CataractNCT02909140
Optimal Method for Mydriasis in Cataract Surgery
A study testing Topical phenylephrine 2.5%, Topical cyclopentolate 1% and Intracameral Lidocaine 1% in people with Cataract, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Obtaining appropriate mydriasis prior to cataract surgery is an important variable in successful surgery. The current practice includes using topical anticholinergic and sympathomimetic agents in the preoperative area prior to cataract surgery, but the pupils are sometimes insufficiently dilated and can often need… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract
- What is being tested?
- Topical phenylephrine 2.5%, Topical cyclopentolate 1% and Intracameral Lidocaine 1%
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to 15 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 40 or older who are undergoing routine cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care at the Wilmer Eye Institute with Dr. Fasika Woreta and her senior resident proficient at cataract surgery.
Who cannot join
- Need for general anesthesia
- Maximum pupillary dilation <6.0mm at the pre-op clinic visit.
- Prior intra-ocular surgery
- Prior trauma
- Any pre-existing iris abnormalities including pupillary deformity, posterior synechiae, peripheral anterior synechiae, zonular dehiscence
- Pseudoexfoliation
- Allergy to any of the mydriasis agents
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
About this study
Obtaining appropriate mydriasis prior to cataract surgery is an important variable in successful surgery. The current practice includes using topical anticholinergic and sympathomimetic agents in the preoperative area prior to cataract surgery, but the pupils are sometimes insufficiently dilated and can often need additional mydriasis with intracameral agents during cataract surgery. Pre-operative topical mydriatic drops take time to take effect, are mildly uncomfortable for the patient, and have a cost to the healthcare system. If intracameral mydriasis alone can achieve adequate pupil dilation, perhaps topical mydriatics would not be needed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether topical versus intracameral versus topical + intracameral mydriasis is the optimal way to dilate pupils during routine cataract surgery. The results of this study have implications for improving the efficiency and reducing time prior to cataract surgery. In addition, it has significant potential to reduce the cost associated with cataract surgery if preoperative drops can be eliminated.
Read the detailed description
Recent research has compared the use of intracameral and topical agents with the preoperative pupil size and cataract surgery success. Studies have compared topical mydriatics with intracameral lidocaine and found no significant difference in dilation. , Other studies have compared topical mydriatics with intracameral dilation that includes solutions with and without epinephrine in the irrigating solution and concluded that irrigating solutions without epinephrine can safely be used with intracameral mydriatics but epinephrine is useful when using topical mydriatics. There have also been studies comparing the success of longer acting drug inserts of mydriatic agents with the use of intracameral agents. In addition to these standard agents, different surgeons have used various formulations of topical and intracameral agents to perform mydriasis. As of yet, there is no formal, standardized method for mydriasis and no large prospective study comparing the outcomes of the various methods. Considerations such as cost and time spent on preoperative mydriatic agents in light of the amount of success seen with these agents calls into question the need for such agents. The investigators would like to study the amount of pupillary dilation seen with topical preoperative mydriatic agents compared to intracameral agents compared to the use of them both together.
This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients will be consented and enrolled at their pre-op visit. They will be randomized to topical drops alone, intracameral injection alone, or topical plus intracameral mydriasis. All patients will receive intracameral lidocaine, as this is used for its anesthetic effect but also has some mydriatic effect. The intervention will take place on the day of the operation. Patients will be followed until post-operative month #1.
Data will be gathered on 4 visits: pre-op clinic visit, day of operation, and post-operative day #1 and post-operative month #1. These are all standard visits for routine cataract surgery, and this study will not require the patient to make any extra visits. Enrollment will continue until the sample size is met.
Patients cannot be blinded to whether or not they receive topical mydriasis eyedrops, and no placebo drops are necessary because patients cannot voluntarily control their pupillary constriction, so no placebo effect would be expected. The surgeon cannot be blinded to whether or not the patient has received topical mydriasis eyedrops in the pre-op area because it will be evident based upon whether or not the patient's eye is dilated. Another researcher who was not present in the operating room will grade the photographs and measure the pupil size, and this researcher will be blinded to which intervention the patient received.
