Geriatric DiseasesFIRSTNCT02925039
Sit-to-stand Exercise Training With Performance Feedback
A study testing Rehab with computer feedback and Treatment as usual in people with Geriatric Diseases, run by University of Strathclyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is a key functional movement critical to independent living. This movement is physically demanding to conduct, especially in older adults, and in the presence of physical impairments associated with a range of conditions, such as stroke, osteoarthritis, Parkinson disease and hip… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Geriatric Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Rehab with computer feedback and Treatment as usual
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 18 Apr 2017to Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients admitted to the geriatric rehabilitation ward at Gartnavel General (Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board).
- Patients with physical impairments that affect their ability to stand up from sitting (sit to stand).
- Patients that are medically stable.
- Patients able to give informed consent.
- Patients able to complete a STS movement with/without the help of a mobility aid or assistance of one other person.
- Patients able to follow a three-word instruction in English.
Who cannot join
- Patients unable to read feedback on a computer screen with or without the use of visual aids.
- Patients known to be epileptic/photosensitive or experience blackouts when exposed to certain light patterns or flashing images.
- Patients with coexisting physical impairments which prevent the practice of sit-to-stand e.g. bilateral amputee or an acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Patients not expected to survive during the period of the study
- Patients with active dermatological problems that may preclude the use of double sided sticky tape.
- Patients with active medical conditions that may limit prescribed mobility exercise e.g. unstable angina.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sui Ho Fan, M.Eng contact
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Gartnavel General Hospital
Glasgow, Scotland, G44 3RL
Andrew Kerr, PhD, 0141 548 2855, a.kerr@strath.ac.uk
Siu Ho Fan, 0141 548 2855, siu.ho@strath.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: The "Feedback Integrated Rehabilitation for Sit-to-stand Training": a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Testing Clinical Acceptability and Effectiveness
The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is a key functional movement critical to independent living. This movement is physically demanding to conduct, especially in older adults, and in the presence of physical impairments associated with a range of conditions, such as stroke, osteoarthritis, Parkinson disease and hip arthroplasty. A limited capacity to perform this movement increases the risk of falls, dependency and increased support for personal care and rehabilitation. Restoring independence in this movement is, therefore, considered a priority for physical rehabilitation.
Sit-to-stand capacity can be regained through participating in rehabilitation exercises. Providing feedback on performance of this movement could enhance the training. Thus, it is an essential aspect of physical therapy. Healthcare providers are required to meet the needs of an increasingly frail population as well as meeting national, evidence-based, guidelines for improving outcomes in conditions such as stroke which includes an increase in the practice repetition of functional movements. Reliance on rehabilitation staff to provide practice, however, places a limit on practice volume, potentially restricting outcomes. Using technology to enhance safe, repetitive practice of this movement with minimal supervision from skilled professionals would be beneficial to patients and rehabilitation services.
The primary aim of this study is to test the acceptability and feasibility of a STS training system that enhances movement feedback to patients undergoing rehabilitation. A secondary aim is to gather data on the effectiveness of the system compared to conventional rehabilitation. This information will inform a statistically powered phase 2 trial.
Read the detailed description
Research Design:
This is a pilot randomised controlled study to test the acceptability and feasibility of a sit-to-stand (STS) training system and gather preliminary data on its effectiveness. Participants will be randomly allocated to an experimental group where participants will receive sit to stand training enhanced by the feedback system or a control group where participants will receive the usual sit to stand training as provided by the treating therapist.
Participants and recruitment:
Patients with physical impairments that affect their capacity to perform the STS movement and who are about to start active rehabilitation will be identified by the clinical team on the ward. If individuals identified in this way indicate to the clinical team that they are willing to talk to the researcher about the study a mutually convenient time will be arranged for the researcher to speak individually to the patient about the study. An information sheet will be left with the patient and they will be encouraged to read this and speak to family and friends about their possible participation. No less than 48 hours after the information sheet is provided, the researcher will make contact with the patient to discuss their participation and take written consent if agreed. This recruitment process and their participation in the study will not interfere with discharge planning during the study.
