AzTrials
AzTrials

Tetralogy of FallotTOF-LIFENCT02968264

Tetralogy of Fallot for Life

An observational study of Tetralogy of Fallot and Congenital Heart Disease, run by Population Health Research Institute at 20 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim is to conduct a prospective multi-centre international inception cohort study with an enrollment goal of 3,000 TOF patients and 2 year follow-up post-repair. The proposed sample size and methodology will result in statistically powerful results to allow for evidence-based change to current TOF surgical… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
1,108 participants
Where
20 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
8 Jun 2015to 1 Jul 2022
How long will I take part?
2 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: TOF patients of any age undergoing their first cardiac intervention. Please refer to the eligibility criteria for more details.

Who may be able to join

  • TOF with RVOT stenosis. TOF is defined as anterio-cephalad deviation of the ventricular outlet septum with no more than 50% aortic override and a single outflow VSD.
  • TOF with pulmonary atresia and confluent pulmonary arteries.
  • Admitted with intent to treat (i.e. patient planned to undergo a primary or staged repair).
  • Patients with coronary artery anomalies, right aortic arch, and 22q11 deletion may be included

Who cannot join

  • TOF with absent pulmonary valve
  • Other major cardiac anomalies such as AVSD, multiple VSDs, right atrial isomerism, and MAPCAs. In this instance, the definition of MAPCAs does not include dilated bronchial collateral arteries.
  • Unbalanced ventricles precluding biventricular repair
  • Major genetic abnormalities/syndromes e.g. trisomy 13,18, and 21
  • Major extra cardiac anomalies e.g. diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, absent sternum, cerebral palsy
  • Infective endocarditis as an indication for intra-cardiac repair
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Stroke in the last 30 days prior to palliation or intra-cardiac repair
  • Known diagnosis of HIV or hepatitis B
  • Any previous cardiac procedures
  • Patient's circumstance that precludes completion of follow-up telephone call and/or obtaining information from the 2-year cardiology follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 12 countries.

20 sites in 12 countries

China6 sites
  • Beijing Fuwai Hospital

    Beijing, 100037

  • West China Hospital

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center

    Guangdong, 510623

  • Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute

    Guangdong

  • Shanghai Children's Medical Centre

    Shanghai

  • Shanghai Xinhua Hospital

    Shanghai

Other trials in China

United States2 sites
  • Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Nemours Children's Hospital

    Orlando, Florida, 32827

Other trials in United States

India2 sites
  • Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital & Medical Research Institutev

    Mumbai, 400 053

  • Fortis Escorts Heart Institute

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110025

Other trials in India

Saudi Arabia2 sites
  • King Abdulaziz University Hospital

    Jeddah, Mecca Region, 21589

  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre - Jeddah

    Jeddah, 21499

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

Australia1 site
  • Royal Children's Hospital

    Parkville, Victoria, 3052

Other trials in Australia

Canada1 site
  • Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

Other trials in Canada

Indonesia1 site
  • National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita

    Jakarta

Other trials in Indonesia

Japan1 site
  • Okayama University Hospital

    Okayama

Other trials in Japan

Nepal1 site
  • Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center

    Kathmandu, 977

Other trials in Nepal

Russia1 site
  • Academician E.N. Meshalkin Research

    Novosibirsk

Other trials in Russia

South Korea1 site
  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

Other trials in South Korea

Ukraine1 site
  • Children's Cardiac Center - Ukraine

    Kyiv

Other trials in Ukraine

About this study

The aim is to conduct a prospective multi-centre international inception cohort study with an enrollment goal of 3,000 TOF patients and 2 year follow-up post-repair. The proposed sample size and methodology will result in statistically powerful results to allow for evidence-based change to current TOF surgical practices.

Read the detailed description

Background: Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most common cyanotic heart defect consisting of 7-10% of all congenital heart disease with an estimated annual global incidence rate of 38,000. It is fatal if untreated; only 50% of patients are alive at 1 year of age. Surgery has dramatically improved the survival so that >95% of repaired TOF children are alive by one year. The initial justified enthusiasm for the benefit of surgical therapy are now tempered by the findings of late sudden cardiac death secondary to right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The original trans-ventricular/trans-annular patching repair results in significant pulmonary insufficiency which leads to RV dilation, subsequent functional tricuspid regurgitation, atrial arrhythmias, and eventual RV failure and ventricular arrhythmias. In attempt to break this cycle, an increasing number of patients are undergoing late pulmonary valve implantation.

Recognizing that the RV adapts to stress signals has led to the idea that leaving mixed residual stenosis and regurgitation may yield to an adaptive change that limits RV dilation while still allowing for adequate cardiac output. Early attempts to limit pulmonary insufficiency and RV damage involve minimal trans-annular patching or complete annulus preservation (AP). Emerging data suggest that patients with a mixed lesion have improved survival, so that 96.6% are alive at 25-years in comparison to 85-90% survival for the conventional technique.

