AsthmaticPhase 4NCT02967393
Influenza Vaccine Feasibility Study in Children With Persistent Asthma
A Phase 4 study testing ccIIV4 and IIV4 in people with Asthmatic, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to note whether a larger safety study using quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) versus quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4)(FLUARIX®), would be feasible in children with persistent asthma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 11 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthmatic
- What is being tested?
- ccIIV4 and IIV4
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2016to 1 Feb 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 11 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children between 5-11 years of age, inclusive, at enrollment.
- Participant must have a current diagnosis of persistent asthma.
- Parent/legal guardian must provide written informed consent and subject must provide assent as appropriate for age prior to initiation of study procedures and according to local Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirement.
- Parent/legal guardian and subject must be willing and able to comply with planned study procedures and be available for all study visits.
- Children aged 5-8 years must have received at least 2 doses of seasonal trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine prior to the current influenza season. Children 9-11 years must have received at least 1 dose of seasonal trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine prior to the current influenza season.
- Is in good health, other than their asthma, as determined by medical history and targeted physical examination based on medical history.
- English or Spanish literate.
- Intention of being available for entire study period and complete all relevant study procedures, including follow-up phone calls and collection of information.
Who cannot join
- Acute illness and/or a reported oral temperature of ≥ 100.4°F within 72 hours prior to enrollment (this may result in a temporary delay of vaccination.
- Use of antipyretic medication during the preceding 24 hours that might mask a fever (temporary deferral).
- History of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of study influenza vaccines or a known allergy to eggs.
- Receipt of any licensed vaccine within 14 days (for inactivated vaccines) or 28 days (for live vaccines) prior to vaccination or planned receipt of any licensed vaccine within 42 days after vaccination.
- Receipt of current year's licensed influenza vaccine.
- Received an investigational agent (licensed or unlicensed vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication) in the 28 days prior to enrollment or planned receipt before 42 days after vaccination.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Has immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or treatment, or use of anticancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 36 months.
- Has taken ≥ 20mg/day of prednisone or its equivalent, for 14 days or more within the past 28 days.
- Has know active neoplasm or a history of any hematologic malignancy.
- Has had a previous exacerbation of their asthma symptoms requiring systemic steroids within the prior 28 days, or has had a life-threatening exacerbation of asthma in the past two years (e.g. hypoxic seizure, mechanical ventilation).
- History of Guillian-Barre syndrome within 6 weeks of previous influenza vaccination.
- Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the evaluation of the responses or would place the participant at unacceptable risk of injury.
- Has any diagnosis, current or past, of schizophrenia, bipolar disease, or other major psychiatric disorder.
- Currently taking aspirin or aspirin-containing products.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
Duke Clinical Vaccine Unit
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
About this study
Official title: Feasibility Study to Assess the Safety of Quadrivalent, Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV4) Versus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) in Children Aged 5-11 Years With Persistent Asthma of Varied Severity (Cell Culture Quadrivalent IIV Used as Surrogate for LAIV4)
This study is designed to note whether a larger safety study using quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) versus quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4)(FLUARIX®), would be feasible in children with persistent asthma. Half of the patients in this study will receive the FLUARIX® influenza vaccine, while the other half will receive a cell cultured quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (ccIIV4)(Flucelvax®) being used as a surrogate for LAIV4.
Read the detailed description
The association of an increased risk in wheezing following receipt of a live-attenuated influenza vaccine in children at least 2 years of age with a prior history of asthma or wheeze remains unclear.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) planned to address a data safety gap regarding use of LAIV4 vaccine in children with asthma by conducting a 3-site randomized, non-inferiority prospective study. The main goal was to compare the safety of LAIV4 versus IIV4 in children 5-11 years with persistent asthma during the 2016-2017 influenza season. CDC and the CISA study sites developed a protocol and associated materials, and were poised to begin enrollment early during the 2016-2017 influenza season. However, after the June 22, 2016 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) vote recommending against use of LAIV4 during the 2016-2017 influenza season, CDC and study investigators decided to defer implementing a study using LAIV4 during the 2016-2017 influenza season. Investigators will reconsider initiating this study during the 2017-2018 influenza season if ACIP votes to reinstate LAIV4 use or new data become available; ACIP makes recommendations annually.
