Drug OverdosePhase 4NCT02924454
Effects of Lipid Emulsion on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Metoprolol.
A Phase 4 study testing metoprolol, intravenous lipid emulsion and Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy in people with Drug Overdose and Overdose of Beta-adrenergic Blocking Drug, run by Mikkel Bring Christensen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous lipid emulsion is effective in attenuating the clinical effects of a cardioactive drug, exemplified by the beta-blocking agent metoprolol. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Drug Overdose, Overdose of Beta-adrenergic Blocking Drug, Blood Pressure
- What is being tested?
- metoprolol, intravenous lipid emulsion and Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to 10 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 30 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- healthy male.
Who cannot join
- Abnormal blood levels of sodium, potassium, creatinine, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, albumin, bilirubin, hemoglobin, HbA1c, cholesterol fractions.
- Abnormal urine albumin to creatinine ratio.
- Abnormal function of CYP2D6 metabolism (ultrarapid or slow metabolizer)
- Any heart disease or hypertension
- Sinoatrial block
- Second or third degree atrioventricular block
Show all 18Show fewer
- Heart failure
- profound bradycardia or hypotension
- sinoatrial node disease
- metabolic acidosis
- untreated pheochromocytoma
- asthma
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- intermittent claudicatio
- diabetes
- Allergy to egg, soy or peanut protein and allergy to any active or inactive ingredients contained in metoprolol (Seloken) or the lipid emulsion (Intralipid)
- Raynaud's syndrome
- Prinzmetal's angina
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Bispebjerg University Hospital Copenhagen
Copenhagen Northwest, Capital Region of Denmark, 2400
About this study
Official title: An Investigation Into the Effects of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion (ILE) on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Metoprolol.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous lipid emulsion is effective in attenuating the clinical effects of a cardioactive drug, exemplified by the beta-blocking agent metoprolol. In addition, the investigators will clarify how intravenous lipid emulsion affects the pharmacokinetic parameters of metoprolol.
Read the detailed description
Overdose or poisonings with cardioactive drugs can have serious consequences. In recent years, intravenous lipid emulsion has emerged as a possible treatment option in otherwise treatment-resistant cardiovascular collapse caused by poisonings with cardio-active drugs.
Experimental evidence obtained from animal studies has been indicating a beneficial effect of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of poisoning with various cardio-toxic medications. Based on these findings, the first reported cases on the use of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of human cardiotoxicity caused by poisonings with local anesthetics were published in 2006. Subsequently, a steadily increasing number of case reports concerning the use of intravenous lipid emulsion in resuscitation and treatment of various medications poisonings have been published. Often patients had either cardiac arrest or severe circulatory failure treated according to guidelines for advanced life support prior to lipid emulsion therapy. It is noteworthy that a common observation following bolus infusion of lipid emulsion has been a rapid hemodynamic stabilization of the patient.
Despite an increasing use of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of the poisoned patient, the mechanism behind lipid rescue has not been elucidated. The most widely accepted hypothesis, the "lipid sink/sponge" model, suggests that intravenous lipid emulsion entraps xenobiotics intravascularly, thereby preventing them from reaching sites of toxicity. Additionally, intravenous lipid emulsion may redistribute xenobiotics to areas of higher lipid content. However, other mechanisms of actions of lipid emulsion, supported by observations from animal experiments, are vasoconstrictive and cardio-tonic effects. These effects could be secondary to direct activation of sodium, potassium or calcium channels in the myocardium, or alternatively fatty acid-induced modulation of the metabolic properties of mitochondria. Both mechanisms could result in hemodynamic stabilization. The potential beneficial effects of lipid emulsion on hemodynamic instability beyond the lipid sink have led to the notion that intravenous lipid emulsion could be valuable in the treatment of poisonings with non-lipophilic xenobiotics.
At present, it remains however unclear to what extent the evidence concerning resuscitation of the poisoned patient with lipid emulsion may reflect publication bias. To our knowledge, only one controlled human trial has been conducted at present. In a randomized crossover study, Litonius et al. investigated the effects of lipid emulsion on plasma concentrations of bupivacaine in eight healthy subjects. It was found that lipid emulsion lowered the total plasma concentrations of bupivacaine. This was attributed to an altered distribution and contradicted so the above hypothesis of a lipid sink-mechanism as the fraction of non-lipid bound bupivacaine was unchanged. The mechanism by which lipid emulsion may attenuate the effects of cardio toxic xenobiotics must therefore still be regarded as undecided. This lack of evidence calls for further human studies in order to elucidate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of intravenous lipid emulsion. The purpose of this double blind, randomized placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial is to investigate the effects of intravenous lipid emulsion on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol in a human model of beta blocker overdose.
