Heart FailureNCT02905786
Protocol of a Pilot Study to Optimize Care for Heart Failure Patients in Primary Care
A study testing Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics), Clinical audit and feedback and Assistance by a specialized HF nurse in people with Heart Failure, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Heart failure (HF) imposes a burden for patients and health economics. Although guidelines exist, they are not implemented as such in the Belgian health care system. General practitioners (GPs) are confronted with the broadest range of HF management. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics), Clinical audit and feedback and Assistance by a specialized HF nurse
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 538 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Heart failure patients are included if:
- They have their electronic medical records ("globaal medisch dossier") registered with one of the participating general practitioners.
- They have a registered diagnosis of HF (ICPC-2 code K77 or free text) in their electronic health record (EHR).
- Patients can be included during the study if:
- They give their informed consent to participate in the study.
- Are eligible for a NT-proBNP POC test.
Who cannot join
- No exclusion criteria will be set
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Implementation of a Multifaceted Intervention to Optimize Care for Heart Failure Patients in Primary Care: Protocol of a Pilot Study
Heart failure (HF) imposes a burden for patients and health economics. Although guidelines exist, they are not implemented as such in the Belgian health care system. General practitioners (GPs) are confronted with the broadest range of HF management. Therefore, a multifaceted intervention will be implemented in Belgian general practice to support GPs in the implementation of evidence-based HF guidelines. This multifaceted intervention will consist of audit and feedback as a method to detect unrecognized HF patients and increase awareness for proactive HF management. Additionally, a NT-proBNP point-of-care test will be offered to every practice to improve detection and adequate diagnosis of HF patients. Furthermore, a specialist HF nurse will assist GPs in education of patients, optimization of treatment and transition of care. The investigators' aim is evaluating the feasibility of the implementation of this multifaceted intervention in general practice and the evolution in predefined quality indicators.
Read the detailed description
Objectives:
The objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a multifaceted intervention to optimize care for HF patients in Belgian general practice. It is not a primary objective to study the effectiveness of the intervention on the defined outcomes, since follow-up might be too short, however the evolution in quality will be evaluated. Specific research questions are:
- Do general practitioners use the NT-proBNP POC test and how does it influence practice?
- Do general practitioners use the assistance of the HF nurse and how does it influence practice?
- Does this intervention improve quality of care for HF patients in primary care?
- Does this intervention improve quality of life for HF patients in primary care?
- Is this intervention/data collection method feasible? How do participating GPs and investigators experience the interventions?
Data collection:
- Measurements at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up
- Baseline demographic data on patient age, gender, years since the diagnosis of HF, cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease), non-cardiovascular comorbidities (diabetes, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia), the last two blood pressure measurements, last 2 creatinine measurements and the last two values of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), last date of GP consultation, involvement of cardiologist (yes/no), last date of cardiologist appointment, echocardiography (yes/no), last date of echocardiography report, ejection fraction (EF), diastolic dysfunction (yes/no), clinically relevant valvular dysfunction (yes/no), left ventricular hypertrophy (yes/no), left atrial enlargement (yes/no) and heart failure treatment with dosage (diuretics, ACE-I, ARB, B-blockers, MRA, digoxin) will be collected. Additionally, the number of chronic medications and the number of chronic comorbidities will be collected. Furthermore, the MLHF-Q will be collected to evaluate patients' quality of life and grip strength (only at baseline) as a predictor of functional decline, disability and mortality. At baseline, HF hospitalization during the last three years will be registered based on discharge letters in the EHR. All hospitalizations and mortality will be collected at practice level during the study course. Data on physician age, gender, years of experience and practice organization (group/single-handed/number of practitioners/EMHS) will be requested as well.
Patient level
Outcomes:
All data will be extracted from the EHR of the general practitioner for all patients who satisfy the eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted at baseline and after 6 months. First, at baseline and after 6 months, all patients with a registered diagnosis of HF will be identified in the EMHS. Demographic data can be extracted with an automated search; other data will need to be collected by manual chart review. Additionally, all identified HF patients will be visited by the HF nurse at baseline and after 6 months and will be asked to fill in the MLHF-Q. At this occasion grip strength will be measured in the dominant hand using a JAMAR® Plus digital hand-held dynamometer. Three attempts at maximal squeeze will be recorded.