Currently, some surgeons use topical plus intracameral mydriasis for mydriasis during cataract surgery. It is hypothesized that intracameral mydriasis alone may be sufficient to adequately dilate the pupil for cataract surgery. Patients who are not adequately dilated at the time of pupil size measurement immediately before the capsulorrhexis step will subsequently receive additional pharmacologic mydriasis, visco-dilation, or iris expansion devices to dilate their pupil to a size that is adequate for their surgery. Therefore, no matter which group the patient is in, their pupil will be eventually dilated to a size that is adequate to proceed with surgery.
There is no placebo or non-treatment group, since all patients must be somehow dilated in order to undergo cataract surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare 3 methods of dilation.
The pupil size will be measured after the viscoelastic is injected and before the capsulorrhexis is performed. Treatment failure is defined as a pupil size that is clinically deemed too small to safely proceed with surgery (approximately less than 5 mm). At this point, a rescue intervention will be implemented with additional pharmacologic mydriasis, visco-dilation, or iris expansion devices, until the pupil is adequately dilated to proceed with surgery. These patients will still be included in the study, and their pupil size prior to the rescue intervention is still the primary outcome.
Participants can choose to stop participating in the study prior to receiving any of the mydriasis agents. Should they choose to withdraw from the study, they would end up receiving routine mydriasis with topical plus intracameral agents. The study ends on post-op month #1 for all individual patients. The study enrollment period will end when the sample size is met.
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Being tested
- Topical phenylephrine 2.5%, Topical cyclopentolate 1%, Intracameral Lidocaine 1%, Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000
- Medical subject headings
- Cataract
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Topical phenylephrine 2.5%Drug
Topical cyclopentolate 1%Drug
Intracameral Lidocaine 1%Drug
Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Topical Mydriasis | Experimental | Topical mydriasis will be with 1 drop of phenylephrine 2.5% and 1 drop of cyclopentolate 1% x 4 doses each, with each drop spaced 5 minutes apart given in the pre-op area. These are the standard dilating drops used for cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. Receives: Drug: Topical phenylephrine 2.5%; Drug: Topical cyclopentolate 1%; Drug: Intracameral Lidocaine 1% |
| Intracameral Mydriasis | Experimental | Intracameral mydriasis will be with 0.2ml to 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 injected into the anterior chamber at the beginning of the cataract surgery procedure. This is the standard concentration use for intracameral mydriasis in cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. Receives: Drug: Intracameral Lidocaine 1%; Drug: Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 |
| Topical + Intracameral mydriasis | Experimental | Topical mydriasis will be with 1 drop of phenylephrine 2.5% and 1 drop of cyclopentolate 1% x 4 doses each, with each drop spaced 5 minutes apart given in the pre-op area. These are the standard dilating drops used for cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. Intracameral mydriasis will be with 0.2ml to 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 injected into the anterior chamber at the beginning of the cataract surgery procedure. This is the standard concentration use for intracameral mydriasis in cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. Receives: Drug: Topical phenylephrine 2.5%; Drug: Topical cyclopentolate 1%; Drug: Intracameral Lidocaine 1%; Drug: Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Capsulorrhexis
Pupil size immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery. This will be recorded by digital photography and measured by a researcher who is masked to the intervention.
Measured: Immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
Pupil Size (mm) Immediately After Nuclear Disassembly
Pupil size immediately after breaking up of cataractous lens
Measured: Immediately after nuclear disassembly step of cataract surgery
Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Intraocular Lens (IOL) Insertion
Pupil size after insertion of IOL lens
Measured: Immediately prior to IOL insertion step of cataract surgery
Pupil Size Upon Completion of Surgery
Measured: intraoperative
Pupil Size on Post-operative Day 1
Measured: Post-operative Day 1
Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Another Mydriatic Agent
Measured: intraoperative
Cumulative Energy Dispersed for Each Arm
The amount of energy needed to break up the cataractous lens
Measured: During cataract surgery
Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification in Each Arm
Measured: intraoperative
Percentage of Patients With an Increase in the Blood Pressure or Heart Rate
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Patients With an Increase in the Blood Pressure or Heart Rate
Measured: intraoperative
Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification
Measured: During cataract surgery
Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Use of an Iris Expansion Device During the Procedure
Measured: intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completion15 Aug 2018
- Study completion15 Aug 2018
Why it stopped: insufficient patient recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for CataractStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fasika Woreta, M.D., M.P.H, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02909140
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00091874
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Method for Mydriasis in Cataract Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02909140
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00091874
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: insufficient patient recruitment
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obtaining appropriate mydriasis prior to cataract surgery is an important variable in successful surgery. The current practice includes using topical anticholinergic and sympathomimetic agents in the preoperative area prior to cataract surgery, but the pupils are sometimes insufficiently dilated and can often need additional mydriasis with intracameral agents during cataract surgery. Pre-operative topical mydriatic drops take time to take effect, are mildly uncomfortable for the patient, and have a cost to the healthcare system. If intracameral mydriasis alone can achieve adequate pupil dilation, perhaps topical mydriatics would not be needed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether topical versus intracameral versus topical + intracameral mydriasis is the optimal way to dilate pupils during routine cataract surgery. The results of this study have implications for improving the efficiency and reducing time prior to cataract surgery. In addition, it has significant potential to reduce the cost associated with cataract surgery if preoperative drops can be eliminated.
