Therapy-Associated CancerNCT02901834
PainSquad+: A Smartphone App to Support Real-time Pain Management for Adolescents With Cancer
An observational study of Therapy-Associated Cancer, run by The Hospital for Sick Children.
Trial summary
Adolescents with cancer (AWC) are in a unique developmental stage that may mean pain characteristics, the impact of pain, and pain treatment outcomes are different in adolescents compared to children and adults. In response, we will develop and test the PainSquad+ pain management smartphone app. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Therapy-Associated Cancer
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to May 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Adolescents aged 12-18 years who have been diagnosed at least 2 months with cancer and have had pain in the past week.
Who may be able to join
- aged 12-18 years,
- able to speak and read English
- actively undergoing cancer treatment on an in- or out-patient basis
- being at least 3 months from diagnosis
- having self-reported pain of any intensity in the week immediately prior to recruitment
Who cannot join
- one or more major co-morbid (medical or psychiatric) conditions that would preclude use of a smartphone
- palliative/end-of-life patients.
About this study
Official title: PainSquad+: A Smartphone App to Support Real-time Pain Management for Adolescents
Adolescents with cancer (AWC) are in a unique developmental stage that may mean pain characteristics, the impact of pain, and pain treatment outcomes are different in adolescents compared to children and adults. In response, we will develop and test the PainSquad+ pain management smartphone app. First, we will conduct usability testing to refine PainSquad+ so that it is useable, acceptable and understandable for AWC. Secondly we will: (a) test the feasibility of conducting a large-scale PainSquad+ experiment and (b) begin to examine how effective PainSquad+ is at helping adolescents manage pain. We hope that once developed and tested for effectiveness, PainSquad+ will improve pain treatment and ultimately quality of life in AWC.
Read the detailed description
Using a conservative estimate of 7 adolescents per cycle and 3 testing cycles, 21 adolescents will take part in usability testing of the PainSquad+ prototype. Recruitment will be conducted in a single hematology/oncology division of a metropolitan and university-affiliated pediatric tertiary care center in Toronto, Canada. This site hosts one of the largest cancer programs in North America, with approximately 350 new diagnoses each year. Based on our previous research at this site, 72 ± 4% (M ± SD; range = 67-75%) of eligible AWC agreed to participate in similar studies (unpublished data). Convenience sampling will be used to recruit eligible individuals. The testing procedures will commence after eligibility is assessed, informed consent is obtained, and demographic and baseline outcome data are collected. Inclusion criteria will be: (a) aged 12-18 years, (b) able to speak and read English, (c) actively undergoing cancer treatment on an in- or out-patient basis, (d) being at least 3 months from diagnosis and (d) having self-reported pain of any intensity in the week immediately prior to recruitment. Exclusion criteria will be: (a) one or more major co-morbid (medical or psychiatric) conditions that would preclude use of a smartphone, and (b) palliative/end-of-life patients.
- Conditions
- Therapy-Associated Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Second Primary
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accrual and attrition rates
The Cancer Pain Management App Recruitment Log has been designed to record data related to the number of eligible adolescents per recruitment day, reasons for ineligibility, and reasons for nonparticipation. The Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log has been designed to record data on attrition (occurrence/reasons for attrition), as well as technical difficulties, adherence and outcome measure completion.
Measured: 12 months
Technical difficulties
The occurrence and description of technical problems will be recorded on the Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log.
Measured: 12 months
Acceptability
The Acceptability E-Scale (AES) ascertains perceptions related to how helpful, difficult, and enjoyable e-based programs are to use, how understandable questions are, and how acceptable the time invested in reporting was (Wu, Johnson, Schepp, \& Berry, 2011). For the purpose of the present study, the wording of the AES will be slightly modified. Specifically, the words "computer program" will be changed to "app" and open-ended questions regarding study acceptability will be added.
Measured: 12 months
Adherence
Measured as the percentage of pain reports received on the secure server. An RA will sign onto the server and extract data logged by AWC on Day 29 to calculate adherence (100% when 28/28 morning and evening reports are completed). These data will be recorded on the Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log.
Measured: 12 months
Outcome measure feasibility
Measured as the percentage of completed questionnaires at baseline and study completion. An RA will sign onto the server and extract data logged by AWC on Day 29 to calculate the percentage of completed questionnaires (100% when all questionnaires are completed). These data will be recorded on the Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log.
Measured: 12 months
Pain intensity
Measured using the pain intensity items (current pain intensity and worst, average, and least pain intensity in the previous week) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI is considered the standard for clinical and research use in cancer patients (Mathias et al., 2011). Each item is rated numerically from 0-10. Individual scores on each of the 4 items may be summed and to provide a composite pain intensity score. Individual and summary scores will be used in our analyses. Validity and reliability have been well-established in adults with cancer and the intensity sub-scale has been used successfully in AWC (Ameringer, 2010).
