Anastomotic LeakTICRANTNCT02879370
Transanal Inspection and Management of Low ColoRectal Anastomosis Performed With a New Technique
A study testing Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis in people with Anastomotic Leak, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The technique the investigators propose to perform colorectal and colo-anal anastomosis in patients underwent low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer could potentially reduce the anastomotic leakage rate by better trans-anal introduction of the circular stapler, elimination of the previous suture lines… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anastomotic Leak
- What is being tested?
- Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing low or ultra-low anterior resection for biopsy proven primary rectal cancer
Who cannot join
- Patients younger than 18 years old,
- pregnant,
- recurrent disease,
- cancer less than 4 cm from the anal verge,
- abdomeno-perineal resection,
- emergency surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: "Transanal Inspection and Management of Low ColoRectal Anastomosis Performed With a New Technique: the TICRANT Study"
The technique the investigators propose to perform colorectal and colo-anal anastomosis in patients underwent low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer could potentially reduce the anastomotic leakage rate by better trans-anal introduction of the circular stapler, elimination of the previous suture lines and dog ears, combined with direct inspection of the anastomosis, easy performance of trans-anal air leak tests and eventually direct repair of any small anastomotic defects. Another important point in cancer surgery is the easily identification of the distal margin. In fact, this technique is simple to perform, reproducible and safe in terms of complications.
Read the detailed description
-Study design Subjects for this study were prospectively enrolled between January 2013 and January 2016 in the participating centers.
All patients signed written informed consent including the possibility of future publication according to the Italian bioethics laws. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval has been obtained from the local Ethical Committee of each center in compliance with the Principals of Helsinki Declaration.
-Preoperative assessment and preparation All cases were discussed individually on colorectal multidisciplinary meeting with standard preoperative staging for rectal cancer including; colonoscopy with biopsy, CT chest, and abdomen, MRI pelvis and/or endo-rectal ultrasound. All patients were evaluated preoperative by expert anesthesiologists for individual co-morbidity with classification according to the ASA score.
The day before surgery mechanical bowel preparation with 4 liters of PEG (PolyEthilene Glycol) was administered together with liquid diet. An adequate thromboembolic prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin was given the evening before the surgery. Antibiotic prophylaxis with second generation cephalosporin was administered at induction of anesthesia.
-Surgical technique The low or ultra-low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) were performed, either open, laparoscopic, robotic. Just before rectal division, the circular anal dilator (CAD) device was introduced into the anal canal and fixed by four 0-silk suture to the perianal skin apply at the 4 cardinal's points. The rectal inspection was carried out by the Purse Suture Anoscope (PSA) to correctly identify the proximal and distal extension of the tumor. After that the rectum was divided by linear or curved stapler under CAD direct inspection.
Four 2-0 prolene sutures were trans-anally placed on the rectal stump; 2 of them at the extremities of the suture line (left and right) and the other two 1 cm medially to each of the previous two sutures. Circular stapler was introduced through the CAD (29 or 33 mm KOL stapler, Touchstone International Medical Science Co., Ltd.), the 4 tails of the prolene stitches were introduced through the stapler channels (2 in the left and 2 in the right side of the instrument) and gently pulled in order to obtain a gradual and homogeneous traction of the tissue. After elimination of both previous suture lines and dog ears, then the stapler was fired.
The rectal anastomosis was carefully inspected trans-anally then tested intraoperatively by air leak test through trans-anal air insufflation with the pelvis immersed with physiological saline to detect bubbles, and competence of donuts. If the anastomosis was considered safe the need for protective stoma was left to discretion of operating surgeon.
CAD may be removed at the end of the surgery, or left in place for 3-4 days postoperative to provide a safe and fast access for anastomosis inspection as well to reduce the endo-luminal pressure.
- Postoperative care The postoperative care concise with the standard care for patients who underwent low or ultra-low rectal resection, thromboembolic prophylaxis continued inform of single low molecular weight heparin 5000 IU 8 hours postoperative or according to the risk status of patients. Antibiotics for 3 days postoperative inform of 1 gm 2nd generation cephalosporin. We encourage fast tract surgery inform early feeding and mobilization as described below;
- 1st POD: removal of the urinary catheter, start mobilization,
- 2nd POD: start oral fluid,
- 3rd-4th POD: start semi-solid then solid feeling,
- 5-6th POD: discharge home (after performing contrast enema or colonoscopy).
