AzTrials
AzTrials

Intellectual DisabilityCNV-SeqNCT02881333

Various Type of Genetic Events in Patients With Intellectual Disability

An observational study of Intellectual Disability, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Currently, for a patient with intellectual disability without a recognizable syndrome (most cases), the way to diagnosis is often long, tedious and expensive because different approaches are used one after the other to identify structural variants (duplications, deletions and other) and point mutations (sequencing of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Intellectual Disability
What is being tested?
Blood samples
How many people
30 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2016to Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients with intellectual deficit without diagnosis

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with developmental disabilities
  • No etiologic diagnosis but suspected genetic cause
  • Fragile X syndrome research negative

Who cannot join

  • Children born to consanguineous couples
  • Diagnosis already established or suspected
  • Identification of an independent etiology

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Tools for the Simultaneous Detection of Point and Structural Mutations in Patients With Intellectual Disability

Currently, for a patient with intellectual disability without a recognizable syndrome (most cases), the way to diagnosis is often long, tedious and expensive because different approaches are used one after the other to identify structural variants (duplications, deletions and other) and point mutations (sequencing of one or more candidate genes). The development of high-throughput sequencing techniques (next generation sequencing: NGS) has drastically increased the detection of point mutations offering the possibility to test a large number of genes simultaneously. NGS also shows a huge potential in detecting structural variants. The objective of this research is to assess the sensitivity of a simultaneous detection of point mutations and structural variants by NGS approaches. This would bring together in a single step the equivalent of performing an array-Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis plus performing a targeted sequencing of candidate genes. Investigators will compare two approaches for this simultaneous detection: a targeted enrichment of candidate genes coding regions using probes covering these regions associated with a backbone of genomic probes, an approach that could be implemented immediately in diagnostic at the hospital, and a whole genome sequencing (WGS), that is currently a too expensive tool for routine diagnosis but that should be the approach used in the future. Investigators will compare these two approaches to the traditional one: CGH array + WGS. The implementation of a "one step" strategy to detect both types of mutations (punctual and structural) would accelerate and improve the access of patients to a molecular diagnosis.

Being tested
Blood samples
Medical subject headings
Intellectual Disability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood samplesGenetic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Detection of mutation from the CGH-array technology on 475 genes

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02881333
Sponsor's protocol ID
6374
Acronym
CNV-Seq
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
16 Aug 2016
Last updated
26 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intellectual Disability, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Amélie Piton (amélie.piton@chru-strasbourg.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Detection of mutation from the CGH-array technology on 475 genes (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in