Inappropriate PrescribingNCT02918643
Using a Mobile Application as a Support at the Prescription of Appropriate Medications for Elderly
A study testing Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients in people with Inappropriate Prescribing, run by Federal University of Bahia.
Trial summary
Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application to support decision making for prescription drugs to elderly patients. Method: Firstly, there will be a two-tier content validation of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) for the elderly based on Beers Criteria and STOPP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Inappropriate Prescribing
- What is being tested?
- Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to 20 Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -Doctors who meet elderly people in basic health units, family health units or primary care polyclinics.
Who cannot join
- -Doctors with residency in medicine-geriatrics or specialization recognized by the Brazilian Society of Geriatrics.
About this study
Official title: Development and Evaluation of the Use of a Mobile Application as a Support at the Prescription of Appropriate Medications for Elderly
Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application to support decision making for prescription drugs to elderly patients. Method: Firstly, there will be a two-tier content validation of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) for the elderly based on Beers Criteria and STOPP. For the validation, a modified Delphi consensus technique will be applied. Twelve national experts will be invited. For each statement contained in the Beers criteria and STOPP a proposition will be prepared in order to allow each participant to issue an opinion on each of the propositions by assigning a value according to their agreement to the statement. Therefore, the Likert scale with established score of 1 to 5 (completely disagree - strongly agree) will be used. Statements with average scores above 4.0 will be considered consensus. All information regarding PIMs will be made available through an application for tablets. The information on risks and recommendations about the drugs will be available whenever the users enter the medicines name. The application will be developed for the Android platform, which is based on the Java programming language. To evaluate the use of this application 30 doctors working in basic health units and health units of the family in a municipality from Bahia will be asked to join the study. Upon acceptance, the proportion of PIMs' prescription by these professionals for a minimum period of two months will be analyzed. Later, 15 doctors will be randomized into the intervention group and will receive a tablet with the application installed. They will be trained to use it as well as to access to the Evidence Based Health Portal of the Ministry of Health. The control group of 15 other physicians will receive the tablet and will be trained to access the Evidence Based Health Portal. The study will be blind to the participants and to the main investigator. To continue, the information will be analyzed by sampling the PIMs' prescription in both groups. To access this information the prescriptions' duplicate original, filed in pharmacies, patient files or home visit will be required. The PIMs prescription ratios before and after the intervention will be compared.
Read the detailed description
Step 1:
Initially, data of the drugs contained in Beers and STOPP criteria will be reviewed. The availability of medicines in the Brazilian market will be analyzed through the website of the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). Subsequently, drug data will be placed in a questionnaire to be sent to national experts in order to establish a consensus on the information presented. The questionnaire assessment will happen in two rounds. The first round consists of sending propositions based on information contained in the Beers criteria, STOPP 2012 and 2006 in order to allow each participant to issue an opinion on each of the propositions by assigning a value according to their agreement to the statement. Therefore, the Likert scale with established score of 1 to 5 (completely disagree - strongly agree) will be used. For the second round, the scores will be analyzed and the propositions in which there is no consensus will again be sent along with the comments of each specialist. In these cases, each specialist may review or maintain their position. It is worth noting that during the application of questionnaires rounds experts do not have access to the identification of their peers. In the second round, Statements with average scores above 4.0 will be considered consensus. The final information will be used for the mobile device application development.
Experts will be selected for convenience. Twelve professionals with experience in geriatrics will be invited via email to participate as experts in the validation of the Beers Criteria and STOPP. This call will include a summary of the project and general information about the Delphi Technique. After acceptance, they will receive a Term of Informed Consent Form (ICF) and an Authorization to Release Name as Specialist / Senior, which must be signed and returned.
The application will be developed for the Android platform, which is based on the Java programming language.
Step 2:
Study design:
Clinical trial, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group. They will be invited to participate in this stage 30 physicians working in primary care of a municipality from Bahia. Upon acceptance to participate in the study and signing of the Informed Consent form (IC), the proportion of PIMs' prescription by these professionals for a minimum period of two months will be analyzed.
After, physicians will be randomized and included in one of two study groups:
Intervention: 15 doctors will receive the tablet with the application installed and will be trained to use it as well as to access the Evidence Based Health Portal of the Ministry of Health.
Control Group: 15 doctors will receive the tablet without the application and will also be trained to access the Evidence Based Health Portal.
After the intervention, the data will be examined again by sampling the proportion of PIM prescriptions by these professionals.
Hypothesis:
The author will evaluate the hypothesis that the frequency of PIM orders will be lower in the intervention group, compared to the control group.
Reference population: The number of participating physicians was determined by convenience. Currently the city has twenty health units (primary care) with internet access. The investigator chose to select two doctors from each unit to ensure the confidentiality of the professionals randomized into the intervention or control group.