The study includes a total of five visits; a screening visit and four trial days. At the screening visit, anthropometric data (weight, height, blood pressure and pulse) is measured. Additionally, blood samples are collected in accordance with exclusion criteria. A spot urine sample measuring the albumin/creatinine ratio is collected and an electrocardiogram (ECG) is recorded to verify normality of heart rhythm and electrical impulses. In addition, an investigator carries out a clinical examination. Based on the clinical examination, urine and blood tests and ECG measurement, the investigator assesses whether the trial participant meet all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria.
After screening and inclusion, participants will be invited to four trial days at the trial site. On each day participants are required to be fasting for 10 hours (including water, coffee and tobacco). A peripheral venous line is inserted into each antecubital vein. An arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer is inserted into the radial artery in the wrist. In randomized order, one of the four interventions are performed (see below). A standard 12 lead ECG is placed on the participant as well as a 5 lead ECG connected to a computer.
At T=0, metoprolol intravenous solution (0.5 mg metoprolol/ml as metoprolol tartrate) or placebo is administered as an intravenous bolus injection. Continuous infusion of metoprolol/placebo is then administered until T=30 minutes. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes. Intravenous lipid emulsion (Intralipid 20 %) or saline solution is shortly thereafter administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by a continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion/dummy infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes. One gram of paracetamol administered as a disintegrating tablet dissolved in 50 ml of water is given per os shortly before study start on each day.
Repeated ECG's are recorded and blood is drawn for measurements of routine biochemistry parameters and serum concentrations of metoprolol and paracetamol. A drop of blood is used to test glucose levels using a blood glucose meter. Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, pulse contour curve/arterial pressure wave) are recorded via the arterial catheter and pressure transducer connected to a computer. The participant is closely monitored on site until T=120 minutes.
- Being tested
- metoprolol, intravenous lipid emulsion, Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy, Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy
- Keywords
- metoprolol, lipid emulsion, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics
- Medical subject headings
- Drug Overdose
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
metoprololDrug
Also called metoprolol tartrate, Seloken, ATC: C07AB02
One hundred and twenty ml, 0.5 mg metoprolol/ml (as metoprolol tartrate) is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes.
intravenous lipid emulsionDrug
Also called Intralipid, ATC: B05BA02
Intravenous lipid emulsion 20 % is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummyDrug
Also called Normal saline
Isotonic 0.9 % sodium chloride solution is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg), followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes.
Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummyDrug
Also called Normal saline
Saline solution is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion to T=30 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol-Lipid emulsion | Experimental | intervention 1: metoprolol Intervention 2: intravenous lipid emulsion Receives: Drug: metoprolol; Drug: intravenous lipid emulsion |
| Metoprolol - normal saline | Experimental | intervention 1: metoprolol intervention 2: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy Receives: Drug: metoprolol; Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy |
| Normal saline-Lipid emulsion | Experimental | intervention 1: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy intervention 2: intravenous lipid emulsion Receives: Drug: intravenous lipid emulsion; Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy |
| Normal saline-normal saline | Experimental | intervention 1: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy intervention 2: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy Receives: Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy; Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in heart rate from baseline compared between study days
Arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer records heart rate (beats per minute).
Measured: From baseline to + 120 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of metoprolol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Blood samples drawn from an antecubital vein.
Measured: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of paracetamol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Paracetamol is used as a tool for measuring gastric emptying time.
Measured: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of paracetamol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Paracetamol is used as a tool for measuring gastric emptying time.
Measured: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of paracetamol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Paracetamol is used as a tool for measuring gastric emptying time.
Measured: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Percent change in plasma levels of standard biochemical measurements from baseline compared between study days.
Blood samples drawn from an antecubital vein measuring alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, C-reactive protein, high density lipoprotein, potassium, sodium, glucagon, lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin, triglycerides, and whole blood glucose levels(measured with a glucose meter).
Measured: Changes at +30 and +60 minutes from baseline.
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of metoprolol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Blood samples drawn from an antecubital vein measuring plasma metoprolol.
Measured: +0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of metoprolol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Blood samples drawn from an antecubital vein measuring plasma metoprolol.
Measured: +0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Cardiac conductivity between days with metoprolol and/or intravenous lipid emulsion compared with placebo.