- Definition of anastomotic leak There is no constant definition for anastomotic leak, but we adapted the criteria recently published by Adams and Papagrigoriadis [8]; feculent material from the drain or the wound, extravasation of dye on contrast enema, anastomotic defect visualized by colonoscopy, or the presence of peri-anastomotic air or fluid visualized by CT scan.
- Patient's fellow-up Patients were followed-up at the outpatient's clinics at one week, two weeks, and at one month postoperative. A further follow-up occurred at time of stoma reversal in patients with diversion in form of colonoscopy to access anastomotic integrity and preoperative anesthetic fitness as usual. Follow-up was continued at twelve months' postoperative by aid of complete colonoscopy.
- Variables studied and statistical analysis Basic demographic data were recorded including age and sex of patients as well as detailed information on BMI, ASA, stage and distance of the tumor from anal verge, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, type of surgical approach (open, laparoscopic and robotic procedure), duration of the operation, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Data were analyzed using excel and SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) version 21 programs under Microsoft Windows. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD when possible.
- Conditions
- Anastomotic Leak
- Being tested
- Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis
- Keywords
- Anastomotic Leak, Rectal cancer, Double stapling technique
- Medical subject headings
- Anastomotic Leak, Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal AnastomosisProcedure or surgery
Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME), either performed open, laparoscopic or robotic Closure of the rectum with linear or curved stapler with transanal inspection Transanal placement of four 2-0 prolene sutures on the rectal stump, respectively 2 at the extremities of the suture line (left and right) and other two 1 cm medial to each of the previous two sutures Circular stapler is introduced, the 4 tails of the prolene stitches are introduced through the windows (2 in the left and 2 in the right side of the instrument) and gently pulled, to obtain a gradual and homogeneous traction of the tissue and elimination of both previous suture lines and doggy ears, then the stapler is fired The termino-terminal anastomosis is carefully inspected A leak test can be performed (if negative the protective stoma is not performed) An eventual leak can be transanally repaired
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TICRANT | Experimental | Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis Receives: Procedure: Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of anastomotic leakage after intervention
The authors adapted these criteria for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage; fecal material from the drain or the wound, extravasation of dye on contrast enema, anastomotic defect visualized by colonoscopy, or the presence of peri-anastomotic air or fluid visualized by CT scan.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Safety margin after tumor resection
postoperative pathology of tumor specimen wiyh asscesment of cancer free both radial and distal margins
Measured: 1 year
Postoperative morbidities and mortalities
Overall all deaths or complications occurred during the surgery or 30 days postoperative
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionMay 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anastomotic LeakStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Casa di Cura San Pio X, Milano, Italy, Policlinico Abano Terme, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pierpaolo Sileri, University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Investigators
- Francesco Crafa, MD, Study director, San Giuseppe Moscati HospitalGiovanni Romano, MD, Study chair, Fondazione G. PascaleJacques Megevand, MD, Study chair, Pavia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879370
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 65/14
- Acronym
- TICRANT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00790.x.
PubMed 9718009Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):360-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01727.x.
PubMed 11260099Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Autschbach F, Stern J, Lucas M, Herfarth C, Heuschen G. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):207-16. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00008.
PubMed 11807360Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Reymond MA, Reck T, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Barlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s004649901064.
PubMed 10384066Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Geibetaler S, Dralle H, Saeger HD, Wolff S, Nestler G, Pross M, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Sep;45(9):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9.
PubMed 12352230Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Yahchouchi E, Laborde Y, Pelissier E, Msika S, Flamant Y. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1999 May;125(5):529-35.
PubMed 10330942Moran BJ. Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1996 Jul;83(7):902-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830707.
PubMed 8813772Pakkastie TE, Ovaska JT, Pekkala ES, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses. Eur J Surg. 1997 Dec;163(12):929-33.
PubMed 9449446Selvasekar CR, Cima RR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Harrington JR, Harmsen WS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH. Effect of infliximab on short-term complications in patients undergoing operation for chronic ulcerative colitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):956-62; discussion 962-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.044.
PubMed 17481518Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1999 Feb;229(2):174-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00003.
PubMed 10024097Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Aug;185(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00018-5.
PubMed 9249076Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A, Reissman P. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery--are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Jul;38(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02048029.
