Altitude SicknessNCT02972411
Controlled Hyperventilation as Prophylaxis for Acute Mountain Sickness
A study testing Voluntary ventilatory response and Acetazolamide in people with Altitude Sickness, run by Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago at 1 site in Chile.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the voluntary ventilatory response as prophylaxis for acute mountain sickness, measured by the Lake Louise Self-Report Score, comparing to a group using acetazolamide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Altitude Sickness
- What is being tested?
- Voluntary ventilatory response and Acetazolamide
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChile
- Study dates
- Oct 2016to May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Living at lower altitude than 900 meters
Who cannot join
- Cardiac or pulmonary comorbidity
- Smoking
- Infectious disease during the last 30 days
- BMI> 30
- Pharmaceutical use as diuretics, corticosteroids, acetazolamide, or anti -inflammatory drugs during the 2 weeks prior to the study
- A history of high altitude cerebral edema or high altitude pulmonary edema
- Cardiovascular risk factors such as a personal history of cardiovascular disease, familial history of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at age younger than 45 yrs, hypercholesterolemia and stroke.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Chile1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
110 Sports and health center
Santiago, 8320000
Mario Sandoval, MD, +56993593944, mariosandoval@110.cl
About this study
Official title: Controlled Hyperventilation as Prophylaxis for Acute Mountain Sickness: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the voluntary ventilatory response as prophylaxis for acute mountain sickness, measured by the Lake Louise Self-Report Score, comparing to a group using acetazolamide.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a common condition among people who go to altitude and stay at altitude. Acclimatization is the most important mechanism in order to reduce the risk of AMS, however, this is not possible or adequate in a large part of the cases. Recently, there are indications that adjustment of respiration by means of a voluntary increase in the respiratory minute volume can have a similar prophylactic effect. The purpose of this study is to measure the effect of the voluntary increase of the minute volume by means of controlled hyperventilation as prophylaxis for acute mountain sickness without prior acclimatization, with AMS being expressed in the Lake Louise Self-Report Score (LLSRS).
Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the voluntary increase in minute ventilation by means of controlled hyperventilation as prophylaxis for AMS, measured by the LLSRS in a randomized controlled trial ascending to 4954m altitude.
Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial, safety and efficacy.
Study population: 30 healthy subjects
Intervention: The investigational prophylaxis is controlled hyperventilation. Participants in the interventional group will be trained to hyperventilate in a controlled fashion doing a series of exercises during the 4 days prior to the ascent. They will also be taught in a practical way to recognize early clinical signs and symptoms of hypocapnia.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Safety and efficacy measured by comparing the LLSRS between the two groups. Target end-tidal CO2 ( PETCO2) will be measured to objectify adequate hyperventilation. Symptoms of hypocapnia due to the (pre-)intervention as well as any adverse events will be reported and analysed.
- Conditions
- Altitude Sickness
- Being tested
- Voluntary ventilatory response, Acetazolamide
- Medical subject headings
- Altitude Sickness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Voluntary ventilatory responseBehavioural
Training of the subjects for voluntary increase in the respiratory minute ventilation
AcetazolamideDrug
Acetazolamide 125mg. PO every 12 hours since 24 hours before ascent, until 48 hours at high altitude
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Voluntary increase in respiration Receives: Behavioral: Voluntary ventilatory response |
| Acetazolamide | Active comparator | Administration of Acetazolamide 125mg. since 24 hours before ascent and until 48 hours post altitude exposure, and absence of altitude sickness symptoms Receives: Drug: Acetazolamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lake Louise Score
Intensity and prevalence of Acute Mountain Sickness. During Ascent.
Measured: Up to 5 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
PETCO2
Pressure of expired CO2, measured with a monitor in the moutain. During ascent.
Measured: Up to 5 months
Pulse oxygen saturation
During ascent.
Measured: Up to 5 months
Respiratory rate
During ascent
Measured: Up to 5 months
Heart rate
During ascent
Measured: Up to 5 months
Borg Scale
During ascent
Measured: Up to 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2016
- Primary completionMay 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Altitude SicknessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sebastián Drago Pérez, Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago
- Investigators
- Sebastián Drago, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital del Trabajador Santiago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02972411
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HospitalTS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bartsch P, Swenson ER. Clinical practice: Acute high-altitude illnesses. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 13;368(24):2294-302. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1214870.
