AzTrials
AzTrials

AttitudesAPPENCT02855593

Exploring Patient and Physician Experiences of Medical Acupuncture

An observational study of Attitudes, run by Mike O'Callaghan Military Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proposed qualitative inquiry seeks to understand medical acupuncture from both the physician and the patient perspective. Interviewees will be asked to describe their experiences from the point of diagnosis or training up until the present day to capture the nature of their experiences across the treatment… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Attitudes
How many people
65 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2016to Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Male and female Department of Defense beneficiaries ages 18 years or older who have received acupuncture and Male and female acupuncture providers will be recruited at the Mike O'Callaghan Federal Medical Center (MOFMC). No special populations (e.g., pregnant women, children, prisoners, detainees) will be recruited.

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female Department of Defense beneficiaries, age 18 years or older, who have received acupuncture OR
  • Male and female acupuncture providers

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mike O'Callaghan Federal Medical Center

    Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, 89191

Other trials in United States

About this study

The proposed qualitative inquiry seeks to understand medical acupuncture from both the physician and the patient perspective. Interviewees will be asked to describe their experiences from the point of diagnosis or training up until the present day to capture the nature of their experiences across the treatment trajectory. Sample size for the qualitative data collection will be based on saturation of themes (thematic findings, e.g., patient talk is limited by family knowledge or physician-patient communication is limited by time constraints in the clinical setting), meaning investigators will continue recruitment until they are no longer hearing new experiences from participants. Saturation will be kept separate by groups (i.e., saturation of themes must be met within the group of patients separately from providers). Investigators will conduct preliminary data analysis after each 10 interviews to determine when saturation is reached. Recruitment numbers here are anticipated maximum numbers needed to reach saturation. Investigators plan to recruit and sample provider and patient populations in the following way. Investigators will group physicians by the physician's training so that we are sensitive to the fact that helpful patient-physician interaction approaches may differ across the patient's lifespan or with patient or physician experience with acupuncture. Audio recordings from each interview will be professionally transcribed and analysis will be concurrent with data collection to ensure reliability and validity of findings. Investigators will review transcripts as data are collected to identify emergent themes and ensure thematic saturation.

Read the detailed description

Investigators will obtain signed Informed Consent Document and HIPAA Authorization. During the screening process, data will be gathered about race, ethnicity, gender, history, and satisfaction rating of prior acupuncture received, and whether or not acupuncture has decrease reliance on prescription and over-the-counter medication use via the Screening Tool. Acknowledging the clinical partnership of patient and provider, the proposed qualitative inquiry seeks to understand medical acupuncture from both the physician and the patient perspective. A modified version of two interview techniques [Lifeline Interview Method (LIM) and Retrospective Interview Technique (RIT)] will be used. From this approach, narrative data can be analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively and provide a visual depiction across time. In the RIT method, each participant receives a modified version of an RIT graph before the interview. The graph provides participants time to reflect on their experiences and behavior. The interviews will all be one-on-one interviews and will take approximately 90 minutes for each group, including the time for completing the RIT graph during the interview.

Interviewees will be asked to describe their experiences from the point of diagnosis or training up until the present day to capture the nature of their experiences across the treatment trajectory. Questions will address the nature of their experiences beginning with the first time the provider introduced acupuncture to the patient and up to the present day to elicit rich details about the impact of acupuncture on their social/relational lives as well as perceived psychological and physical health. Questions will also be centered on the role of communication in facilitating receptivity and adherence to an acupuncture treatment plan both in terms of provider-patient interaction and patients' interactive experiences within their social network. For physicians, questions will address pre-training and post-training perceptions of acupuncture as well.