12-lead ECG
Measured: T-10, T-5, T 0, T 10, T 20, T 30, T 40, T 50, T 60, T 90, T 120 minutes.
Effects of metoprolol and lipid emulsion on stroke volume compared to days with placebo.
Stroke volume (mL) derived from arterial pulse contour analysis.
Measured: T-10, T-5, T 0, T 10, T 20, T 30, T 40, T 50, T 60, T 90, T 120 minutes.
Effect of metoprolol on systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with placebo.
Arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer records blood pressure in mm Hg.
Measured: T-10, T-5, T 0, T 10, T 15, T 20, T 30, T 40, T 50, T 60, T 90, T100, T110, T 120 minutes.
Change in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure from baseline compared between study days.
Arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer records blood pressure in mm Hg.
Measured: Changes at +5, +10, +15, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +95, +100, +105, +110, +115, +120 minutes from baseline.
Change in heart rate from baseline compared between study days.
Arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer records heart rate (beats per minute).
Measured: Changes at +5, +10, +15, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +95, +100, +105, +110, +115, +120 minutes from baseline.
Change in stroke volume (ml) from baseline compared between study days.
Stroke volume (ml) derived from arterial pulse contour analysis.
Measured: Changes at +5, +10, +15, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +95, +100, +105, +110, +115, +120 minutes from baseline.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completion10 Mar 2017
- Study completion10 Mar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Drug OverdoseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mikkel Bring Christensen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mikkel Bring Christensen, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
- Investigators
- Mikkel B Christensen, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02924454
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Intralipid-Metoprolol
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson L, Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, editors. Goldfrank's toxicologic emergencies. Tenth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. 1882 p.
Picard J, Ward SC, Zumpe R, Meek T, Barlow J, Harrop-Griffiths W. Guidelines and the adoption of 'lipid rescue' therapy for local anaesthetic toxicity. Anaesthesia. 2009 Feb;64(2):122-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05816.x.
PubMed 19143686Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nicholson T, Cave G. Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):134-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.016. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
PubMed 16436797Di Gregorio G, Schwartz D, Ripper R, Kelly K, Feinstein DL, Minshall RD, Massad M, Ori C, Weinberg GL. Lipid emulsion is superior to vasopressin in a rodent model of resuscitation from toxin-induced cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):993-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181961a12.
PubMed 19237909Weinberg G, Ripper R, Feinstein DL, Hoffman W. Lipid emulsion infusion rescues dogs from bupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):198-202. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50041.
PubMed 12772136Weinberg GL, Di Gregorio G, Ripper R, Kelly K, Massad M, Edelman L, Schwartz D, Shah N, Zheng S, Feinstein DL. Resuscitation with lipid versus epinephrine in a rat model of bupivacaine overdose. Anesthesiology. 2008 May;108(5):907-13. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816d91d2.
PubMed 18431127Weinberg GL, VadeBoncouer T, Ramaraju GA, Garcia-Amaro MF, Cwik MJ. Pretreatment or resuscitation with a lipid infusion shifts the dose-response to bupivacaine-induced asystole in rats. Anesthesiology. 1998 Apr;88(4):1071-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199804000-00028.
PubMed 9579517Rosenblatt MA, Abel M, Fischer GW, Itzkovich CJ, Eisenkraft JB. Successful use of a 20% lipid emulsion to resuscitate a patient after a presumed bupivacaine-related cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):217-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00033. No abstract available.
PubMed 16810015Litz RJ, Popp M, Stehr SN, Koch T. Successful resuscitation of a patient with ropivacaine-induced asystole after axillary plexus block using lipid infusion. Anaesthesia. 2006 Aug;61(8):800-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04740.x.
PubMed 16867094Bet 2: intralipid/lipid emulsion in beta-blocker overdose. Emerg Med J. 2011 Nov;28(11):991-3. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200722.
PubMed 22002529Blaber MS, Khan JN, Brebner JA, McColm R. "Lipid rescue" for tricyclic antidepressant cardiotoxicity. J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.010. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
PubMed 22244291Espinet AJ, Emmerton MT. The successful use of intralipid for treatment of local anesthetic-induced central nervous system toxicity: Some considerations for administration of intralipid in an emergency. Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):808-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af739e.
PubMed 19851162Finn SD, Uncles DR, Willers J, Sable N. Early treatment of a quetiapine and sertraline overdose with Intralipid. Anaesthesia. 2009 Feb;64(2):191-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05744.x.