Randomization: The random sequence to assign the study groups will be determined by the principal investigator based on a randomization table, constructed by the randomization method interchangeable blocks. A sequence of numbers will be generated and stored in sealed envelopes, individually arranged and marked with serial numbers for each participating physician. The envelope with the lowest number will be opened by the researcher for the inclusion of a new doctor in the study.
Prescription sampling:
In order to calculate the sample of prescriptions that will be verified before and after the intervention the following factors will be considered: expected proportion of PIM prescription before intervention 35%, expected difference between the intervention and control groups after the intervention: 30%. 5% significance level and 80% power of the test. Two-tailed hypothesis test and loss of 20% of prescriptions. The number of prescriptions per doctor should also take into consideration the proportion of elderly patients attended (in the previous three months) per doctor. A sensitivity analysis will be performed to compare the professional groups that meet different proportions of elderly in order to isolate the bias of demand. Patient prescriptions will be randomly selected.
Inclusion criteria:
Doctors who meet elderly people in basic health units, family health units or primary care polyclinics.
Exclusion criteria:
Doctors with residency in medicine-geriatrics or specialization recognized by the Brazilian Society of Geriatrics.
Dependent variables:
Number of orders with at least one PIM prescribed, frequency of PIMs prescribed, types of PIMs prescribed.
Primary outcome - Frequency of PIMs prescribed.
Independent variables:
Age; gender; training time; medical specialty.
Study Procedures:
In order to evaluate the PIM prescription frequency before the intervention, the prescriptions' duplicate originals stored in pharmacies of health facilities or patient records will be used. In occasions where this information is not available, home visits will be carried out to check the first copy of the prescription in the user's possession. In these situations, the user must sign a consent form. The visits will be carried out preferably in the company of a community health agent.
After the allocation of doctors, each group separately will receive training on access to the Evidence Based Health Portal of the Ministry of Health. For this, the investigators will use one of the computer labs on Universidade Federal da Bahia - Anísio Teixeira campus. In case of professionals' low compliance, the training will be held in the health clinics, in the day of the health teams meeting. Then, for doctors in the intervention group, there will be training to access the application as well as lectures related to PIMs.
After receiving the tablets, each doctor will be visited by a project team member at least twice a week during the 2 months of intervention. During these visits the struggles regarding the access to the Evidence Based Health Portal will be checked. It will be checked if doctors consult the application during the service or at other times, even outside working hours. The number of hits will be monitored also through a feature available in the application itself, for this purpose. Those who do not access the application at least once a week will be considered as a loss in the data analysis.
After the intervention period, a new sample of prescriptions for later analysis will be collected.
Data processing and statistical analysis:
The data will be posted and reviewed in a database built in SPSS® for Windows version 23.0, in order to make up the necessary statistical analysis. Statistical analysis will be composed by descriptive analysis of simple frequency and chi-square test to evaluate the difference between proportions of PIM prescriptions in both groups before and after the intervention. The statistical significance level is p <0.05 with 95% confidence interval.
- Conditions
- Inappropriate Prescribing
- Being tested
- Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients
- Keywords
- Elderly, Potentially Inappropriate Medications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patientsOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Active comparator | 7 physicians will receive an application to tablet device with information about potentially inappropriate medications for elderly and access for consultation of the portal of evidence-based health Receives: Other: Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients |
| Control | Sham comparator | 7 physicians will receive a tablet with internet access for consultation of the portal of evidence-based health Receives: Other: Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prescription frequency of potentially inappropriate medications for elderly after intervention
Measured: Two months after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completion20 Mar 2019
- Study completion20 Mar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inappropriate PrescribingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Bahia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Márcio Galvão Guimarães de Oliveira, Federal University of Bahia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02918643
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CNPq 444841/2014-8
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MS, Kivela SL, Lyles A, Leikola SN. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Aug;59(8):1521-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03497.x. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
PubMed 21797829American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Apr;60(4):616-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
PubMed 22376048Oliveira MG, Amorim WW, de Jesus SR, Rodrigues VA, Passos LC. Factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly in the Brazilian primary care setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Aug;34(4):626-32. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9656-9. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PubMed 22692715Amorim WW, Passos LC, Gama RS, Souza RM, Santos PM, Macedo JC, Queiroga HM, Nunes LG, Fraga LM, Oliveira BS, Graia LT, Oliveira MG. Using a mobile application to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing for older Brazilian adults in primary care: a triple-blind randomised clinical trial. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04645-z.