Process evaluation:
GPs will be asked to fill in a study registration form about the indication and results of their NT-proBNP POC test use and how it influenced their decision-making. The HF nurse will keep a log of all actions. Consequence of these actions will be collected from the patients' medical record. GPs will be asked to take note of the HF nurse advice in the EHR and indicate if it influenced decision-making.
Experiences of GPs and investigators:
The feedback meeting at 6 months will be organized as a focus group in each GP practice to get more insight in the experiences of the participating physicians and investigators. The meetings will be audiotaped and typed out. Any harm as a result of the trial will be explicitly collected and reported.
Practice level
Impact of the intervention on hospitalizations and mortality cannot be studied in this pilot trial, however, in a later stage this would be the outcome in the larger cluster-randomized trial, therefore, the feasibility of collecting data on hospitalizations and mortality will be tested. These outcomes will be measured at practice level in all patients aged 40 years or older, enlisted in one of the participating GP practices. GPs will be asked to register date of death and cause of death in the EHR of all patients who die during the study course. A list of hospitalized patients of each participating GP will be collected in all the surrounding hospitals (ZOL Genk, AZ Vesalius, Jessa Hasselt) and handed over to the GPs. Cause of hospitalization will be deducted from the discharge letter in the EHR by the GP in a standardized manner (trained by principal investigator (PI)). The anonymized data will be handed over to the PI.
Data management:
Data collection and data entries will be done by the PI and an assisting data manager. All patient data will be coded and anonymized. All other authors will have full access to the coded data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and will be able to take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Data analysis:
Descriptive statistics will be provided regarding baseline variables of the HF patients and general practitioners/general practices. Outcomes measured before and after the study intervention will be compared with a chi-squared test. Experiences of participating GPs and investigators will be analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis as method.
Ethics:
Before the study start the investigators will present the participating physicians with an informed consent that outlines the intervention and the purpose of the trial. Additionally, all identified HF patients will be visited by the HF nurse before the start of the study. On that occasion the HF nurse will inform all HF patients about the study outline and purpose and ask informed consent. Furthermore, patients eligible for a NT-proBNP POC test will be informed by their GPs about the study outline and purpose and asked informed consent. However, informed consent cannot be sought for all patients on practice level (hospitalizations/mortality). Therefore, information about the study intervention and purpose of the trial will be presented on a poster in each practice, visible for all patients, who can opt-out if they object to study participation.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics), Clinical audit and feedback, Assistance by a specialized HF nurse
- Keywords
- General Practice, Nurse practitioner, Natriuretic peptides, Clinical audit
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics)Device
NT-proBNP point-of-care test
Clinical audit and feedbackOther
Clinical audit and feedback to detect previously unrecognized HF patients and inform GPs about their current quality of HF care
Assistance by a specialized HF nurseOther
Assistance by a specialized HF nurse in general practice for education of patients, advice in diagnosis and treatment, transition of care
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the use of NT-proBNP POC test
How often do GPs use the POC test, for which indications, influence on decision-making?
Measured: 6 months
Evaluation of the use of specialized HF nurse assistance
How often and for which indications do GPs use the assistance of the specialized HF nurse?
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Adequacy of HF diagnosis
Number of registered HF patients. Number of registered HF patients referred for echocardiography.
