AzTrials
AzTrials

Geriatric DiseasesFIRSTNCT02925039

Sit-to-stand Exercise Training With Performance Feedback

A study testing Rehab with computer feedback and Treatment as usual in people with Geriatric Diseases, run by University of Strathclyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is a key functional movement critical to independent living. This movement is physically demanding to conduct, especially in older adults, and in the presence of physical impairments associated with a range of conditions, such as stroke, osteoarthritis, Parkinson disease and hip… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Geriatric Diseases
What is being tested?
Rehab with computer feedback and Treatment as usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
18 Apr 2017to Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients admitted to the geriatric rehabilitation ward at Gartnavel General (Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board).
  • Patients with physical impairments that affect their ability to stand up from sitting (sit to stand).
  • Patients that are medically stable.
  • Patients able to give informed consent.
  • Patients able to complete a STS movement with/without the help of a mobility aid or assistance of one other person.
  • Patients able to follow a three-word instruction in English.

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to read feedback on a computer screen with or without the use of visual aids.
  • Patients known to be epileptic/photosensitive or experience blackouts when exposed to certain light patterns or flashing images.
  • Patients with coexisting physical impairments which prevent the practice of sit-to-stand e.g. bilateral amputee or an acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Patients not expected to survive during the period of the study
  • Patients with active dermatological problems that may preclude the use of double sided sticky tape.
  • Patients with active medical conditions that may limit prescribed mobility exercise e.g. unstable angina.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Andrew Kerr, PhD contact

1416377647

a.kerr@strath.ac.uk

Sui Ho Fan, M.Eng contact

siu.Ho@strath.ac.uk

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Gartnavel General Hospital

    Glasgow, Scotland, G44 3RL

    Andrew Kerr, PhD, 0141 548 2855, a.kerr@strath.ac.uk

    Siu Ho Fan, 0141 548 2855, siu.ho@strath.ac.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: The "Feedback Integrated Rehabilitation for Sit-to-stand Training": a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Testing Clinical Acceptability and Effectiveness

The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is a key functional movement critical to independent living. This movement is physically demanding to conduct, especially in older adults, and in the presence of physical impairments associated with a range of conditions, such as stroke, osteoarthritis, Parkinson disease and hip arthroplasty. A limited capacity to perform this movement increases the risk of falls, dependency and increased support for personal care and rehabilitation. Restoring independence in this movement is, therefore, considered a priority for physical rehabilitation.

Sit-to-stand capacity can be regained through participating in rehabilitation exercises. Providing feedback on performance of this movement could enhance the training. Thus, it is an essential aspect of physical therapy. Healthcare providers are required to meet the needs of an increasingly frail population as well as meeting national, evidence-based, guidelines for improving outcomes in conditions such as stroke which includes an increase in the practice repetition of functional movements. Reliance on rehabilitation staff to provide practice, however, places a limit on practice volume, potentially restricting outcomes. Using technology to enhance safe, repetitive practice of this movement with minimal supervision from skilled professionals would be beneficial to patients and rehabilitation services.

The primary aim of this study is to test the acceptability and feasibility of a STS training system that enhances movement feedback to patients undergoing rehabilitation. A secondary aim is to gather data on the effectiveness of the system compared to conventional rehabilitation. This information will inform a statistically powered phase 2 trial.

Read the detailed description

Research Design:

This is a pilot randomised controlled study to test the acceptability and feasibility of a sit-to-stand (STS) training system and gather preliminary data on its effectiveness. Participants will be randomly allocated to an experimental group where participants will receive sit to stand training enhanced by the feedback system or a control group where participants will receive the usual sit to stand training as provided by the treating therapist.

Participants and recruitment:

Patients with physical impairments that affect their capacity to perform the STS movement and who are about to start active rehabilitation will be identified by the clinical team on the ward. If individuals identified in this way indicate to the clinical team that they are willing to talk to the researcher about the study a mutually convenient time will be arranged for the researcher to speak individually to the patient about the study. An information sheet will be left with the patient and they will be encouraged to read this and speak to family and friends about their possible participation. No less than 48 hours after the information sheet is provided, the researcher will make contact with the patient to discuss their participation and take written consent if agreed. This recruitment process and their participation in the study will not interfere with discharge planning during the study.

