AzTrials
AzTrials

Meibomian Gland DysfunctionNCT02952079

Comparison of BlephEx to MiBoflo as Treatment Options for Blepharitis

A study testing Blephex and MiboFlo in people with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dry Eye, run by University of the Incarnate Word at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to compare which treatment - BlephEx or MiBoFlo - will be a better option for patients suffering from dry eye secondary to Meibomian Gland dysfunction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Blephex and MiboFlo
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2015to Apr 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must have dry eye secondary to Meibomian gland dysfunction (posterior blepharitis)

Who cannot join

  • Must not have active ocular surface infections. Must not be currently using steroids or immunosuppression eye drops.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rosenberg School of Optometry

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to compare which treatment - BlephEx or MiBoFlo - will be a better option for patients suffering from dry eye secondary to Meibomian Gland dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

The investigators have previously studied the effect of the BlephEx instrument (debridement of lid debris) in relieving signs and symptoms of blepharitis (Connor CG et al, ARVO 2014). This previous study demonstrated positive results from the BlephEx treatment. Warming the eyelids (e.g., using warm wash cloths) still remains a viable treatment option for this disease. However, patients are often non-compliant with warm compress therapy due to the requirement of performing it at least twice per day. The MiBoflo delivers uniform and consistent amounts of heat to the eyelid. It is suggested that two treatments over 30 days is adequate to relieve signs and symptoms of Meibomian gland dysfunction. This equipment is currently used in optometric practices in this country.

There are no clinical studies comparing BlephEx and MiBoflo as treatment options for blepharitis. Hence, the current study will provide new and useful information on which treatment option may be better for treating blepharitis and Meibomian gland dysfunction. Part of this study will also investigate if a combination of BlephEx and MiBoflo treatments is more beneficial to the patient. The data generated will directly benefit clinical practice and impact several millions of patients who suffer from this Blepharitis and / or Meibomian gland dysfunction.

Being tested
Blephex, MiboFlo
Medical subject headings
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BlephexDevice

    Lid margin exfoliation

  • MiboFloDevice

    Lid warming treatment

Study groups in NCT02952079
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BlephEx treatmentActive comparatorTreatment with the BlephEx instrument (lid margin exfoliation)
Receives: Device: Blephex
MiBoFlo treatmentActive comparatorTreatment with the MiboFlo equipment (heat therapy to eyelids)
Receives: Device: MiboFlo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ocular irritation symptoms (OSDI Questionnaire score)

    Measured: one month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Tear break-up

    Measured: one month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionApr 2018
  4. Study completionApr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02952079
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-06-015
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
29 Oct 2016
Last updated
8 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: No plan to share IPD to other researchers

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blephex and MiboFlo in people with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and Dry Eye, run by University of the Incarnate Word at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ocular irritation symptoms (OSDI Questionnaire score) (time frame: one month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in