Ultimately, the impact of acupuncture on patients' lives will be examined using the "turning point" approach. By centering on turning points individuals have the opportunity to reflect on notable moments of change that are memorable because of their impact on health, health behavior as well as health perceptions. Such turning points can also be helpful in identifying challenges patients and their physicians face with regard to adopting and adhering to acupuncture treatment. In this approach participants consider how the treatment impacted their life across time as they plot changes ("turning points") that emerged across the treatment trajectory. Time will be represented on the horizontal axis of the graph, while impact of acupuncture (as is perceived by the participant) will be represented on the vertical axis. Impact of treatment will be considered as changes that capture how treatment has a positive effect (enhancing health, enhancing receptivity, or adherence) or negative (inhibiting health, not facilitating receptivity or adherence). These turning points are always communicatively managed and, thus, the communicative nature will give rise to communication factors that facilitate the treatment and health-promoting outcomes as well as barriers (and thus, contribute to the treatment not being perceived as beneficial). From this approach, participants use a visual tool (turning point graph) to plot turning points. Once completed they connect the points with a line to provide a trajectory that illustrates how the treatment impacted their lives across the acupuncture treatment (patients) or how the treatment impacted the lives of their patients (providers).

This interview technique helps facilitate a storied approach for the participants sharing their insider experiences thereby facilitating disclosure in a more natural manner and generating narrative data rich for intervention-making. This approach allows for a translational approach to research as the narratives can be used to develop interventions and medical education critical for facilitating this form of care.

Sample size for the qualitative data collection will be based on saturation of themes (thematic findings, e.g., patient talk is limited by family knowledge or physician-patient communication is limited by time constraints in the clinical setting, meaning investigators will continue recruitment until investigators are no longer hearing new experiences from participants. Saturation will be kept separate by groups (i.e., saturation of themes must be met within the group of patients separately from providers). Generally saturation is met with 10-30 individuals within a group, depending upon how diverse the groups are (other demographic variables may require more participants and an amendment to increase the approved number of enrollments). Investigators plan to recruit and sample provider and patient populations in the following way.

Since investigators are concerned with communication differences based on training maturity, investigators will group physicians by the physician's training so that investigators are sensitive to the fact that helpful patient-physician interaction approaches may differ across the lifespan or with experience. Our goal is to interview physicians who are just completing training and physicians who completed training more than three years prior. Thus, investigators will have a "newly trained" provider group and an "experienced" provider group. For each group, investigators will ask them about the entirety of their experiences (from the point of training up to the present day) and analyze that data about patient-physician communication according to the training phase of the physician. This will ensure investigators have both in-the-moment reflections about experiences and retrospective accounts. For patients, investigators will recruit 2 groups: those seeking treatment for either 1) chronic or 2) acute conditions. Given gendered differences in health behavior and perceptions, investigators will aim to have representative male and female populations within each group.

Audio recordings from each interview will be professionally transcribed and analysis will be concurrent with data collection to ensure reliability and validity of findings. Professional transcriptionists will complete transcription of pseudoanonymous recordings. Investigators will review transcripts as data are collected to identify emergent themes and ensure thematic saturation. Qualitative data will be analyzed according to van Manen's"selective approach," using the software program ATLAS.ti.to manage large data sets. Three analytical steps according to the constant comparative method and outlined by Strauss and Corbin will be employed, beginning with the discovery of concepts and assignment of codes to text. The thematic analysis then proceeds with identifying categories by grouping related concepts to reach "thematic salience," as reflected in recurrence, repetition, and forcefulness. The final step involves defining themes and dimensions of these categories to ensure thick description. Separate analyses will be conducted for each research question and for each group and then compared across groups. Investigators will incorporate final sets of themes into action-oriented thematic statements using Banning's ecological sentence synthesis approach to ensure the research can be more easily translated into practice. These action-oriented statements can more easily be integrated into interventions and psychosocial materials in an effort to enhance provider-patient communication and shared decision making, the health care system, and by offering patients and physicians a roadmap of barriers that might impede care practice or patient adherence as well as communication strategies that can facilitate and enhance acupuncture treatment (both for patients and providers).

Conditions
Attitudes
Keywords
acupuncture
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02855593
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PhysiciansPhysicians who perform acupuncture
PatientsPatients who have received acupuncture treatment in the past

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Retrospective Interview Technique

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Lifeline Interview Method

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
65 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02855593
Sponsor's protocol ID
FWH20160066H
Acronym
APPE
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
27 Jul 2016
Last updated
12 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: no plans to share data

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Attitudes, run by Mike O'Callaghan Military Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Retrospective Interview Technique (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in