OHSSPhase 2NCT02875587
Cabergoline Versus Calcium Gluconate Infusion in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
A Phase 2 study testing Cabergoline and Calcium gluconate in people with OHSS, run by Aljazeera Hospital at 2 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 37 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- OHSS
- What is being tested?
- Cabergoline and Calcium gluconate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 170 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- Oct 2016to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 37 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are stimulated using the long luteal GnRH agonist protocol and at high risk for developing OHSS [have more than 18 follicles (> 11mm) and serum estradiol ≥ 3000 pg/ml on the day of HCG administration].
Who cannot join
- Fibrosis of lung
- Swelling or inflammation around the heart or lung
- Hypertension
- Liver disease
- Heart valve disease and allergy to cabergoline or ergot derivatives.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Egypt2 sites
Aljazeera hospital
Giza
Riyadh Fertility and Reproductive Health center
Giza
About this study
Official title: Cabergoline Versus Calcium Gluconate Infusion in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS.
Read the detailed description
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of assisted reproduction.
Previous studies revealed that calcium gluconate infusion reduced the risk of OHSS. Other studies revealed that cabergoline (potent dopamine receptor agonist on D2 receptors)was effective in preventing OHSS.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS.
- Conditions
- OHSS
- Being tested
- Cabergoline, Calcium gluconate
- Keywords
- OHSS, Infertility, Cabergoline, Calcium gluconate, IVF-ET
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CabergolineDrug
Cabergoline (Dostinex; Pfizer, Italy) at a daily dose of 0.5 mg is administered orally at bed time for 8 days starting on the day of HCG administration
Calcium gluconateDrug
Intravenous 10% calcium gluconate, 10 mL in 200 mL of physiologic saline on the day of ovum pickup, day 1, day 2, and day 3 after ovum pickup. Intravenous infusion will be performed within 30 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cabergoline group | Active comparator | Cabergoline is administered starting on the day of HCG administration. Receives: Drug: Cabergoline |
| Calcium gluconate infusion group | Experimental | Calcium gluconate is administered starting on the day of HCG administration. Receives: Drug: Calcium gluconate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Measured: Within 4 weeks of HCG adminstration
Secondary outcomes (1)
The Number of Participants Who Achieved Ongoing Pregnancy
Measured: 18 weeks after embryo transfer
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2016
- Primary completionAug 2018
- Study completionDec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OHSSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aljazeera Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof .Usama M.Fouda, Aljazeera Hospital
- Investigators
- Usama M Fouda, M.D,PhD, Study chair, Aljazeera( Al Gazeera) hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02875587
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cabergoline/calcium gluconate
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gurgan T, Demirol A, Guven S, Benkhalifa M, Girgin B, Li TC. Intravenous calcium infusion as a novel preventive therapy of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome for patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.094. Epub 2011 May 31.
PubMed 21621772
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cabergoline Versus Calcium Gluconate Infusion in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02875587
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cabergoline/calcium gluconate
- Conditions
- OHSS
- Keywords
- OHSS, Infertility, Cabergoline, Calcium gluconate, IVF-ET
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aljazeera HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2016
- Primary completion
- Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS.
Detailed description
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of assisted reproduction.
Previous studies revealed that calcium gluconate infusion reduced the risk of OHSS. Other studies revealed that cabergoline (potent dopamine receptor agonist on D2 receptors)was effective in preventing OHSS.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cabergoline group | Active comparator | Drug: CabergolineCabergoline is administered starting on the day of HCG administration. |
| Calcium gluconate infusion group | Experimental | Drug: Calcium gluconateCalcium gluconate is administered starting on the day of HCG administration. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 37 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who are stimulated using the long luteal GnRH agonist protocol and at high risk for developing OHSS [have more than 18 follicles (> 11mm) and serum estradiol ≥ 3000 pg/ml on the day of HCG administration].
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Fibrosis of lung
- Swelling or inflammation around the heart or lung
- Hypertension
- Liver disease
- Heart valve disease and allergy to cabergoline or ergot derivatives.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CabergolineCabergoline (Dostinex; Pfizer, Italy) at a daily dose of 0.5 mg is administered orally at bed time for 8 days starting on the day of HCG administration | Drug | Cabergoline group |
| Calcium gluconateIntravenous 10% calcium gluconate, 10 mL in 200 mL of physiologic saline on the day of ovum pickup, day 1, day 2, and day 3 after ovum pickup. Intravenous infusion will be performed within 30 minutes. | Drug | Calcium gluconate infusion group |
Primary outcome
Moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of HCG adminstration
1 secondary outcome
The Number of Participants Who Achieved Ongoing Pregnancy
Time frame: 18 weeks after embryo transfer
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21621772Gurgan T, Demirol A, Guven S, Benkhalifa M, Girgin B, Li TC. Intravenous calcium infusion as a novel preventive therapy of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome for patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.094. Epub 2011 May 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for OHSS
Not yet recruiting
Oral GnRH Antagonist (Linzagolix) Versus Injectable GnRH Antagonist in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial With a Concurrent Comparator Cohort Undergoing Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS)
Infertility, Female, Ovulation Induction
RecruitingPhase 2
Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Cabergoline to Coasting in Reducing the Incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Gynecologic Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evidence on Follitropin Delta Individual Dosing
Infertility, Sterility
Recruiting
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Prevention
Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Usama M Fouda, M.D,PhD study chair
Aljazeera( Al Gazeera) hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cabergoline and Calcium gluconate in people with OHSS, run by Aljazeera Hospital at 2 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (time frame: Within 4 weeks of HCG adminstration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02875587, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2018.