PubMed 38191317
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Evaluation of the Use of a Mobile Application as a Support at the Prescription of Appropriate Medications for Elderly
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02918643
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CNPq 444841/2014-8
- Conditions
- Inappropriate Prescribing
- Keywords
- Elderly, Potentially Inappropriate Medications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of BahiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
- Study start
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application to support decision making for prescription drugs to elderly patients. Method: Firstly, there will be a two-tier content validation of potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) for the elderly based on Beers Criteria and STOPP. For the validation, a modified Delphi consensus technique will be applied. Twelve national experts will be invited. For each statement contained in the Beers criteria and STOPP a proposition will be prepared in order to allow each participant to issue an opinion on each of the propositions by assigning a value according to their agreement to the statement. Therefore, the Likert scale with established score of 1 to 5 (completely disagree - strongly agree) will be used. Statements with average scores above 4.0 will be considered consensus. All information regarding PIMs will be made available through an application for tablets. The information on risks and recommendations about the drugs will be available whenever the users enter the medicines name. The application will be developed for the Android platform, which is based on the Java programming language. To evaluate the use of this application 30 doctors working in basic health units and health units of the family in a municipality from Bahia will be asked to join the study. Upon acceptance, the proportion of PIMs' prescription by these professionals for a minimum period of two months will be analyzed. Later, 15 doctors will be randomized into the intervention group and will receive a tablet with the application installed. They will be trained to use it as well as to access to the Evidence Based Health Portal of the Ministry of Health. The control group of 15 other physicians will receive the tablet and will be trained to access the Evidence Based Health Portal. The study will be blind to the participants and to the main investigator. To continue, the information will be analyzed by sampling the PIMs' prescription in both groups. To access this information the prescriptions' duplicate original, filed in pharmacies, patient files or home visit will be required. The PIMs prescription ratios before and after the intervention will be compared.
Detailed description
Step 1:
Initially, data of the drugs contained in Beers and STOPP criteria will be reviewed. The availability of medicines in the Brazilian market will be analyzed through the website of the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA). Subsequently, drug data will be placed in a questionnaire to be sent to national experts in order to establish a consensus on the information presented. The questionnaire assessment will happen in two rounds. The first round consists of sending propositions based on information contained in the Beers criteria, STOPP 2012 and 2006 in order to allow each participant to issue an opinion on each of the propositions by assigning a value according to their agreement to the statement. Therefore, the Likert scale with established score of 1 to 5 (completely disagree - strongly agree) will be used. For the second round, the scores will be analyzed and the propositions in which there is no consensus will again be sent along with the comments of each specialist. In these cases, each specialist may review or maintain their position. It is worth noting that during the application of questionnaires rounds experts do not have access to the identification of their peers. In the second round, Statements with average scores above 4.0 will be considered consensus. The final information will be used for the mobile device application development.
Experts will be selected for convenience. Twelve professionals with experience in geriatrics will be invited via email to participate as experts in the validation of the Beers Criteria and STOPP. This call will include a summary of the project and general information about the Delphi Technique. After acceptance, they will receive a Term of Informed Consent Form (ICF) and an Authorization to Release Name as Specialist / Senior, which must be signed and returned.
The application will be developed for the Android platform, which is based on the Java programming language.
Step 2:
Study design:
Clinical trial, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group. They will be invited to participate in this stage 30 physicians working in primary care of a municipality from Bahia. Upon acceptance to participate in the study and signing of the Informed Consent form (IC), the proportion of PIMs' prescription by these professionals for a minimum period of two months will be analyzed.
After, physicians will be randomized and included in one of two study groups:
Intervention: 15 doctors will receive the tablet with the application installed and will be trained to use it as well as to access the Evidence Based Health Portal of the Ministry of Health.
Control Group: 15 doctors will receive the tablet without the application and will also be trained to access the Evidence Based Health Portal.
After the intervention, the data will be examined again by sampling the proportion of PIM prescriptions by these professionals.
Hypothesis:
The author will evaluate the hypothesis that the frequency of PIM orders will be lower in the intervention group, compared to the control group.
Reference population: The number of participating physicians was determined by convenience. Currently the city has twenty health units (primary care) with internet access. The investigator chose to select two doctors from each unit to ensure the confidentiality of the professionals randomized into the intervention or control group.
Randomization: The random sequence to assign the study groups will be determined by the principal investigator based on a randomization table, constructed by the randomization method interchangeable blocks. A sequence of numbers will be generated and stored in sealed envelopes, individually arranged and marked with serial numbers for each participating physician. The envelope with the lowest number will be opened by the researcher for the inclusion of a new doctor in the study.
