AzTrials
AzTrials

Premature BirthNCT02983513

Early Intervention in Preterm Infants: Short and Long Term Developmental Outcome After a Parental Training Program

A study testing Early Intervention in people with Premature Birth, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Preterm infants, during their stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), face a period of stressful environment, which may negatively impact early brain development and subsequent neurobehavioral outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 29 weeks
Conditions the study is for
Premature Birth
What is being tested?
Early Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Apr 2014to Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 29 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Gestational age between 25+0 and 29+6 weeks

Who cannot join

  • major brain lesions as documented by cranial ultrasound (intraventricular hemorrhage > 2 grade, cystic periventricular leukomalacia)
  • neurosensorial deficits (retinopathy of prematurity > stage 2)
  • genetic syndromes and/or major congenital malformations
  • major neonatal comorbidities
  • Mothers are selected according to the following inclusion criteria: age over 18 years, good comprehension of Italian language, no obvious cognitive impairments or psychiatric disorders, no drug addiction and no single-parent families.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

    Milan, 20122

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Early Intervention in Preterm Infants: Effects of a Parental Training Program on Neonatal Brain Development, Visual Functions and Neurobehavioral Outcome

Preterm infants, during their stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), face a period of stressful environment, which may negatively impact early brain development and subsequent neurobehavioral outcomes. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of training parents in reducing stressful experiences early in life and in enhancing brain development and long term developmental outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Very preterm birth is associated with motor, cognitive and behavioral problems.

Micro-structural brain abnormalities, even in the absence of focal lesions, have been documented by neuroimaging studies in preterm infants at term corrected age and later in childhood. These alterations in brain maturation occurring during the neonatal period may be implicated in long-term neurobehavioral disorders later experienced by preterm babies.

However, there is increasing evidence that also negative environmental factors (intensive care, excessive sensory stimulation, paucity of parental contact etc.) can affect later outcomes.

Potential benefits of early dyadic interaction and preterm baby massage in reducing the effects of the NICU stressor environment have been demonstrated. More recently, few studies have investigated visual function in preterm infants focusing on the potential role of early visual interaction to enhance attention and improve later neurodevelopment.

The role of early intervention strategies to improve neurodevelopment has been recently emphasized.

Early intervention programs based on the concept of "individualized care" have proved to be effective in promoting brain maturation and neurodevelopmental outcome. In this context, early interventions as the Mother Infant Transaction Program (MITP) and the Premie Start, both targeting parenting, have the greatest potential to have sustained effects on child development.

In addition, recent studies have shown that exposure to stressful events in the neonatal period can cause epigenetic modifications in children born preterm; in particular alteration of serotonergic tone was observed, associated with methylation of the serotonin transporter gene, which could be implicated in the etiology of behavioral disorders observed in these children. In animal models these epigenetic effects appear to be influenced by maternal care that can epigenetically modulate the offsprings' stress response.

Conditions
Premature Birth
Being tested
Early Intervention
Keywords
Early intervention, Brain Development, Neurodevelopment
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Early InterventionBehavioural

Study groups in NCT02983513
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early InterventionExperimentalThe early intervention program is delivered during the NICU stay, according to the MITP and Premie Start Protocol, in order to train parents to: recognize signs of infant stress and alert-available behavior to promote mother-infant interaction; adopt principles of graded stimulation; optimize interactions and avoid overwhelming infants through facilitation strategies (for example, engage and support the visual attention of the newborn). The program is held in eight main sessions and one additional post-discharge session. In addition parents are trained and invited to daily promote preterm baby massage therapy and visual attention according to a detailed protocol.
Receives: Behavioral: Early Intervention
Standard CareNo interventionStandard Care according to NICU protocols including Kangaroo Mother Care, nesting and minimal handling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neonatal Visual Assessment Battery to evaluate visual function

    Neonatal Visual Function is assessed using the Visual Assessment Battery developed by Ricci et al. The assessment evaluates the following items: Ocular spontaneous motility, ability to fix and follow a target, reaction to colour, visual acuity and visual attention at distance. Each item is scored as normal (score 0) or abnormal (score 1). The global score is then calculated as the sum of all the individual items, as designed by the authors.

    Measured: 40 weeks postmenstrual age

  2. Neonatal Behavior

    Neonatal behavior is assessed using the Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale that evaluates: habituation, social-interactive, motor system, state organization and regulation, autonomic system, reflexes.