PubMed 19143698Foxall G, McCahon R, Lamb J, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM. Levobupivacaine-induced seizures and cardiovascular collapse treated with Intralipid. Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):516-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05065.x.
PubMed 17448066Ludot H, Tharin JY, Belouadah M, Mazoit JX, Malinovsky JM. Successful resuscitation after ropivacaine and lidocaine-induced ventricular arrhythmia following posterior lumbar plexus block in a child. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1572-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286176.55971.f0.
PubMed 18420879
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Investigation Into the Effects of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion (ILE) on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Metoprolol.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02924454
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Intralipid-Metoprolol
- Keywords
- metoprolol, lipid emulsion, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mikkel Bring ChristensenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous lipid emulsion is effective in attenuating the clinical effects of a cardioactive drug, exemplified by the beta-blocking agent metoprolol. In addition, the investigators will clarify how intravenous lipid emulsion affects the pharmacokinetic parameters of metoprolol.
Detailed description
Overdose or poisonings with cardioactive drugs can have serious consequences. In recent years, intravenous lipid emulsion has emerged as a possible treatment option in otherwise treatment-resistant cardiovascular collapse caused by poisonings with cardio-active drugs.
Experimental evidence obtained from animal studies has been indicating a beneficial effect of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of poisoning with various cardio-toxic medications. Based on these findings, the first reported cases on the use of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of human cardiotoxicity caused by poisonings with local anesthetics were published in 2006. Subsequently, a steadily increasing number of case reports concerning the use of intravenous lipid emulsion in resuscitation and treatment of various medications poisonings have been published. Often patients had either cardiac arrest or severe circulatory failure treated according to guidelines for advanced life support prior to lipid emulsion therapy. It is noteworthy that a common observation following bolus infusion of lipid emulsion has been a rapid hemodynamic stabilization of the patient.
Despite an increasing use of intravenous lipid emulsion in the treatment of the poisoned patient, the mechanism behind lipid rescue has not been elucidated. The most widely accepted hypothesis, the "lipid sink/sponge" model, suggests that intravenous lipid emulsion entraps xenobiotics intravascularly, thereby preventing them from reaching sites of toxicity. Additionally, intravenous lipid emulsion may redistribute xenobiotics to areas of higher lipid content. However, other mechanisms of actions of lipid emulsion, supported by observations from animal experiments, are vasoconstrictive and cardio-tonic effects. These effects could be secondary to direct activation of sodium, potassium or calcium channels in the myocardium, or alternatively fatty acid-induced modulation of the metabolic properties of mitochondria. Both mechanisms could result in hemodynamic stabilization. The potential beneficial effects of lipid emulsion on hemodynamic instability beyond the lipid sink have led to the notion that intravenous lipid emulsion could be valuable in the treatment of poisonings with non-lipophilic xenobiotics.
At present, it remains however unclear to what extent the evidence concerning resuscitation of the poisoned patient with lipid emulsion may reflect publication bias. To our knowledge, only one controlled human trial has been conducted at present. In a randomized crossover study, Litonius et al. investigated the effects of lipid emulsion on plasma concentrations of bupivacaine in eight healthy subjects. It was found that lipid emulsion lowered the total plasma concentrations of bupivacaine. This was attributed to an altered distribution and contradicted so the above hypothesis of a lipid sink-mechanism as the fraction of non-lipid bound bupivacaine was unchanged. The mechanism by which lipid emulsion may attenuate the effects of cardio toxic xenobiotics must therefore still be regarded as undecided. This lack of evidence calls for further human studies in order to elucidate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of intravenous lipid emulsion. The purpose of this double blind, randomized placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial is to investigate the effects of intravenous lipid emulsion on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the adrenoceptor antagonist metoprolol in a human model of beta blocker overdose.
The study includes a total of five visits; a screening visit and four trial days. At the screening visit, anthropometric data (weight, height, blood pressure and pulse) is measured. Additionally, blood samples are collected in accordance with exclusion criteria. A spot urine sample measuring the albumin/creatinine ratio is collected and an electrocardiogram (ECG) is recorded to verify normality of heart rhythm and electrical impulses. In addition, an investigator carries out a clinical examination. Based on the clinical examination, urine and blood tests and ECG measurement, the investigator assesses whether the trial participant meet all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria.
After screening and inclusion, participants will be invited to four trial days at the trial site. On each day participants are required to be fasting for 10 hours (including water, coffee and tobacco). A peripheral venous line is inserted into each antecubital vein. An arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer is inserted into the radial artery in the wrist. In randomized order, one of the four interventions are performed (see below). A standard 12 lead ECG is placed on the participant as well as a 5 lead ECG connected to a computer.
