Oral Lichen PlanusPhase 2NCT02920658
Topical "Non-Aromatic Very Rich in Steranes" (NAVS) Naphthalan for the Treatment of Oral Mucosal Diseases
A Phase 2 study testing NAVS Naphthalan and 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate in people with Oral Lichen Planus and Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis, run by Ivan Alajbeg at 1 site in Croatia.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of topical NAVS naphthalan in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). Half of participants with OLP and RAS will receive topical NAVS naphthalan in adhesive paste, while the other half will receive 0.05%-betamethasone dipropionate in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Oral Lichen Planus, Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis
- What is being tested?
- NAVS Naphthalan and 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCroatia
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- for OLP patients: adult patients with a clinically and histologically proven OLP (Al-Hashimi et al, 2007)
- for RAS patients: in the acute stage of the disease, according to Lehner (1968), at least 2 episodes per year
Who cannot join
- for OLP patients: younger than 18 years, hepatobiliary system diseases, lichenoid reaction (amalgam, drugs) or lichen planus with lesions in contact to restorative materials (Zakrzewska et al, 2005), the current comparative systemic or local anti-inflammatory treatment (antibiotics, corticosteroids, non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, chemotherapeutics) (Lo Muzio et al, 2001; Nolan et al, 2006; Rodriguez et al, 2007) and pregnancy.
- for RAS patients: patients younger than 18 years, haematological deficits (assessed by complete blood count (CBC), iron (Fe), vitamin B12, hypersensitivity to toothpaste and oral mouth rinse solutions (assessed by medical history) (Nolan et al, 2006), pregnancy, inflammatory bowel disease (assessed by medical history), significant immunodeficiencies, current comparative systemic or topical anti-inflammatory treatment (antibiotics, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal antirheumatics, chemotherapeutics) (Lo Muzio et al, 2001; Nolan et al, 2006; Rodriguez et al, 2007).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Croatia1 site
School of Dental medicine, University of Zagreb
Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10 000
About this study
Official title: Nonaromatic Naphthalan - Composition Study and Biological Effects on Epithelial Tissues
This study evaluates the effectiveness of topical NAVS naphthalan in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). Half of participants with OLP and RAS will receive topical NAVS naphthalan in adhesive paste, while the other half will receive 0.05%-betamethasone dipropionate in adhesive paste. Our hypothesis is that NAVS could be efficient in the treatment of OLP and RAS, with effects comparable to that of topical steroids.
Read the detailed description
Non-Aromatic-Very rich in Steranes (NAVS) naphthalan is a transparent, earth mineral oil prepared by a complex set of procedures of separations and refining, starting with a special oil that is used as the raw material for brown naphthalane, which has been successfully used in the treatment of psoriasis. In order to remove potentially mutagenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), liquid chromatography was used. UV / VIS (ultra violet / visible light) spectrophotometry confirmed that PAHs were bellow detection threshold. Additionally, the precise distillation process has concentrated steranes, which are important bioactive constituents. Since steranes contain similar chemical structure as well-known bioactive substances, such as vitamin D3 and steroid hormones, the assumption is that NAVS is effective in the treatment of oral diseases which have immune genesis such as OLP and RAS.
Today, topical steroid preparations are considered as first-line therapy for many chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the oral mucosa. Risks of short-term use of topical corticosteroids are clinically insignificant, while their long-term use is not recommended because of potential side effects, such as mucosal atrophy, secondary infection with Candida albicans, possible systemic absorption and suppression of the adrenal gland.
