DCISCOMETNCT02926911
Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS
A study testing Surgery and Active Monitoring in people with DCIS and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, run by Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. at 141 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study looks at the risks and benefits of active monitoring (AM) compared to surgery in the setting of a pragmatic prospective randomized trial for low risk DCIS. Our overarching hypothesis is that management of low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) using an AM approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 99 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- DCIS, Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
- What is being tested?
- Surgery and Active Monitoring
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 997 participants
- Where
- 141 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Feb 2017to Jul 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 99 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of unilateral, bilateral, unifocal, multifocal, or multicentric DCIS without invasive breast cancer (date of diagnosis defined as the date of the first pathology report that diagnosed the patient with DCIS) OR: atypia verging on DCIS OR: DCIS + LCIS (mix and/or separate locations in the same breast)
- A patient who has had a lumpectomy or partial mastectomy with margins positive for DCIS (i.e. <2mm/ink on tumor) as part of their treatment for a current DCIS diagnosis is also eligible (post-excision bilateral mammogram required at enrollment to establish a new baseline)
- No previous DCIS or invasive breast cancer in ipsilateral breast 5 years prior to current DCIS diagnosis
- 40 years of age or older at time of DCIS diagnosis
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
- No contraindication for surgery
Show all 22Show fewer
- Baseline imaging (must include dimensions):
- Unilateral DCIS: contralateral normal mammogram ≤ 6 months of registration and ipsilateral breast imaging ≤ 120 days of registration (must include ipsilateral mammogram; can also include ultrasound or breast MRI)
- Bilateral DCIS: bilateral breast imaging ≤ 120 days of registration (must include bilateral mammogram; can also include ultrasound or breast MRI)
- DCIS s/p lumpectomy: post excision mammogram on side of excision ≤ 60 days of registration
- Pathologic criteria:
- Any grade I DCIS (irrespective of necrosis/comedonecrosis)
- Any grade II DCIS (irrespective of necrosis/comedonecrosis)
- Absence of invasion or microinvasion
- Diagnosis of DCIS confirmed on core needle biopsy, vacuum-assisted or surgery ≤ 120 days of registration
- ER(+) and/or PR(+) by IHC (≥ 10% staining or Allred score ≥ 4) unless atypia verging on DCIS in which case biomarker criterion does not apply
- HER2 0, 1+, or 2+ by IHC if HER2 testing is performed
- Histology slides reviewed and agreement between two clinical pathologists (not required to be at same institution) that pathology fulfills COMET eligibility criteria. In cases of disagreement between the two pathology reviews about whether or not a case fulfills the eligibility criteria, a third pathology review will be required.
- At least two sites of biopsy for those cases where individual mammographic extent of calcifications exceeds 4 cm, with second biopsy benign or both sites fulfilling pathology eligibility criteria (ER/PR testing required for second biopsy)
- Amenable to follow up examinations
- Ability to read, understand and evaluate study materials and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- Reads and speaks Spanish or English
Who cannot join
- Male DCIS
- Grade III DCIS
- Concurrent diagnosis of invasive or microinvasive breast cancer in either breast
- Documented mass on examination or mass/hypoechoic area on imaging at site of DCIS prior to biopsy yielding diagnosis of DCIS, with exception of: subsequent lumpectomy or partial mastectomy (with positive DCIS margins i.e. <2mm/ink on tumor) followed by a post-surgery MMG; fibroadenoma at a distinct/separate site from site of DCIS; or diagnosis of mass/hypoechoic area as a cyst or a papilloma. In cases of uncertainty about whether the mass was present on physical examination prior to biopsy, the following criteria should be applied: if mammogram noting abnormal findings is diagnostic MMG = symptomatic/if mammogram noting abnormal findings is screening MMG = asymptomatic. If a patient has a mass on imaging that is biopsied (worked-up) and does not show invasive breast cancer, they are eligible. If a patient has a mass on initial MMG that is not seen on subsequent MMG, they are eligible (if initial mass occurred due to additional work-up).
- Any color/bloody nipple discharge (ipsilateral breast)
- Mammographic finding of BIRADS 4 or greater within 6 months prior to registration at site of breast other than that of known DCIS, without pathologic assessment
Show all 11Show fewer
- Use of investigational cancer agents within 6 weeks prior to diagnosis of DCIS
- Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other existing condition that would prevent compliance with the trial or consent process
- Pregnancy. If a woman has been confirmed as pregnant, she will not be eligible to take part in the trial. If she suspects there is a chance that she may be pregnant, a pregnancy test should be undertaken, although a pregnancy test for all women of child-bearing potential is not mandatory. In addition, if a woman becomes pregnant once registered to the trial, she can continue to be followed (endocrine therapy is not a mandatory requirement of the study)
- Documented history of prior tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor, or raloxifene use in the 6 months prior to registration
- Current use of exogenous hormones (i.e. oral progesterone)
Trial locations and contacts
141 sites in 1 country.