Detailed description
Recent research has compared the use of intracameral and topical agents with the preoperative pupil size and cataract surgery success. Studies have compared topical mydriatics with intracameral lidocaine and found no significant difference in dilation. , Other studies have compared topical mydriatics with intracameral dilation that includes solutions with and without epinephrine in the irrigating solution and concluded that irrigating solutions without epinephrine can safely be used with intracameral mydriatics but epinephrine is useful when using topical mydriatics. There have also been studies comparing the success of longer acting drug inserts of mydriatic agents with the use of intracameral agents. In addition to these standard agents, different surgeons have used various formulations of topical and intracameral agents to perform mydriasis. As of yet, there is no formal, standardized method for mydriasis and no large prospective study comparing the outcomes of the various methods. Considerations such as cost and time spent on preoperative mydriatic agents in light of the amount of success seen with these agents calls into question the need for such agents. The investigators would like to study the amount of pupillary dilation seen with topical preoperative mydriatic agents compared to intracameral agents compared to the use of them both together.
This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients will be consented and enrolled at their pre-op visit. They will be randomized to topical drops alone, intracameral injection alone, or topical plus intracameral mydriasis. All patients will receive intracameral lidocaine, as this is used for its anesthetic effect but also has some mydriatic effect. The intervention will take place on the day of the operation. Patients will be followed until post-operative month #1.
Data will be gathered on 4 visits: pre-op clinic visit, day of operation, and post-operative day #1 and post-operative month #1. These are all standard visits for routine cataract surgery, and this study will not require the patient to make any extra visits. Enrollment will continue until the sample size is met.
Patients cannot be blinded to whether or not they receive topical mydriasis eyedrops, and no placebo drops are necessary because patients cannot voluntarily control their pupillary constriction, so no placebo effect would be expected. The surgeon cannot be blinded to whether or not the patient has received topical mydriasis eyedrops in the pre-op area because it will be evident based upon whether or not the patient's eye is dilated. Another researcher who was not present in the operating room will grade the photographs and measure the pupil size, and this researcher will be blinded to which intervention the patient received.
Currently, some surgeons use topical plus intracameral mydriasis for mydriasis during cataract surgery. It is hypothesized that intracameral mydriasis alone may be sufficient to adequately dilate the pupil for cataract surgery. Patients who are not adequately dilated at the time of pupil size measurement immediately before the capsulorrhexis step will subsequently receive additional pharmacologic mydriasis, visco-dilation, or iris expansion devices to dilate their pupil to a size that is adequate for their surgery. Therefore, no matter which group the patient is in, their pupil will be eventually dilated to a size that is adequate to proceed with surgery.
There is no placebo or non-treatment group, since all patients must be somehow dilated in order to undergo cataract surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare 3 methods of dilation.
The pupil size will be measured after the viscoelastic is injected and before the capsulorrhexis is performed. Treatment failure is defined as a pupil size that is clinically deemed too small to safely proceed with surgery (approximately less than 5 mm). At this point, a rescue intervention will be implemented with additional pharmacologic mydriasis, visco-dilation, or iris expansion devices, until the pupil is adequately dilated to proceed with surgery. These patients will still be included in the study, and their pupil size prior to the rescue intervention is still the primary outcome.