The planned LAIV4 study had unique features in its design that previously had not been implemented in vaccine safety studies, including: 1) enrolling a substantial proportion of children with moderate-severe asthma 2) using digital peak flow meters and 3) collecting clinical data through multiple, complementary, measures for 42 days after vaccination. To capitalize on progress made during development of the study protocol and associated documents and procedures, CISA is proposing to carry out a study at the three sites to assess the feasibility of recruiting, enrolling, retaining, and collecting clinical data on children 5-11 years with persistent asthma of varied levels of severity in an influenza vaccine safety study. Findings from this proposed feasibility study will facilitate improving the LAIV4 study in the future if it goes forward through the CISA Project or in another venue. In 2016-2017 season, FDA approved a new influenza vaccine for use in persons aged 4 years and older, Flucelvax® Quadrivalent (ccIIV4); ACIP incorporated this vaccine into its recommendations for the 2016-2017 influenza season. Therefore ccIIV4 will be used in place of LAIV4 for this feasibility study. There is no evidence that Flucelvax® increases the risk of wheezing in asthmatic children. The feasibility study also offers an opportunity to gain some additional descriptive safety data for this new vaccine in asthmatic children.
- Conditions
- Asthmatic
- Being tested
- ccIIV4, IIV4
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ccIIV4Drug
Also called Flucelvax
IIV4Drug
Also called Fluarix
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IIV4 | Active comparator | 0.5 mL intramuscular injection Receives: Drug: IIV4 |
| cc IIV4 | Active comparator | 0.5 mL intramuscular injection Receives: Drug: ccIIV4 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Complete the Memory Aid 1.
Memory aid 1 is a diary completed by the subjects Parent. Daily symptoms, peak flow and requires the parent to record daily symptoms, peak flow, days, post-vaccination asthma clinical symptoms and symptom scores, adverse event, fever and concomitant medication administration data for 14 days (until day 15) after vaccination.
Measured: 15 days
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parent Completing Collection of Adverse Event Data
Parent will collect the following data: need for new prescription or nonprescription medications for the control of asthma, an unscheduled healthcare provider visit or consultation within 42 days after vaccination, any other clinically significant event occurring at any point during the study period. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) will also be monitored through 42 days after vaccination and will include events that result in death, were life threatening, result in subject hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity. Additionally, important medical events that may not have resulted in death, were not life threatening, or did not require hospitalization might be considered SAEs when, according to appropriate medical judgment, they jeopardize the patient or subject and require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Measured: Day 16 to 43
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Perform and Document All Home Digital Peak Flow Measurements
Number of parents that perform and document all home digital peak flow measurements at least 11 days out of the 15-day monitoring period.
Measured: 15 days
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Perform and Document the Digital Peak Flow for Day 42
Parent will perform and document the digital peak flow for Day 42
Measured: Day 42
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Document Nighttime Awakenings
Number of parents that document nighttime awakenings for at least 11 of the 15-day monitoring period.
Measured: 15 days
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 4 Call and Provide Requested Data
Number of parents that respond to Day 4 ( -1 day or + 2 days) call and provide requested data
Measured: Day 3 to 6
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 8 Call and Provide Requested Data.
Number of parents that respond to Day 8 (plus 2 days) call and provide requested data.
Measured: Day 8-10
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 15 Call and Provide Requested Data
Number of parents that respond to Day 15 (minus 1 or plus 2 days) call and provide requested data
Measured: Day 14 to 17
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 29 Call and Provide Requested Data.
Number of Parents that respond to Day 29 ( Plus 2 Days) call and provide requested data.
Measured: Day 29-31
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 44 Call
Number of parents that respond to Day 44 ( Plus 3 Days) call and provide requested data.
Measured: Day 44-47
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents Completing a Satisfaction Survey
Parent of each participant will be asked to complete a at the end of the study
Measured: 42 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Severe Local Reactogenicity Events During the 14 Days Post-vaccination
Number of severe local reactogenicity events for 14 days after vaccination between recipients of ccIIV4 and IIV4.
Measured: 14 days
Severe Systemic Reactogenicity Events During the 14 Days Post-vaccination
Number of solicited severe (not serious) systemic reactogenicity events for 14 days after vaccination between recipients of ccIIV4 and IIV4.
