AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid LeukemiaNCT02975869

A Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Model for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A study testing Standard Leukemia Care and Palliative Care in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research study is evaluating the impact a collaborative palliative care and oncology team will have on the quality of life, symptoms, mood, and end of life outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
What is being tested?
Standard Leukemia Care and Palliative Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 1 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized patients with high-risk AML, defined as:
  • Newly diagnosed patients with AML ≥ 60 years of age
  • Newly diagnosed AML with antecedent hematologic disorder
  • Newly diagnosed therapy-related AML
  • Relapsed AML
  • Primary refractory AML

Who cannot join

  • Patients already receiving palliative care
  • Major psychiatric illness or comorbid conditions prohibiting compliance with study procedures.
  • A diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML)

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • Massachusetts general Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 16802

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of a Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Model for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This research study is evaluating the impact a collaborative palliative care and oncology team will have on the quality of life, symptoms, mood, and end of life outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Palliative care is a medical specialty focused on lessening (or "palliating") symptoms and assisting in coping with serious illness.

Read the detailed description

The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of care - standard leukemia oncology care and standard leukemia oncology care with collaborative involvement of palliative care clinicians to see which is better for improving the experience of patients and families with AML undergoing treatment.

The investigators aim to find out whether introducing patients and families undergoing AML treatment to the palliative care team that specializes in symptom management can improve the physical and psychological symptoms that patients and families experience during their hospitalizations for their leukemia care as well as enhance the quality of patients' end of life care.

Being tested
Standard Leukemia Care, Palliative Care
Keywords
Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Leukemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard Leukemia CareOther

  • Palliative CareOther

Study groups in NCT02975869
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Leukemia CareActive comparatorStandard Leukemia care
Receives: Other: Standard Leukemia Care
Collaborative Palliative and Oncology CareExperimentalCollaborative care from Palliative Care and Leukemia will be given
Receives: Other: Palliative Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of Patients' quality of life as measured by (FACT-Leukemia) Score at Week-2 Between Study Arms

    We will compare patients' FACT-Leukemia scores at week-2 adjusting for baseline scores. FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Compare patient quality of life longitudinally using FACT-Leukemia Scores longitudinally Between Study Arms.

    We will compare FACT-leukemia scores longitudinally between study arm. FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: up to 6 months

  2. Compare psychological distress (as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) between Study Arms

    We will compare patients' psychological distress using the HADS between study arms at week-2 and longitudinally between study arms. The HADS consistent of two subscales assessing anxiety and depression symptoms with scores ranging from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse psychological distress.

    Measured: up to 6 months

  3. Compare Symptom Burden (as per ESAS) Between Study Arms.

    We will compare patients' symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) between the two arms at week-2 and longitudinally. The ESAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.

    Measured: up to 6 months

  4. Compare Patient-Reported PTSD (as per PTSD-Checklist) between study arms

    We will compare PTSD symptoms as measured by the PTSD-Checklist (PCL) between the two groups at week-2 and longitudinally. PCL scores range from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms

    Measured: up to 6 months

  5. Compare Patient-Report Of Discussion EOL Care Preferences Between Study Arms

    We will compare patient-reported discussing their EOL care preferences between the two groups

    Measured: up to 6 months

  6. Compare Rates Of Chemotherapy Administration Within 30 Days Of Death Between The Two Study Arms

    to compare rates of chemotherapy administration near the end of life between the two arms

    Measured: up to 6 months

  7. Compare Rates Of Hospitalizations Within 7 Days Of Death Between The Study Arms

    to compare rates of hospitalizations within the last week of life between the study arms

    Measured: up to 6 months

  8. Compare Rates Of Hospice Utilization And Length-Of-Stay In Hospice At The EOL Between The Study Arms.

    to compare rates of hospice utilization and length-of-stay in hospice at the end of life between the two study arms

    Measured: up to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02975869
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-439
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
24 Nov 2016
Last updated
3 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jensen-Battaglia M, Sohn MB, Consagra W, Wang Y, Zhang Z, LoCastro M, Davis J, Buettner K, Mortaz S, El-Jawahri AR, Loh KP. Trajectories of physical well-being among adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 11;8(11):2612-2621. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011804.

    PubMed 38429079
  • El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc TW, Kavanaugh A, Webb JA, Jackson VA, Campbell TC, O'Connor N, Luger SM, Gafford E, Gustin J, Bhatnagar B, Walker AR, Fathi AT, Brunner AM, Hobbs GS, Nicholson S, Davis D, Addis H, Vaughn D, Horick N, Greer JA, Temel JS. Effectiveness of Integrated Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;7(2):238-245. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6343.

    PubMed 33331857

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard Leukemia Care and Palliative Care in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of Patients' quality of life as measured by (FACT-Leukemia) Score at Week-2 Between Study Arms (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02975869, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in