AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NCT02917902

Assessing Health Outcomes in Low-income Diabetics Who Receive Monthly Boxes of Healthy Food at Clinic

A study testing Food boxes in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of California, San Diego.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effectiveness of providing monthly boxes of nutritious foods to low-income patients with diabetes on site at Free Clinics with referrals to off-site food pantries on diabetes related health outcomes Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Food boxes
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
201 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2015to May 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • type 2 diabetes
  • receiving medical care at one of the UC San Diego Student-run Free Clinic Sites

Who cannot join

  • unable to attend monthly food distribution onsite (pt states will not able to come monthly due to any kind of conflict (work, transportation, childcare), or is not interested in coming monthly due to time or transportation burden)

About this study

Official title: Impact of Food Distribution at Low-income Clinics on Health Outcomes of Patients With Diabetes

To compare the effectiveness of providing monthly boxes of nutritious foods to low-income patients with diabetes on site at Free Clinics with referrals to off-site food pantries on diabetes related health outcomes

Read the detailed description

It is hypothesized that providing healthy foods may stabilize unhealthy eating patterns for diabetics so that HbA1c measurements significantly improve. The UCSD Student-Run Free Clinic Project (SRFCP) will offer boxes of nutritious food monthly along with a brief nutrition class to its diabetic patients and continue their otherwise usual care. The UCSD SRFCP will partner with a large food bank, Feeding America San Diego, that can provide monthly food boxes of healthy food along with education about eating healthy on a budget. Food insecurity negatively impacts health outcomes in diabetic patients; therefore enhancing food security with nutritious food as well as providing education to cultivate healthy eating habits could be a cost-effective way to improve health outcomes in diabetics, necessitating the use of human subjects for this study. Blood pressure, weight, and LDL cholesterol will be secondary outcome measures along with survey measures for diabetes distress, depression, dietary quality assessment, medication adherence, hypoglycemia, and food security.

Diabetics who enroll in this study will be randomly assigned to an initial 3-month period of either immediate intervention (the food boxes and education) or a wait list control group. The intervention involves receiving a box of nutritious food each month along with brief education provided by food pantry staff, in addition to usual medical care. In measuring clinical outcomes, this study will not deviate from routine care.

As a part of routine care screening, all UCSD SRFCP patients will receive the six-item 'Short Form' of the USDA Food Security Survey Module to assess their food security upon arrival in the waiting area. This survey will be self-administered or orally administered depending on patient preference. Regardless of food security status, everyone will be offered referral to local food banks and referral for Cal-Fresh (Food Stamps) application if eligible.

All patients who receive care at the UCSD SRFCP sites with a diagnosis of diabetes, regardless of food security status, will be offered these same resources in addition to being informed of this study. The investigators will track health outcomes from routine clinical visits by querying the electronic health records if patients chose to participate in the study. Participants will also be asked to complete a survey at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months (for the wait list group). Those who are interested in the study will speak with a study coordinator and be provided a detailed discussion about the study.

Once the study is fully explained and ample time is given for patients to make a well-informed decision, the informed consent will be obtained in a private room or space with study coordinators fluent in the patient's preferred language (English or Spanish) who are capable of answering questions about the study. The informed consent forms will be provided in English and Spanish. It will be made clear to patients that they are under no obligation to participate and that refusal to participate in no way influences the routine care they receive at the UCSD SRFCP.

If patients choose to participate in the study, after signing the informed consent, patients will then complete the 'Pre Survey,' which includes measures for diabetes distress, medication adherence, depression, dietary assessment, and hypoglycemia. This is available in English and Spanish, and it can also be self-administered or orally administered depending on patient preference.

A wait list study design allows for comparison between the immediate intervention arm and the wait list intervention arm to isolate the diabetes food boxes as the variable responsible for patient improvement, while still allowing all patients who are interested to receive the nutritious food boxes on site free of charge. After patient enrollment and completion of the 'Pre Survey', participants will be randomized into either an immediate intervention arm, in which they will receive food and nutrition education within a month, at the next available monthly food distribution and nutrition education session, or they will be enrolled in the delayed intervention arm when they will begin the food distribution and nutrition classes 3 months later. The UCSD SRFCP diabetic patients' routine appointments are typically scheduled about every three months so this would be after their next scheduled routine appointment. Realistically patient visits do not fall exactly 90 days later, so any visit data or lab results nearest to the baseline, 3 month, 6 month, and 9 month time frames can be included in assessing outcomes for this study.

To determine sample size, we examined 3-month data from a previous UCSD clinical trial conducted by Dr. Cheryl Rock in subjects with type 2 diabetes (Rock et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1573). Assuming mean (SD) HbA1c% reduction from baseline of 0.68 (1.02)% in immediate intervention, and 0.0 (0.88)% in the wait list control group, there is 97% power with a dropout/nonadherence rate of up to 40% to see a group difference at 3 months if we assign 100 patients to immediate intervention and 100 to wait list control patients for a total of 200 patients under study.

Analysis will examine longitudinal changes over 3 months in HbA1c% (the primary outcome variable) and secondary outcome variables (e.g., weight), which will be extracted from medical records, allowing for a 45-day window before or after the 3-month time point. Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS. Any missing data will be imputed and primary analysis will be intent to treat. The investigators will use t-tests and χ2 analyses to assess between-group baseline differences. Baseline variables that differ between arms will be controlled for in subsequent analysis. Outcomes will be transformed as needed to better approximate Gaussian distributions or analyzed non-parametrically. Analyses evaluating intervention effects will be conducted at the 2-sided 5% significance level. The investigators will perform 2-sample t-tests and repeated measures analyses using linear mixed models to examine between-group differences and paired t-tests to examine within-subject changes. Likelihood ratio tests will be used to assess significance of model terms; covariates deemed to be imbalanced across randomization arms will be controlled for in the models.

