AzTrials
AzTrials

Short Bowel SyndromePhase 3NCT02980666

Study in Japanese Pediatric Subjects With Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) Who Are Dependent on Parenteral Support

A Phase 3 study testing Teduglutide in people with Short Bowel Syndrome, run by Shire at 5 sites in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if an investigational treatment (teduglutide) is safe and effective in Japanese children (age 4 months through 15 years of age) with SBS who are dependent on parenteral support. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 months to 15 years
Conditions the study is for
Short Bowel Syndrome
What is being tested?
Teduglutide
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
5 sitesJapan
Study dates
13 Jan 2017to 21 Jan 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 months to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent by a parent or guardian prior to any study-related procedures
  • When applicable, informed assent (as deemed appropriate by the Institutional Review Board) by the participant prior to any study-related procedures
  • Male or female infant 4 to <12 months corrected gestational age or child or adolescent aged 1 year through 15 years
  • Current history of SBS as a result of major intestinal resection (eg, due to necrotizing enterocolitis, midgut volvulus, intestinal atresia, or gastroschisis)
  • Short bowel syndrome that requires PN/IV support that provides at least 30% of caloric and/or fluid/electrolyte needs
  • Stable PN/IV support, defined as:
Show all 11Show fewer
  • For infants 4 to <12 months corrected gestational age: Inability to significantly reduce PN/IV support, usually associated with minimal or no advance in enteral feeds (ie, 10% or less change in PN or advance in feeds) for at least 1 month prior to and during screening, as assessed by the investigator.
  • For children 1 to 15 years of age:
  • Inability to significantly reduce PN/IV support, usually associated with minimal or no advance in enteral feeds (ie, 10% or less change in PN or advance in feeds) for at least 3 months prior to and during screening, as assessed by the investigator.
  • Transient instability for events such as interruption of central access or treatment of sepsis is allowed if the PN/IV support returns to within 10% of baseline prior to the event.
  • Sexually active female participants of childbearing potential must use medically acceptable methods of birth control during and for 4 weeks following the last dose of investigational product.

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are not expected to be able to advance oral or tube feeding regimens
  • Serial transverse enteroplasty or any other bowel lengthening procedure performed within 3 months of screening
  • Known clinically significant untreated intestinal obstruction contributing to feeding intolerance and inability to reduce parenteral support
  • Unstable absorption due to cystic fibrosis or other known DNA abnormalities (eg, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, Fanconi-Bickel syndrome)
  • Severe, known dysmotility syndrome such as pseudo-obstruction or persistent, severe, active gastroschisis-related dysmotility; that is the primary contributing factor to feeding intolerance and inability to reduce parenteral support, prior to screening. Dysmotility is defined as severe if it is expected to limit the advancement of enteral feeding.
  • Evidence of clinically significant obstruction on the most recent upper GI series done within 6 months prior to screening.
Show all 34Show fewer
  • Major GI surgical intervention including significant intestinal resection within 3 months prior to screening (insertion of feeding tube, anastomotic ulcer repair, minor intestinal resections <=10 centimeter (cm), or endoscopic procedure is allowed)
  • Unstable cardiac disease or congenital heart disease or cyanotic disease, with the exception of participants who had undergone ventricular or atrial septal defect repair, and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) ligation
  • History of cancer or clinically significant lymphoproliferative disease, not including resected cutaneous basal or squamous cell carcinoma, or in situ nonaggressive and surgically resected cancer. Participants with known cancer predisposition syndrome, such as juvenile polyposis or Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, or first degree relative with early onset of GI cancer (including hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer) will also be excluded.
  • Pregnant or lactating female participants
  • Participation in a clinical study using an experimental drug (other than glutamine or Omegaven) within 3 months or 5.5 half-lives of the experimental drug, whichever is longer, prior to screening and for the duration of the study
  • Previous use of teduglutide or native/synthetic GLP-2
  • Previous use of glucagon-like peptide-1 analog or human growth hormone within 3 months prior to screening
  • Previous use of octreotide or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors within 3 months prior to screening
  • Participants with active Crohn's disease who had been treated with biological therapy (eg, antitumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF]) within the 6 months prior to the screening visit
  • Participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who require chronic systemic immunosuppressant therapy that had been introduced or changed during the 3 months prior to screening
  • More than 3 serious complications of SBS (eg, documented infection-related catheter sepsis, clots, bowel obstruction, severe water-electrolyte disturbances) within 3 months prior to the screening visit
  • A serious complication that affects parenteral support requirements within 1 month prior to or during screening, excluding uncomplicated treatment of bacteremia, central line replacement/repair, or issues of similar magnitude in an otherwise stable participant
  • Body weight < 5 kilogram (kg) at screening and baseline visits
  • Signs of active, severe, or unstable clinically significant hepatic impairment during the screening period:
  • For infants 4 to <12 months corrected gestational age at least 2 of any of the following parameters:
  • International normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 not corrected with parenteral vitamin K
  • Platelet count <100×10^3/ (microliters)mcL due to portal hypertension
  • Presence of clinically significant gastric or esophageal varices
  • Documented cirrhosis
  • Persistent cholestasis defined as conjugated bilirubin >4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (>68 micromoles per liter [mcmol/L]) over a 2 week period
  • For children 1 to 15 years of age:
  • Total bilirubin >= 2x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >= 7x ULN
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >= 7x ULN
  • Signs of known continuous active or unstable, clinically significant renal dysfunction shown by results of an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 50 milliliter per minute (mL/min)/1.73 meter (m)^2
  • Parent(s)/guardian(s) and/or participants who are not capable of understanding or not willing to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Unstable, clinically significant, active, untreated pancreatic or biliary disease
  • Any condition, disease, illness, or circumstance that in the investigator's opinion puts the participant at any undue risk, prevents completion of the study, or interferes with analysis of the study results.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