PubMed 7607032
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- "Transanal Inspection and Management of Low ColoRectal Anastomosis Performed With a New Technique: the TICRANT Study"
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879370
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TICRANT / 65/14
- Conditions
- Anastomotic Leak
- Keywords
- Anastomotic Leak, Rectal cancer, Double stapling technique
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rome Tor VergataUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Casa di Cura San Pio X, Milano, Italy, Policlinico Abano Terme, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The technique the investigators propose to perform colorectal and colo-anal anastomosis in patients underwent low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer could potentially reduce the anastomotic leakage rate by better trans-anal introduction of the circular stapler, elimination of the previous suture lines and dog ears, combined with direct inspection of the anastomosis, easy performance of trans-anal air leak tests and eventually direct repair of any small anastomotic defects. Another important point in cancer surgery is the easily identification of the distal margin. In fact, this technique is simple to perform, reproducible and safe in terms of complications.
Detailed description
-Study design Subjects for this study were prospectively enrolled between January 2013 and January 2016 in the participating centers.
All patients signed written informed consent including the possibility of future publication according to the Italian bioethics laws. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval has been obtained from the local Ethical Committee of each center in compliance with the Principals of Helsinki Declaration.
-Preoperative assessment and preparation All cases were discussed individually on colorectal multidisciplinary meeting with standard preoperative staging for rectal cancer including; colonoscopy with biopsy, CT chest, and abdomen, MRI pelvis and/or endo-rectal ultrasound. All patients were evaluated preoperative by expert anesthesiologists for individual co-morbidity with classification according to the ASA score.
The day before surgery mechanical bowel preparation with 4 liters of PEG (PolyEthilene Glycol) was administered together with liquid diet. An adequate thromboembolic prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin was given the evening before the surgery. Antibiotic prophylaxis with second generation cephalosporin was administered at induction of anesthesia.
-Surgical technique The low or ultra-low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) were performed, either open, laparoscopic, robotic. Just before rectal division, the circular anal dilator (CAD) device was introduced into the anal canal and fixed by four 0-silk suture to the perianal skin apply at the 4 cardinal's points. The rectal inspection was carried out by the Purse Suture Anoscope (PSA) to correctly identify the proximal and distal extension of the tumor. After that the rectum was divided by linear or curved stapler under CAD direct inspection.
Four 2-0 prolene sutures were trans-anally placed on the rectal stump; 2 of them at the extremities of the suture line (left and right) and the other two 1 cm medially to each of the previous two sutures. Circular stapler was introduced through the CAD (29 or 33 mm KOL stapler, Touchstone International Medical Science Co., Ltd.), the 4 tails of the prolene stitches were introduced through the stapler channels (2 in the left and 2 in the right side of the instrument) and gently pulled in order to obtain a gradual and homogeneous traction of the tissue. After elimination of both previous suture lines and dog ears, then the stapler was fired.
The rectal anastomosis was carefully inspected trans-anally then tested intraoperatively by air leak test through trans-anal air insufflation with the pelvis immersed with physiological saline to detect bubbles, and competence of donuts. If the anastomosis was considered safe the need for protective stoma was left to discretion of operating surgeon.
CAD may be removed at the end of the surgery, or left in place for 3-4 days postoperative to provide a safe and fast access for anastomosis inspection as well to reduce the endo-luminal pressure.
- Postoperative care The postoperative care concise with the standard care for patients who underwent low or ultra-low rectal resection, thromboembolic prophylaxis continued inform of single low molecular weight heparin 5000 IU 8 hours postoperative or according to the risk status of patients. Antibiotics for 3 days postoperative inform of 1 gm 2nd generation cephalosporin. We encourage fast tract surgery inform early feeding and mobilization as described below;
- 1st POD: removal of the urinary catheter, start mobilization,
- 2nd POD: start oral fluid,
- 3rd-4th POD: start semi-solid then solid feeling,
- 5-6th POD: discharge home (after performing contrast enema or colonoscopy).
- Definition of anastomotic leak There is no constant definition for anastomotic leak, but we adapted the criteria recently published by Adams and Papagrigoriadis [8]; feculent material from the drain or the wound, extravasation of dye on contrast enema, anastomotic defect visualized by colonoscopy, or the presence of peri-anastomotic air or fluid visualized by CT scan.
- Patient's fellow-up Patients were followed-up at the outpatient's clinics at one week, two weeks, and at one month postoperative. A further follow-up occurred at time of stoma reversal in patients with diversion in form of colonoscopy to access anastomotic integrity and preoperative anesthetic fitness as usual. Follow-up was continued at twelve months' postoperative by aid of complete colonoscopy.