Measured: 14 days
Unsolicited and Severe Adverse Events
The nature and frequency of the unsolicited and Severe adverse events will be described in children receiving ccIIV4 and IIV4 during the 42 days after vaccination.
Measured: 42 days
Number of Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Steroids
For the purpose of this study, asthma exacerbation will be defined as: any acute episode of progressively worsening shortness of breath/dyspnea, cough, wheezing, chest tightness, and/or respiratory distress during the 42 days post-vaccination (until day 43) for which the patient receives a new prescription for systemic corticosteroids..
Measured: 42 days
Number Participants With Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Medical Attention
For the purpose of this study, asthma exacerbation will be defined as: any acute episode of progressively worsening shortness of breath/dyspnea, cough, wheezing, chest tightness, and/or respiratory distress during the 42 days post-vaccination (until day 43) for which the patient seeks unscheduled medical attention (e.g., healthcare provider office or Emergency Department visit or hospitalization)
Measured: 42 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start10 Oct 2016
- Primary completion1 Feb 2017
- Study completion1 Feb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for AsthmaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Duke University, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kathryn Edwards, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Kathryn M Edwards, MD, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02967393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIV4/LAIV4/CDC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Study to Assess the Safety of Quadrivalent, Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV4) Versus Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) in Children Aged 5-11 Years With Persistent Asthma of Varied Severity (Cell Culture Quadrivalent IIV Used as Surrogate for LAIV4)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02967393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IIV4/LAIV4/CDC
- Conditions
- Asthmatic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Duke University, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to note whether a larger safety study using quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) versus quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4)(FLUARIX®), would be feasible in children with persistent asthma. Half of the patients in this study will receive the FLUARIX® influenza vaccine, while the other half will receive a cell cultured quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (ccIIV4)(Flucelvax®) being used as a surrogate for LAIV4.
Detailed description
The association of an increased risk in wheezing following receipt of a live-attenuated influenza vaccine in children at least 2 years of age with a prior history of asthma or wheeze remains unclear.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) planned to address a data safety gap regarding use of LAIV4 vaccine in children with asthma by conducting a 3-site randomized, non-inferiority prospective study. The main goal was to compare the safety of LAIV4 versus IIV4 in children 5-11 years with persistent asthma during the 2016-2017 influenza season. CDC and the CISA study sites developed a protocol and associated materials, and were poised to begin enrollment early during the 2016-2017 influenza season. However, after the June 22, 2016 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) vote recommending against use of LAIV4 during the 2016-2017 influenza season, CDC and study investigators decided to defer implementing a study using LAIV4 during the 2016-2017 influenza season. Investigators will reconsider initiating this study during the 2017-2018 influenza season if ACIP votes to reinstate LAIV4 use or new data become available; ACIP makes recommendations annually.
The planned LAIV4 study had unique features in its design that previously had not been implemented in vaccine safety studies, including: 1) enrolling a substantial proportion of children with moderate-severe asthma 2) using digital peak flow meters and 3) collecting clinical data through multiple, complementary, measures for 42 days after vaccination. To capitalize on progress made during development of the study protocol and associated documents and procedures, CISA is proposing to carry out a study at the three sites to assess the feasibility of recruiting, enrolling, retaining, and collecting clinical data on children 5-11 years with persistent asthma of varied levels of severity in an influenza vaccine safety study. Findings from this proposed feasibility study will facilitate improving the LAIV4 study in the future if it goes forward through the CISA Project or in another venue. In 2016-2017 season, FDA approved a new influenza vaccine for use in persons aged 4 years and older, Flucelvax® Quadrivalent (ccIIV4); ACIP incorporated this vaccine into its recommendations for the 2016-2017 influenza season. Therefore ccIIV4 will be used in place of LAIV4 for this feasibility study. There is no evidence that Flucelvax® increases the risk of wheezing in asthmatic children. The feasibility study also offers an opportunity to gain some additional descriptive safety data for this new vaccine in asthmatic children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IIV4 | Active comparator | Drug: IIV40.5 mL intramuscular injection |
| cc IIV4 | Active comparator | Drug: ccIIV40.5 mL intramuscular injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Children between 5-11 years of age, inclusive, at enrollment.