PubMed 23758234Buijze GA, Hopman MT. Controlled hyperventilation after training may accelerate altitude acclimatization. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Dec;25(4):484-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Oct 14. No abstract available.
PubMed 25443751Luks AM, McIntosh SE, Grissom CK, Auerbach PS, Rodway GW, Schoene RB, Zafren K, Hackett PH; Wilderness Medical Society. Wilderness Medical Society consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute altitude illness. Wilderness Environ Med. 2010 Jun;21(2):146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
PubMed 20591379Richalet JP, Larmignat P, Poitrine E, Letournel M, Canoui-Poitrine F. Physiological risk factors for severe high-altitude illness: a prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan 15;185(2):192-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201108-1396OC. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
PubMed 22071330Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
PubMed 20335313Vargas M, Osorio J, Jimenez D, Moraga F, Sepulveda M, Del Solar J, Hudson C, Cortes G, Leon A. [Acute mountain sickness at 3500 and 4250 m. A study of symptom, incidence and severity]. Rev Med Chil. 2001 Feb;129(2):166-72. Spanish.
PubMed 11351468Acetazolamide in control of acute mountain sickness. Lancet. 1981 Jan 24;1(8213):180-3.
PubMed 6109857Bernardi L, Passino C, Spadacini G, Bonfichi M, Arcaini L, Malcovati L, Bandinelli G, Schneider A, Keyl C, Feil P, Greene RE, Bernasconi C. Reduced hypoxic ventilatory response with preserved blood oxygenation in yoga trainees and Himalayan Buddhist monks at altitude: evidence of a different adaptive strategy? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Mar;99(5):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0373-8. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
PubMed 17206440Bernardi L, Schneider A, Pomidori L, Paolucci E, Cogo A. Hypoxic ventilatory response in successful extreme altitude climbers. Eur Respir J. 2006 Jan;27(1):165-71. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00015805.
PubMed 16387950Moore LG, Harrison GL, McCullough RE, McCullough RG, Micco AJ, Tucker A, Weil JV, Reeves JT. Low acute hypoxic ventilatory response and hypoxic depression in acute altitude sickness. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Apr;60(4):1407-12. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.4.1407.
PubMed 3084449
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Controlled Hyperventilation as Prophylaxis for Acute Mountain Sickness: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02972411
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HospitalTS
- Conditions
- Altitude Sickness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital del Trabajador de SantiagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2016
- Primary completion
- May 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the voluntary ventilatory response as prophylaxis for acute mountain sickness, measured by the Lake Louise Self-Report Score, comparing to a group using acetazolamide.
Detailed description
Rationale: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a common condition among people who go to altitude and stay at altitude. Acclimatization is the most important mechanism in order to reduce the risk of AMS, however, this is not possible or adequate in a large part of the cases. Recently, there are indications that adjustment of respiration by means of a voluntary increase in the respiratory minute volume can have a similar prophylactic effect. The purpose of this study is to measure the effect of the voluntary increase of the minute volume by means of controlled hyperventilation as prophylaxis for acute mountain sickness without prior acclimatization, with AMS being expressed in the Lake Louise Self-Report Score (LLSRS).
Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the voluntary increase in minute ventilation by means of controlled hyperventilation as prophylaxis for AMS, measured by the LLSRS in a randomized controlled trial ascending to 4954m altitude.
Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial, safety and efficacy.
Study population: 30 healthy subjects
Intervention: The investigational prophylaxis is controlled hyperventilation. Participants in the interventional group will be trained to hyperventilate in a controlled fashion doing a series of exercises during the 4 days prior to the ascent. They will also be taught in a practical way to recognize early clinical signs and symptoms of hypocapnia.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Safety and efficacy measured by comparing the LLSRS between the two groups. Target end-tidal CO2 ( PETCO2) will be measured to objectify adequate hyperventilation. Symptoms of hypocapnia due to the (pre-)intervention as well as any adverse events will be reported and analysed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Voluntary ventilatory responseVoluntary increase in respiration |
| Acetazolamide | Active comparator | Drug: AcetazolamideAdministration of Acetazolamide 125mg. since 24 hours before ascent and until 48 hours post altitude exposure, and absence of altitude sickness symptoms |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Living at lower altitude than 900 meters
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Cardiac or pulmonary comorbidity
- Smoking
- Infectious disease during the last 30 days
- BMI> 30
- Pharmaceutical use as diuretics, corticosteroids, acetazolamide, or anti -inflammatory drugs during the 2 weeks prior to the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Voluntary ventilatory responseTraining of the subjects for voluntary increase in the respiratory minute ventilation | Behavioural | Intervention |
| AcetazolamideAcetazolamide 125mg. PO every 12 hours since 24 hours before ascent, until 48 hours at high altitude | Drug | Acetazolamide |
Primary outcome
Lake Louise Score
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Intensity and prevalence of Acute Mountain Sickness. During Ascent.
