in many activities of daily living; social stigma and embarrassment; and decreased quality of life. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy is the "gold standard" for treatment of PCD. Although effective in improving dystonia symptoms, BoNT injections have been associated with suboptimal improvements and the benefits of BoNT may last shorter than the expected time frame of 12 weeks. PCD subjects are referred for deep brain stimulation surgery if there is poor or inconsistent response to medical treatment. In addition to the need for repetitive injections, subjects may suffer from side effects such as neck pain, muscle weakness, head drop, breathing difficulty, and swallowing issues. BoNT therapy outcomes are not likely to improve until and unless the investigators understand the underlying mechanisms of action.
The primary goal of this study is to examine the physiological effects of BoNT therapy and to advance the understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia. BoNT therapy is commonly perceived to induce peripheral muscle weakness through inhibition of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. However many argue that this is not likely the only or primary mechanism of action, as many subjects have improvement in dystonia without discernible muscle weakness and others have significant weakness and no improvement in their dystonia. Indeed, BoNT has been proposed to induce central effects possibly related to modulation of the muscle spindle afferent feedback or a retrograde transport of toxin to the central nervous system. A leading theory underpinning the pathophysiology of dystonia is loss of motor inhibition (or increased excitability) at the level of the spinal cord, brainstem and the motor cortex. Thus, modulation of pathology in these central pathways is critical for control of dystonia. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive physiological technique for assessment of motor cortex excitability. Paired-pulse TMS paradigms, such as short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) are well established paradigms for evaluation of motor cortex excitability.
SICI is measured by delivering a subthreshold conditioning pulse prior to the suprathreshold test pulse at short interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 1-5 milliseconds (ms) resulting in a lower motor evoked potential (MEP) response to the test pulse. SICI is regarded as a gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA-A) receptor-mediated inhibition that involves activation of the cortical inhibitory interneurons. ICF is measured using a paradigm similar to SICI but with a longer ISI of 8-30 ms resulting in increase in MEP response. Glutamate is probably involved in producing ICF through cortical facilitation.
In focal dystonia, including PCD, there is failure of SICI recorded from hand muscles, and conversely, there is enhanced ICF recorded from hand muscles. These paradigms were not recorded from neck muscles as they are technically challenging. Nevertheless an important finding was noted that in PCD, the motor cortical inhibition is widespread and extends beyond the area of symptomatic muscles.
TMS was used to assess the effects of BoNT on SICI in subjects with arm dystonia. SICI in distal hand muscle increases at one month after BoNT injections and returns to the previously abnormal levels of excitability at three months. It can be speculated that the BoNT therapy to arm muscles modulates the afferent input from muscles, which probably results in reorganization of the motor cortex. It is not clear if the physiological change induced by BoNT therapy had any correlation with the clinical improvement. In addition, it is not clear if the change in motor cortex excitability ultimately affects the corticospinal drive to the dystonic muscles.
In this study, the investigators will focus on the physiological effects of BoNT using broader TMS measures of motor cortex excitability. The central hypothesis is that BoNT modulates the motor cortex excitability and the corticospinal drive to the muscles and that these physiological effects of BoNT will have a clear correlation with the clinical response. To test this hypothesis, the investigators plan to measure the corticospinal drive to dystonic muscles using electromyographic (EMG) spectral analysis. They will record the clinical outcome with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) which is a standardized validated rating scale for PCD.
The first and second aim will focus on the physiological aspects of BoNT therapy in PCD. The investigators plan to determine the cortical and corticospinal physiologic changes at the time of peak BoNT effects (BoNT ON) which are typically seen around 4-8 weeks after the injections and at the time of wearing off related to BoNT therapy which will correspond to the time of the next injection cycle (BoNT OFF). The third aim will help the investigators understand the physiological differences between clinical responders and non-responders. Healthy controls will be enrolled for normative physiological data. The main significance of this study is advancement of physiological knowledge related to BoNT therapy in subjects with PCD.
Aim 1:
To determine the effect of BoNT therapy on the motor cortex excitability in PCD.
TMS measures (such as SICI, ICF,...) will be collected using standardized protocols at the time of peak BoNT effects (BoNT ON) and at the time of trough BoNT effects (BoNT OFF).
Hypothesis 1:
The TMS measures will be normalized to healthy controls at the time of peak BoNT effects and these effects will reverse once the BoNT effects wear off.
Aim 2:
To determine the effects of BoNT therapy on the corticospinal drive to the PCD muscles.
EMG spectral analysis for the auto-spectral peak of 4-7 Hertz (Hz) at the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and the 10-12 Hz coherence between the SCM and the splenius capitis (SPL) will be used at the time of peak (BoNT ON) and trough BoNT effects (BoNT OFF).