Measured: 6 months
Adequacy of HF treatment
Number of HFrEF patients treated with RAAS-blockade, B-blockers or MRAs. The number of HFrEF patients treated with RAAS-blockade/B-blockers with a dose higher than starting dose
Measured: 6 months
Evolution of HF patients' QoL
Evolution in quality of life of HF patients measured with a validated dutch version of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Number of hospitalizations (all-cause, cardiovascular, HF-related)
the number of patients that are hospitalized at practice level
Measured: 6 months
Mortality (all-cause/cardiovascular)
the number of patients that die during study course at practice level
Measured: 6 months
Adequacy of follow-up
The number of HF patients that consulted their GP in the past 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Adequacy of specialized follow-up
The number of HF patients that were referred to a cardiologist in the past 18 months
Measured: 6 months
Adequacy of transition of care
The number of patients that contacted a familiar physician (cardiologist, GP, HF nurse) in the first 30 days after hospitalization
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completionFeb 2018
- Study completionFeb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 538 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Miek Smeets, KU Leuven
- Investigators
- Bert Aertgeerts, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Public Health and Primary Care
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02905786
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S59579
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Smeets M, Raat W, Aertgeerts B, Penders J, Vercammen J, Droogne W, Mullens W, Janssens S, Vaes B. Mixed-methods evaluation of a multifaceted heart failure intervention in general practice: the OSCAR-HF pilot study. ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):907-916. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14251. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
PubMed 36461750
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementation of a Multifaceted Intervention to Optimize Care for Heart Failure Patients in Primary Care: Protocol of a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02905786
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S59579
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- General Practice, Nurse practitioner, Natriuretic peptides, Clinical audit
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 538 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Heart failure (HF) imposes a burden for patients and health economics. Although guidelines exist, they are not implemented as such in the Belgian health care system. General practitioners (GPs) are confronted with the broadest range of HF management. Therefore, a multifaceted intervention will be implemented in Belgian general practice to support GPs in the implementation of evidence-based HF guidelines. This multifaceted intervention will consist of audit and feedback as a method to detect unrecognized HF patients and increase awareness for proactive HF management. Additionally, a NT-proBNP point-of-care test will be offered to every practice to improve detection and adequate diagnosis of HF patients. Furthermore, a specialist HF nurse will assist GPs in education of patients, optimization of treatment and transition of care. The investigators' aim is evaluating the feasibility of the implementation of this multifaceted intervention in general practice and the evolution in predefined quality indicators.
Detailed description
Objectives:
The objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a multifaceted intervention to optimize care for HF patients in Belgian general practice. It is not a primary objective to study the effectiveness of the intervention on the defined outcomes, since follow-up might be too short, however the evolution in quality will be evaluated. Specific research questions are:
- Do general practitioners use the NT-proBNP POC test and how does it influence practice?
- Do general practitioners use the assistance of the HF nurse and how does it influence practice?
- Does this intervention improve quality of care for HF patients in primary care?
- Does this intervention improve quality of life for HF patients in primary care?
- Is this intervention/data collection method feasible? How do participating GPs and investigators experience the interventions?
Data collection:
- Measurements at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up
- Baseline demographic data on patient age, gender, years since the diagnosis of HF, cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease), non-cardiovascular comorbidities (diabetes, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia), the last two blood pressure measurements, last 2 creatinine measurements and the last two values of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), last date of GP consultation, involvement of cardiologist (yes/no), last date of cardiologist appointment, echocardiography (yes/no), last date of echocardiography report, ejection fraction (EF), diastolic dysfunction (yes/no), clinically relevant valvular dysfunction (yes/no), left ventricular hypertrophy (yes/no), left atrial enlargement (yes/no) and heart failure treatment with dosage (diuretics, ACE-I, ARB, B-blockers, MRA, digoxin) will be collected. Additionally, the number of chronic medications and the number of chronic comorbidities will be collected. Furthermore, the MLHF-Q will be collected to evaluate patients' quality of life and grip strength (only at baseline) as a predictor of functional decline, disability and mortality. At baseline, HF hospitalization during the last three years will be registered based on discharge letters in the EHR. All hospitalizations and mortality will be collected at practice level during the study course. Data on physician age, gender, years of experience and practice organization (group/single-handed/number of practitioners/EMHS) will be requested as well.
Patient level
Outcomes:
All data will be extracted from the EHR of the general practitioner for all patients who satisfy the eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted at baseline and after 6 months. First, at baseline and after 6 months, all patients with a registered diagnosis of HF will be identified in the EMHS. Demographic data can be extracted with an automated search; other data will need to be collected by manual chart review. Additionally, all identified HF patients will be visited by the HF nurse at baseline and after 6 months and will be asked to fill in the MLHF-Q. At this occasion grip strength will be measured in the dominant hand using a JAMAR® Plus digital hand-held dynamometer. Three attempts at maximal squeeze will be recorded.
Process evaluation:
GPs will be asked to fill in a study registration form about the indication and results of their NT-proBNP POC test use and how it influenced their decision-making. The HF nurse will keep a log of all actions. Consequence of these actions will be collected from the patients' medical record. GPs will be asked to take note of the HF nurse advice in the EHR and indicate if it influenced decision-making.