At T=0, metoprolol intravenous solution (0.5 mg metoprolol/ml as metoprolol tartrate) or placebo is administered as an intravenous bolus injection. Continuous infusion of metoprolol/placebo is then administered until T=30 minutes. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes. Intravenous lipid emulsion (Intralipid 20 %) or saline solution is shortly thereafter administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by a continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion/dummy infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes. One gram of paracetamol administered as a disintegrating tablet dissolved in 50 ml of water is given per os shortly before study start on each day.
Repeated ECG's are recorded and blood is drawn for measurements of routine biochemistry parameters and serum concentrations of metoprolol and paracetamol. A drop of blood is used to test glucose levels using a blood glucose meter. Cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, pulse contour curve/arterial pressure wave) are recorded via the arterial catheter and pressure transducer connected to a computer. The participant is closely monitored on site until T=120 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol-Lipid emulsion | Experimental | Drug: metoprolol, Drug: intravenous lipid emulsionintervention 1: metoprolol Intervention 2: intravenous lipid emulsion |
| Metoprolol - normal saline | Experimental | Drug: metoprolol, Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummyintervention 1: metoprolol intervention 2: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy |
| Normal saline-Lipid emulsion | Experimental | Drug: intravenous lipid emulsion, Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummyintervention 1: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy intervention 2: intravenous lipid emulsion |
| Normal saline-normal saline | Experimental | Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy, Drug: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummyintervention 1: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummy intervention 2: Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 30 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- healthy male.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Abnormal blood levels of sodium, potassium, creatinine, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, albumin, bilirubin, hemoglobin, HbA1c, cholesterol fractions.
- Abnormal urine albumin to creatinine ratio.
- Abnormal function of CYP2D6 metabolism (ultrarapid or slow metabolizer)
- Any heart disease or hypertension
- Sinoatrial block
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| metoprololAlso: metoprolol tartrate, Seloken, ATC: C07AB02One hundred and twenty ml, 0.5 mg metoprolol/ml (as metoprolol tartrate) is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion. Infusion is halted if heart rate drops below 35 bpm or systolic blood pressure drops below 80 mm Hg, or the participant experiences subjective side effects. Infusion stops at T=30 minutes. | Drug | Metoprolol - normal saline, Metoprolol-Lipid emulsion |
| intravenous lipid emulsionAlso: Intralipid, ATC: B05BA02Intravenous lipid emulsion 20 % is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg) followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Lipid emulsion infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes. | Drug | Metoprolol-Lipid emulsion, Normal saline-Lipid emulsion |
| Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummyAlso: Normal salineIsotonic 0.9 % sodium chloride solution is administered as an intravenous bolus infusion (1.5 ml/kg), followed by continuous infusion (infusion rate: 0.25 ml/kg/min). Infusion is stopped at T = 30 minutes. | Drug | Metoprolol - normal saline, Normal saline-normal saline |
| Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - metoprolol dummyAlso: Normal salineSaline solution is administered as an intravenous bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion to T=30 minutes. | Drug | Normal saline-Lipid emulsion, Normal saline-normal saline |
Primary outcome
Change in heart rate from baseline compared between study days
Time frame: From baseline to + 120 minutes.
Arterial catheter connected to a pressure transducer records heart rate (beats per minute).
13 secondary outcomes
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of metoprolol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Time frame: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of paracetamol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Time frame: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of paracetamol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Time frame: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of paracetamol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Time frame: 0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Percent change in plasma levels of standard biochemical measurements from baseline compared between study days.
Time frame: Changes at +30 and +60 minutes from baseline.
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of metoprolol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Time frame: +0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of metoprolol on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with lipid emulsion placebo.
Time frame: +0, +10, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +120 minutes post metoprolol dose.
Cardiac conductivity between days with metoprolol and/or intravenous lipid emulsion compared with placebo.
Time frame: T-10, T-5, T 0, T 10, T 20, T 30, T 40, T 50, T 60, T 90, T 120 minutes.
Effects of metoprolol and lipid emulsion on stroke volume compared to days with placebo.
Time frame: T-10, T-5, T 0, T 10, T 20, T 30, T 40, T 50, T 60, T 90, T 120 minutes.
Effect of metoprolol on systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure on days with co-administration of intravenous lipid emulsion compared to days with placebo.