Group allocation:

Sealed opaque envelopes contained randomly generated codes for treatment allocations will be given to a member of the clinical team. Once informed consent has been provided, the envelope will be opened randomising participants into two groups: 1) A control group who will conduct conventional sit-to-stand training and 2) An experimental group who will conduct augmented STS training using the feedback system. Twenty participants will be randomly allocated to each group. Participants allocated to either group will be attached with a physical activity monitor (ActivePAL sensor,PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow) by the researcher onto the unaffected or dominant side of the thigh. Full instructions will be provided on its use. The monitor is small and lightweight (<15 grams) but capable of detecting and storing information on movement and position (e.g. duration of sitting, standing and the number of STS execution 24 hours aday for 28 days).Data to record from medical notes: Participants' background information (i.e. gender, age, height, weight, reasons for admission and number and type of co-morbidities) will be noted.Pre-assessments:

Participants in both groups will be asked to carry out the following baseline measurements by the researcher: 1)Timed performance of up to five repetitions of the sit to stand movement (FTSTST), if able; 2) Abbreviated Mental Test -4 with a inclusion score of 4 or higher (AMT-4); 3) Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment (TGBA); 4) Elderly Mobility Scale Test (EMST). These assessments are already being used by the clinical team. Training with the system:The rehabilitation staff will supervise all training sessions as per normal practice. The researcher will provide technical support for all the sessions. The participant will be asked to sit on an adjustable chair with armrests. The height of the chair to be adjusted by the researcher for individual needs. A loose vest with a pouch pocket fitted near the chest region will be worn by the participant. Help will be provided by the researcher if needed. An inertial sensor (Spatial 3/3/3, Phidgets Inc, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) will be placed into the pocket and connected by a USB (Universal Serial Bus) cable to a laptop computer. The participant will then be asked to place both feet on a portable balance plate (BP5046, Bertec Inc, Columbus, OH, USA), which is also attached to the laptop via the USB. The system provides a virtual reality environment that simulates user getting on and off a bus seat. The participant can observe their real-time movement as an avatar on a computerised image (projected on a wall by a projector). Real-time feedback on performance (balance, strength and/or coordination), verbally and visually, will be provided throughout training. The game can be personalised to suit different needs based on the participant's real-time performance. Training should be two to three times a week based on advice on current practice. During the study, the researcher will check with the ward staff that the activity monitor (ActivePAL) is still attached to the participant's thigh and that they are free of skin irritation. The researcher will also change the monitor after seven days so that the skin can be fully inspected and cleaned if necessary. After the study, the monitor will be completely removed by the researcher. The captured anonymised physical activity data will be downloaded to an encrypted folder on a computer and used exclusively for this study. It will then be transferred to a secured computer at the University of Strathclyde for safe storage. Post-assessment: The researcher will carry out a repeat of the baseline measurements at the end of the study.

In addition, the following information will be recorded by the researcher on acceptability and feasibility: 1) Number of sessions attended as a proportion of a total number of the session available; 2)Adverse incidents, type and number; 3) acceptability of the system by a semi-structured interview with the clinical team and participants. The anonymised data will be analysed to address three questions:

  1. Is the system feasible to use with older people undergoing inpatient rehabilitation?
  2. Is the system feasible to use in a clinical environment?
  3. Can the system improve sit-to-stand performance compared to conventional training?
  4. Is the system acceptable from the point of view of users (patients and rehabilitation staff)?
Being tested
Rehab with computer feedback, Treatment as usual
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Geriatric

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rehab with computer feedbackOther

    Sit to stand training with addition of computerised feedback (speed, symmetry and trunk tilt)

  • Treatment as usualOther

    Treatment as usual

Study groups in NCT02925039
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalExperimentalSit to stand training augmented with technology delivered movement feedback
Receives: Other: Rehab with computer feedback
ControlActive comparatorSit to stand training as per normal practice
Receives: Other: Treatment as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. sit to stand ability

    Five times sit to stand test

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Acceptability

    opinions from users on acceptability of system. This will be gained through semi-structured interviews with participants after completion of the intervention and will be conducted by an independent interviewer. These interviews will be brief (10 mins) and focus on the practicalities of using the system (e.g.length of time to set up) as well as the type of feedback provided. We will aim to interview all the participants (n=20) in the intervention arm.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start18 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pilot Randomised controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02925039
Sponsor's protocol ID
UStrathclydeBMEKerr01
Acronym
FIRST
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
4 Oct 2016
Last updated
11 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rehab with computer feedback and Treatment as usual in people with Geriatric Diseases, run by University of Strathclyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Andrew Kerr, PhD (1416377647, a.kerr@strath.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

sit to stand ability (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in