Japan5 sites
  • Kyushu University Hospital

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582

  • Kagoshima University

    Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890-8520

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574

  • Showa University

    Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo-To, 142-8555

  • Tsukuba University Hospital

    Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A 24-week Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacodynamic, and Pharmacokinetic Study of Teduglutide in Japanese Pediatric Subjects, Aged 4 Months Through 15 Years, With Short Bowel Syndrome Who Are Dependent on Parenteral Support

The purpose of this study is to determine if an investigational treatment (teduglutide) is safe and effective in Japanese children (age 4 months through 15 years of age) with SBS who are dependent on parenteral support. This study will also evaluate how teduglutide moves through the body (pharmacokinetics) and how it affects the body (pharmacodynamics).

Being tested
Teduglutide
Medical subject headings
Short Bowel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TeduglutideDrug

    0.05 mg/kg/day SC injection once daily for 24 weeks.

Study groups in NCT02980666
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TeduglutideExperimentalParticipants will receive teduglutide 0.05 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) subcutaneous (SC) injection once daily for 24 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Teduglutide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from baseline in PS volume at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period. Here, milliliter per kilogram per day is abbreviated as mL/kg/day.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from baseline in PS volume at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  3. Absolute Change From Baseline in Parenteral Support (PS) Caloric Intake at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from baseline in PS caloric intake at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period. Here, kilo-calories per kilogram per day was abbreviated as (kcal/kg/day).

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Parenteral Support (PS) Caloric Intake at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from baseline in PS caloric intake at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  5. Absolute Change From Baseline in Plasma Citrulline at End of Treatment (EOT)

    Absolute change from baseline in plasma citrulline at EOT (up to Week 24) was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Plasma Citrulline at End of Treatment (EOT)

    Percent change from baseline in plasma citrulline at EOT (up to Week 24) was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  7. Absolute Change From Baseline in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from baseline in EN volume at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from baseline in EN volume at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  9. Absolute Change From Baseline in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Caloric Intake at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from baseline in EN caloric intake at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Caloric Intake at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from baseline in EN caloric intake at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  11. Number of Participants Who Achieved At Least 20 Percent (%) Reduction in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at Week 24

    Number of participants who achieved at least 20% reduction in PS volume at Week 24 was reported.

    Measured: Week 24

  12. Number of Participants Who Achieved At Least 20 Percent (%) Reduction in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT)

    Number of participants who achieved at least 20% reduction in PS volume at EOT (up to Week 24) was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24)

  13. Number of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent (%) Reduction in Complete Weaning of Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT)

    Number of participants who achieved at least 100% reduction in complete weaning of PS volume at EOT (up to Week 24) was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24)

  14. Number of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20 Percent (%) Reduction in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at Week 28

    Number of participants who achieved >= 20% reduction in PS volume at Week 28 was reported.

    Measured: Week 28

  15. Absolute Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from EOT (up to Week 24) in PS volume at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  16. Percent Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from EOT (up to Week 24) in PS volume at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  17. Absolute Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Parenteral Support (PS) Caloric Intake at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from EOT (up to Week 24) in PS caloric intake at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  18. Percent Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Parenteral Support (PS) Caloric Intake at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from EOT (up to Week 24) in PS caloric intake at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  19. Absolute Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Plasma Citrulline at End of Study (EOS)

    Absolute change from EOT (up to Week 24) in plasma citrulline at EOS (up to Week 28) was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  20. Percent Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Plasma Citrulline at End of Study (EOS)

    Percent change from EOT (up to Week 24) in plasma citrulline at EOS (up to Week 28) was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  21. Absolute Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Volume at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from EOT (up to Week 24) in EN volume at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  22. Percent Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Volume at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from EOT (up to Week 24) in EN volume at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  23. Absolute Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Caloric Intake at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from EOT (up to Week 24) in EN caloric intake at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  24. Percent Change From End of Treatment (EOT) in Enteral Nutritional (EN) Caloric Intake at End of Study (EOS) Based on Dairy Data

    Percent change from EOT (up to Week 24) in EN caloric intake at EOS (up to Week 28) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: EOT (up to Week 24), EOS (up to Week 28)

  25. Absolute Change From Baseline in Number of Hours Per Day of Parenteral Support (PS) Usage at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from baseline in number of hours per day of PS Usage at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  26. Absolute Change From Baseline in Number of Days Per Week of Parenteral Support (PS) Usage at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data

    Absolute change from baseline in number of days per Week of PS usage at EOT (up to Week 24) based on dairy data was reported. EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  27. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as any AEs whose onset occurred, severity worsened, or intensity increased after receiving the investigational product.