141 sites in 1 country
United States141 sites
New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Community Hospital of Anaconda
Anaconda, Montana, 59711
Providence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, 99508
Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48197
Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center -Appleton
Appleton, Wisconsin, 54911
University of Maryland - Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Overlake Hospital Medical Center
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
Strecker Cancer Center - Belpre
Belpre, Ohio, 45714
Saint Charles Health System
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Billings Clinic
Billings, Montana, 59101
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Bozeman Health
Bozeman, Montana, 59715
Eastern Maine Medical Center Cancer Care
Brewer, Maine, 04412
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
The University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Burlington, Wisconsin, 53105
Dayton Physicians-Miami Valley Hospital South
Centerville, Ohio, 45459
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43202
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Mount Carmel East Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Columbus Oncology & Hematology INC
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Grant Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
MidOhio Oncology Hematology, Mark H. Zangmeister Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43219
Mount Carmel West Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43223
Doctors Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43228
UT Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center-Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Dayton Physicians-Miami Valley Hospital North
Dayton, Ohio, 45415
Grady Hospital
Delaware, Ohio, 43015
OhioHealth Grady - Delaware Health Center
Delaware, Ohio, 43015
Colorado Cancer Research Program
Denver, Colorado, 80222
Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates - Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
St. Elizabeth Healthcare Edgewood
Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631
NorthShore University HealthSystem-Evanston Hospital
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Cape Fear Valley Health System
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304
Armes Family Cancer Center
Findlay, Ohio, 45840
Aurora Health Center - Fond du Lac
Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 54937
Dayton Physicians-Atrium
Franklin, Ohio, 45005
Georgetown Hospital System
Georgetown, South Carolina, 29440
Aurora Health Care, Germantown Health Center
Germantown, Wisconsin, 53022
Southeastern Medical Oncology Center
Goldsboro, North Carolina, 27534
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Grafton, Wisconsin, 53024
Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Benefis Sletten Cancer Institute
Great Falls, Montana, 59405
Saint Vincent Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
BayCare Aurora LLC, Aurora Cancer Care
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54311
Cone Health Cancer Center
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
Novant Health Breast Surgery - Greensboro
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Wayne Hospital
Greenville, Ohio, 45331
Greenville Memorial Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Memorial Healthcare System
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
University of Hawaii Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
New Hampshire Oncology Hematology PA
Hooksett, New Hampshire, 03106
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 60586
University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Kalispell Regional Medical Center
Kalispell, Montana, 59901
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 49408
Kettering Medical Center
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
Saint Joseph Hospital- Cancer Centers of Colorado
Lafayette, Colorado, 80026
Doctors Hospital of Laredo
Laredo, Texas, 78045
Cancer Centers of Southwest Oklahoma
Lawton, Oklahoma, 73505
University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
OhioHealth Mansfield Hospital
Mansfield, Ohio, 44903
Marietta Memorial Hospital
Marietta, Ohio, 45750
Aurora Bay Area Medical Group - Cancer Care Clinic
Marinette, Wisconsin, 54143
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Marinette, Wisconsin, 54143
OhioHealth Marion General Hospital
Marion, Ohio, 43302
Baptist Cancer Care
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic of Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53233
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Community Medical Center
Missoula, Montana, 59804
West Virginia University Medicine
Morgantown, Virginia, 26506
Atlantic Health System / Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, 07960
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753
Carolina East Medical Center
New Bern, North Carolina, 28561
Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 60608
Licking Memorial Hospital
Newark, Ohio, 43055
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54904
The Valley Hospital - Luckow Pavilion
Paramus, New Jersey, 07652
Illinois Cancer Care
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Kootenai Health
Post Falls, Idaho, 83854
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Racine, Wisconsin, 53406
Rex Cancer Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
OSF Saint Anthony Medical Center
Rockford, Illinois, 61108
Beaumont NCORP
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Metro MN Community Oncology Research Consortium (MMCORC)
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
Guthrie Medical Group PC-Robert Packer Hospital
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840
Maine Center for Cancer Medicine-Scarborough
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
New England Cancer Specialists
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, 53081
Washington University - Siteman Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Summit, Wisconsin, 53066
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care at Montefiore Medical Park
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Two Rivers, Wisconsin, 54241
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center
Vallejo, California, 94589
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226
Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care
West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227
St. Ann's Hospital
Westerville, Ohio, 43081
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
WellSpan Health York Cancer Center
York, Pennsylvania, 17403
St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital
Youngstown, Ohio, 44501
Genesis Health Care System
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
About this study
Official title: Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial
This study looks at the risks and benefits of active monitoring (AM) compared to surgery in the setting of a pragmatic prospective randomized trial for low risk DCIS. Our overarching hypothesis is that management of low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) using an AM approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
Read the detailed description
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from mammographic screening have been estimated to be as high as 1 in 4 patients diagnosed with breast cancer although the absence of standard definitions for measuring overdiagnosis has led to much uncertainty around this estimate. The national health care expenditure resulting from false positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnosis has been estimated to approach $4 billion annually. There is general consensus that much of this burden derives from the treatment of DCIS; for those estimated 40,000 women per year whose DCIS may never have progressed even without treatment, medical intervention can only harm. In those women who undergo surgical management of DCIS, there is risk of developing persistent pain at the surgical site, with estimates ranging from 25-68%. Importantly, persistent pain after lumpectomy may be as prevalent as that after total mastectomy. Persistent postsurgical pain is rated by patients as the most troubling symptom, leading to disability and psychological distress, and is often resistant to management. Although prospective population-based data have demonstrated significant patient and surgical focus on pain with remarkably high levels of chronic pain 4 and 9 months after breast surgery, much of these data have been collected in women with invasive cancer, with little data directly relevant to patients with DCIS.
The overarching hypothesis of the study is that management of low-risk DCIS using an active monitoring (AM) approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
- Conditions
- DCIS, Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
- Being tested
- Surgery, Active Monitoring
- Keywords
- Ductal Carcinoma
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Carcinoma, Ductal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SurgeryOther
Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy
Active MonitoringOther
Choice for endocrine therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Surgery | Active comparator | DCIS - Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 12 months x 5 years usual care for recurrent disease) Receives: Other: Surgery |
| Active Monitoring | Experimental | DCIS - Choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 6 months x 5 years GCC for invasive progression) Receives: Other: Active Monitoring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of New Diagnoses of Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer in Surgery and AM Arms at 2 Years of Follow up
To compare the number of patients that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer that received surgery to the number of patients that were placed on active monitoring after 2 years of follow-up
Measured: At 2 years follow-up
Secondary outcomes (13)
Quality of Life (QOL)
Measured by Short Form (SF)-36
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Psychological Outcomes
Measured by five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Generalized Anxiety
Measured by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Generalized Depression
Measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 10
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Coping
Coping evaluated using the Brief COPE, a shortened form of the COPE Inventory, inclusive of 28 items (14 subscales).
Measured: Baseline
Intolerance of Uncertainty
Assessment of feelings of uncertainty using the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (Short-form), which has been used in studies of active monitoring in the prostate cancer setting.
Measured: Baseline and at 2 years
Mastectomy Rate
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the number of mastectomies performed in patients with DCIS
Measured: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Breast Conservation Rate
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the number of breast conservation surgeries performed in patients with DCIS
Measured: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Contralateral Invasive Cancer Rate
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the rate of development of contralateral invasive cancer in patients with DCIS
Measured: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Overall Survival Rate
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the overall survival rate in patients with DCIS
Measured: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Breast Cancer Specific Survival Rate
To compare the impact of surgery vs. AM on the breast cancer specific survival rate in patients with DCIS
Measured: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer Rate in Surgery Arm at 5 and 7 Year Follow-up
To determine the number of DCIS patients in the surgery arm that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer
Measured: 5 and 7 year follow-up
Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer Rate in AM Arm
To determine the number of DCIS patients in the AM arm that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer
Measured: 5 and 7 year follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Feb 2017
- Primary completion27 Jun 2024
- Study completionJul 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DCISStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 997 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Duke University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, New York University, Washington University School of Medicine, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Rising Tide Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Duke UniversityAnn Partridge, MD, MPH, Study chair, Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteAlastair Thompson, MD, Study chair, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02926911
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AFT-25
- Acronym
- COMET
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 12 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient medical information both, associated with biologic specimens or not, is confidential and may only be disclosed to third parties as permitted by the Informed Consent Form (ICF) (or separate authorization for use and disclosure of personal health information) which has been signed by the patient, unless permitted or required by law. Data derived from biologic specimen analysis on individual patients will in generally not be provided to study investigators unless a request for research use is granted. The overall results of any research conducted using biologic specimens will be available in accordance with the effective Alliance Foundation Trial (AFT) policy on study data publication.