Hypothesis 2:
The coherence between SPL and SCM muscles will be lost at the time of peak BoNT effects. There will be a re-appearance of the auto-spectral peak in SPL muscle as seen in healthy controls. These spectral analysis changes will reverse as the BoNT effects wear off during trough.
Aim 3:
To determine the correlation between the physiological measures (TMS and EMG measures) during peak BoNT effects and the clinical scores.
Hypothesis 3:
The change in TMS measures and EMG spectral findings at the time of peak BoNT effects will correlate with the change in clinical score on the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scale.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia, Primary
- Being tested
- Botulinum Toxin injection, Physiological measures
- Keywords
- Cervical dystonia, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Electromyography, TMS, EMG
- Medical subject headings
- Cervical Dystonia, Primary, Torticollis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Botulinum Toxin injectionProcedure or surgery
Botulinum toxin injection for cervical dystonia subjects (as part of clinical care)
Physiological measuresOther
These include TMS and EMG measurements
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Dystonia | Experimental | 'Botulinum Toxin injection' will be done and 'physiological measures' will then be collected. Receives: Procedure: Botulinum Toxin injection; Other: Physiological measures |
| Healthy controls | Other | No Botulinum toxin is injected, 'physiological measures' will be collected as a healthy comparator. Receives: Other: Physiological measures |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in TMS measures
Measured: Baseline, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1; Arm 2 measured only at baseline
Changes in EMG measures
Measured: baseline, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1; Arm 2 measured only at baseline
Secondary outcomes (1)
Changes in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Clinical measurement of cervical dystonia
Measured: 0, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1 only
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completion26 Sep 2018
- Study completion26 Sep 2018
Why it stopped: Inability to recruit controls and limited research staff to complete project.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical Dystonia, PrimaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of FloridaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Florida
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dystonia Medical Research Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aparna Wagle Shukla, Principal investigator, University of Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02837185
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB201600759
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physiological Effects of Botulinum Toxin Therapy in Primary Cervical Dystonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02837185
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB201600759
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia, Primary
- Keywords
- Cervical dystonia, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Electromyography, TMS, EMG
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Inability to recruit controls and limited research staff to complete project.
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of FloridaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dystonia Medical Research Foundation
- Study start
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will look into the effects of Botulinum Toxin in patients with primary cervical dystonia. The effects will be determined by neck muscle activity measurements and brain function activity measurements. The goal of the study is to try to identify markers of the effects of Botulinum toxin.
Detailed description
Primary Cervical Dystonia (PCD) is the most common type of focal dystonia. In addition to pain, PCD is associated with disability in many activities of daily living; social stigma and embarrassment; and decreased quality of life. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy is the "gold standard" for treatment of PCD. Although effective in improving dystonia symptoms, BoNT injections have been associated with suboptimal improvements and the benefits of BoNT may last shorter than the expected time frame of 12 weeks. PCD subjects are referred for deep brain stimulation surgery if there is poor or inconsistent response to medical treatment. In addition to the need for repetitive injections, subjects may suffer from side effects such as neck pain, muscle weakness, head drop, breathing difficulty, and swallowing issues. BoNT therapy outcomes are not likely to improve until and unless the investigators understand the underlying mechanisms of action.
The primary goal of this study is to examine the physiological effects of BoNT therapy and to advance the understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia. BoNT therapy is commonly perceived to induce peripheral muscle weakness through inhibition of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. However many argue that this is not likely the only or primary mechanism of action, as many subjects have improvement in dystonia without discernible muscle weakness and others have significant weakness and no improvement in their dystonia. Indeed, BoNT has been proposed to induce central effects possibly related to modulation of the muscle spindle afferent feedback or a retrograde transport of toxin to the central nervous system. A leading theory underpinning the pathophysiology of dystonia is loss of motor inhibition (or increased excitability) at the level of the spinal cord, brainstem and the motor cortex. Thus, modulation of pathology in these central pathways is critical for control of dystonia. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive physiological technique for assessment of motor cortex excitability. Paired-pulse TMS paradigms, such as short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) are well established paradigms for evaluation of motor cortex excitability.
SICI is measured by delivering a subthreshold conditioning pulse prior to the suprathreshold test pulse at short interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 1-5 milliseconds (ms) resulting in a lower motor evoked potential (MEP) response to the test pulse. SICI is regarded as a gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA-A) receptor-mediated inhibition that involves activation of the cortical inhibitory interneurons. ICF is measured using a paradigm similar to SICI but with a longer ISI of 8-30 ms resulting in increase in MEP response. Glutamate is probably involved in producing ICF through cortical facilitation.