    Measured: From start of study drug administration up to EOS (up to Week 28)

  28. Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Z-score at Week 28

    Body weight was measured using age Z-score. A Z-score was defined as the deviation of the value for an individual from the mean value of the reference population divided by the standard deviation for the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in body weight for age Z-score at Week 28 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  29. Change From Baseline in Height for Age Z-score at Week 28

    Height was measured using age Z-score. A Z-score was defined as the deviation of the value for an individual from the mean value of the reference population divided by the standard deviation for the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in height for age Z-score at Week 28 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  30. Change From Baseline in Head Circumference for Age Z-score at Week 28

    Head circumference was measured using age Z-score. A Z-score was defined as the deviation of the value for an individual from the mean value of the reference population divided by the standard deviation for the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in head circumference for age Z-score at Week 28 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  31. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Vital sign assessments included pulse rate, blood pressure, or body temperature. Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs by the investigator were recorded as TEAEs.

    Measured: From start of study drug administration up to EOS (up to Week 28)

  32. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    12-lead ECG was performed. Any change in ECG assessments which were deemed to be clinically significant changes were recorded as TEAEs.

    Measured: From start of study drug administration up to EOS (up to Week 28)

  33. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Clinical laboratory assessments included biochemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis. The number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were reported as TEAEs.

    Measured: From start of study drug administration up to EOS (up to Week 28)

  34. Change From Baseline in the Average Urine Output at Week 28

    Average urine output was recorded in measured volume at Week 28 was recorded.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  35. Change From Baseline in the Fecal Output at Week 28

    Change from baseline in the fecal output (Average number of stools per day) at Week 28 was recorded.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  36. Number of Participants With Positive Specific Antibodies to Teduglutide

    Number of participants with positive specific antibodies to teduglutide were used to summarize the presence of antibodies.

    Measured: From start of study drug administration up to EOS (up to Week 28)

  37. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Gastrointestinal (GI) Specific Testing

    GI specific testing included colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, abdominal ultrasound, fecal occult blood testing, upper GI series with small bowel follow-through (UGI/SBFT). EOT was defined as the last available measurement after the date of first dose during the 24-week treatment period. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal findings in gastrointestinal specific testing were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)

  38. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve at Steady State (AUCtau,ss) of Teduglutide in Plasma

    Since only 2 sparse pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  39. Maximum Plasma Concentration at Steady-state (Cmax,ss) of Teduglutide in Plasma

    Since only 2 sparse PK samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  40. Minimum Plasma Concentration at Steady-state (Cmin.ss) of Teduglutide in Plasma

    Since only 2 sparse PK samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  41. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Tmax) of Teduglutide in Plasma

    Since only 2 sparse PK samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  42. Terminal-Phase Half-life (t1/2) of Teduglutide in Plasma

    Since only 2 sparse PK samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  43. Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Teduglutide

    Since only 2 sparse PK samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

  44. Apparent Volume of Distribution (V[Lambda z]/F) of Teduglutide

    Since only 2 sparse PK samples were collected during the study, PK parameters were not estimated and analyzed using this study samples. Therefore, no PK parameters were reported in this study.

    Measured: Baseline: Pre-dose, 1, 6 hours post-dose; Week 4: Pre-dose, 2, 4 hours post-dose

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start13 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion21 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion21 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02980666
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHP633-302
Other IDs
2020-005791-35
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
30 Nov 2016
Last updated
2 Feb 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as there is a reasonable likelihood that individual patients could be re-identified (due to the limited number of study participants/study sites, …).

Publications

  • Chiba M, Masumoto K, Kaji T, Matsuura T, Morii M, Fagbemi A, Hill S, Pakarinen MP, Protheroe S, Urs A, Chen ST, Sakui S, Udagawa E, Wada M. Efficacy and Safety of Teduglutide in Infants and Children With Short Bowel Syndrome Dependent on Parenteral Support. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023 Sep 1;77(3):339-346. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003867. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

    PubMed 37364133

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Teduglutide in people with Short Bowel Syndrome, run by Shire at 5 sites in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absolute Change From Baseline in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT) Based on Dairy Data (time frame: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 24)). The study lists 44 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02980666, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in