Group allocation:
Sealed opaque envelopes contained randomly generated codes for treatment allocations will be given to a member of the clinical team. Once informed consent has been provided, the envelope will be opened randomising participants into two groups: 1) A control group who will conduct conventional sit-to-stand training and 2) An experimental group who will conduct augmented STS training using the feedback system. Twenty participants will be randomly allocated to each group. Participants allocated to either group will be attached with a physical activity monitor (ActivePAL sensor,PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow) by the researcher onto the unaffected or dominant side of the thigh. Full instructions will be provided on its use. The monitor is small and lightweight (<15 grams) but capable of detecting and storing information on movement and position (e.g. duration of sitting, standing and the number of STS execution 24 hours aday for 28 days).Data to record from medical notes: Participants' background information (i.e. gender, age, height, weight, reasons for admission and number and type of co-morbidities) will be noted.Pre-assessments:
Participants in both groups will be asked to carry out the following baseline measurements by the researcher: 1)Timed performance of up to five repetitions of the sit to stand movement (FTSTST), if able; 2) Abbreviated Mental Test -4 with a inclusion score of 4 or higher (AMT-4); 3) Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment (TGBA); 4) Elderly Mobility Scale Test (EMST). These assessments are already being used by the clinical team. Training with the system:The rehabilitation staff will supervise all training sessions as per normal practice. The researcher will provide technical support for all the sessions. The participant will be asked to sit on an adjustable chair with armrests. The height of the chair to be adjusted by the researcher for individual needs. A loose vest with a pouch pocket fitted near the chest region will be worn by the participant. Help will be provided by the researcher if needed. An inertial sensor (Spatial 3/3/3, Phidgets Inc, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) will be placed into the pocket and connected by a USB (Universal Serial Bus) cable to a laptop computer. The participant will then be asked to place both feet on a portable balance plate (BP5046, Bertec Inc, Columbus, OH, USA), which is also attached to the laptop via the USB. The system provides a virtual reality environment that simulates user getting on and off a bus seat. The participant can observe their real-time movement as an avatar on a computerised image (projected on a wall by a projector). Real-time feedback on performance (balance, strength and/or coordination), verbally and visually, will be provided throughout training. The game can be personalised to suit different needs based on the participant's real-time performance. Training should be two to three times a week based on advice on current practice. During the study, the researcher will check with the ward staff that the activity monitor (ActivePAL) is still attached to the participant's thigh and that they are free of skin irritation. The researcher will also change the monitor after seven days so that the skin can be fully inspected and cleaned if necessary. After the study, the monitor will be completely removed by the researcher. The captured anonymised physical activity data will be downloaded to an encrypted folder on a computer and used exclusively for this study. It will then be transferred to a secured computer at the University of Strathclyde for safe storage. Post-assessment: The researcher will carry out a repeat of the baseline measurements at the end of the study.
In addition, the following information will be recorded by the researcher on acceptability and feasibility: 1) Number of sessions attended as a proportion of a total number of the session available; 2)Adverse incidents, type and number; 3) acceptability of the system by a semi-structured interview with the clinical team and participants. The anonymised data will be analysed to address three questions:
- Is the system feasible to use with older people undergoing inpatient rehabilitation?
- Is the system feasible to use in a clinical environment?
- Can the system improve sit-to-stand performance compared to conventional training?
- Is the system acceptable from the point of view of users (patients and rehabilitation staff)?
- Conditions
- Geriatric Diseases
- Being tested
- Rehab with computer feedback, Treatment as usual
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Geriatric
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rehab with computer feedbackOther
Sit to stand training with addition of computerised feedback (speed, symmetry and trunk tilt)
Treatment as usualOther
Treatment as usual
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Sit to stand training augmented with technology delivered movement feedback Receives: Other: Rehab with computer feedback |
| Control | Active comparator | Sit to stand training as per normal practice Receives: Other: Treatment as usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
sit to stand ability
Five times sit to stand test
Measured: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Acceptability
opinions from users on acceptability of system. This will be gained through semi-structured interviews with participants after completion of the intervention and will be conducted by an independent interviewer. These interviews will be brief (10 mins) and focus on the practicalities of using the system (e.g.length of time to set up) as well as the type of feedback provided. We will aim to interview all the participants (n=20) in the intervention arm.