Publications
Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546.
PubMed 12381707Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J, Gertig D. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 May;97(2):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9101-z. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
PubMed 16319971Ozanne EM, Shieh Y, Barnes J, Bouzan C, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ. Characterizing the impact of 25 years of DCIS treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1430-5. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
PubMed 21390494Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v.
PubMed 8096941Partridge AH, Hyslop T, Rosenberg SM, Bennett AV, Drier S, Jonsson M, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Lynch T, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Darai S, Carey L, Thompson A, Hwang ES; COMET Study Consortium. Patient-Reported Outcomes for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Secondary Analysis of the COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):300-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6556.
PubMed 39665588Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Ryser MD, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Grimm L, Schnitt S, Badve S, Factor R, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Watson MA, West R, Davies L, Donovan JL, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Bennett AV, Rosenberg S, Marks J, Winer E, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Carey LA, Thompson AM, Partridge AH; COMET Study Investigators. Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.
PubMed 39665585Ozanne EM, Maves K, Tramontano AC, Lynch T, Thompson A, Partridge A, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Hyslop T, Ryser MD, Rosenberg S, Hwang ES, Punglia RS. Impact of an online decision support tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using a pre-post design (AFT-25). Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 17;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01891-w.
PubMed 39289750Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Frank E, Pinto D, Basila D, Collyar D, Bennett A, Kaplan C, Rosenberg S, Thompson A, Weiss A, Partridge A. The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 12;9(3):e026797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026797.
PubMed 30862637
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS: A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02926911
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMET / AFT-25
- Conditions
- DCIS, Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
- Keywords
- Ductal Carcinoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 997 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Duke University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, New York University, Washington University School of Medicine, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Rising Tide Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation
- Study start
- 22 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study looks at the risks and benefits of active monitoring (AM) compared to surgery in the setting of a pragmatic prospective randomized trial for low risk DCIS. Our overarching hypothesis is that management of low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) using an AM approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
Detailed description
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from mammographic screening have been estimated to be as high as 1 in 4 patients diagnosed with breast cancer although the absence of standard definitions for measuring overdiagnosis has led to much uncertainty around this estimate. The national health care expenditure resulting from false positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnosis has been estimated to approach $4 billion annually. There is general consensus that much of this burden derives from the treatment of DCIS; for those estimated 40,000 women per year whose DCIS may never have progressed even without treatment, medical intervention can only harm. In those women who undergo surgical management of DCIS, there is risk of developing persistent pain at the surgical site, with estimates ranging from 25-68%. Importantly, persistent pain after lumpectomy may be as prevalent as that after total mastectomy. Persistent postsurgical pain is rated by patients as the most troubling symptom, leading to disability and psychological distress, and is often resistant to management. Although prospective population-based data have demonstrated significant patient and surgical focus on pain with remarkably high levels of chronic pain 4 and 9 months after breast surgery, much of these data have been collected in women with invasive cancer, with little data directly relevant to patients with DCIS.
The overarching hypothesis of the study is that management of low-risk DCIS using an active monitoring (AM) approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Surgery | Active comparator | Other: SurgeryDCIS - Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 12 months x 5 years usual care for recurrent disease) |
| Active Monitoring | Experimental | Other: Active MonitoringDCIS - Choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 6 months x 5 years GCC for invasive progression) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 99 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Diagnosis of unilateral, bilateral, unifocal, multifocal, or multicentric DCIS without invasive breast cancer (date of diagnosis defined as the date of the first pathology report that diagnosed the patient with DCIS) OR: atypia verging on DCIS OR: DCIS + LCIS (mix and/or separate locations in the same breast)
- A patient who has had a lumpectomy or partial mastectomy with margins positive for DCIS (i.e. <2mm/ink on tumor) as part of their treatment for a current DCIS diagnosis is also eligible (post-excision bilateral mammogram required at enrollment to establish a new baseline)
- No previous DCIS or invasive breast cancer in ipsilateral breast 5 years prior to current DCIS diagnosis
- 40 years of age or older at time of DCIS diagnosis
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Male DCIS
- Grade III DCIS
- Concurrent diagnosis of invasive or microinvasive breast cancer in either breast
- Documented mass on examination or mass/hypoechoic area on imaging at site of DCIS prior to biopsy yielding diagnosis of DCIS, with exception of: subsequent lumpectomy or partial mastectomy (with positive DCIS margins i.e. <2mm/ink on tumor) followed by a post-surgery MMG; fibroadenoma at a distinct/separate site from site of DCIS; or diagnosis of mass/hypoechoic area as a cyst or a papilloma. In cases of uncertainty about whether the mass was present on physical examination prior to biopsy, the following criteria should be applied: if mammogram noting abnormal findings is diagnostic MMG = symptomatic/if mammogram noting abnormal findings is screening MMG = asymptomatic. If a patient has a mass on imaging that is biopsied (worked-up) and does not show invasive breast cancer, they are eligible. If a patient has a mass on initial MMG that is not seen on subsequent MMG, they are eligible (if initial mass occurred due to additional work-up).