In focal dystonia, including PCD, there is failure of SICI recorded from hand muscles, and conversely, there is enhanced ICF recorded from hand muscles. These paradigms were not recorded from neck muscles as they are technically challenging. Nevertheless an important finding was noted that in PCD, the motor cortical inhibition is widespread and extends beyond the area of symptomatic muscles.
TMS was used to assess the effects of BoNT on SICI in subjects with arm dystonia. SICI in distal hand muscle increases at one month after BoNT injections and returns to the previously abnormal levels of excitability at three months. It can be speculated that the BoNT therapy to arm muscles modulates the afferent input from muscles, which probably results in reorganization of the motor cortex. It is not clear if the physiological change induced by BoNT therapy had any correlation with the clinical improvement. In addition, it is not clear if the change in motor cortex excitability ultimately affects the corticospinal drive to the dystonic muscles.
In this study, the investigators will focus on the physiological effects of BoNT using broader TMS measures of motor cortex excitability. The central hypothesis is that BoNT modulates the motor cortex excitability and the corticospinal drive to the muscles and that these physiological effects of BoNT will have a clear correlation with the clinical response. To test this hypothesis, the investigators plan to measure the corticospinal drive to dystonic muscles using electromyographic (EMG) spectral analysis. They will record the clinical outcome with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) which is a standardized validated rating scale for PCD.
The first and second aim will focus on the physiological aspects of BoNT therapy in PCD. The investigators plan to determine the cortical and corticospinal physiologic changes at the time of peak BoNT effects (BoNT ON) which are typically seen around 4-8 weeks after the injections and at the time of wearing off related to BoNT therapy which will correspond to the time of the next injection cycle (BoNT OFF). The third aim will help the investigators understand the physiological differences between clinical responders and non-responders. Healthy controls will be enrolled for normative physiological data. The main significance of this study is advancement of physiological knowledge related to BoNT therapy in subjects with PCD.
Aim 1:
To determine the effect of BoNT therapy on the motor cortex excitability in PCD.
TMS measures (such as SICI, ICF,...) will be collected using standardized protocols at the time of peak BoNT effects (BoNT ON) and at the time of trough BoNT effects (BoNT OFF).
Hypothesis 1:
The TMS measures will be normalized to healthy controls at the time of peak BoNT effects and these effects will reverse once the BoNT effects wear off.
Aim 2:
To determine the effects of BoNT therapy on the corticospinal drive to the PCD muscles.
EMG spectral analysis for the auto-spectral peak of 4-7 Hertz (Hz) at the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and the 10-12 Hz coherence between the SCM and the splenius capitis (SPL) will be used at the time of peak (BoNT ON) and trough BoNT effects (BoNT OFF).
Hypothesis 2:
The coherence between SPL and SCM muscles will be lost at the time of peak BoNT effects. There will be a re-appearance of the auto-spectral peak in SPL muscle as seen in healthy controls. These spectral analysis changes will reverse as the BoNT effects wear off during trough.
Aim 3:
To determine the correlation between the physiological measures (TMS and EMG measures) during peak BoNT effects and the clinical scores.
Hypothesis 3:
The change in TMS measures and EMG spectral findings at the time of peak BoNT effects will correlate with the change in clinical score on the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Dystonia | Experimental | Procedure: Botulinum Toxin injection, Other: Physiological measures'Botulinum Toxin injection' will be done and 'physiological measures' will then be collected. |
| Healthy controls | Other | Other: Physiological measuresNo Botulinum toxin is injected, 'physiological measures' will be collected as a healthy comparator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin injectionBotulinum toxin injection for cervical dystonia subjects (as part of clinical care) | Procedure or surgery | Cervical Dystonia |
| Physiological measuresThese include TMS and EMG measurements | Other | Cervical Dystonia, Healthy controls |
Primary outcome
Changes in TMS measures
Time frame: Baseline, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1; Arm 2 measured only at baseline
Changes in EMG measures
Time frame: baseline, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1; Arm 2 measured only at baseline
1 secondary outcome
Changes in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Time frame: 0, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1 only
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Inability to recruit controls and limited research staff to complete project.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia, Primary
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Waning of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia, Primary
Active, not recruiting
Segmental Muscle Vibration on Pain in Patients With Primary Cervical Dystonia
Primary Cervical Dystonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aparna Wagle Shukla principal investigator
University of Florida
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Botulinum Toxin injection and Physiological measures in people with Cervical Dystonia, Primary, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Inability to recruit controls and limited research staff to complete project.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in TMS measures (time frame: Baseline, BoNT ON (around 6 weeks), BoNT OFF (around 12 weeks) for Arm 1; Arm 2 measured only at baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2018.