Muscle SpasticityPhase 4ITBNCT02903823
Intrathecal (IT) Baclofen Drug Distribution
A Phase 4 study testing Baclofen bolus injection in people with Muscle Spasticity, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this pilot study to determine whether there is a significant therapeutic advantage to place the ITB catheter within the cervical, thoracic or lumbar region of the spine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Muscle Spasticity
- What is being tested?
- Baclofen bolus injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Apr 2016to 1 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients with spasticity from spinal origin (spinal cord injury)
- Adult patients with spasticity of cerebral origin (cerebral palsy and cerebrovascular accident)
- Adult women of child bearing age with a negative pregnancy test
Who cannot join
- Patients with spasticity from Multiple sclerosis
- Pregnant women
- Patients under the age of 18 years
- Patients over the age of 50
- Patients who are unable to have an MRI scan of the total spine
- Patients with spinal deformity that would prevent easy access to the lumbar intrathecal space
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients who have an allergic reaction to IT baclofen
- Patients who have significant headache from CSF withdrawal
- Patients who have intradural blockage that prevents advancing the IT catheter to the level of C4
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Intrathecal (IT) Baclofen Drug Distribution Pilot Study
The goal of this pilot study to determine whether there is a significant therapeutic advantage to place the ITB catheter within the cervical, thoracic or lumbar region of the spine. It is also a goal of this pilot study to determine whether the origin of spasticity influences the effect of Lioresal Intrathecal (baclofen injection) on ITB catheters located in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar regions of the spine. The investigators propose to study the impact of catheter location on the reduction in spasticity within a group of patients who are scheduled for ITB trial.
Read the detailed description
While ITB therapy is commonly recommended for treatment of severe spasticity due to a variety of diseases, the location of optimal drug (baclofen) delivery has not been defined in a controlled study. Furthermore, the cost of pharmacological management in these patients is significant, and optimal location for drug delivery through an implantable drug pump may have significant impact on the cost burden of maintenance refills. It is the goal of this pilot study to determine whether there is a significant therapeutic advantage to place the ITB catheter within the cervical, thoracic or lumbar region of the spine. It is also a goal of this pilot study to determine whether the origin of spasticity influences the effect of Lioresal Intrathecal (baclofen injection) on ITB catheters located in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar regions of the spine. The investigators propose to study the impact of catheter location on the reduction in spasticity within a group of patients who are scheduled for ITB trial. In studying the impact of catheter location among patients with spinal versus cerebral origin of spasticity, the disease origin may also have a significant impact on baclofen dosing relative to the placement of the catheter.
In addition, the pharmacokinetic half-life and the variability of intrathecal baclofen is poorly understood as data is limited. In order to provide initial data regarding CSF baclofen washout, samples of spinal fluid obtained just prior to- and following IT baclofen administration will be obtained for delayed analysis. The results of these pharmacological analysis may refine the understanding of how quickly baclofen is distributed from a given catheter location, and whether it is affected by catheter location or disease origin. Since multiple catheter locations will be studied within a given patient, it also affords the opportunity to sample small amounts of CSF at key anatomical sites along the spinal axis as a secondary objective.
- Conditions
- Muscle Spasticity
- Being tested
- Baclofen bolus injection
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Muscle Spasticity, Spinal Cord Injuries, Cerebral Palsy, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Baclofen bolus injectionDrug
Also called Injection of baclofen bolus
A baclofen bolus injection (50 micrograms) will be administered daily after the patient returns from radiology to position catheter injection location. The injection may be given at C4, T4, T10 or L2 spinal locations depending on the catheter tip location.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Baclofen injection at designated spinal level | Experimental | Days 2,3,4,5 a baclofen injection bolus will be given in the catheter, located at C4, T4, T10 and L2 respectively. Effect of baclofen injection (50 microgram bolus) upon rigidity will be assessed manually using the Modified Ashworth rating score for selected upper and lower extremities. Receives: Drug: Baclofen bolus injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Subjects Experiencing Maximal MAS Change From Baseline - Spasticity of Cerebral Origin
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale (Standard MAS scale values: "0, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, or 4") used to evaluate spasticity based on grading muscle tone by moving joints. The MAS scores in this cohort are measured in biceps, triceps and forearm flexor muscles in upper extremities; and quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles in lower extremities. The score ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension). Improvement in spasticity was a reduction in MAS score by 1 point across a joint tested. Maximal MAS change is the sum of MAS score reduction in all four limbs tested.
