AzTrials
AzTrials

Renal TransplantationCATAPULTNCT02843295

Catalytic Antibodies to Predict Uninvasively Late Transplant Failure

A study testing blood samples in people with Renal Transplantation, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN), a major cause of late allograft failure, is characterized by a progressive decline in graft function correlating with tissue destruction. Recent data suggest that it may be possible to delay graft destruction if adequate management is initiated early (ie, at the stage of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Renal Transplantation
What is being tested?
blood samples
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Sep 2010to Sep 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 the day of transplantation
  • Recipient of a renal graft
  • Informed consent to participate to the study
  • Patient transplanted and followed 2 years in one of the 3 transplantation centers of the study (Hospital Edouard Herriot or Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud)

Who cannot join

  • Multiorgan transplantation
  • Previous transplantation
  • ABO incompatible renal transplantation
  • Patient > 18 years old but under guardianship

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Transplantation Department

    Lyon, 69003

Other trials in France

About this study

Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN), a major cause of late allograft failure, is characterized by a progressive decline in graft function correlating with tissue destruction. Recent data suggest that it may be possible to delay graft destruction if adequate management is initiated early (ie, at the stage of subclinical CAN). It is therefore essential to design new tests allowing physicians to predict transplant recipients prone to develop CAN

Read the detailed description

Superantibodies are multifunctional antibodies combining the classical antigen-binding function with nonclassical biological activities, such as protease-like activity. In the past few years the role of proteolytic SuperAntibody (pSAb) has been evidenced in many biological processes in which their role may be either deleterious (autoimmune disease, alloimmune response against) or beneficial (sepsis).

Nothing is known so far regarding the role of pSAb in the setting of solid organ transplantation.

Preliminary data

The investigator has obtained preliminary results from a retrospective case control study indicating that an elevated serine protease activity of circulating IgG (measured by the hydrolysis of a synthetic fluorescent substrate: Proline-Phenylalanine-Arginine-Methylcoumarinamide (PFR-MCA)), correlates with the absence of CAN on protocol biopsy performed 2 years post-transplantation. Interestingly, low level of proteolysis IgG, measured 3 months post-transplantation, were also predictive of CAN at 2 years down the lane.

Aim of the Research project:

The aim is to validate in a prospective study, the potential of pSAb as predictive marker for CAN

100 recipients of a renal graft have to be enrolled and followed for 2 years.

The level of PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating Immunoglobulin G (IgG) will be measured before the transplantation and every 3 months up to one year and every 6 months thereafter until 2 year post-transplantation. The development of CAN will be assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification of the Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula), the proteinuria and the histological examination of the graft (screening biopsy at 3 months and 1 year will be analysed using a computerized color image analysis to quantify interstitial fibrosis).

The capacity of the pSAb test to predict CAN will be validated and the sensibility and specificity of this test will be calculated. The optimal cut-off value will be determined from the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. The accuracy of the test will be evaluated in subgroups displaying various risk factors for CAN.

Being tested
blood samples
Keywords
renal transplantation, immunology, rejection
Medical subject headings
Rejection, Psychology

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • blood samplesOther

Study groups in NCT02843295
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Population of the studyExperimental3 stratification groups: Group 1: High immunologic risk Patients receiving a ≥ 2nd graft and/or Panel Reactive Antibody ≥ 30% and/or Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) mismatches ≥ 4 Group 2: High non-immunologic risk Donors over 60 years of age and/or Donor between 50 to 59 years of age who have died of stroke, or had a history of high blood pressure, or at the time of death had a creatininemia ≥ 135 µmol/L Group 3: Low risk Patients not included in Groups 1 or 2
Receives: Other: blood samples

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol)

    Measured: at 3 months post-transplantation

  2. PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol)

    Measured: at 6 months post-transplantation

  3. PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol)

    Measured: at 9 months post-transplantation

  4. PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol)

    Measured: at 12 months post-transplantation

  5. PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol)

    Measured: at 18 months post-transplantation

  6. PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol)

    Measured: at 24 months post-transplantation

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Glomerular filtration rate by MDRD formula (ml/min)

    Measured: at 3 months post-transplantation

  2. Glomerular filtration rate by MDRD formula (ml/min)

    Measured: at 6 months post-transplantation

  3. Glomerular filtration rate by MDRD formula (ml/min)

    Measured: at 9 months post-transplantation

  4. Glomerular filtration rate by MDRD formula (ml/min)

    Measured: at 12 months post-transplantation

  5. Glomerular filtration rate by MDRD formula (ml/min)

    Measured: at 18 months post-transplantation

  6. Glomerular filtration rate by MDRD formula (ml/min)

    Measured: at 24 months post-transplantation

  7. Proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (g/g)

    Measured: at 3 months post-transplantation

  8. Proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (g/g)

    Measured: at 6 months post-transplantation

  9. Proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (g/g)

    Measured: at 9 months post-transplantation

  10. Proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (g/g)

    Measured: at 12 months post-transplantation

  11. Proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (g/g)

    Measured: at 18 months post-transplantation

  12. Proteinuria/creatinuria ratio (g/g)

    Measured: at 24 months post-transplantation

  13. Interstitial fibrosis on graft biopsy (%)

    Measured: at day 0

  14. Interstitial fibrosis on graft biopsy (%)

    Measured: at 12 months post-transplantation

  15. Interstitial fibrosis on graft biopsy (%)

    Measured: at 24 months post-transplantation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionSep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02843295
Sponsor's protocol ID
2009-592
Acronym
CATAPULT
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
21 Jul 2016
Last updated
25 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing blood samples in people with Renal Transplantation, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PFR-MCA hydrolysis by circulating IgG (mmol/min/mol) (time frame: at 3 months post-transplantation). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in