Measured: 12 months
Pain interference
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short-form Scale is an 8-item scale describing how pain restricts daily activities related to physical, psychological, and social functioning, as well as sleep, school, and enjoyment of life. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert response scale and totaling the scores generates a summary score, which will be used in our analyses. Construct validity has been established in AWC (Hinds et al., 2013).
Measured: 12 months
Health-related quality of life (HRQL)
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 is a 23-item generic HRQL scale not specific to pain. It is comprised of physical, emotional, social and school functioning subscales with each subscale containing 5 to 8 items. PedsQL4.0 is a reliable and valid measure of HRQL in AWC (Varni, Burwinkle, Katz, Meeske, \& Dickinson, 2002). We will use age-appropriate versions of PedsQL4.0 (i.e., appropriate item wording for 12 and 13-18 year olds). Total and subscale scores will be used in analyses.
Measured: 12 months
Self-efficacy
The Sherer's General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) is a 17-item scale that measures general belief in personal competence and has been used in children as young as 10 years old. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Item scores are summed to provide an overall self-efficacy score to be used in analyses. The psychometric properties of the measure have been demonstrated in AWC (Hinds et al., 2000).
Measured: 12 months
Healthcare utilization
Healthcare utilization related to pain will be examined as the number of visits/calls to primary care provider, emergency room visits, oncology clinic visits and hospitalizations (i.e., bed days of care). RN calls will not be included in healthcare utilization analyses. Data will be collected using adolescent self-report and medical health records (by site specific RAs at end of study).
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Therapy-Associated CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hospital for Sick ChildrenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick Children
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jennifer Stinson, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Investigators
- Jennifer Stinson, RN, PhD, Principal investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02901834
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 100045124
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Jibb LA, Cafazzo JA, Nathan PC, Seto E, Stevens BJ, Nguyen C, Stinson JN. Development of a mHealth Real-Time Pain Self-Management App for Adolescents With Cancer: An Iterative Usability Testing Study [Formula: see text]. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;34(4):283-294. doi: 10.1177/1043454217697022. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
PubMed 28376666Jibb LA, Stevens BJ, Nathan PC, Seto E, Cafazzo JA, Johnston DL, Hum V, Stinson JN. Implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a real-time pain management smartphone app for adolescents with cancer: A multicenter pilot clinical study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Oct;64(10). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26554. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
PubMed 28423223
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PainSquad+: A Smartphone App to Support Real-time Pain Management for Adolescents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02901834
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 100045124
- Conditions
- Therapy-Associated Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2015
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adolescents with cancer (AWC) are in a unique developmental stage that may mean pain characteristics, the impact of pain, and pain treatment outcomes are different in adolescents compared to children and adults. In response, we will develop and test the PainSquad+ pain management smartphone app. First, we will conduct usability testing to refine PainSquad+ so that it is useable, acceptable and understandable for AWC. Secondly we will: (a) test the feasibility of conducting a large-scale PainSquad+ experiment and (b) begin to examine how effective PainSquad+ is at helping adolescents manage pain. We hope that once developed and tested for effectiveness, PainSquad+ will improve pain treatment and ultimately quality of life in AWC.
Detailed description
Using a conservative estimate of 7 adolescents per cycle and 3 testing cycles, 21 adolescents will take part in usability testing of the PainSquad+ prototype. Recruitment will be conducted in a single hematology/oncology division of a metropolitan and university-affiliated pediatric tertiary care center in Toronto, Canada. This site hosts one of the largest cancer programs in North America, with approximately 350 new diagnoses each year. Based on our previous research at this site, 72 ± 4% (M ± SD; range = 67-75%) of eligible AWC agreed to participate in similar studies (unpublished data). Convenience sampling will be used to recruit eligible individuals. The testing procedures will commence after eligibility is assessed, informed consent is obtained, and demographic and baseline outcome data are collected. Inclusion criteria will be: (a) aged 12-18 years, (b) able to speak and read English, (c) actively undergoing cancer treatment on an in- or out-patient basis, (d) being at least 3 months from diagnosis and (d) having self-reported pain of any intensity in the week immediately prior to recruitment. Exclusion criteria will be: (a) one or more major co-morbid (medical or psychiatric) conditions that would preclude use of a smartphone, and (b) palliative/end-of-life patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Adolescents aged 12-18 years who have been diagnosed at least 2 months with cancer and have had pain in the past week.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- aged 12-18 years,
- able to speak and read English
- actively undergoing cancer treatment on an in- or out-patient basis
- being at least 3 months from diagnosis
- having self-reported pain of any intensity in the week immediately prior to recruitment
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- one or more major co-morbid (medical or psychiatric) conditions that would preclude use of a smartphone
- palliative/end-of-life patients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Accrual and attrition rates
Time frame: 12 months
The Cancer Pain Management App Recruitment Log has been designed to record data related to the number of eligible adolescents per recruitment day, reasons for ineligibility, and reasons for nonparticipation. The Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log has been designed to record data on attrition (occurrence/reasons for attrition), as well as technical difficulties, adherence and outcome measure completion.