5 secondary outcomes
PETCO2
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Pulse oxygen saturation
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Respiratory rate
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Heart rate
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Borg Scale
Time frame: Up to 5 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 23758234Bartsch P, Swenson ER. Clinical practice: Acute high-altitude illnesses. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 13;368(24):2294-302. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1214870.
- Background: PubMed 25443751Buijze GA, Hopman MT. Controlled hyperventilation after training may accelerate altitude acclimatization. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Dec;25(4):484-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Oct 14. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20591379Luks AM, McIntosh SE, Grissom CK, Auerbach PS, Rodway GW, Schoene RB, Zafren K, Hackett PH; Wilderness Medical Society. Wilderness Medical Society consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute altitude illness. Wilderness Environ Med. 2010 Jun;21(2):146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
- Background: PubMed 22071330Richalet JP, Larmignat P, Poitrine E, Letournel M, Canoui-Poitrine F. Physiological risk factors for severe high-altitude illness: a prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan 15;185(2):192-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201108-1396OC. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
- Background: PubMed 20335313Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 11351468Vargas M, Osorio J, Jimenez D, Moraga F, Sepulveda M, Del Solar J, Hudson C, Cortes G, Leon A. [Acute mountain sickness at 3500 and 4250 m. A study of symptom, incidence and severity]. Rev Med Chil. 2001 Feb;129(2):166-72. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 6109857Acetazolamide in control of acute mountain sickness. Lancet. 1981 Jan 24;1(8213):180-3.
- Background: PubMed 17206440Bernardi L, Passino C, Spadacini G, Bonfichi M, Arcaini L, Malcovati L, Bandinelli G, Schneider A, Keyl C, Feil P, Greene RE, Bernasconi C. Reduced hypoxic ventilatory response with preserved blood oxygenation in yoga trainees and Himalayan Buddhist monks at altitude: evidence of a different adaptive strategy? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Mar;99(5):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0373-8. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 16387950Bernardi L, Schneider A, Pomidori L, Paolucci E, Cogo A. Hypoxic ventilatory response in successful extreme altitude climbers. Eur Respir J. 2006 Jan;27(1):165-71. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00015805.
- Background: PubMed 3084449Moore LG, Harrison GL, McCullough RE, McCullough RG, Micco AJ, Tucker A, Weil JV, Reeves JT. Low acute hypoxic ventilatory response and hypoxic depression in acute altitude sickness. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Apr;60(4):1407-12. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.4.1407.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Altitude Sickness
Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Six-minute Walking Distance 6MWD Between High Altitude HA vs. Sea Level LA in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension PAH
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Pulmonary Vascular Disease
Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Lung Function (Lufu) at Sea Level LA vs. High Altitude HA in Healthy Individuals
Healthy, Healthy Adult
Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Lung Function (Lufu) at Sea Level LA vs. High Altitude HA in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension PAH
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Pulmonary Vascular Disease
Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Total Pulmonary Resistance sPAP/CO Between Sea Level LA vs. High Altitude HA After Re-ascent in Healthy Individuals
High Altitude, Healthy
Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Total Pulmonary Resistance sPAP/CO Between High Altitude HA vs. Sea Level LA in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension PAH
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Pulmonary Vascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sebastián Drago, MD principal investigator
Hospital del Trabajador Santiago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Voluntary ventilatory response and Acetazolamide in people with Altitude Sickness, run by Hospital del Trabajador de Santiago at 1 site in Chile.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Chile. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sebastián Drago, MD (+56992191310, sebadrago@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lake Louise Score (time frame: Up to 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02972411, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2016.