This outcome looks at subjects with spasticity of cerebral origin.
Measured: Baseline to 6 hours post-injection
Subjects Experiencing Maximal MAS Change From Baseline - Spasticity of Spinal Origin
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale (Standard MAS scale values: "0, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, or 4") used to evaluate spasticity based on grading muscle tone by moving joints. The MAS scores in this cohort are measured in biceps, triceps and forearm flexor muscles in upper extremities; and quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles in lower extremities. The score ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension). Improvement in spasticity was a reduction in MAS score by 1 point across a joint tested. Maximal MAS change is the sum of MAS score reduction in all four limbs tested.
This outcome looks at subjects with spasticity of spinal origin.
Measured: Baseline to 6 hours post-injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Apr 2016
- Primary completion1 Feb 2019
- Study completion1 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Muscle SpasticityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter Konrad, Vanderbilt University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02903823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 151399
- Acronym
- ITB
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Penn RD. Catheter implant systems for intrathecal drug delivery. J Neurosurg. 1996 Apr;84(4):713. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.4.0713a. No abstract available.
PubMed 8613874Kroin JS, Ali A, York M, Penn RD. The distribution of medication along the spinal canal after chronic intrathecal administration. Neurosurgery. 1993 Aug;33(2):226-30; discussion 230.
PubMed 7690122Grabb PA, Guin-Renfroe S, Meythaler JM. Midthoracic catheter tip placement for intrathecal baclofen administration in children with quadriparetic spasticity. Neurosurgery. 1999 Oct;45(4):833-6; discussion 836-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199910000-00020.
PubMed 10515478Albright AL. Technique for insertion of intraventricular baclofen catheters. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Oct;8(4):394-5. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.PEDS11211.
PubMed 21961547Coffey JR, Cahill D, Steers W, Park TS, Ordia J, Meythaler J, Herman R, Shetter AG, Levy R, Gill B, et al. Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spasticity of spinal origin: results of a long-term multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):226-32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0226.
PubMed 8421205Albright AL, Turner M, Pattisapu JV. Best-practice surgical techniques for intrathecal baclofen therapy. J Neurosurg. 2006 Apr;104(4 Suppl):233-9. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.4.233.
PubMed 16619633
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intrathecal (IT) Baclofen Drug Distribution Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02903823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ITB / 151399
- Conditions
- Muscle Spasticity
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, stroke
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Study start
- 22 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Apr 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this pilot study to determine whether there is a significant therapeutic advantage to place the ITB catheter within the cervical, thoracic or lumbar region of the spine. It is also a goal of this pilot study to determine whether the origin of spasticity influences the effect of Lioresal Intrathecal (baclofen injection) on ITB catheters located in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar regions of the spine. The investigators propose to study the impact of catheter location on the reduction in spasticity within a group of patients who are scheduled for ITB trial.
Detailed description
While ITB therapy is commonly recommended for treatment of severe spasticity due to a variety of diseases, the location of optimal drug (baclofen) delivery has not been defined in a controlled study. Furthermore, the cost of pharmacological management in these patients is significant, and optimal location for drug delivery through an implantable drug pump may have significant impact on the cost burden of maintenance refills. It is the goal of this pilot study to determine whether there is a significant therapeutic advantage to place the ITB catheter within the cervical, thoracic or lumbar region of the spine. It is also a goal of this pilot study to determine whether the origin of spasticity influences the effect of Lioresal Intrathecal (baclofen injection) on ITB catheters located in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar regions of the spine. The investigators propose to study the impact of catheter location on the reduction in spasticity within a group of patients who are scheduled for ITB trial. In studying the impact of catheter location among patients with spinal versus cerebral origin of spasticity, the disease origin may also have a significant impact on baclofen dosing relative to the placement of the catheter.