Technical difficulties
Time frame: 12 months
The occurrence and description of technical problems will be recorded on the Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log.
Acceptability
Time frame: 12 months
The Acceptability E-Scale (AES) ascertains perceptions related to how helpful, difficult, and enjoyable e-based programs are to use, how understandable questions are, and how acceptable the time invested in reporting was (Wu, Johnson, Schepp, \& Berry, 2011). For the purpose of the present study, the wording of the AES will be slightly modified. Specifically, the words "computer program" will be changed to "app" and open-ended questions regarding study acceptability will be added.
Adherence
Time frame: 12 months
Measured as the percentage of pain reports received on the secure server. An RA will sign onto the server and extract data logged by AWC on Day 29 to calculate adherence (100% when 28/28 morning and evening reports are completed). These data will be recorded on the Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log.
Outcome measure feasibility
Time frame: 12 months
Measured as the percentage of completed questionnaires at baseline and study completion. An RA will sign onto the server and extract data logged by AWC on Day 29 to calculate the percentage of completed questionnaires (100% when all questionnaires are completed). These data will be recorded on the Cancer Pain Management App Activity Log.
Pain intensity
Time frame: 12 months
Measured using the pain intensity items (current pain intensity and worst, average, and least pain intensity in the previous week) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI is considered the standard for clinical and research use in cancer patients (Mathias et al., 2011). Each item is rated numerically from 0-10. Individual scores on each of the 4 items may be summed and to provide a composite pain intensity score. Individual and summary scores will be used in our analyses. Validity and reliability have been well-established in adults with cancer and the intensity sub-scale has been used successfully in AWC (Ameringer, 2010).
Pain interference
Time frame: 12 months
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short-form Scale is an 8-item scale describing how pain restricts daily activities related to physical, psychological, and social functioning, as well as sleep, school, and enjoyment of life. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert response scale and totaling the scores generates a summary score, which will be used in our analyses. Construct validity has been established in AWC (Hinds et al., 2013).
Health-related quality of life (HRQL)
Time frame: 12 months
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 is a 23-item generic HRQL scale not specific to pain. It is comprised of physical, emotional, social and school functioning subscales with each subscale containing 5 to 8 items. PedsQL4.0 is a reliable and valid measure of HRQL in AWC (Varni, Burwinkle, Katz, Meeske, \& Dickinson, 2002). We will use age-appropriate versions of PedsQL4.0 (i.e., appropriate item wording for 12 and 13-18 year olds). Total and subscale scores will be used in analyses.
Self-efficacy
Time frame: 12 months
The Sherer's General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) is a 17-item scale that measures general belief in personal competence and has been used in children as young as 10 years old. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Item scores are summed to provide an overall self-efficacy score to be used in analyses. The psychometric properties of the measure have been demonstrated in AWC (Hinds et al., 2000).
Healthcare utilization
Time frame: 12 months
Healthcare utilization related to pain will be examined as the number of visits/calls to primary care provider, emergency room visits, oncology clinic visits and hospitalizations (i.e., bed days of care). RN calls will not be included in healthcare utilization analyses. Data will be collected using adolescent self-report and medical health records (by site specific RAs at end of study).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 28376666Jibb LA, Cafazzo JA, Nathan PC, Seto E, Stevens BJ, Nguyen C, Stinson JN. Development of a mHealth Real-Time Pain Self-Management App for Adolescents With Cancer: An Iterative Usability Testing Study [Formula: see text]. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;34(4):283-294. doi: 10.1177/1043454217697022. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 28423223Jibb LA, Stevens BJ, Nathan PC, Seto E, Cafazzo JA, Johnston DL, Hum V, Stinson JN. Implementation and preliminary effectiveness of a real-time pain management smartphone app for adolescents with cancer: A multicenter pilot clinical study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Oct;64(10). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26554. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
Related trials for Therapy-Associated Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of Neurocognitive Tests and Questionnaires for People With Head and Neck Cancer Who Are Undergoing Radiation Therapy
Head and Neck Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer Stinson, RN, PhD principal investigator
The Hospital for Sick Children
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Therapy-Associated Cancer, run by The Hospital for Sick Children.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accrual and attrition rates (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02901834, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2018.