Preliminary Data: A review of data comparing AP to TAP repair at our institution (n=185, AP repair=124, TAP=61) demonstrated that at 10-15 year follow-up those who received an AP repair had smaller RV volumes and pulmonary regurgitant jet width. They were also seen to have improved exercise capacity as measure by VO2 max tests. The AP technique also has been seen to significantly decrease the risk of reoperation in comparison to TAP, 11% and 29% respectively.

Current Problem: Although trans-ventricular VSD closure along with a TAP is known to result in increased risk of long-term morbidity and mortality, it continues to be the predominant repair strategy implemented globally according to STS/EACTS databases. Reasons for this are:

  • Trans-ventricular/TAP approach is technically easier than annulus preservation, which often requires multiple pump runs
  • There is a fear of leaving too much obstruction
  • High quality evidence supporting one approach over the other is lacking.

Gaps in Literature

  1. Most data on the impact of surgical strategy emerge from single centre experiences that are retrospective and based on small patient population. This makes the results difficult to standardize to the general TOF population.
  2. Retrospective registry data published by STS and EACTS omit many crucial surgical and clinical variables that can potentially impact outcomes.
  3. None of the current evidence are based on anatomically matched/adjusted patients
Medical subject headings
Tetralogy of Fallot, Heart Defects, Congenital

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02968264
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TOF participantsTetralogy of fallot patients at any age

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. RV physiology and morphology

    To determine the association between baseline morphology, surgical repair technique (various surgical strategies for VSD closure and managing the RVOT), and RV physiology and morphology at 2 years obtained from echocardiogram studies.

    Measured: 2 years post-repair

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of patients undergoing various palliation procedures and surgical repair strategies

    To determine the pattern of palliation procedures (BT shunt, RVOT stent, or balloon dilation), surgical repair strategy (staged versus primary repair), and surgical repair technique (AP, minimal TAP, standard TAP) at participating centres.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Cardiovascular mortality rate

    To determine the 30-day and 2 year cardiovascular mortality rate (for equivalent patients) after primary and staged repair.

    Measured: 30 days and 2 years after repair

  3. Rate of palliation failure

    To determine the rate of palliation failure following various palliation techniques

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Effect of palliation procedures on cardiac morphology

    To determine the possible effect of palliative procedures (BT shunts, balloon dilation, stent insertion) on cardiac morphology (growth of the infundibular chamber, the pulmonary annulus and PA branches' diameter) and subsequent repair technique.

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Post-operative restrictive physiology

    To determine the relationship between repair technique/strategy and prevalence of postoperative restrictive physiology as defined by the presence of antegrade flow in pulmonary artery during atrial contraction on echocardiogram.

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Cardiac re-interventions

    To determine the relationship between TOF repair strategy/technique on the incidence and prevalence of cardiac re-interventions (e.g. pulmonary valve implantation, RVOT stent insertion or balloon dilatation)

    Measured: 2 years

  7. RV physiology and morphology following TOF pulmonary atresia repair

    To determine the right ventricular morphological and physiological adaptations to severe pulmonary stenosis or regurgitation using repaired TOF pulmonary atresia as a model. For example RV/LV end diastolic and systolic diameter ratio. RV and LV wall thickness relation to outflow gradient obtained by echocardiogram studies.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2022
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,108 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02968264
Sponsor's protocol ID
TOF-LIFE 2.0 2015-06-11
Acronym
TOF-LIFE
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
4 Jan 2016
Last updated
21 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sarris GE, Comas JV, Tobota Z, Maruszewski B. Results of reparative surgery for tetralogy of Fallot: data from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Congenital Database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;42(5):766-74; discussion 774. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs478.

    PubMed 23087090
  • Al Habib HF, Jacobs JP, Mavroudis C, Tchervenkov CI, O'Brien SM, Mohammadi S, Jacobs ML. Contemporary patterns of management of tetralogy of Fallot: data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):813-9; discussion 819-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.110.

    PubMed 20732501
  • Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, Siu SC, Hokanson JS, Poile C, Rosenthal M, Nakazawa M, Moller JH, Gillette PC, Webb GD, Redington AN. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet. 2000 Sep 16;356(9234):975-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02714-8.

    PubMed 11041398
  • d'Udekem Y, Galati JC, Rolley GJ, Konstantinov IE, Weintraub RG, Grigg L, Ramsay JM, Wheaton GR, Hope S, Cheung MH, Brizard CP. Low risk of pulmonary valve implantation after a policy of transatrial repair of tetralogy of Fallot delayed beyond the neonatal period: the Melbourne experience over 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 18;63(6):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

    PubMed 24513776
  • Pondorfer P YT, Cheung M, Ashburn D, Manlhiot C, McCrindle B, Mertens L, Grosse-Wortmann L, Redington A, Van Arsdell G. Abstract 18833: Annulus Preservation Strategy Improves Late Outcomes in Tetralogy of Fallot: An Anatomical Equivalency Study. Circulation. 2014;130:A18833.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Tetralogy of Fallot and Congenital Heart Disease, run by Population Health Research Institute at 20 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in China, United States, India, Saudi Arabia, Australia and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

RV physiology and morphology (time frame: 2 years post-repair). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02968264, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in