Study participants are adult patients of the Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine in Zagreb, with a clinically and histologically proven OLP or RAS in the acute stage of the disease.The treatment outcome of the OLP patients will be measured by clinical improvement and subjective symptomatic relief. The outcome of RAS patients treated by NAVS naphthalan or by betamethasone will be measured clinically by the decrease in number and size of lesions as well as by subjective symptomatic relief over treatment period. One member of the team, who will not evaluate the therapeutic effect, will took care of the allocation of test and control preparations. At the end of the study, a randomization code will be opened and statistically analysed. In both clinical and subjective domains, of both clinical conditions, the improvement rate will be measured by comparing these readings, as the percentual reduction of clinical scores and symptoms. Since the data will not be normally distributed, methods of nonparametric statistics will be used: Wilcoxon test for dependent and Mann-Withney test for independent samples. Baseline intergroup differences will be assessed by Mann-Withney test. For the interpretation of the average values, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) will be used. Fisher exact test will be used to compare gender representation among the groups. Statistical analysis will be performed using MedCalc Software 13.0.0.0 (Acacialaan 22, 8400 Ostend, Belgium). P value lower then 0.05 (p< 0.05) will be considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Oral Lichen Planus, Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis
- Being tested
- NAVS Naphthalan, 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate
- Keywords
- NAVS Naphthalan, Betamethasone dipropionate, Topical treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Lichen Planus, Oral, Stomatitis, Aphthous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NAVS NaphthalanDrug
0.05% Betamethasone dipropionateDrug
Also called Beloderm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NAVS Naphthalan | Experimental | NAVS oil in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 2:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 4 weeks for OLP patients; NAVS oil in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 2:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 5 days for RAS patients Receives: Drug: NAVS Naphthalan |
| 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate | Active comparator | 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 1:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 4 weeks for OLP patients; 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 1:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 5 days for RAS patients Receives: Drug: 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The change of presence of reticulation, erythema and ulceration on mucosal surfaces
Clinical improvement of OLP lesions after treatment will be scored (Pibooniyom et al.,2005). This clinical scale measures the presence of reticular, erythematous and ulcerative lesions on oral mucosal surfaces, providing a score by adding those values.
Investigator will assess patients' lesions on oral mucosal surfaces, on day 0 and day 28 and provide score for each assessment. The change of this score between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Calibration process : three examiners independently reviewed and evaluated photo of the individual patient. The second evaluation of photographs was a week after to assess the objectivity of the reading on the first visit. Once the examiners reviewed the photographs twice with one-week gap, the obtained results were analysed using Spearman "rank" correlation to determine intra- and inter-observer reliability.
Measured: 28 days per patient
The change in the number of RAS lesions
The number of RAS lesions will be recorded on day 0 and on day 5 after the start of treatment (Khandwala et al, 1997). The change in the number of lesions between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Measured: 5 days per patient
The change in the diameter of RAS lesions
The change in the diameter of RAS lesions (in millimeters) will be recorded on day 0 and on day 5 after the start of treatment (Khandwala et al, 1997). The change in the cumulative diameter of lesions between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Measured: 5 days per patient
The change of pain intensity and discomfort in OLP patients
The intensity of pain and discomfort will be determined using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) on day 0 and day 28. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Measured: 28 days per patient
The quality of life change in OLP patients
The quality of life for OLP patients will be determined using "Oral health impact profile"(OHIP-14) questionnaire on day 0 and day 28. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Measured: 28 days per patient
The change of pain intensity and discomfort in RAS patients
The intensity of pain and discomfort will be determined using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) 30 and 60 minutes after the application of the therapeutic agent at home. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Measured: 5 days per patient
The quality of life change in RAS patients
The quality of life for RAS patients will be determined using "Oral health impact profile"(OHIP-14) questionnaire on day 0 and day 5. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
Measured: 5 days per patient
Secondary outcomes (1)
Adverse reactions to treatment modalities in OLP patients
In OLP patients application of both treatment modalities lasts for 28 days. The occurrence of oral Candidal infection or irritation will be recorded by clinician on day 28. The frequency of each will be compared between two treatment groups.
Measured: 28 days per patient
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Oral Lichen PlanusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ivan Alajbeg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Science, Education and Sport, Republic of Croatia
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ivan Alajbeg, University of Zagreb
- Investigators
- Ivan Alajbeg, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Zagreb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02920658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 065-0650445-1277
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Yes, de-identified data are available upon request.
Publications
Al-Hashimi I, Schifter M, Lockhart PB, Wray D, Brennan M, Migliorati CA, Axell T, Bruce AJ, Carpenter W, Eisenberg E, Epstein JB, Holmstrup P, Jontell M, Lozada-Nur F, Nair R, Silverman B, Thongprasom K, Thornhill M, Warnakulasuriya S, van der Waal I. Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103 Suppl:S25.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.001. Epub 2007 Jan 29.
PubMed 17261375Khandwala A, Van Inwegen RG, Alfano MC. 5% amlexanox oral paste, a new treatment for recurrent minor aphthous ulcers: I. Clinical demonstration of acceleration of healing and resolution of pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Feb;83(2):222-30. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90009-3.