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start18 Apr 2017
- Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Geriatric DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Pilot Randomised controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Strathclyde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrew Kerr, University of Strathclyde
- Investigators
- Andrew Kerr, Principal investigator, University of Strathclyde
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02925039
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UStrathclydeBMEKerr01
- Acronym
- FIRST
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 11 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The "Feedback Integrated Rehabilitation for Sit-to-stand Training": a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Testing Clinical Acceptability and Effectiveness
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02925039
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FIRST / UStrathclydeBMEKerr01
- Conditions
- Geriatric Diseases
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Geriatric
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of StrathclydeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The sit-to-stand (STS) movement is a key functional movement critical to independent living. This movement is physically demanding to conduct, especially in older adults, and in the presence of physical impairments associated with a range of conditions, such as stroke, osteoarthritis, Parkinson disease and hip arthroplasty. A limited capacity to perform this movement increases the risk of falls, dependency and increased support for personal care and rehabilitation. Restoring independence in this movement is, therefore, considered a priority for physical rehabilitation.
Sit-to-stand capacity can be regained through participating in rehabilitation exercises. Providing feedback on performance of this movement could enhance the training. Thus, it is an essential aspect of physical therapy. Healthcare providers are required to meet the needs of an increasingly frail population as well as meeting national, evidence-based, guidelines for improving outcomes in conditions such as stroke which includes an increase in the practice repetition of functional movements. Reliance on rehabilitation staff to provide practice, however, places a limit on practice volume, potentially restricting outcomes. Using technology to enhance safe, repetitive practice of this movement with minimal supervision from skilled professionals would be beneficial to patients and rehabilitation services.
The primary aim of this study is to test the acceptability and feasibility of a STS training system that enhances movement feedback to patients undergoing rehabilitation. A secondary aim is to gather data on the effectiveness of the system compared to conventional rehabilitation. This information will inform a statistically powered phase 2 trial.
Detailed description
Research Design:
This is a pilot randomised controlled study to test the acceptability and feasibility of a sit-to-stand (STS) training system and gather preliminary data on its effectiveness. Participants will be randomly allocated to an experimental group where participants will receive sit to stand training enhanced by the feedback system or a control group where participants will receive the usual sit to stand training as provided by the treating therapist.
Participants and recruitment:
Patients with physical impairments that affect their capacity to perform the STS movement and who are about to start active rehabilitation will be identified by the clinical team on the ward. If individuals identified in this way indicate to the clinical team that they are willing to talk to the researcher about the study a mutually convenient time will be arranged for the researcher to speak individually to the patient about the study. An information sheet will be left with the patient and they will be encouraged to read this and speak to family and friends about their possible participation. No less than 48 hours after the information sheet is provided, the researcher will make contact with the patient to discuss their participation and take written consent if agreed. This recruitment process and their participation in the study will not interfere with discharge planning during the study.
Group allocation:
Sealed opaque envelopes contained randomly generated codes for treatment allocations will be given to a member of the clinical team. Once informed consent has been provided, the envelope will be opened randomising participants into two groups: 1) A control group who will conduct conventional sit-to-stand training and 2) An experimental group who will conduct augmented STS training using the feedback system. Twenty participants will be randomly allocated to each group. Participants allocated to either group will be attached with a physical activity monitor (ActivePAL sensor,PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow) by the researcher onto the unaffected or dominant side of the thigh. Full instructions will be provided on its use. The monitor is small and lightweight (<15 grams) but capable of detecting and storing information on movement and position (e.g. duration of sitting, standing and the number of STS execution 24 hours aday for 28 days).Data to record from medical notes: Participants' background information (i.e. gender, age, height, weight, reasons for admission and number and type of co-morbidities) will be noted.Pre-assessments:
Participants in both groups will be asked to carry out the following baseline measurements by the researcher: 1)Timed performance of up to five repetitions of the sit to stand movement (FTSTST), if able; 2) Abbreviated Mental Test -4 with a inclusion score of 4 or higher (AMT-4); 3) Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment (TGBA); 4) Elderly Mobility Scale Test (EMST). These assessments are already being used by the clinical team. Training with the system:The rehabilitation staff will supervise all training sessions as per normal practice. The researcher will provide technical support for all the sessions. The participant will be asked to sit on an adjustable chair with armrests. The height of the chair to be adjusted by the researcher for individual needs. A loose vest with a pouch pocket fitted near the chest region will be worn by the participant. Help will be provided by the researcher if needed. An inertial sensor (Spatial 3/3/3, Phidgets Inc, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) will be placed into the pocket and connected by a USB (Universal Serial Bus) cable to a laptop computer. The participant will then be asked to place both feet on a portable balance plate (BP5046, Bertec Inc, Columbus, OH, USA), which is also attached to the laptop via the USB. The system provides a virtual reality environment that simulates user getting on and off a bus seat. The participant can observe their real-time movement as an avatar on a computerised image (projected on a wall by a projector). Real-time feedback on performance (balance, strength and/or coordination), verbally and visually, will be provided throughout training. The game can be personalised to suit different needs based on the participant's real-time performance. Training should be two to three times a week based on advice on current practice. During the study, the researcher will check with the ward staff that the activity monitor (ActivePAL) is still attached to the participant's thigh and that they are free of skin irritation. The researcher will also change the monitor after seven days so that the skin can be fully inspected and cleaned if necessary. After the study, the monitor will be completely removed by the researcher. The captured anonymised physical activity data will be downloaded to an encrypted folder on a computer and used exclusively for this study. It will then be transferred to a secured computer at the University of Strathclyde for safe storage. Post-assessment: The researcher will carry out a repeat of the baseline measurements at the end of the study.
In addition, the following information will be recorded by the researcher on acceptability and feasibility: 1) Number of sessions attended as a proportion of a total number of the session available; 2)Adverse incidents, type and number; 3) acceptability of the system by a semi-structured interview with the clinical team and participants. The anonymised data will be analysed to address three questions:
- Is the system feasible to use with older people undergoing inpatient rehabilitation?
- Is the system feasible to use in a clinical environment?
- Can the system improve sit-to-stand performance compared to conventional training?
- Is the system acceptable from the point of view of users (patients and rehabilitation staff)?
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Pilot Randomised controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Other: Rehab with computer feedbackSit to stand training augmented with technology delivered movement feedback |
| Control | Active comparator | Other: Treatment as usualSit to stand training as per normal practice |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients admitted to the geriatric rehabilitation ward at Gartnavel General (Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board).
- Patients with physical impairments that affect their ability to stand up from sitting (sit to stand).
- Patients that are medically stable.
- Patients able to give informed consent.
- Patients able to complete a STS movement with/without the help of a mobility aid or assistance of one other person.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients unable to read feedback on a computer screen with or without the use of visual aids.
- Patients known to be epileptic/photosensitive or experience blackouts when exposed to certain light patterns or flashing images.
- Patients with coexisting physical impairments which prevent the practice of sit-to-stand e.g. bilateral amputee or an acute exacerbation of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Patients not expected to survive during the period of the study
- Patients with active dermatological problems that may preclude the use of double sided sticky tape.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rehab with computer feedbackSit to stand training with addition of computerised feedback (speed, symmetry and trunk tilt) | Other | Experimental |
| Treatment as usualTreatment as usual | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
sit to stand ability
Time frame: 6 weeks
Five times sit to stand test
1 secondary outcome
Acceptability
Time frame: 6 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Geriatric Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality to Advance Dementia Care and Quality of Life
Dementia, Agitation
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol Oral Solution (CBD-OS [GWP42003-P, JZP926]) for the Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures
Focal Seizures
RecruitingObservational study
Validation of the D-TAP Parental Questionnaire for Early Screening of Pediatric Feeding Disorder in Hospitalized Children Aged 8 to 18 Months
Pediatric Feeding Disorder, Feeding Difficulties in Infants and Young Children
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Effects of Ciprofol on Perioperative Neurocognitive Function in Elderly Patients Undergoing Daytime Surgery
PND, POCD - Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sui Ho Fan, M.Eng contact
Andrew Kerr principal investigator
University of Strathclyde
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rehab with computer feedback and Treatment as usual in people with Geriatric Diseases, run by University of Strathclyde at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Andrew Kerr, PhD (1416377647, a.kerr@strath.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
sit to stand ability (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2017.