Time frame: T-10, T-5, T 0, T 10, T 15, T 20, T 30, T 40, T 50, T 60, T 90, T100, T110, T 120 minutes.
Change in systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure from baseline compared between study days.
Time frame: Changes at +5, +10, +15, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +95, +100, +105, +110, +115, +120 minutes from baseline.
Change in heart rate from baseline compared between study days.
Time frame: Changes at +5, +10, +15, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +95, +100, +105, +110, +115, +120 minutes from baseline.
Change in stroke volume (ml) from baseline compared between study days.
Time frame: Changes at +5, +10, +15, +20, +30, +40, +50, +60, +90, +95, +100, +105, +110, +115, +120 minutes from baseline.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2017.
- BackgroundHoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson L, Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum N, editors. Goldfrank's toxicologic emergencies. Tenth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. 1882 p.
- Background: PubMed 19143686Picard J, Ward SC, Zumpe R, Meek T, Barlow J, Harrop-Griffiths W. Guidelines and the adoption of 'lipid rescue' therapy for local anaesthetic toxicity. Anaesthesia. 2009 Feb;64(2):122-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05816.x.
- Background: PubMed 16436797Tebbutt S, Harvey M, Nicholson T, Cave G. Intralipid prolongs survival in a rat model of verapamil toxicity. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):134-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.016. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 19237909Di Gregorio G, Schwartz D, Ripper R, Kelly K, Feinstein DL, Minshall RD, Massad M, Ori C, Weinberg GL. Lipid emulsion is superior to vasopressin in a rodent model of resuscitation from toxin-induced cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):993-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181961a12.
- Background: PubMed 12772136Weinberg G, Ripper R, Feinstein DL, Hoffman W. Lipid emulsion infusion rescues dogs from bupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):198-202. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50041.
- Background: PubMed 18431127Weinberg GL, Di Gregorio G, Ripper R, Kelly K, Massad M, Edelman L, Schwartz D, Shah N, Zheng S, Feinstein DL. Resuscitation with lipid versus epinephrine in a rat model of bupivacaine overdose. Anesthesiology. 2008 May;108(5):907-13. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31816d91d2.
- Background: PubMed 9579517Weinberg GL, VadeBoncouer T, Ramaraju GA, Garcia-Amaro MF, Cwik MJ. Pretreatment or resuscitation with a lipid infusion shifts the dose-response to bupivacaine-induced asystole in rats. Anesthesiology. 1998 Apr;88(4):1071-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199804000-00028.
- Background: PubMed 16810015Rosenblatt MA, Abel M, Fischer GW, Itzkovich CJ, Eisenkraft JB. Successful use of a 20% lipid emulsion to resuscitate a patient after a presumed bupivacaine-related cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):217-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00033. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16867094Litz RJ, Popp M, Stehr SN, Koch T. Successful resuscitation of a patient with ropivacaine-induced asystole after axillary plexus block using lipid infusion. Anaesthesia. 2006 Aug;61(8):800-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04740.x.
- Background: PubMed 22002529Bet 2: intralipid/lipid emulsion in beta-blocker overdose. Emerg Med J. 2011 Nov;28(11):991-3. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200722.
- Background: PubMed 22244291Blaber MS, Khan JN, Brebner JA, McColm R. "Lipid rescue" for tricyclic antidepressant cardiotoxicity. J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.010. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 19851162Espinet AJ, Emmerton MT. The successful use of intralipid for treatment of local anesthetic-induced central nervous system toxicity: Some considerations for administration of intralipid in an emergency. Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):808-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af739e.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Drug Overdose
Not yet recruiting
HIV/STI/HCV Testing and Overdose Prevention Among Survivors of Sex Trafficking
HIV Testing, STI
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Disease Intervention Specialist (DIS) for SUD
Substance Use Disorder (SUD), Opioid Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Prevention and Rapid Outreach for Treatment, Engagement, and Care Transition From the Emergency Department
Opioid Overdose Prevention, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Remote Intervention to Prevent Overdose
Accidental Overdose of Opiate
Active, not recruiting
Introducing Electronic Alerts to Reduce Inappropriate Digoxin Prescribing in Older Adults
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reaction, Digoxin Overdose
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mikkel B Christensen, MD, PhD principal investigator
Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing metoprolol, intravenous lipid emulsion and Sodium chloride 0.9% solution - lipid emulsion dummy in people with Drug Overdose and Overdose of Beta-adrenergic Blocking Drug, run by Mikkel Bring Christensen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in heart rate from baseline compared between study days (time frame: From baseline to + 120 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02924454, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2017.