- Any color/bloody nipple discharge (ipsilateral breast)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SurgerySurgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy | Other | Surgery |
| Active MonitoringChoice for endocrine therapy | Other | Active Monitoring |
Primary outcome
Proportion of New Diagnoses of Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer in Surgery and AM Arms at 2 Years of Follow up
Time frame: At 2 years follow-up
To compare the number of patients that develop ipsilateral invasive cancer that received surgery to the number of patients that were placed on active monitoring after 2 years of follow-up
13 secondary outcomes
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Psychological Outcomes
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Generalized Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Generalized Depression
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and once a year (years 2 through 5)
Coping
Time frame: Baseline
Intolerance of Uncertainty
Time frame: Baseline and at 2 years
Mastectomy Rate
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Breast Conservation Rate
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Contralateral Invasive Cancer Rate
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Overall Survival Rate
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Breast Cancer Specific Survival Rate
Time frame: 2, 5, and 7 year follow-up
Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer Rate in Surgery Arm at 5 and 7 Year Follow-up
Time frame: 5 and 7 year follow-up
Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer Rate in AM Arm
Time frame: 5 and 7 year follow-up
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12381707Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546.
- Background: PubMed 16319971Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J, Gertig D. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 May;97(2):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9101-z. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 21390494Ozanne EM, Shieh Y, Barnes J, Bouzan C, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ. Characterizing the impact of 25 years of DCIS treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1430-5. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 8096941Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39665588Partridge AH, Hyslop T, Rosenberg SM, Bennett AV, Drier S, Jonsson M, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Lynch T, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Darai S, Carey L, Thompson A, Hwang ES; COMET Study Consortium. Patient-Reported Outcomes for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Secondary Analysis of the COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):300-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6556.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39665585Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Ryser MD, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Grimm L, Schnitt S, Badve S, Factor R, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Watson MA, West R, Davies L, Donovan JL, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Bennett AV, Rosenberg S, Marks J, Winer E, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Carey LA, Thompson AM, Partridge AH; COMET Study Investigators. Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39289750Ozanne EM, Maves K, Tramontano AC, Lynch T, Thompson A, Partridge A, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Hyslop T, Ryser MD, Rosenberg S, Hwang ES, Punglia RS. Impact of an online decision support tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using a pre-post design (AFT-25). Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 17;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01891-w.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30862637Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Frank E, Pinto D, Basila D, Collyar D, Bennett A, Kaplan C, Rosenberg S, Thompson A, Weiss A, Partridge A. The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 12;9(3):e026797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026797.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient medical information both, associated with biologic specimens or not, is confidential and may only be disclosed to third parties as permitted by the Informed Consent Form (ICF) (or separate authorization for use and disclosure of personal health information) which has been signed by the patient, unless permitted or required by law. Data derived from biologic specimen analysis on individual patients will in generally not be provided to study investigators unless a request for research use is granted. The overall results of any research conducted using biologic specimens will be available in accordance with the effective Alliance Foundation Trial (AFT) policy on study data publication.
Related trials for DCIS
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative vs. Pathologic Size in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study
Mastectomy, Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary
Not yet recruiting
Agentic AI App and Home Bioimpedance Monitoring for Endocrine Therapy Adherence and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary, Lymphedema Arm
Not yet recruiting
Addressing Financial Hardship in AYA Cancer Survivors Through the Use of the New LIFT UP Intervention
Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 2
DCIS: RECAST Trial Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Re-Evaluating Conditions for Active Surveillance Suitability as Treatment
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Tamoxifen Citrate, Letrozole, Anastrozole, or Exemestane With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Invasive RxPONDER Breast Cancer
Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH principal investigator
Duke University
Ann Partridge, MD, MPH study chair
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Alastair Thompson, MD study chair
Baylor College of Medicine
141 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Surgery and Active Monitoring in people with DCIS and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, run by Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. at 141 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 22 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 141 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of New Diagnoses of Ipsilateral Invasive Cancer in Surgery and AM Arms at 2 Years of Follow up (time frame: At 2 years follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02926911, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2026.