PubMed 9117754Lehner T. Autoimmunity in oral diseases, with special reference to recurrent oral ulceration. Proc R Soc Med. 1968 May;61(5):515-24. doi: 10.1177/003591576806100543. No abstract available.
PubMed 4297643Lo Muzio L, della Valle A, Mignogna MD, Pannone G, Bucci P, Bucci E, Sciubba J. The treatment of oral aphthous ulceration or erosive lichen planus with topical clobetasol propionate in three preparations: a clinical and pilot study on 54 patients. J Oral Pathol Med. 2001 Nov;30(10):611-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2001.301006.x.
PubMed 11722711Neppelberg E, Johannessen AC, Jonsson R. Apoptosis in oral lichen planus. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001 Oct;109(5):361-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00081.x.
PubMed 11695759Nolan A, Baillie C, Badminton J, Rudralingham M, Seymour RA. The efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid in the management of recurrent aphthous ulceration. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006 Sep;35(8):461-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00433.x.
PubMed 16918596Piboonniyom SO, Treister N, Pitiphat W, Woo SB. Scoring system for monitoring oral lichenoid lesions: a preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jun;99(6):696-703. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.013.
PubMed 15897856Rodriguez M, Rubio JA, Sanchez R. Effectiveness of two oral pastes for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis. 2007 Sep;13(5):490-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01327.x.
PubMed 17714352Zakrzewska JM, Chan ES, Thornhill MH. A systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of treatments used in oral lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Aug;153(2):336-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06493.x.
PubMed 16086745Rogulj AA, Z Alajbeg I, Brailo V, Skrinjar I, Zuzul I, Vucicevic-Boras V, Alajbeg I. Topical NAVS naphthalan for the treatment of oral lichen planus and recurrent aphthous stomatitis: A double blind, randomized, parallel group study. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249862. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33831097
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nonaromatic Naphthalan - Composition Study and Biological Effects on Epithelial Tissues
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02920658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 065-0650445-1277
- Conditions
- Oral Lichen Planus, Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis
- Keywords
- NAVS Naphthalan, Betamethasone dipropionate, Topical treatment
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ivan AlajbegUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Science, Education and Sport, Republic of Croatia
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of topical NAVS naphthalan in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). Half of participants with OLP and RAS will receive topical NAVS naphthalan in adhesive paste, while the other half will receive 0.05%-betamethasone dipropionate in adhesive paste. Our hypothesis is that NAVS could be efficient in the treatment of OLP and RAS, with effects comparable to that of topical steroids.
Detailed description
Non-Aromatic-Very rich in Steranes (NAVS) naphthalan is a transparent, earth mineral oil prepared by a complex set of procedures of separations and refining, starting with a special oil that is used as the raw material for brown naphthalane, which has been successfully used in the treatment of psoriasis. In order to remove potentially mutagenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), liquid chromatography was used. UV / VIS (ultra violet / visible light) spectrophotometry confirmed that PAHs were bellow detection threshold. Additionally, the precise distillation process has concentrated steranes, which are important bioactive constituents. Since steranes contain similar chemical structure as well-known bioactive substances, such as vitamin D3 and steroid hormones, the assumption is that NAVS is effective in the treatment of oral diseases which have immune genesis such as OLP and RAS.
Today, topical steroid preparations are considered as first-line therapy for many chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the oral mucosa. Risks of short-term use of topical corticosteroids are clinically insignificant, while their long-term use is not recommended because of potential side effects, such as mucosal atrophy, secondary infection with Candida albicans, possible systemic absorption and suppression of the adrenal gland.