- Variables studied and statistical analysis Basic demographic data were recorded including age and sex of patients as well as detailed information on BMI, ASA, stage and distance of the tumor from anal verge, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, type of surgical approach (open, laparoscopic and robotic procedure), duration of the operation, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Data were analyzed using excel and SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) version 21 programs under Microsoft Windows. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD when possible.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TICRANT | Experimental | Procedure: Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal AnastomosisTransanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients undergoing low or ultra-low anterior resection for biopsy proven primary rectal cancer
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients younger than 18 years old,
- pregnant,
- recurrent disease,
- cancer less than 4 cm from the anal verge,
- abdomeno-perineal resection,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal AnastomosisLow anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME), either performed open, laparoscopic or robotic Closure of the rectum with linear or curved stapler with transanal inspection Transanal placement of four 2-0 prolene sutures on the rectal stump, respectively 2 at the extremities of the suture line (left and right) and other two 1 cm medial to each of the previous two sutures Circular stapler is introduced, the 4 tails of the prolene stitches are introduced through the windows (2 in the left and 2 in the right side of the instrument) and gently pulled, to obtain a gradual and homogeneous traction of the tissue and elimination of both previous suture lines and doggy ears, then the stapler is fired The termino-terminal anastomosis is carefully inspected A leak test can be performed (if negative the protective stoma is not performed) An eventual leak can be transanally repaired | Procedure or surgery | TICRANT |
Primary outcome
Incidence of anastomotic leakage after intervention
Time frame: 1 year
The authors adapted these criteria for diagnosis of anastomotic leakage; fecal material from the drain or the wound, extravasation of dye on contrast enema, anastomotic defect visualized by colonoscopy, or the presence of peri-anastomotic air or fluid visualized by CT scan.
2 secondary outcomes
Safety margin after tumor resection
Time frame: 1 year
Postoperative morbidities and mortalities
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2017.
- Background: PubMed 9718009Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00790.x.
- Background: PubMed 11260099Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):360-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01727.x.
- Background: PubMed 11807360Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Autschbach F, Stern J, Lucas M, Herfarth C, Heuschen G. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):207-16. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 10384066Kockerling F, Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Reymond MA, Reck T, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Barlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s004649901064.
- Background: PubMed 12352230Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Geibetaler S, Dralle H, Saeger HD, Wolff S, Nestler G, Pross M, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Sep;45(9):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9.
- Background: PubMed 10330942Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Yahchouchi E, Laborde Y, Pelissier E, Msika S, Flamant Y. Is prophylactic pelvic drainage useful after elective rectal or anal anastomosis? A multicenter controlled randomized trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1999 May;125(5):529-35.
- Background: PubMed 8813772Moran BJ. Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1996 Jul;83(7):902-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830707.
- Background: PubMed 9449446Pakkastie TE, Ovaska JT, Pekkala ES, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses. Eur J Surg. 1997 Dec;163(12):929-33.
- Background: PubMed 17481518Selvasekar CR, Cima RR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Harrington JR, Harmsen WS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH. Effect of infliximab on short-term complications in patients undergoing operation for chronic ulcerative colitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):956-62; discussion 962-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.044.
- Background: PubMed 10024097Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1999 Feb;229(2):174-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 9249076Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, Strong SA, Oakley JR. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Aug;185(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00018-5.
- Background: PubMed 7607032Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Ulrich A, Reissman P. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery--are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Jul;38(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02048029.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Anastomotic Leak
Recruiting
Endo-SPONGE for Treatment of Anastomotic or Hartmann's Stump Leakages in Lower Pelvic Area
Anastomotic Leaks, Hartmanns Stump Leakage
Recruiting
Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial of Biological Mesh for Alimentary Tract Reconstruction in Digestive Surgery
Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Anastomosis, Surgical
Recruiting
Pre-emptive Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Reduces the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Surgery
Not yet recruiting
FLuorescent Angiography in REduction of Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer Surgery
Rectal Cancer Patients, Rectal Cancer Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
Surgical Intuition in Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery
Anastomotic Leaks
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesco Crafa, MD study director
San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital
Giovanni Romano, MD study chair
Fondazione G. Pascale
Jacques Megevand, MD study chair
Pavia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transanal Inspection and management of low ColoRectal Anastomosis in people with Anastomotic Leak, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of anastomotic leakage after intervention (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02879370, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2017.