Participants in the immediate and the waitlist arms of the study will ultimately both receive food for the same duration of time (6 months).

There are approximately 200 patients with diabetes, predominantly Latinos, receiving care at the UCSD SRFCP and the investigators wanted to ensure that any patient with diabetes receiving medical care at the SRFCP could enter the study to receive additional food resources onsite. The investigators have a commitment from Feeding America San Diego of food for 200 patients for the duration of the study. The initial enrollment period is estimated to be 3-6 months. Participants will receive carts to facilitate carrying home the box of food.

Brief educational sessions led by food pantry staff will also be utilized to empower patients to continue making informed decisions about their health and nutrition after the study ends. These sessions will be led by a bilingual person, fluent in Spanish and English. Example recipes and nutritional pamphlets will also be provided in the diabetes boxes. The investigators would like participants will eat the food that is being provided, although it is understood that it may also be used for immediate family members who are eating meals with the participant. Food insecurity is measured routinely only at the household level, therefore it is appropriate to try to raise the household food insecurity as part of this study.

The 'Post Survey' will also be administered at 3 months, at 6 months, and (for the waitlisted group) at 9 months during the educational sessions. The 'Post survey' consists of the same questions from the 'Pre Survey' plus the questions from the initial USDA Food Security screening.

All participants will be assigned to unique study identification numbers in order to de-identify patients' medical information. The de-identified dataset will be entered into ishare, a UCSD password-secure website utilized by the SRFCP, or REDCap, a secure website and research tool for managing surveys and databases. Permission to view the folders containing the de-identified database will be limited only to those directly involved in this study. This de-identified dataset will then be subject to statistical analysis without the potential of a link being made back to the patient's medical record with private health information. Data analysis and interpretation will be from the de-identified data only.

Finally, there are plans to assist participants to continue to eat foods like that which is provided in the study, and the barriers that participants face are both fiscal and knowledge-based. First, Feeding America San Diego has agreed to continue to provide healthful diabetes food boxes after the conclusion of the study for any interested participants. Second, the education that is included in this study is designed around empowering participants to continue to make healthy food choices on a budget. It is hoped that, by exposure to budget-friendly and healthy foods, participants will continue to make these same healthy and affordable food choices when doing their own grocery shopping. Third, at the beginning of this project, an objective is to not only enroll participants in this study but also to expose all UCSD Student-run Free Clinic Project (SRFCP) patients to the other available resources, such as facilitation with Food Stamps (Cal-Fresh) enrollment as well as local food bank distributions in patients' neighborhoods. Feeding America San Diego, for example, has over 100 food bank sites throughout San Diego. Therefore, food resources will persist once the study has finished, hopefully leaving participants with lasting nutrition education as well as connections with Cal-Fresh and food banks. Making this a successful transition will be an emphasis of the research team throughout the study.

Being tested
Food boxes
Keywords
student-run free clinic, food supply, food insecure, medically uninsured, medically underserved
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Food boxesOther

    Box of approximately 50 pounds of nutritious foods provided by food pantry, including fresh fruits and vegetables as well as shelf-stable items selected for diabetic patients, along with brief education provided by food pantry staff.

Study groups in NCT02917902
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate interventionExperimentalIntervention: Food boxes. Monthly boxes of food for 6 months, along with brief educational information from food pantry staff regarding eating healthy on a budget, starting immediately after randomization. Patients will continue to receive routine medical care at the Free Clinic.
Receives: Other: Food boxes
Delayed interventionOtherIntervention: Food boxes. Monthly boxes of food for 6 months, along with brief educational information from food pantry staff regarding eating healthy on a budget, starting 3 months after randomization. Patients will continue to receive routine medical care at the Free Clinic. Participants will be given referrals to local food pantries in their neighborhoods that provide food free of charge as well as referrals for CalFresh (formerly known as food stamps) during the 3 month time frame when patients are waiting to receive food distributions on site at the clinics.
Receives: Other: Food boxes

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in HbA1c (measured as part of routine care)

    Measured: primary outcome measure is change in HbA1c from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9months is for delayed intervention only)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in Food Insecurity

    United States Department of Agriculture 6 item food security scale

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  2. Change in Diabetes Distress

    As measured by Diabetes Distress Scale

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  3. Change in Fruit and Vegetable Intake

    As measured by Fruit Frequency Questionnaire

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  4. Change in Hypoglycemic Events

    patient report of frequency of hypoglycemia by survey item

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  5. Change in Medication adherence

    as measured by survey item

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  6. Change in Blood Pressure (systolic and diastolic)

    as measured as part of routine medical care

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  7. Change in LDL

    as measured as part of routine medical care

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  8. Change in weight (in pounds) and Body Mass Index

    as measured as part of routine medical care

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

  9. Change in Body Mass Index, measured in kg/m^2, weight in kilograms, height in meters

    as measured as part of routine medical care

    Measured: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9 months is for delayed intervention only)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
201 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02917902
Sponsor's protocol ID
141481
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
23 Sep 2016
Last updated
28 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Food boxes in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of California, San Diego.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in HbA1c (measured as part of routine care) (time frame: primary outcome measure is change in HbA1c from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 9 months (9months is for delayed intervention only)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in