- Participant must have a current diagnosis of persistent asthma.
- Parent/legal guardian must provide written informed consent and subject must provide assent as appropriate for age prior to initiation of study procedures and according to local Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirement.
- Parent/legal guardian and subject must be willing and able to comply with planned study procedures and be available for all study visits.
- Children aged 5-8 years must have received at least 2 doses of seasonal trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine prior to the current influenza season. Children 9-11 years must have received at least 1 dose of seasonal trivalent or quadrivalent influenza vaccine prior to the current influenza season.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Acute illness and/or a reported oral temperature of ≥ 100.4°F within 72 hours prior to enrollment (this may result in a temporary delay of vaccination.
- Use of antipyretic medication during the preceding 24 hours that might mask a fever (temporary deferral).
- History of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of study influenza vaccines or a known allergy to eggs.
- Receipt of any licensed vaccine within 14 days (for inactivated vaccines) or 28 days (for live vaccines) prior to vaccination or planned receipt of any licensed vaccine within 42 days after vaccination.
- Receipt of current year's licensed influenza vaccine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ccIIV4Also: Flucelvax | Drug | cc IIV4 |
| IIV4Also: Fluarix | Drug | IIV4 |
Primary outcome
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Complete the Memory Aid 1.
Time frame: 15 days
Memory aid 1 is a diary completed by the subjects Parent. Daily symptoms, peak flow and requires the parent to record daily symptoms, peak flow, days, post-vaccination asthma clinical symptoms and symptom scores, adverse event, fever and concomitant medication administration data for 14 days (until day 15) after vaccination.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parent Completing Collection of Adverse Event Data
Time frame: Day 16 to 43
Parent will collect the following data: need for new prescription or nonprescription medications for the control of asthma, an unscheduled healthcare provider visit or consultation within 42 days after vaccination, any other clinically significant event occurring at any point during the study period. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) will also be monitored through 42 days after vaccination and will include events that result in death, were life threatening, result in subject hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, result in persistent or significant disability or incapacity. Additionally, important medical events that may not have resulted in death, were not life threatening, or did not require hospitalization might be considered SAEs when, according to appropriate medical judgment, they jeopardize the patient or subject and require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Perform and Document All Home Digital Peak Flow Measurements
Time frame: 15 days
Number of parents that perform and document all home digital peak flow measurements at least 11 days out of the 15-day monitoring period.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Perform and Document the Digital Peak Flow for Day 42
Time frame: Day 42
Parent will perform and document the digital peak flow for Day 42
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Document Nighttime Awakenings
Time frame: 15 days
Number of parents that document nighttime awakenings for at least 11 of the 15-day monitoring period.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 4 Call and Provide Requested Data
Time frame: Day 3 to 6
Number of parents that respond to Day 4 ( -1 day or + 2 days) call and provide requested data
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 8 Call and Provide Requested Data.
Time frame: Day 8-10
Number of parents that respond to Day 8 (plus 2 days) call and provide requested data.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 15 Call and Provide Requested Data
Time frame: Day 14 to 17
Number of parents that respond to Day 15 (minus 1 or plus 2 days) call and provide requested data
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 29 Call and Provide Requested Data.
Time frame: Day 29-31
Number of Parents that respond to Day 29 ( Plus 2 Days) call and provide requested data.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Respond to Day 44 Call
Time frame: Day 44-47
Number of parents that respond to Day 44 ( Plus 3 Days) call and provide requested data.
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents Completing a Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: 42 days
Parent of each participant will be asked to complete a at the end of the study
5 secondary outcomes
Severe Local Reactogenicity Events During the 14 Days Post-vaccination
Time frame: 14 days
Severe Systemic Reactogenicity Events During the 14 Days Post-vaccination
Time frame: 14 days
Unsolicited and Severe Adverse Events
Time frame: 42 days
Number of Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Steroids
Time frame: 42 days
Number Participants With Asthma Exacerbations Requiring Medical Attention
Time frame: 42 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthmatic
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kathryn M Edwards, MD principal investigator
Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing ccIIV4 and IIV4 in people with Asthmatic, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility Benchmark: Number of Parents That Complete the Memory Aid 1. (time frame: 15 days). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2018.