Participants can choose to stop participating in the study prior to receiving any of the mydriasis agents. Should they choose to withdraw from the study, they would end up receiving routine mydriasis with topical plus intracameral agents. The study ends on post-op month #1 for all individual patients. The study enrollment period will end when the sample size is met.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Topical Mydriasis | Experimental | Drug: Topical phenylephrine 2.5%, Drug: Topical cyclopentolate 1%, Drug: Intracameral Lidocaine 1%Topical mydriasis will be with 1 drop of phenylephrine 2.5% and 1 drop of cyclopentolate 1% x 4 doses each, with each drop spaced 5 minutes apart given in the pre-op area. These are the standard dilating drops used for cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. |
| Intracameral Mydriasis | Experimental | Drug: Intracameral Lidocaine 1%, Drug: Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000Intracameral mydriasis will be with 0.2ml to 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 injected into the anterior chamber at the beginning of the cataract surgery procedure. This is the standard concentration use for intracameral mydriasis in cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. |
| Topical + Intracameral mydriasis | Experimental | Drug: Topical phenylephrine 2.5%, Drug: Topical cyclopentolate 1%, Drug: Intracameral Lidocaine 1%, Drug: Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000Topical mydriasis will be with 1 drop of phenylephrine 2.5% and 1 drop of cyclopentolate 1% x 4 doses each, with each drop spaced 5 minutes apart given in the pre-op area. These are the standard dilating drops used for cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. Intracameral mydriasis will be with 0.2ml to 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 injected into the anterior chamber at the beginning of the cataract surgery procedure. This is the standard concentration use for intracameral mydriasis in cataract surgery. These patients will also receive intracameral lidocaine 1% for anesthesia. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients aged 40 or older who are undergoing routine cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care at the Wilmer Eye Institute with Dr. Fasika Woreta and her senior resident proficient at cataract surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Need for general anesthesia
- Maximum pupillary dilation <6.0mm at the pre-op clinic visit.
- Prior intra-ocular surgery
- Prior trauma
- Any pre-existing iris abnormalities including pupillary deformity, posterior synechiae, peripheral anterior synechiae, zonular dehiscence
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Topical phenylephrine 2.5% | Drug | Topical + Intracameral mydriasis, Topical Mydriasis |
| Topical cyclopentolate 1% | Drug | Topical + Intracameral mydriasis, Topical Mydriasis |
| Intracameral Lidocaine 1% | Drug | Intracameral Mydriasis, Topical + Intracameral mydriasis, Topical Mydriasis |
| Intracameral 0.2- 0.3ml of epinephrine 1:10,000 | Drug | Intracameral Mydriasis, Topical + Intracameral mydriasis |
Primary outcome
Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Capsulorrhexis
Time frame: Immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery
Pupil size immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery. This will be recorded by digital photography and measured by a researcher who is masked to the intervention.
11 secondary outcomes
Pupil Size (mm) Immediately After Nuclear Disassembly
Time frame: Immediately after nuclear disassembly step of cataract surgery
Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Intraocular Lens (IOL) Insertion
Time frame: Immediately prior to IOL insertion step of cataract surgery
Pupil Size Upon Completion of Surgery
Time frame: intraoperative
Pupil Size on Post-operative Day 1
Time frame: Post-operative Day 1
Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Another Mydriatic Agent
Time frame: intraoperative
Cumulative Energy Dispersed for Each Arm
Time frame: During cataract surgery
Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification in Each Arm
Time frame: intraoperative
Percentage of Patients With an Increase in the Blood Pressure or Heart Rate
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Patients With an Increase in the Blood Pressure or Heart Rate
Time frame: intraoperative
Mean Time Taken to Perform Phacoemulsification
Time frame: During cataract surgery
Percentage of Patients in Each Arm That Required Use of an Iris Expansion Device During the Procedure
Time frame: intraoperative
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Capella Scientia Development Study
Cataract
Recruiting
Clareon TruPlus Study
Aphakia, Astigmatism
RecruitingObservational study
Anterior Segment Anatomy Assessed by Swept-Source OCT in Ocular Surgery Patients
Cataract, Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Follow-Up
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fasika Woreta, M.D., M.P.H principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Topical phenylephrine 2.5%, Topical cyclopentolate 1% and Intracameral Lidocaine 1% in people with Cataract, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pupil Size Immediately Prior to Capsulorrhexis (time frame: Immediately prior to the capsulorrhexis step of cataract surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2019.