Breast NeoplasmsNCT02852421
Single Versus Multiple Injection Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Blocks
A study testing Single injection paravertebral block and Multiple injection paravertebral blocks in people with Breast Neoplasms and Anesthesia, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Paravertebral block (PVB) has been shown to provide excellent analgesia for major breast surgeries resulting in reduced narcotic consumption, reduced nausea, improved quality of recovery, reduced chronic pain and possibly reduced metastasis with breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasms, Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Single injection paravertebral block and Multiple injection paravertebral blocks
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to May 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Females, age 18 to 80 years, scheduled to receive unilateral mastectomy surgery, with or without axillary node dissection
- Able to give informed consent
- Able to cooperate with study process
- Availability of home telephone.
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal or lack of informed consent
- allergy to local anesthetic and other medications used in the study
- Bilateral mastectomies
- Coexisting hematological disorder or with deranged coagulation parameters
- Pre-existing major organ dysfunction such as hepatic and renal failure
- Significant thoracic kyphoscoliosis
- History of previous thoracic surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
St. Joseph's Health Care
London, Ontario, N6A 4V2
London Health Sciences Centre University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
About this study
Official title: Randomized Prospective Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Single Versus Multiple Injection Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Blocks for Breast Surgery
Paravertebral block (PVB) has been shown to provide excellent analgesia for major breast surgeries resulting in reduced narcotic consumption, reduced nausea, improved quality of recovery, reduced chronic pain and possibly reduced metastasis with breast cancer. Traditionally, PVB is done by multiple injections below T1-T5 transverse processes. With multiple injections, the risk is increased for a pleural, an intraneural, and/or an intravascular injection. Recently, ultrasonography is being used to facilitate PVB. The use of ultrasound imaging enables real-time needle visualization during the procedure. This may improve efficacy and reduce the chances of complication like pneumothorax. Currently, there are no data comparing ultrasound-guided single injection technique with multiple injections technique with regards to extent of spread for PVB. Our objective is to investigate the extent of dermatomal spread of PVB when equal volumes of local anesthetic are injected at one versus five paravertebral sites for patients undergoing major breast surgery. In addition, the investigators wish to compare the performance time and duration of analgesia.
Methodology: After local REB approval, 72 patients undergoing a unilateral mastectomy with or without axillary node dissection will be randomized to receive either single or multiple injections PVB. The PVB will be performed in prone position under real-time ultrasound guidance using a para-sagittal approach.The patients in single injection group will receive single injection PVB at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and four subcutaneous sham injections. Patients in the multiple injection group will receive five injections of PVB from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at each level. Pleural drift will be used as a sign of correct needle tip location and local anaesthetic spread. The pinprick method will be used to assess the extent of dermatomal blockade, 20 minutes following the completion of procedure. All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia for the surgery. Any adverse events including pneumothorax, epidural spread, LA toxicity/seizure, total spinal, will be recorded.
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms, Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Single injection paravertebral block, Multiple injection paravertebral blocks
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single injection paravertebral blockProcedure or surgery
The patients in single injection group will receive single injection paravertebral block at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" and four subcutaneous sham injections
Multiple injection paravertebral blocksProcedure or surgery
Patients in the multiple injection group will receive five injections of paravertebral blocks from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" was injected at each level.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple injection paravertebral blocks | Active comparator | Patients in this group will receive five injections of paravertebral blocks from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" was injected at each level. Receives: Procedure: Multiple injection paravertebral blocks |
| Single injection paravertebral block | Experimental | Patients in single injection group will receive single injection paravertebral blocks at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" and four subcutaneous sham injections. Receives: Procedure: Single injection paravertebral block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensory dermatomal spread
20 minutes after block performance
Measured: 20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time to performance of procedure
Measured: Duration of procedure
Cephalic and caudal dermatomal spread
Measured: 20 minutes after block performance
Incidence of complication
Follow-up phone call
Measured: 24 hours
VAS pain scores in PACU
During PACU stay
Measured: 6 hours
Duration of self-reported numbness at the surgical site
At follow-up phone call
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sugantha Ganapathy, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02852421
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17477
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Kee SS, Frenzel JC, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Kuerer HM, Lucci A. Improved postoperative pain control using thoracic paravertebral block for breast operations. Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00763.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
PubMed 19624418Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):660-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00008.
PubMed 17006061Cheema S, Richardson J, McGurgan P. Factors affecting the spread of bupivacaine in the adult thoracic paravertebral space. Anaesthesia. 2003 Jul;58(7):684-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03189_1.x.
PubMed 12886912Lonnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):813-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06148.x.
PubMed 7573876Naja ZM, El-Rajab M, Al-Tannir MA, Ziade FM, Tayara K, Younes F, Lonnqvist PA. Thoracic paravertebral block: influence of the number of injections. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.12.004.
PubMed 16701182O Riain SC, Donnell BO, Cuffe T, Harmon DC, Fraher JP, Shorten G. Thoracic paravertebral block using real-time ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):248-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c35906. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
PubMed 19933536Uppal V, Sondekoppam RV, Sodhi P, Johnston D, Ganapathy S. Single-Injection Versus Multiple-Injection Technique of Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Blocks: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Dermatomal Spread. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):575-581. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000631.
