AzTrials
AzTrials

EmergenciesELFNCT02952430

Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty Study

An observational study of Emergencies and Frail Older Adult, run by North Western Research Collaborative.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients aged over 65 comprise more than half the emergency general surgical workload, however, available risk-prediction tools for such patients are extrapolated from younger cohorts. Research suggests that high pre-operative frailty scores correlate with increased post-operative mortality and morbidity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Emergencies, Frail Older Adult, Laparotomy
What is being tested?
Emergency laparotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
500 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2016to May 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Study population: Patients admitted to the emergency surgical department requiring an emergency laparotomy

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 65 years and older
  • Admitted to emergency surgical departments
  • Requiring an emergency laparotomy

Who cannot join

  • Patients less than 65 years old

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Kat Parmar, MBChB, MSc contact

07817296021

klparmar@hotmail.co.uk

About this study

Official title: Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty; a National Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study of Older Surgical Patients (ELF Study)

Patients aged over 65 comprise more than half the emergency general surgical workload, however, available risk-prediction tools for such patients are extrapolated from younger cohorts. Research suggests that high pre-operative frailty scores correlate with increased post-operative mortality and morbidity. Validated frailty assessments may help identify high risk older emergency surgical patients, facilitating decision-making and informing patient choice.

We propose the first prospective UK observational study assessing frailty as an independent predictor of outcome in the older surgical patient undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Read more

Prospective data collection of patients over 65 undergoing emergency laparotomy will be performed in 20 NHS Trusts. Pre-operative frailty scores will be evaluated using the Rockwood Frailty Scale. Primary outcome measure is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures are post-operative complications, altered independence status and length of stay.

Results will be disseminated at national/international surgical meetings and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Read the detailed description

The ELF steering committee will run this project as part of the North West Research Collaborative(NWRC), consisting of surgical trainees with a successful record of publishing credible research and establishing clinical trials.

Following ethical approval, data will be collected from NHS Trusts throughout the UK. Trained leads will facilitate data collection adhering to a study protocol and local clinical governance.

Patients over 65 undergoing emergency laparotomy will be identified prospectively over 3 months. Demographics, time to surgical intervention, length of stay(LOS), pre- and post-admission independence, intermediate care stay, Clavien-Dindo post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and 30-day re-admission data will be collected on a secure database. Pre-operative frailty will be assessed using the Rockwood Frailty Scale.

500 patients are required for a statistically significant difference in primary outcome (30 day mortality). Secondary outcome measures are complications, change in independence status and LOS. Outcomes will be analysed to compare the impact of frailty.

Being tested
Emergency laparotomy
Medical subject headings
Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Emergency laparotomyProcedure or surgery

    Patients already undergoing emergency laparotomy - groups divided pre-operatively into frail and not frail based on modified Rockwood score. Then outcomes observed.

Study groups in NCT02952430
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FrailPatients over 65 year old having emergency laparotomy with a Frailty score (Modified Rockwood score) of greater than or equal to five. This group will then be observed after intervention to review outcomes.
Receives: Procedure: Emergency laparotomy
Not frailPatients over 65 year old having emergency laparotomy with a Frailty score (Modified Rockwood score) of less than five. This group will then be observed after intervention to review outcomes.
Receives: Procedure: Emergency laparotomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    Patient alive at 90 days (rounded up to the nearest whole day) post operatively

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Post-operative complications

    Evidence of post-operative complications at 30 days (rounded up to the nearest whole day) post operatively. Measured using the Clavein Dindo classification

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Lowering of independence status post-operatively

    Change in living status from pre to post operatively. Including increased care required at home and discharge to increased care (such as residential or nursing home care).

    Measured: 30 days

  3. Length of stay

    Length of hospital admission - rounded up to whole days

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Readmission

    All cause readmission to hospital for emergency care - within 30 days post-operatively (rounded up to the nearest whole day).

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02952430
Sponsor's protocol ID
NWRC- ELF
Acronym
ELF
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
31 Oct 2016
Last updated
2 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bisset CN, Carter B, Law J, Hewitt J, Parmar K, Moug SJ; ELF Study Group Collaborative Authorship. The influence of social media on recruitment to surgical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 28;20(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01072-1.

    PubMed 32723388
  • Parmar KL, Law J, Carter B, Hewitt J, Boyle JM, Casey P, Maitra I, Farrell IS, Pearce L, Moug SJ; ELF Study Group. Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study. Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402.

    PubMed 31188201
  • Parmar KL, Pearce L, Farrell I, Hewitt J, Moug S. Influence of frailty in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a UK-based observational study. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e017928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017928.

    PubMed 28988184

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Emergencies and Frail Older Adult, run by North Western Research Collaborative.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kat Parmar, MBChB, MSc (07817296021, klparmar@hotmail.co.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02952430, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in