In addition, the pharmacokinetic half-life and the variability of intrathecal baclofen is poorly understood as data is limited. In order to provide initial data regarding CSF baclofen washout, samples of spinal fluid obtained just prior to- and following IT baclofen administration will be obtained for delayed analysis. The results of these pharmacological analysis may refine the understanding of how quickly baclofen is distributed from a given catheter location, and whether it is affected by catheter location or disease origin. Since multiple catheter locations will be studied within a given patient, it also affords the opportunity to sample small amounts of CSF at key anatomical sites along the spinal axis as a secondary objective.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Baclofen injection at designated spinal level | Experimental | Drug: Baclofen bolus injectionDays 2,3,4,5 a baclofen injection bolus will be given in the catheter, located at C4, T4, T10 and L2 respectively. Effect of baclofen injection (50 microgram bolus) upon rigidity will be assessed manually using the Modified Ashworth rating score for selected upper and lower extremities. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients with spasticity from spinal origin (spinal cord injury)
- Adult patients with spasticity of cerebral origin (cerebral palsy and cerebrovascular accident)
- Adult women of child bearing age with a negative pregnancy test
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with spasticity from Multiple sclerosis
- Pregnant women
- Patients under the age of 18 years
- Patients over the age of 50
- Patients who are unable to have an MRI scan of the total spine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Baclofen bolus injectionAlso: Injection of baclofen bolusA baclofen bolus injection (50 micrograms) will be administered daily after the patient returns from radiology to position catheter injection location. The injection may be given at C4, T4, T10 or L2 spinal locations depending on the catheter tip location. | Drug | Baclofen injection at designated spinal level |
Primary outcome
Subjects Experiencing Maximal MAS Change From Baseline - Spasticity of Cerebral Origin
Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post-injection
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale (Standard MAS scale values: "0, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, or 4") used to evaluate spasticity based on grading muscle tone by moving joints. The MAS scores in this cohort are measured in biceps, triceps and forearm flexor muscles in upper extremities; and quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles in lower extremities. The score ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension). Improvement in spasticity was a reduction in MAS score by 1 point across a joint tested. Maximal MAS change is the sum of MAS score reduction in all four limbs tested. This outcome looks at subjects with spasticity of cerebral origin.
Subjects Experiencing Maximal MAS Change From Baseline - Spasticity of Spinal Origin
Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post-injection
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale (Standard MAS scale values: "0, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, or 4") used to evaluate spasticity based on grading muscle tone by moving joints. The MAS scores in this cohort are measured in biceps, triceps and forearm flexor muscles in upper extremities; and quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles in lower extremities. The score ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension). Improvement in spasticity was a reduction in MAS score by 1 point across a joint tested. Maximal MAS change is the sum of MAS score reduction in all four limbs tested. This outcome looks at subjects with spasticity of spinal origin.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 8613874Penn RD. Catheter implant systems for intrathecal drug delivery. J Neurosurg. 1996 Apr;84(4):713. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.4.0713a. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 7690122Kroin JS, Ali A, York M, Penn RD. The distribution of medication along the spinal canal after chronic intrathecal administration. Neurosurgery. 1993 Aug;33(2):226-30; discussion 230.
- Background: PubMed 10515478Grabb PA, Guin-Renfroe S, Meythaler JM. Midthoracic catheter tip placement for intrathecal baclofen administration in children with quadriparetic spasticity. Neurosurgery. 1999 Oct;45(4):833-6; discussion 836-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199910000-00020.
- Background: PubMed 21961547Albright AL. Technique for insertion of intraventricular baclofen catheters. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Oct;8(4):394-5. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.PEDS11211.
- Background: PubMed 8421205Coffey JR, Cahill D, Steers W, Park TS, Ordia J, Meythaler J, Herman R, Shetter AG, Levy R, Gill B, et al. Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spasticity of spinal origin: results of a long-term multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):226-32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0226.
- Background: PubMed 16619633Albright AL, Turner M, Pattisapu JV. Best-practice surgical techniques for intrathecal baclofen therapy. J Neurosurg. 2006 Apr;104(4 Suppl):233-9. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.4.233.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Muscle Spasticity
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy as an Additional Treatment for Spasticity Secondary to Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spasticity
Recruiting
Short-Term Effects of Manual Therapy Prior to Neuromotor Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP), Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effects of the EXOPULSE Suit on Mobility, Walking Ability, and Balance in People With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BMS-986368 in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity
Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Baclofen bolus injection in people with Muscle Spasticity, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Subjects Experiencing Maximal MAS Change From Baseline - Spasticity of Cerebral Origin (time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post-injection). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02903823, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2022.