Experiences of GPs and investigators:
The feedback meeting at 6 months will be organized as a focus group in each GP practice to get more insight in the experiences of the participating physicians and investigators. The meetings will be audiotaped and typed out. Any harm as a result of the trial will be explicitly collected and reported.
Practice level
Impact of the intervention on hospitalizations and mortality cannot be studied in this pilot trial, however, in a later stage this would be the outcome in the larger cluster-randomized trial, therefore, the feasibility of collecting data on hospitalizations and mortality will be tested. These outcomes will be measured at practice level in all patients aged 40 years or older, enlisted in one of the participating GP practices. GPs will be asked to register date of death and cause of death in the EHR of all patients who die during the study course. A list of hospitalized patients of each participating GP will be collected in all the surrounding hospitals (ZOL Genk, AZ Vesalius, Jessa Hasselt) and handed over to the GPs. Cause of hospitalization will be deducted from the discharge letter in the EHR by the GP in a standardized manner (trained by principal investigator (PI)). The anonymized data will be handed over to the PI.
Data management:
Data collection and data entries will be done by the PI and an assisting data manager. All patient data will be coded and anonymized. All other authors will have full access to the coded data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and will be able to take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Data analysis:
Descriptive statistics will be provided regarding baseline variables of the HF patients and general practitioners/general practices. Outcomes measured before and after the study intervention will be compared with a chi-squared test. Experiences of participating GPs and investigators will be analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis as method.
Ethics:
Before the study start the investigators will present the participating physicians with an informed consent that outlines the intervention and the purpose of the trial. Additionally, all identified HF patients will be visited by the HF nurse before the start of the study. On that occasion the HF nurse will inform all HF patients about the study outline and purpose and ask informed consent. Furthermore, patients eligible for a NT-proBNP POC test will be informed by their GPs about the study outline and purpose and asked informed consent. However, informed consent cannot be sought for all patients on practice level (hospitalizations/mortality). Therefore, information about the study intervention and purpose of the trial will be presented on a poster in each practice, visible for all patients, who can opt-out if they object to study participation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- They have their electronic medical records ("globaal medisch dossier") registered with one of the participating general practitioners.
- They have a registered diagnosis of HF (ICPC-2 code K77 or free text) in their electronic health record (EHR).
- They give their informed consent to participate in the study.
- Are eligible for a NT-proBNP POC test.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No exclusion criteria will be set
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics)NT-proBNP point-of-care test | Device | – |
| Clinical audit and feedbackClinical audit and feedback to detect previously unrecognized HF patients and inform GPs about their current quality of HF care | Other | – |
| Assistance by a specialized HF nurseAssistance by a specialized HF nurse in general practice for education of patients, advice in diagnosis and treatment, transition of care | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the use of NT-proBNP POC test
Time frame: 6 months
How often do GPs use the POC test, for which indications, influence on decision-making?
Evaluation of the use of specialized HF nurse assistance
Time frame: 6 months
How often and for which indications do GPs use the assistance of the specialized HF nurse?
8 secondary outcomes
Adequacy of HF diagnosis
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of HF treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Evolution of HF patients' QoL
Time frame: 6 months
Number of hospitalizations (all-cause, cardiovascular, HF-related)
Time frame: 6 months
Mortality (all-cause/cardiovascular)
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of specialized follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Adequacy of transition of care
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36461750Smeets M, Raat W, Aertgeerts B, Penders J, Vercammen J, Droogne W, Mullens W, Janssens S, Vaes B. Mixed-methods evaluation of a multifaceted heart failure intervention in general practice: the OSCAR-HF pilot study. ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):907-916. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14251. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Pediatric Participants With Heart Failure Due to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (MK-1242-036)
Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 1/2
HS235 Study in Overweight and Obese Participants With Combined Pre and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Pulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting
Heart Failure Patient Management and Interventions Using Continuous Patient Monitoring Outside Hospitals and Real-world Data
Chronic Heart Failure, Heart Transplant Recipient
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Savagen (Sacubitril/Valsartan) in Malaysian HFrEF Patients
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bert Aertgeerts, MD, PhD principal investigator
Department of Public Health and Primary Care
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cobas h232 (Roche Diagnostics), Clinical audit and feedback and Assistance by a specialized HF nurse in people with Heart Failure, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the use of NT-proBNP POC test (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02905786, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2018.