    Measured: 2 months corrected age

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Brain development

    Conventional and advanced MRI

    Measured: 40 weeks postmenstrual age

  2. Developmental outcome

    Children development is assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddlers (Third edition) - including: cognitive, motor, language, social-emotional and adaptive behavior)

    Measured: 24 months corrected age

  3. Epigenetic changes

    epigenetic analysis is performed at birth on a cord blood sample (0.5 ml) and at hospital discharge on a peripheral blood sample (0.5 ml) collected according routine clinical procedures

    Measured: up to 48 weeks gestational age

  4. overall duration of hospitalisation

    number of days from admission to home discharge from NICU

    Measured: up to 48 weeks gestational age

  5. Weight (in grams) at 40 weeks postmenstrual age

    Measured: 40 week gestational age

  6. Length(in centimeters) at 40 weeks postmenstrual age

    Measured: 40 week gestational age

  7. Head circumference (in centimeters) at 40 weeks postmenstrual age

    Measured: 40 week gestational age

  8. Acquisition of full oral feeding

    Postmenstrual age at the acquisition of full oral feeding

    Measured: up to 48 weeks gestational age

  9. Feeding with Human milk

    Feeding with human milk at 40 weeks postmenstrual age (yes or no)

    Measured: up to 40 weeks gestational age

  10. Neurodevelopmental outcome

    Children neurodevelopment is assessed using the Griffiths Development Scales (GMDS).

    Scores range from 50 to 150 General quotient mean 100 SD 12, sub scales mean 100 SD 16 Higher scores mean a better outcome

    Measured: 5-6 years of age

  11. Behavioral outcome

    Children behavior is assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist. A T score above 70 is considered to be in the clinical range, a T score between 65 an 70 is considered borderline while a T score below 65 is considered normal

    Measured: 5-6 years of age

  12. Neuromotor outcome

    Children neuromotor is assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Movement ABC).

    A score above 67 is considered to be in the normal range, a score between 57 an 67 is considered borderline while a score below 56 is considered pathological

    Measured: 5-6 years of age

  13. Attention outcome

    Child attention abilities is assessed using the Early Childhood Attention Battery (ECAB).

    Scaled scores range from 1 to 19. Lower scores indicate worst outcome

    Measured: 5-6 years of age

  14. L1 promoter methylation levels on buccal swab

    epigenetic analysis - L1 promoter methylation (Percent) assessment is performed on a buccal swab collected at follow-up assessment at 5-6 years.

    Measured: 5-6 years of age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2017
  4. Study completionJan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02983513
Sponsor's protocol ID
MITP Preterm
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
16 Nov 2016
Last updated
10 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: individual patient consent would be required according to the EU GDPR and Italian regulations

Publications

  • Newnham CA, Milgrom J, Skouteris H. Effectiveness of a modified Mother-Infant Transaction Program on outcomes for preterm infants from 3 to 24 months of age. Infant Behav Dev. 2009 Jan;32(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

    PubMed 19026450
  • Provenzi L, Fumagalli M, Sirgiovanni I, Giorda R, Pozzoli U, Morandi F, Beri S, Menozzi G, Mosca F, Borgatti R, Montirosso R. Pain-related stress during the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit stay and SLC6A4 methylation in very preterm infants. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Apr 21;9:99. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00099. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25941480
  • Guzzetta A, D'Acunto MG, Carotenuto M, Berardi N, Bancale A, Biagioni E, Boldrini A, Ghirri P, Maffei L, Cioni G. The effects of preterm infant massage on brain electrical activity. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Sep;53 Suppl 4:46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04065.x.

    PubMed 21950394
  • Ricci D, Cesarini L, Romeo DM, Gallini F, Serrao F, Groppo M, De Carli A, Cota F, Lepore D, Molle F, Ratiglia R, De Carolis MP, Mosca F, Romagnoli C, Guzzetta F, Cowan F, Ramenghi LA, Mercuri E. Visual function at 35 and 40 weeks' postmenstrual age in low-risk preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2008 Dec;122(6):e1193-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1888.

    PubMed 19047222
  • Ricci D, Romeo DM, Serrao F, Cesarini L, Gallini F, Cota F, Leone D, Zuppa AA, Romagnoli C, Cowan F, Mercuri E. Application of a neonatal assessment of visual function in a population of low risk full-term newborn. Early Hum Dev. 2008 Apr;84(4):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Nov 8.

    PubMed 17996405
  • Fontana C, Provitera L, Bonfanti C, Schiavolin P, Polimeni B, Marasca F, Pesenti N, Iuliano R, Gangi S, Bodega B, Fumagalli M. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 to 6 years of age of an early intervention program in preterm infants. Sci Rep. 2025 Dec 2;15(1):45786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-28564-8.

    PubMed 41331309
  • Fontana C, Marasca F, Provitera L, Mancinelli S, Pesenti N, Sinha S, Passera S, Abrignani S, Mosca F, Lodato S, Bodega B, Fumagalli M. Early maternal care restores LINE-1 methylation and enhances neurodevelopment in preterm infants. BMC Med. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01896-0.

    PubMed 33541338
  • Fontana C, De Carli A, Ricci D, Dessimone F, Passera S, Pesenti N, Bonzini M, Bassi L, Squarcina L, Cinnante C, Mosca F, Fumagalli M. Effects of Early Intervention on Visual Function in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Pediatr. 2020 Jun 4;8:291. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00291. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32582595

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Early Intervention in people with Premature Birth, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neonatal Visual Assessment Battery to evaluate visual function (time frame: 40 weeks postmenstrual age). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02983513, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in