Heart FailureNCT02916225
High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
A study testing High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Continuous Training in people with Heart Failure and Diastolic Heart Failure, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate continuous training in increasing cardiopulmonary capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Diastolic Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Continuous Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) of any etiology that have functional class of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) between I and III, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50% and who meet clinical and echocardiography criteria for HFPEF according to the consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology (Paulus et al.). Patients should be clinical stable for the last 3 months and under optimized pharmacologic treatment, being capable of walking without limitations.
Who cannot join
- Patients with exercise-induced unstable ventricular arrhythmias, unstable angina, moderate to severe valvular heart disease, severe pulmonary disease, severe anemia, cognitive limitations to understand study protocol, use of pacemaker, autonomic neuropathy, cardiovascular event for less than 3 months, congenital heart disease, terminal illness with less than 1 year of life expectancy, peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication or osteoarticular conditions limiting exercise will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
About this study
Official title: High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients: a Randomized Study.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate continuous training in increasing cardiopulmonary capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.
Read the detailed description
High intensity interval training (HIIT) has been proved to increase oxygen consumption, having superior cardiovascular effect when compared to moderate continuous training (MCT) in post-infarction patients (Wisloff et al.) Aerobic training also had shown positive effect on oxygen consumption and diastolic function in subjects with HFPEF when compared to usual care (Edelmann et al).
However, the comparison of HIIT and MCT on improving functional capacity and diastolic function in HFPEF patients has not yet been study.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Diastolic Heart Failure
- Being tested
- High Intensity Interval Training, Moderate Continuous Training
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Heart Failure, Diastolic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Intensity Interval TrainingBehavioural
The HIIT group will warm up for 10 minutes at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate(50% to 60% of V̇O2peak) before walking four 4-minute intervals at 85% to 95% of peak heart rate. Each interval will be separated by 3-minute active pauses, walking at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate. The training session will be terminated by a 3-minute cool-down at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate. Total exercise time will be 38 minutes for the HIIT group. Patients will perform 3 training sessions per week for 12 consecutive weeks.
Moderate Continuous TrainingBehavioural
The moderate continuous training (MCT) group will undergo treadmill walking continuously at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate for 47 minutes each session to make sure the training protocols will be isocaloric. Patients will perform 3 training sessions per week for 12 consecutive weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High intensity interval training | Active comparator | exercise protocol for high intensity/aerobic interval training as described by ESC statement (Mezzani et al.) Receives: Behavioral: High Intensity Interval Training |
| Moderate Continuous Training | Placebo comparator | exercise protocol for continuous aerobic training as described by ESC statement (Mezzani et al.) Receives: Behavioral: Moderate Continuous Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximal Oxygen Consumption
Measured: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Secondary outcomes (4)
Diastolic Function
assessed by echocardiography
Measured: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Pulmonary function tests
assessed by spirometry
Measured: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Respiratory muscle strength
assessed by manovacuometry
Measured: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Quality of life
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire
Measured: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionMar 2017
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ricardo Stein, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Investigators
- Ricardo Stein, ScD, Study director, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02916225
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 140362
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mezzani A, Hamm LF, Jones AM, McBride PE, Moholdt T, Stone JA, Urhausen A, Williams MA; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(3):442-67. doi: 10.1177/2047487312460484. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
PubMed 23104970Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, Tjonna AE, Helgerud J, Slordahl SA, Lee SJ, Videm V, Bye A, Smith GL, Najjar SM, Ellingsen O, Skjaerpe T. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 19;115(24):3086-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
PubMed 17548726Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE, Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbely A, Edes I, Handoko ML, Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG, Brutsaert DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2539-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm037. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
PubMed 17428822Edelmann F, Gelbrich G, Dungen HD, Frohling S, Wachter R, Stahrenberg R, Binder L, Topper A, Lashki DJ, Schwarz S, Herrmann-Lingen C, Loffler M, Hasenfuss G, Halle M, Pieske B. Exercise training improves exercise capacity and diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results of the Ex-DHF (Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure) pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 18;58(17):1780-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.054.
PubMed 21996391Donelli da Silveira A, Beust de Lima J, da Silva Piardi D, Dos Santos Macedo D, Zanini M, Nery R, Laukkanen JA, Stein R. High-intensity interval training is effective and superior to moderate continuous training in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Nov;27(16):1733-1743. doi: 10.1177/2047487319901206. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
PubMed 31964186
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients: a Randomized Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02916225
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 140362
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Diastolic Heart Failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate continuous training in increasing cardiopulmonary capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.