PubMed 28665874
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Prospective Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Single Versus Multiple Injection Ultrasound Guided Paravertebral Blocks for Breast Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02852421
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17477
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms, Anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Paravertebral block (PVB) has been shown to provide excellent analgesia for major breast surgeries resulting in reduced narcotic consumption, reduced nausea, improved quality of recovery, reduced chronic pain and possibly reduced metastasis with breast cancer. Traditionally, PVB is done by multiple injections below T1-T5 transverse processes. With multiple injections, the risk is increased for a pleural, an intraneural, and/or an intravascular injection. Recently, ultrasonography is being used to facilitate PVB. The use of ultrasound imaging enables real-time needle visualization during the procedure. This may improve efficacy and reduce the chances of complication like pneumothorax. Currently, there are no data comparing ultrasound-guided single injection technique with multiple injections technique with regards to extent of spread for PVB. Our objective is to investigate the extent of dermatomal spread of PVB when equal volumes of local anesthetic are injected at one versus five paravertebral sites for patients undergoing major breast surgery. In addition, the investigators wish to compare the performance time and duration of analgesia.
Methodology: After local REB approval, 72 patients undergoing a unilateral mastectomy with or without axillary node dissection will be randomized to receive either single or multiple injections PVB. The PVB will be performed in prone position under real-time ultrasound guidance using a para-sagittal approach.The patients in single injection group will receive single injection PVB at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and four subcutaneous sham injections. Patients in the multiple injection group will receive five injections of PVB from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected at each level. Pleural drift will be used as a sign of correct needle tip location and local anaesthetic spread. The pinprick method will be used to assess the extent of dermatomal blockade, 20 minutes following the completion of procedure. All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia for the surgery. Any adverse events including pneumothorax, epidural spread, LA toxicity/seizure, total spinal, will be recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple injection paravertebral blocks | Active comparator | Procedure: Multiple injection paravertebral blocksPatients in this group will receive five injections of paravertebral blocks from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" was injected at each level. |
| Single injection paravertebral block | Experimental | Procedure: Single injection paravertebral blockPatients in single injection group will receive single injection paravertebral blocks at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" and four subcutaneous sham injections. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Females, age 18 to 80 years, scheduled to receive unilateral mastectomy surgery, with or without axillary node dissection
- Able to give informed consent
- Able to cooperate with study process
- Availability of home telephone.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient refusal or lack of informed consent
- allergy to local anesthetic and other medications used in the study
- Bilateral mastectomies
- Coexisting hematological disorder or with deranged coagulation parameters
- Pre-existing major organ dysfunction such as hepatic and renal failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single injection paravertebral blockThe patients in single injection group will receive single injection paravertebral block at T3-T4 level with 25 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" and four subcutaneous sham injections | Procedure or surgery | Single injection paravertebral block |
| Multiple injection paravertebral blocksPatients in the multiple injection group will receive five injections of paravertebral blocks from T1 to T5 level. 5 ml of 0.5% "ropivacaine" was injected at each level. | Procedure or surgery | Multiple injection paravertebral blocks |
Primary outcome
Sensory dermatomal spread
Time frame: 20 minutes
20 minutes after block performance
5 secondary outcomes
Time to performance of procedure
Time frame: Duration of procedure
Cephalic and caudal dermatomal spread
Time frame: 20 minutes after block performance
Incidence of complication
Time frame: 24 hours
VAS pain scores in PACU
Time frame: 6 hours
Duration of self-reported numbness at the surgical site
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19624418Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Kee SS, Frenzel JC, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Kuerer HM, Lucci A. Improved postoperative pain control using thoracic paravertebral block for breast operations. Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00763.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 17006061Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):660-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 12886912Cheema S, Richardson J, McGurgan P. Factors affecting the spread of bupivacaine in the adult thoracic paravertebral space. Anaesthesia. 2003 Jul;58(7):684-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03189_1.x.
- Background: PubMed 7573876Lonnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, Conacher ID. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):813-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06148.x.
- Background: PubMed 16701182Naja ZM, El-Rajab M, Al-Tannir MA, Ziade FM, Tayara K, Younes F, Lonnqvist PA. Thoracic paravertebral block: influence of the number of injections. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.12.004.
- Background: PubMed 19933536O Riain SC, Donnell BO, Cuffe T, Harmon DC, Fraher JP, Shorten G. Thoracic paravertebral block using real-time ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):248-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c35906. Epub 2009 Nov 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28665874Uppal V, Sondekoppam RV, Sodhi P, Johnston D, Ganapathy S. Single-Injection Versus Multiple-Injection Technique of Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Blocks: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Dermatomal Spread. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):575-581. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000631.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitation
Exercise Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients With Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia, Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Study on Prophylactic RespOnse To hEtrombopag for Secondary Prevention in Anti-Cancer Therapy-induced Thrombocytopeniae
Breast Cancer Patients at High Risk of Chemotherapy-induced Thrombocytopenia (CTIT)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Lovastatin in HER2-low and Ultralow Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer, Advanced Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Audit of Targeted Sentinel Node Biopsy (TSNB) in Patients With Limited Nodal Disease Undergoing Primary Surgery
Breast Cancer, Axillary Lymph Nodes Dissection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Vaccine (STEMVAC) With Standard Endocrine-Based Therapy or Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Single injection paravertebral block and Multiple injection paravertebral blocks in people with Breast Neoplasms and Anesthesia, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensory dermatomal spread (time frame: 20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02852421, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2016.