Prescription sampling:
In order to calculate the sample of prescriptions that will be verified before and after the intervention the following factors will be considered: expected proportion of PIM prescription before intervention 35%, expected difference between the intervention and control groups after the intervention: 30%. 5% significance level and 80% power of the test. Two-tailed hypothesis test and loss of 20% of prescriptions. The number of prescriptions per doctor should also take into consideration the proportion of elderly patients attended (in the previous three months) per doctor. A sensitivity analysis will be performed to compare the professional groups that meet different proportions of elderly in order to isolate the bias of demand. Patient prescriptions will be randomly selected.
Inclusion criteria:
Doctors who meet elderly people in basic health units, family health units or primary care polyclinics.
Exclusion criteria:
Doctors with residency in medicine-geriatrics or specialization recognized by the Brazilian Society of Geriatrics.
Dependent variables:
Number of orders with at least one PIM prescribed, frequency of PIMs prescribed, types of PIMs prescribed.
Primary outcome - Frequency of PIMs prescribed.
Independent variables:
Age; gender; training time; medical specialty.
Study Procedures:
In order to evaluate the PIM prescription frequency before the intervention, the prescriptions' duplicate originals stored in pharmacies of health facilities or patient records will be used. In occasions where this information is not available, home visits will be carried out to check the first copy of the prescription in the user's possession. In these situations, the user must sign a consent form. The visits will be carried out preferably in the company of a community health agent.
After the allocation of doctors, each group separately will receive training on access to the Evidence Based Health Portal of the Ministry of Health. For this, the investigators will use one of the computer labs on Universidade Federal da Bahia - Anísio Teixeira campus. In case of professionals' low compliance, the training will be held in the health clinics, in the day of the health teams meeting. Then, for doctors in the intervention group, there will be training to access the application as well as lectures related to PIMs.
After receiving the tablets, each doctor will be visited by a project team member at least twice a week during the 2 months of intervention. During these visits the struggles regarding the access to the Evidence Based Health Portal will be checked. It will be checked if doctors consult the application during the service or at other times, even outside working hours. The number of hits will be monitored also through a feature available in the application itself, for this purpose. Those who do not access the application at least once a week will be considered as a loss in the data analysis.
After the intervention period, a new sample of prescriptions for later analysis will be collected.
Data processing and statistical analysis:
The data will be posted and reviewed in a database built in SPSS® for Windows version 23.0, in order to make up the necessary statistical analysis. Statistical analysis will be composed by descriptive analysis of simple frequency and chi-square test to evaluate the difference between proportions of PIM prescriptions in both groups before and after the intervention. The statistical significance level is p <0.05 with 95% confidence interval.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Active comparator | Other: Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients7 physicians will receive an application to tablet device with information about potentially inappropriate medications for elderly and access for consultation of the portal of evidence-based health |
| Control | Sham comparator | Other: Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients7 physicians will receive a tablet with internet access for consultation of the portal of evidence-based health |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Doctors who meet elderly people in basic health units, family health units or primary care polyclinics.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Doctors with residency in medicine-geriatrics or specialization recognized by the Brazilian Society of Geriatrics.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients | Other | Application, Control |
Primary outcome
Prescription frequency of potentially inappropriate medications for elderly after intervention
Time frame: Two months after the intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21797829Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MS, Kivela SL, Lyles A, Leikola SN. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Aug;59(8):1521-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03497.x. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
- Background: PubMed 22376048American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Apr;60(4):616-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
- Background: PubMed 22692715Oliveira MG, Amorim WW, de Jesus SR, Rodrigues VA, Passos LC. Factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly in the Brazilian primary care setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Aug;34(4):626-32. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9656-9. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38191317Amorim WW, Passos LC, Gama RS, Souza RM, Santos PM, Macedo JC, Queiroga HM, Nunes LG, Fraga LM, Oliveira BS, Graia LT, Oliveira MG. Using a mobile application to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing for older Brazilian adults in primary care: a triple-blind randomised clinical trial. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04645-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Inappropriate Prescribing
Active, not recruiting
Ensuring Clinical Appropriateness and Safety of Pharmacological Therapies in Nursing Home Residents
Inappropriate Prescribing
Active, not recruiting
A Trial to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Adults Visiting the Emergency Department
Inappropriate Prescribing
Active, not recruiting
The Study in Outpatient Medicine Using Nudges to Improve Sleep
Inappropriate Prescribing
Recruiting
Deprescribing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors
Inappropriate Prescribing, Reflux Disease
Not yet recruiting
Reduction of Low-value Prescribing Through Audit and Feedback
Inappropriate Prescribing, Implementation Science
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Use of an application to for mobile devices like decision-making support for prescription drugs to elderly patients in people with Inappropriate Prescribing, run by Federal University of Bahia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prescription frequency of potentially inappropriate medications for elderly after intervention (time frame: Two months after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02918643, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.