Study participants are adult patients of the Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine in Zagreb, with a clinically and histologically proven OLP or RAS in the acute stage of the disease.The treatment outcome of the OLP patients will be measured by clinical improvement and subjective symptomatic relief. The outcome of RAS patients treated by NAVS naphthalan or by betamethasone will be measured clinically by the decrease in number and size of lesions as well as by subjective symptomatic relief over treatment period. One member of the team, who will not evaluate the therapeutic effect, will took care of the allocation of test and control preparations. At the end of the study, a randomization code will be opened and statistically analysed. In both clinical and subjective domains, of both clinical conditions, the improvement rate will be measured by comparing these readings, as the percentual reduction of clinical scores and symptoms. Since the data will not be normally distributed, methods of nonparametric statistics will be used: Wilcoxon test for dependent and Mann-Withney test for independent samples. Baseline intergroup differences will be assessed by Mann-Withney test. For the interpretation of the average values, medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) will be used. Fisher exact test will be used to compare gender representation among the groups. Statistical analysis will be performed using MedCalc Software 13.0.0.0 (Acacialaan 22, 8400 Ostend, Belgium). P value lower then 0.05 (p< 0.05) will be considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NAVS Naphthalan | Experimental | Drug: NAVS NaphthalanNAVS oil in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 2:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 4 weeks for OLP patients; NAVS oil in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 2:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 5 days for RAS patients |
| 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate | Active comparator | Drug: 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 1:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 4 weeks for OLP patients; 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate in adhesive powder in a volume ratio 1:1, to apply on the affected mucosa three times daily during 5 days for RAS patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- for OLP patients: adult patients with a clinically and histologically proven OLP (Al-Hashimi et al, 2007)
- for RAS patients: in the acute stage of the disease, according to Lehner (1968), at least 2 episodes per year
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- for OLP patients: younger than 18 years, hepatobiliary system diseases, lichenoid reaction (amalgam, drugs) or lichen planus with lesions in contact to restorative materials (Zakrzewska et al, 2005), the current comparative systemic or local anti-inflammatory treatment (antibiotics, corticosteroids, non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, chemotherapeutics) (Lo Muzio et al, 2001; Nolan et al, 2006; Rodriguez et al, 2007) and pregnancy.
- for RAS patients: patients younger than 18 years, haematological deficits (assessed by complete blood count (CBC), iron (Fe), vitamin B12, hypersensitivity to toothpaste and oral mouth rinse solutions (assessed by medical history) (Nolan et al, 2006), pregnancy, inflammatory bowel disease (assessed by medical history), significant immunodeficiencies, current comparative systemic or topical anti-inflammatory treatment (antibiotics, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal antirheumatics, chemotherapeutics) (Lo Muzio et al, 2001; Nolan et al, 2006; Rodriguez et al, 2007).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NAVS Naphthalan | Drug | NAVS Naphthalan |
| 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionateAlso: Beloderm | Drug | 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate |
Primary outcome
The change of presence of reticulation, erythema and ulceration on mucosal surfaces
Time frame: 28 days per patient
Clinical improvement of OLP lesions after treatment will be scored (Pibooniyom et al.,2005). This clinical scale measures the presence of reticular, erythematous and ulcerative lesions on oral mucosal surfaces, providing a score by adding those values. Investigator will assess patients' lesions on oral mucosal surfaces, on day 0 and day 28 and provide score for each assessment. The change of this score between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality. Calibration process : three examiners independently reviewed and evaluated photo of the individual patient. The second evaluation of photographs was a week after to assess the objectivity of the reading on the first visit. Once the examiners reviewed the photographs twice with one-week gap, the obtained results were analysed using Spearman "rank" correlation to determine intra- and inter-observer reliability.
The change in the number of RAS lesions
Time frame: 5 days per patient
The number of RAS lesions will be recorded on day 0 and on day 5 after the start of treatment (Khandwala et al, 1997). The change in the number of lesions between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
The change in the diameter of RAS lesions
Time frame: 5 days per patient
The change in the diameter of RAS lesions (in millimeters) will be recorded on day 0 and on day 5 after the start of treatment (Khandwala et al, 1997). The change in the cumulative diameter of lesions between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
The change of pain intensity and discomfort in OLP patients
Time frame: 28 days per patient
The intensity of pain and discomfort will be determined using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) on day 0 and day 28. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
The quality of life change in OLP patients
Time frame: 28 days per patient
The quality of life for OLP patients will be determined using "Oral health impact profile"(OHIP-14) questionnaire on day 0 and day 28. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
The change of pain intensity and discomfort in RAS patients
Time frame: 5 days per patient
The intensity of pain and discomfort will be determined using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) 30 and 60 minutes after the application of the therapeutic agent at home. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
The quality of life change in RAS patients
Time frame: 5 days per patient
The quality of life for RAS patients will be determined using "Oral health impact profile"(OHIP-14) questionnaire on day 0 and day 5. The change in the amount between the two time points is a measure of clinical efficacy of applied treatment modality.