Detailed description
High intensity interval training (HIIT) has been proved to increase oxygen consumption, having superior cardiovascular effect when compared to moderate continuous training (MCT) in post-infarction patients (Wisloff et al.) Aerobic training also had shown positive effect on oxygen consumption and diastolic function in subjects with HFPEF when compared to usual care (Edelmann et al).
However, the comparison of HIIT and MCT on improving functional capacity and diastolic function in HFPEF patients has not yet been study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High intensity interval training | Active comparator | Behavioral: High Intensity Interval Trainingexercise protocol for high intensity/aerobic interval training as described by ESC statement (Mezzani et al.) |
| Moderate Continuous Training | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Moderate Continuous Trainingexercise protocol for continuous aerobic training as described by ESC statement (Mezzani et al.) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) of any etiology that have functional class of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) between I and III, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50% and who meet clinical and echocardiography criteria for HFPEF according to the consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology (Paulus et al.). Patients should be clinical stable for the last 3 months and under optimized pharmacologic treatment, being capable of walking without limitations.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with exercise-induced unstable ventricular arrhythmias, unstable angina, moderate to severe valvular heart disease, severe pulmonary disease, severe anemia, cognitive limitations to understand study protocol, use of pacemaker, autonomic neuropathy, cardiovascular event for less than 3 months, congenital heart disease, terminal illness with less than 1 year of life expectancy, peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication or osteoarticular conditions limiting exercise will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Interval TrainingThe HIIT group will warm up for 10 minutes at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate(50% to 60% of V̇O2peak) before walking four 4-minute intervals at 85% to 95% of peak heart rate. Each interval will be separated by 3-minute active pauses, walking at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate. The training session will be terminated by a 3-minute cool-down at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate. Total exercise time will be 38 minutes for the HIIT group. Patients will perform 3 training sessions per week for 12 consecutive weeks. | Behavioural | High intensity interval training |
| Moderate Continuous TrainingThe moderate continuous training (MCT) group will undergo treadmill walking continuously at 60% to 70% of peak heart rate for 47 minutes each session to make sure the training protocols will be isocaloric. Patients will perform 3 training sessions per week for 12 consecutive weeks. | Behavioural | Moderate Continuous Training |
Primary outcome
Maximal Oxygen Consumption
Time frame: 12 weeks after beginning of training
4 secondary outcomes
Diastolic Function
Time frame: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Pulmonary function tests
Time frame: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Respiratory muscle strength
Time frame: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Quality of life
Time frame: 12 weeks after beginning of training
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23104970Mezzani A, Hamm LF, Jones AM, McBride PE, Moholdt T, Stone JA, Urhausen A, Williams MA; European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(3):442-67. doi: 10.1177/2047487312460484. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 17548726Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, Tjonna AE, Helgerud J, Slordahl SA, Lee SJ, Videm V, Bye A, Smith GL, Najjar SM, Ellingsen O, Skjaerpe T. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 19;115(24):3086-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 17428822Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE, Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbely A, Edes I, Handoko ML, Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG, Brutsaert DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2539-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm037. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
- Background: PubMed 21996391Edelmann F, Gelbrich G, Dungen HD, Frohling S, Wachter R, Stahrenberg R, Binder L, Topper A, Lashki DJ, Schwarz S, Herrmann-Lingen C, Loffler M, Hasenfuss G, Halle M, Pieske B. Exercise training improves exercise capacity and diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results of the Ex-DHF (Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure) pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 18;58(17):1780-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.054.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31964186Donelli da Silveira A, Beust de Lima J, da Silva Piardi D, Dos Santos Macedo D, Zanini M, Nery R, Laukkanen JA, Stein R. High-intensity interval training is effective and superior to moderate continuous training in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Nov;27(16):1733-1743. doi: 10.1177/2047487319901206. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure
Recruiting
ELEVATE-HFpEF Clinical Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Recruiting
Barostim-Enabled NEurohormonal Intervention For Improving Treatment of Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class II
RecruitingObservational study
31P-MRS Myocardial Energetic Phenotyping and Prognosis Across the Cardiac Disease Spectrum
Cardiomyopathies, Heart Failure
Not yet recruiting
Importance of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Early Detection of Valvular and Cardiac Diseases (IMPROVE)
Valvular Heart Disease Patients, Aortic Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ricardo Stein, ScD study director
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Continuous Training in people with Heart Failure and Diastolic Heart Failure, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximal Oxygen Consumption (time frame: 12 weeks after beginning of training). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02916225, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2018.