1 secondary outcome
Adverse reactions to treatment modalities in OLP patients
Time frame: 28 days per patient
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2016.
- Background: PubMed 17261375Al-Hashimi I, Schifter M, Lockhart PB, Wray D, Brennan M, Migliorati CA, Axell T, Bruce AJ, Carpenter W, Eisenberg E, Epstein JB, Holmstrup P, Jontell M, Lozada-Nur F, Nair R, Silverman B, Thongprasom K, Thornhill M, Warnakulasuriya S, van der Waal I. Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103 Suppl:S25.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.001. Epub 2007 Jan 29.
- Background: PubMed 9117754Khandwala A, Van Inwegen RG, Alfano MC. 5% amlexanox oral paste, a new treatment for recurrent minor aphthous ulcers: I. Clinical demonstration of acceleration of healing and resolution of pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Feb;83(2):222-30. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90009-3.
- Background: PubMed 4297643Lehner T. Autoimmunity in oral diseases, with special reference to recurrent oral ulceration. Proc R Soc Med. 1968 May;61(5):515-24. doi: 10.1177/003591576806100543. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11722711Lo Muzio L, della Valle A, Mignogna MD, Pannone G, Bucci P, Bucci E, Sciubba J. The treatment of oral aphthous ulceration or erosive lichen planus with topical clobetasol propionate in three preparations: a clinical and pilot study on 54 patients. J Oral Pathol Med. 2001 Nov;30(10):611-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0714.2001.301006.x.
- Background: PubMed 11695759Neppelberg E, Johannessen AC, Jonsson R. Apoptosis in oral lichen planus. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001 Oct;109(5):361-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00081.x.
- Background: PubMed 16918596Nolan A, Baillie C, Badminton J, Rudralingham M, Seymour RA. The efficacy of topical hyaluronic acid in the management of recurrent aphthous ulceration. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006 Sep;35(8):461-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00433.x.
- Background: PubMed 15897856Piboonniyom SO, Treister N, Pitiphat W, Woo SB. Scoring system for monitoring oral lichenoid lesions: a preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jun;99(6):696-703. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.013.
- Background: PubMed 17714352Rodriguez M, Rubio JA, Sanchez R. Effectiveness of two oral pastes for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis. 2007 Sep;13(5):490-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01327.x.
- Background: PubMed 16086745Zakrzewska JM, Chan ES, Thornhill MH. A systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of treatments used in oral lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Aug;153(2):336-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06493.x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33831097Rogulj AA, Z Alajbeg I, Brailo V, Skrinjar I, Zuzul I, Vucicevic-Boras V, Alajbeg I. Topical NAVS naphthalan for the treatment of oral lichen planus and recurrent aphthous stomatitis: A double blind, randomized, parallel group study. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249862. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Yes, de-identified data are available upon request.
Related trials for Oral Lichen Planus
RecruitingObservational study
Salivary IL-8 and Serum IL-6 as Biomarkers for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in Smokers and Never-Smokers
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders, Oral Lichen Planus
Not yet recruiting
Curcumin-mediated Photodynamic Therapy Versus Photobiomodulation in the Treatment of Oral Erosive Lichen Planus
Oral Lichen Planus
Not yet recruiting
Adherence to Topical and Systemic Medications Among Symptomatic Oral Lichen Planus Patients: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Degree of Adherence of Symptomatic OLP Patients to Their Medications
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Low Level Laser Therapy With Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Management of Oral Lichen Planus
Oral Lichen Planus
Active, not recruiting
Widefield Fluorescence and Reflectance Imaging Systems and Oral Tissue Samples in Monitoring Participants at Risk for Developing Oral Cancer
Erythroplakia, Fanconi Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ivan Alajbeg, PhD principal investigator
University of Zagreb
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing NAVS Naphthalan and 0.05% Betamethasone dipropionate in people with Oral Lichen Planus and Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis, run by Ivan Alajbeg at 1 site in Croatia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Croatia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The change of presence of reticulation, erythema and ulceration on mucosal surfaces (time frame: 28 days per patient). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02920658, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2016.